I'm having a similar invisibility problem, but involving an XO and a
different laptop. I just received my G1G1 XO. Wanting to emulate
another XO, I installed Sugar LiveCD on a Toshiba. The XO and Toshiba
each can see and connect to my wireless AP (and other APs in the area),
and browse the
Definitely a problem. We are thinking about having a landing page
similar to the one in http://www.eclipse.org/ that hopefully will give
a way for everybody to find how to better interact with us depending
on their role. The idea is that a prospecting developer would just
click on one of
On 24.11.2008, at 03:23, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
Hi all,
I briefly wanted to check in to see whether anyone here is planning on
attending 25C3 (http://events.ccc.de/congress/2008/) in Berlin at the
end of December?
I'll be there from the 27th to the 29th, I've heard that some people
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:04, Stanley Sokolow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a similar invisibility problem, but involving an XO and a
different laptop. I just received my G1G1 XO. Wanting to emulate
another XO, I installed Sugar LiveCD on a Toshiba. The XO and Toshiba
each can see and
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 01:50, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no reason to have two separate channels when 95% of the help
will be the same information.
If we do our job well, the number of Sugar users who do not have
an XO is hopefully going to increase over time.
To take advantage of the jabber-based collaboration, you should set
all the machines to the same jabber server from the Network menu
option in the Sugar Control Panel (The Control Panel is found in the
hover menu that appears on the XO icon on the Home View.) We are in
the process of compiling a
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seth Woodworth wrote:
Instead of creating a new channel, why don't we merge with olpc-help
and rename it if need-be.
There's no reason to have two separate channels when 95% of the help
will be the same information.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 15:30, Luke Faraone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 23:35, victor rajewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First up, sorry if this isn't the place for this discussion, but I
understand that specialised discussion lists are still evolving...
I've been
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 20:09, C.W. Holeman II
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are some comments on the Sugar Camp Brainstorm session.
Sugarcamp (http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugarcamp_proposal) had a link to:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/User:Mchua/proposals#Sugarcamp_brainstorm
SugarLabs the easiest
Hi,
most of the people in the SugarLabs community is unable to do anything
about OLPC's hardware, but as was commented in this thread, there's
lots of work to do in the software side.
Perhaps someone will volunteer to lead an Accessibility Team? See
http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Teams
Hi,
was wondering if there would be some value of including the notion of
projects inside SugarLabs' organizational structure.
Teams seem to me as something not bounded in time, a way to focus energy.
Projects would be smaller in scope, involve several teams and
milestones would be an important
I think the idea of a roadmap (with project schedules) within each
team would address much of this need.
-walter
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
was wondering if there would be some value of including the notion of
projects inside SugarLabs'
Hi,
I mistakenly CC'ed rather than BCC'ing in an earlier message in this
thread. If you'd kindly edit out the @gallaudet.edu addresses, I'd
appreciate it, as none of the folks on that list are at all technical,
and wouldn't know Sugar from Salt. ;-) And the likelihood of them
signing up for a
http://www.netcaucus.org/events/2009/kickoff/demonstrate.shtml
If we want to get in front of the United States government and talk the
Sugar talk, this is the time.
--g
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
Hi,
these news of ARM partnering with Canonical for an ARMv7-powered
netbook using Ubuntu may be relevant.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10097468-92.html?part=rsssubj=newstag=2547-1_3-0-20
I just hope whoever ends up building the machines takes some
inspiration from the XO...
Regards,
I'm on it,
-walter
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.netcaucus.org/events/2009/kickoff/demonstrate.shtml
If we want to get in front of the United States government and talk the
Sugar talk, this is the time.
--g
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:34, Greg Dekoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.netcaucus.org/events/2009/kickoff/demonstrate.shtml
If we want to get in front of the United States government and talk the
Sugar talk, this is the time.
There have been similar rumblings about getting in
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Walter Bender wrote:
I think the idea of a roadmap (with project schedules) within each
team would address much of this need.
Agreed.
Project management is a pain in the ass, and we don't always have the
resources to have dedicated and proper project management -- which
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Luke Faraone wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:22, Jameson Chema Quinn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
embedding
mibbit or cgiirc in our wiki?
I'll work on that in [[IRC]], as well as explaining all the different
channels. (this will have some duplication from
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Luke Faraone wrote:
All,
In order to facilitate non-developer use, I'd like to propose the
addition of the following:
* #sugar-users - a channel for non-development how do I use this
questions, akin to #olpc-help
* a sugar-users mailing list for the same
On 24.11.2008, at 19:38, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Luke Faraone wrote:
All,
In order to facilitate non-developer use, I'd like to propose the
addition of the following:
* #sugar-users - a channel for non-development how do I use this
questions, akin to
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
The more typical setup would be #sugar for user questions and
#sugar-devel as refuge for developers.
Possibly.
Frankly, if you can get an IRC client running reliably from one of the web
pages, we can change our IRC channels after the fact at
You don't? Why not? The world needs to hear your voice.
You do? Great! You should be aggregated on the Sugar Labs Planet!
Just send an email to planetmaster at sugarlabs dot org with the URL of
your blog feed. If you're unsure, just ask the planetmaster.
Currently, there are only about a
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 10:50 -0500, Kevin Cole wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:34, Greg Dekoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.netcaucus.org/events/2009/kickoff/demonstrate.shtml
If we want to get in front of the United States government and talk the
Sugar talk, this is the
Hello all. Reposting my blog entry from the other day. If you care about
marketing, please read it, and then respond to my Request For Meeting,
below. :)
===
In their excellent book The Starfish and the Spider, Ori Brafman and Rod
Beckstrom make the compelling case that, in large
On Nov 24, 2008, at 8:00 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
You don't? Why not?
http://radian.org/~krstic/img/blogging.jpg
:)
--
Ivan Krstić [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://radian.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
I just now sent this message on the US Chess Federation Web site,
http://www.uschess.org/. Scholastic Chess includes all of the USCF
activities in schools: teaching, clubs, tournaments, publications...
One Laptop Per Child (http://laptop.org/) and Sugar Labs
(http://sugarlabs.og/) have put chess
Brilliant, Ed!
--g
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Edward Cherlin wrote:
I just now sent this message on the US Chess Federation Web site,
http://www.uschess.org/. Scholastic Chess includes all of the USCF
activities in schools: teaching, clubs, tournaments, publications...
One Laptop Per Child
This is great. I don't think that gnuchess is installed by default in
all country deployments, but I'm pretty sure that it comes standard in
at least one large deployment.
Providing an awesome translated manual would be amazing.
--Seth
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg [EMAIL
I can likely pitch in on the day of Internet Caucus if needed. I can bring
some of the heavier, bulkier stuff like a Freeplay Weza or solar panels
since I'm local.
It was kind of fun hanging out across from Obama's DC Transition
Headquarters at lunch today with an XO. Didn't meet any staffers,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Morgan Collett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
snip
Please make those files available by creating a ticket on
http://dev.sugarlabs.org and attaching the files. Please state in the
ticket what works and what doesn't (You can see the avahi entries, you
can't see the
On 24 Nov 2008, at 22:04, Edward Cherlin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Simon Schampijer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Definitely a problem. We are thinking about having a landing page
similar to the one in http://www.eclipse.org/ that hopefully will
give
a way for everybody to
FYI.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Greg Lindstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 2:59 PM
Subject: [PyCon-Organizers] Teaching math using Python
To: pycon-organizers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tutorial List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The tutorial committee worked this afternoon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary C Martin wrote:
Just a nit pick, SciPy is much replaced by Numpy though SciPy still
overlaps enough the documentation seems pretty useful.
This is a typo. You mean that Numeric and Numarray are replaced by NumPy.
SciPy is NumPy's sister
Hi Seth:
This is great. I don't think that gnuchess is installed by default in
all country deployments, but I'm pretty sure that it comes standard in
at least one large deployment.
In the Etoys image for OLPC there is a chess in the game section.
Please look at this:
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
was wondering if there would be some value of including the notion of
projects inside SugarLabs' organizational structure.
Teams seem to me as something not bounded in time, a way to focus energy.
Projects would be smaller in scope, involve several teams and
milestones
In our case, it's harder, but might still make sense. If we go
this route, let's make sure we support projects involving multiple
teams. For example, Sugar on a Stick would touch Development,
Infrastructure, Marketing...
I am going to be setting up LiquidPlanner, a free for nonprofits,
On 25 Nov 2008, at 00:52, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary C Martin wrote:
Just a nit pick, SciPy is much replaced by Numpy though SciPy still
overlaps enough the documentation seems pretty useful.
This is a typo. You mean that Numeric and
38 matches
Mail list logo
