Re: [IAEP] Voting on GPLv3 motion
Hi, Sam This was in response to Dave Crossland's concern that the Board is acting in secret. The motion passed with 6 votes in favor and one abstention. Tony On 07/01/2016 11:55 AM, Sam Parkinson wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Tony Anderson wrote: Hi, Dave This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion. _At today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting [1], we discussed the motion submitted by Sebastian Silva to finalize the transition from GPLv2 to GPLv3 for the Sugar core libraries (Sugar Activity developers are still free to choose whatever Libre license they prefer for their work.) See [2]. I second the motion and bring it to you in an email vote._ Didn't the motion pass? I already merged the change of licence into the sugar repo, as per the approval. Also, will we migrate sugar-toolkit-gtk3 to LGPLv3+? What about sugar-datastore? _ __ __Approve.__ __Tony Anderson__ __ _ _Approve._ __ _Sameer__ _ _Approve._ _ _ _BTW I'm worried about the fact that the Sugar-Web part (and so Sugarizer too) use the Apache 2.0 Licence. _ _I'm not a specialist but what imply a Licence migration ?_ These web people and their non copyleft liscenses. I'm defiantly not a copyright holder for sugar-web, but aren't they worried about people stealing their work and rolling it into nonfree software? Thanks, Sam _ _ _ Lionel._ _ _ _+1 para GPLv3 motion_ _ _ _ ___ __Lic. José Miguel García__ __Montevideo - Uruguay_ _ __Approved!_ _ _ _Claudia_ Today at 8:04PM (ET) would be the deadline for the GPLv3 motion. (May 13 @ 8:04PM ET) So this vote was 6 in favor and one abstention. Tony ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Voting on GPLv3 motion
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Tony Anderson wrote: Hi, Dave This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion. At today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting [1], we discussed the motion submitted by Sebastian Silva to finalize the transition from GPLv2 to GPLv3 for the Sugar core libraries (Sugar Activity developers are still free to choose whatever Libre license they prefer for their work.) See [2]. I second the motion and bring it to you in an email vote. Didn't the motion pass? I already merged the change of licence into the sugar repo, as per the approval. Also, will we migrate sugar-toolkit-gtk3 to LGPLv3+? What about sugar-datastore? Approve. Tony Anderson Approve. Sameer Approve. BTW I'm worried about the fact that the Sugar-Web part (and so Sugarizer too) use the Apache 2.0 Licence. I'm not a specialist but what imply a Licence migration ? These web people and their non copyleft liscenses. I'm defiantly not a copyright holder for sugar-web, but aren't they worried about people stealing their work and rolling it into nonfree software? Thanks, Sam Lionel. +1 para GPLv3 motion ___ Lic. José Miguel García Montevideo - Uruguay Approved! Claudia Today at 8:04PM (ET) would be the deadline for the GPLv3 motion. (May 13 @ 8:04PM ET) So this vote was 6 in favor and one abstention. Tony ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Voting on GPLv3 motion
On 1 July 2016 at 01:32, Tony Anderson wrote: > This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion. AWESOME! Thanks for posting these - I will update the Decision page with links to your emails and these results soon :) ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] Voting on GPLv3 motion
Hi, Dave This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion. _At today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting [1], we discussed the motion submitted by Sebastian Silva to finalize the transition from GPLv2 to GPLv3 for the Sugar core libraries (Sugar Activity developers are still free to choose whatever Libre license they prefer for their work.) See [2]. I second the motion and bring it to you in an email vote.__ __ __Approve.__ __Tony Anderson__ __ _ _Approve._ __ _Sameer__ _ _Approve._ _ _ _BTW I'm worried about the fact that the Sugar-Web part (and so Sugarizer too) use the Apache 2.0 Licence. _ _I'm not a specialist but what imply a Licence migration ?_ _ _ _ Lionel._ _ _ _+1 para GPLv3 motion_ _ _ _ ___ __Lic. José Miguel García__ __Montevideo - Uruguay_ _ __Approved!_ _ _ _Claudia_ Today at 8:04PM (ET) would be the deadline for the GPLv3 motion. (May 13 @ 8:04PM ET) So this vote was 6 in favor and one abstention. Tony ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep