Hi, Sam
This was in response to Dave Crossland's concern that the Board is
acting in secret. The motion passed with 6 votes in favor and one
abstention.
Tony
On 07/01/2016 11:55 AM, Sam Parkinson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Tony Anderson
wrote:
Hi, Dave
This is what I have
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Tony Anderson
wrote:
Hi, Dave
This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion.
At today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting [1], we discussed the
motion submitted by Sebastian Silva to finalize the transition from
GPLv2 to GPLv3 for the Su
On 1 July 2016 at 01:32, Tony Anderson wrote:
> This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion.
AWESOME! Thanks for posting these - I will update the Decision page
with links to your emails and these results soon :)
___
IAEP -- It's An
Hi, Dave
This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion.
_At today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting [1], we discussed the
motion submitted by Sebastian Silva to finalize the transition from
GPLv2 to GPLv3 for the Sugar core libraries (Sugar Activity developers
are still
