Hello Laura
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Laura Vargas wrote:
> Walter,
>
> I just want to point out there is a US$ 1,000 difference among Walter's
> motion (US $2,800) and Samson's proposal (US $1,851).
>
> Samson,
>
> I think it was a mistake, nothing more to it and
Hi,
Laura, i think you are bringing more question that are not applicable. Open
the link to the proposal, scroll to the last page you will see our total
budget. There is no over billing.
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Laura Vargas wrote:
> Walter,
>
> I just want to
Thank you Ibiam and Samson for clarifying.
I would like to elaborate for the reason why I abstained:
Just as happened with Ignacio's request, you guys are requesting cash in
advance for your travel.
Just as happened with Ignacio's request, even after we all voted approving
the motion, the cash
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Samson Goddy
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
>>
>>> As such, a more financially judicious gamble might involve a
>
>
>
> You need to establish evidence that the visa will be approved. A single
> applicant (rather than two) confirmed by a high-level contact in the French
> government might be the best way.
>
We'll talk with the organizer and see if he has any contact with the French
government, aside that
Thanks Laura for explaining better.
Though this is my first time to hear something like this. But i guess we
should wait for walter to clarify the claim.
BR
Samson
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Laura Vargas wrote:
> Thank you Ibiam and Samson for clarifying.
>
> I
1) Lionel is correct to suggest that some-or-most of the $2800 could
disappear, if France rejects visas (every reasonably-priced flight is
non-refundable in 2017; these funds would be lost). Not at all an abstract
hypothetical: France's visa approval process may require the flight be
purchased in
+1
Sameer
On May 19, 2017 9:01 AM, "Walter Bender" wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Sameer Verma wrote:
>
>> I second.
>>
>> Sameer
>>
>> On May 19, 2017 5:50 AM, "Walter Bender" wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps someone
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> 1) Lionel is correct to suggest that some-or-most of the $2800 could
> disappear, if France rejects visas (every reasonably-priced flight is
> non-refundable in 2017; these funds would be lost). Not at all an abstract
>
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Samson Goddy
wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
>
>> As such, a more financially judicious gamble might involve a carefully
>> thought-out proposal for one single individual to attend. Likely an
Samson and Ibiam will need a Shengen visa
(https://buzznigeria.com/schengen-visa/).
This is handled by the Consulate of France in Nigeria in Lagos
(http://www.vfsglobal.com/France/Nigeria/)
I would recommend they add a couple of days to the trip to visit Paris.
They could fly to Paris de
The only advice is to get busy with the visa application. It takes a
minimum of 15 days to process. The step by step is outlined on those
websites. The main
point it that they must spend a day in Lagos up front filling out the
visa application. In my experience this is like renewing a driver's
12 matches
Mail list logo