Nice! Thanks!
/Ties
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:46 PM, David Van Assche wrote:
> well, u can find it here: http://www.nubae.com/logs/sugar
>
> There are various curious commands the bot can help with based on
> google stuff the list is as follows:
>
> [control command is @ and not !]
> example: @g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:43:24AM +0100, David Van Assche wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:09:02PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
>>>On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Jonas Smedegaard
>>>wrot
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:09:02PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
>>On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>>Ubuntu will sync their changes back to Debian as soon as we c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:09:02PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>Ubuntu will sync their changes back to Debian as soon as we can; that
>is, as soon as Sugar releases its next stable version. Wh
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >Why can't there be something like Holger is suggesting... just a place
> >where Debian and Ubuntu can work alongside each other.
>
> We do work alongside each other, it is the place both Holger an I are
> talking about: The OLPC team hos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 04:29:21PM +1800, David Farning wrote:
>There has recently been a rather long packing thread on this list.
>
>First, a couple of observations:
>The goal of Sugar Labs is to create a _great_ learning platform.
>Sugar Labs can _no
There has recently been a rather long packing thread on this list.
First, a couple of observations:
The goal of Sugar Labs is to create a _great_ learning platform.
Sugar Labs can _not_ accomplish that goal alone; we need a strong
ecosystem to distribute and deploy the platform.
Sugar Labs does no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:08:14PM +0100, David Van Assche wrote:
>The problem is that 0.82 is not stable at all
Compared to not-yet-released 0.84 or what do you mean?
>Ubuntu LTS, btw... [detail snippet], so no, its not the same.
Not identica
What might help is to have an 'add to calendar' link on the announcement
pages and in announcement emails, so one could add the item to one's
personal calendar.
David Farning-5 wrote:
>
> Well, It seems that using google calendar was a flop:( It just added
> another level of complexity without
The problem is that 0.82 is not stable at all but being released
in a stable Debian... Ubuntu LTS, btw... always backports its most
stable packages to it, so no, its not the same. Otherwise the state it
would be in as it was when it was released would be unusable...
remember the cachepixmaps bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:37:15PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>please relax...
Please stop posting noise that can be mistaken as invitation to break
what I build.
>On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> If someone (me[1]) reor
Let's also plan on a slobs meeting tomorrow (Friday) as well, 14 UTC
on #sugar-meeting
-walter
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are going to have a Soas planning meeting tomorrow, at 17 UTC. Here
> is a quick agenda, feel free to add to it.
>
> * Build
Hi Jonas,
please relax...
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> If someone (me[1]) reorganize the packaging routines as already drafted
> at the Alioth OLPC list, then it is not sponsoring but ordinary package
> maintainance.
again, to clarify what I ment:
If someone reorg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:29:15PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>we could prepare sugar 0.83 (or 0.84) in experimental, as long as we
>dont want it in unstable...
Current packaging routines used for packaging Sugar for Debian cannot.
(did I not write
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are going to have a Soas planning meeting tomorrow, at 17 UTC. Here
> is a quick agenda, feel free to add to it.
Place is the usual one, irc.freenode.net #sugar-meeting
Marco
Hello,
we are going to have a Soas planning meeting tomorrow, at 17 UTC. Here
is a quick agenda, feel free to add to it.
* Build system setup and infrastructure.
* Release announcement and changelogs.
* Activities packaging.
* Custom repositories.
* File system layout and customization.
* Testing
Hi,
we could prepare sugar 0.83 (or 0.84) in experimental, as long as we dont want
it in unstable...
(I'd be happy to sponsor if someone provides those packages as branch in the
alioth gito repos.)
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David (and others),
[quotes reordered to not use TOFU[1] ]
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:38:20AM +0100, David Van Assche wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:16:19PM +0100, David Van Assche
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> > yeah, guess that would work. We could also put Sugarlabs marketing
> > material on one side, and OLPC Deutschland e.V. material on the other :)
> > (And then mix the people... :)
> Sounds good.
so far people on olpc...@l.l.o also li
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> Oh, awesome - sounds like a great idea to me.
>
> :-)
>
>> One little thing I am
>> worried in general, is to make sure that people perceive Sugar Labs now
>> as something independent of OLPC, but
The quickest way to develop the Sugar brand (aside from the logo of
course) is color: something different from the XO's green (Pantone-361
if I remember correctly). I have looked at the logo page and see
possibilities. It doesn't have to be one color (although that may be
preferable), but it should
Hi Simon,
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Oh, awesome - sounds like a great idea to me.
:-)
> One little thing I am
> worried in general, is to make sure that people perceive Sugar Labs now
> as something independent of OLPC, but that we share some of the goals. I
>
well, u can find it here: http://www.nubae.com/logs/sugar
There are various curious commands the bot can help with based on
google stuff the list is as follows:
[control command is @ and not !]
example: @google define:sugarlabs
# !google [.google.country.code] [define:|spell:|movie:] #
#
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> I would like us to be present at LinuxTag (24-27 June 2009) [1].
>
> What do you think about a shared booth with the german OLPC association, OLPC
> Deutschland e.V.?
>
> regards,
> Holger
Oh
Hi,
On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> I would like us to be present at LinuxTag (24-27 June 2009) [1].
What do you think about a shared booth with the german OLPC association, OLPC
Deutschland e.V.?
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Absolutely great. Will she be working within schools.sugarlabs.org?
If so, I'd love to help as I have quite a bit of experience with
everything Moodle related and how teachers actually use it
David Van Assche
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:14 AM, David Farning wrote:
> I would like to announce th
Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 9 Feb 2009, at 16:41, Gary C Martin wrote:
>
>> On 9 Feb 2009, at 02:35, David Farning wrote:
>>
>>> I took another stab at the thank you page tonight. Added some logos
>>> and whatnot:)
>>>
>>> http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/ThankYou
>>>
>>> Are we missing any spons
you mean lenny+1 then so we'lll see sugar 0.84 in debian in about 1.5 years?
David
P.S. The worst thing right now would be a fork from Debian for Ubuntu.
We'd loose devs, credibility, major problems later down with a
remerge... please lets try and find a way to get ubuntu being what it
reall
28 matches
Mail list logo
