2016-05-18 6:47 GMT+08:00 Dave Crossland :
>
> Hi!
>
> On 17 May 2016 at 17:54, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> 2016-05-15 22:53 GMT-05:00 Dave Crossland :
>>
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> On 15 May 2016 at 13:29, Laura Vargas wrote:
>>>
Sugar Network is up the air, and it has more than 35.000 use
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 18, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
>
>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>> Fortunately, SLOBs votes are done via email, at any time, and the monthly
>> SLOBs meetings are there to unjam any backlogs.
>
>
> ah I was under the impres
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Walter Bender
wrote:
> Done.
Wow! bravo Walter that was quick!!
Sean
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Walter Bender
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>
>>> Fortunately, SLOBs votes are done via email, at any time, and the
>>> monthly SLOBs meetings are there to unjam any
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> Fortunately, SLOBs votes are done via email, at any time, and the monthly
>> SLOBs meetings are there to unjam any backlogs.
>
>
>
> ah I was under the impression that motions were d
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Fortunately, SLOBs votes are done via email, at any time, and the monthly
> SLOBs meetings are there to unjam any backlogs.
ah I was under the impression that motions were debated and voted in the
meetings, with recourse to e-mail when m
On 18 May 2016 at 13:07, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> Dave Crossland has proposed 2 additional motions that are linked at the
> bottom of the first 2 motions. They are still in the editing stage as far
> as I can see.
>
I am waiting for Adam to draft what he wanted to see there :)
Hi
On 18 May 2016 at 11:53, Sean DALY wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> FWIW I think this is reasonable, since the board have shared and equal
>> financial responsibility for the Conservancy account.
>
>
> In my view it's theoretically reasonable, however th
Hi Again…
I just changed it so that the SLOB members can edit the motions. Please! Don't
Edit Until You Have Discussed and Reached Consensis!
Caryl
From: cbige...@hotmail.com
To: olpc-...@lists.laptop.org; d...@lab6.com; h...@laptop.org;
walter.ben...@gmail.com; callaur...@gmail.com; lio...@olp
Hi Folks…
I think it is time to take action on the 2 motions I have for the SLOB. Motion
A is for a Finance Manager and Motion B lays out the procedures for requesting
and disbursing funds. A lot of editing has been done by a few people, but the
amounts for $Y (a stipend for the FM) and $X the a
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> FWIW I think this is reasonable, since the board have shared and equal
> financial responsibility for the Conservancy account.
In my view it's theoretically reasonable, however there is a real risk of
red tape logjam. It's quite common fo
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Walter Bender
wrote:
> FWIW, while I agree that retroactively approving of funds is not ideal,
> this particular case is a matter of formal approval of what was already
> approved. SLOB gave me authority to make these sorts of decisions for the
> Trip Advisor gra
On 18 May 2016 at 10:05, Walter Bender wrote:
> for some reason or other, the SFC seems to think that every outlay
> requires explicit approval from the entire board
FWIW I think this is reasonable, since the board have shared and equal
financial responsibility for the Conservancy account.
FWIW, while I agree that retroactively approving of funds is not ideal,
this particular case is a matter of formal approval of what was already
approved. SLOB gave me authority to make these sorts of decisions for the
Trip Advisor grant several times now and I believe it is within Chris's
discretio
Hi
In https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Vacancies I see a link to
http://www.mail-archive.com/iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg10937.html
Is this deployment still active? :)
Are any other deployments seeking volunteers in 2016?
--
Cheers
Dave
___
IAEP -- It's
+1 for the remark of Adam.
+1 for the motion due to the relative small amount of money engaged.
Lionel.
2016-05-18 15:20 GMT+02:00 Adam Holt :
> I find the practice of retroactively voting for funds to be highly
> unprofessional, in all instances.
>
> Nevertheless I am hereby voting in fa
I find the practice of retroactively voting for funds to be highly
unprofessional, in all instances.
Nevertheless I am hereby voting in favor in this 1 instance, on the hope
that Translation Community Manager Chris Leonard will begin improving the
situation with a public blog going forward -- so e
The information collected at first boot is not relevant to any personal
research. At deployments I am
familiar with, the first boot is done at installation time to check the
install and perform configuration.
At this time, the laptop has not been assigned to a user. For
deployments I work with,
18 matches
Mail list logo