On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 06:09, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 06:07 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>> * as a 3rd party developer, I don't see such teachers requests listed
>> somewhere on wiki, that let me see what can I do and peek most
>> interesting/suitable-for-my-skils/etc task
>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 20:31, Bryan Berry wrote:
> I strongly agree w/ tomeu on this.
> Making Sugar easier to contribute to isn't anywhere near the top of the list
> of requested features by our kids and teachers in Nepal.
> The far and away most requested feature by teachers in Nepal is a mecha
Aleksey,
I fully support your initiative to make Sugar's handling of activities Work As
Designed and I look forward to testing both your upcoming blob-free activities,
your PackageKit integration, and your 0install Sugar packaging in coming weeks.
Keep pushing.
-
Bryan,
> Making Sugar
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 02:01:18PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 15 Dec 2009, at 13:36, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:52:56AM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:07, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> >>> * implementing Zero Sugar initiative, in my mind, is provi
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:19, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 15.12.2009, at 15:09, Daniel Drake wrote:
>>
>> I believe there are still various well-known 0.86 regressions (over
>> 0.84). For example, Record not working. These regressions are going to
>> be a huge headache to anyone who tries to upg
On 15.12.2009, at 15:09, Daniel Drake wrote:
>
> I believe there are still various well-known 0.86 regressions (over
> 0.84). For example, Record not working. These regressions are going to
> be a huge headache to anyone who tries to upgrade, perhaps you could
> squash a few of those.
Speaking of
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 06:07 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> * as a 3rd party developer, I don't see such teachers requests listed
> somewhere on wiki, that let me see what can I do and peek most
> interesting/suitable-for-my-skils/etc task
There's enough going around that you could work on which w
On 15 Dec 2009, at 13:36, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:52:56AM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:07, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:16:02AM +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
I strongly agree w/ tomeu on this.
Making Sugar easier
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:52:56AM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:07, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:16:02AM +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
> >> I strongly agree w/ tomeu on this.
> >>
> >> Making Sugar easier to contribute to isn't anywhere near the top of t
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:07, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:16:02AM +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
>> I strongly agree w/ tomeu on this.
>>
>> Making Sugar easier to contribute to isn't anywhere near the top of the list
>> of requested features by our kids and teachers in Nepal.
>>
>
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:16:02AM +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
> I strongly agree w/ tomeu on this.
>
> Making Sugar easier to contribute to isn't anywhere near the top of the list
> of requested features by our kids and teachers in Nepal.
>
> The far and away most requested feature by teachers in
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:01:26PM -0500, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> I for one would love to learn a new way to hack on my sugar and easily share
> patches.
> If we can do better than jhbuild does (user experience wise), I would love
> it!
yeah, some day we can provide 0install glucose e.g. for test
I for one would love to learn a new way to hack on my sugar and easily share
patches.
If we can do better than jhbuild does (user experience wise), I would love
it!
Icarito
2009/12/14 Tomeu Vizoso
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:01, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:19:51PM -0200,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:01, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:19:51PM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:25, Benjamin M. Schwartz
>> wrote:
>> > Aleksey Lim wrote:
>> >> So, I have
>> >> strong intension to switching development focus from core team,
>> >> w
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:19:51PM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:25, Benjamin M. Schwartz
> wrote:
> > Aleksey Lim wrote:
> >> So, I have
> >> strong intension to switching development focus from core team,
> >> which develops sucrose - glucose(core) and fructose(some cor
Tomeu,
I think your point is well taken.
As a teacher and project manager for a deployment of about 150 XOs and SOAS,
I find the students and teachers really interested in making stuff with
their devices and software (we are in the middle of some cool EToys science
projects at the moment.).
But I
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:25, Benjamin M. Schwartz
wrote:
> Aleksey Lim wrote:
>> So, I have
>> strong intension to switching development focus from core team,
>> which develops sucrose - glucose(core) and fructose(some core
>> activities) to wide range of developers/doers thus some kind of
>> de
Aleksey Lim wrote:
> So, I have
> strong intension to switching development focus from core team,
> which develops sucrose - glucose(core) and fructose(some core
> activities) to wide range of developers/doers thus some kind of
> decentralization of development process.
I agree. I think this has b
18 matches
Mail list logo
