--- snip ---
GDPS/PPRC is not supported at that distance. Do you mean GDPS/XRC?
We are the latter at a distance of 500 miles. I posted more information
about this a few weeks ago when I recommended staying with one vendor for
both sides of the COMM pipe. The growth in storage is an issue. If I buy
In a message dated 6/30/2005 9:52:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I went back to check the source code for the program I have for doing this
level of 'CLEARING' a DASD. It does indeed write a record to allow the DASD
to
be used by subsequent users.
Very good.
John,
The issues have not been with the receiving DASD, they have been with the
sending DASD. We are planning to swap out the sending DASD to end up with one
vendor. We do FlashCopy the secondary DASD. We do have the XRC feature on the
secondary DASD for reverse mirroring. We have successfully
All,
Can any one guide me on how to use IPCS on VTAM dump?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Mary
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Joel C. Ewing writes:
This also suggests that calling the statistics INVALID may be too strong
a pejorative, as all the counts reflect actual activity to the file - it's
just that they do not represent ALL the activity to the file.
and there is a perspective from which his view has merit.
...
This also suggests that calling the statistics INVALID may be too
strong a pejorative, as all the counts reflect actual activity to the
file - it's just that they do not represent ALL the activity to the file.
...
If they do not represent ALL, how can you use them to make a decision?
You
Hi,
Our company is currently working on installing multiple sysplexes.
Eventually it should look something like this:
Production sysplex: Prod1 - Prod2
QA sysplex: QA1 - QA2
Test sysplex: Test1 - Test2
The following thing makes me wonder if other shops out there have
experiences (good or bad)
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:18:35 -0700, Edward E. Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They can indeed be stored in MVS data sets. An extended shelf is not
necessary if you have a PDF that corresponds to a BOOK. In that case,
the normal bookshelf will suffice to describe them both. An extended
shelf is
I've just been exploring some of the more dustier and cob-webbed 'corridors'
(well, disk volumes, to be precise) in the great mansion that is my mainframe,
and opened some PDS source libraries that have obviously been lying around a
while.
Just found some members in there that have 'created'
On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:43 AM, Joe Zitzelberger wrote:
SNIP
Ideally you would find them working in the industry for at least 3-5
years after successfully completing formal training in computer
science at some university, technical school, military, et al.
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 01:15:13 +0200, Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our MVS folks working on the NCS 6.1 upgrade.
Roland, let me know how that upgrade goes. I was unofficially
warned aginst going to 6.1 (although that was several months ago),
so we are sticking with
mary george wrote:
Can any one guide me on how to use IPCS on VTAM dump?
These books might help:
LY43-0090 z/OS Communication Server SNA Data Areas Volume 1
LY43-0091 z/OS Communication Server SNA Data Areas Volume 2
LY43-0088 z/OS Communication Server SNA Diagnosis Volume 1
LY43-0089
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/30/2005
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In the fact that SMF takes the data from the JFCB, yes.
The JFCB has nothing to do with JES.
The above is an out of context quote.
It shows what you wanted to say,
rather than what I said.
Huh? How is To
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/30/2005
at 03:16 PM, Edward E. Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
*$L2=USSPO,HDZ11H0,010625,SJPLGEC: BPAM USS DIRECTORY SUPPORT
@L2A
I read that as June, 2001.
Thanks.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In a message dated 7/1/2005 9:14:35 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First feed the DSName into a LOCATE macro, and out comes the
volser(s).
Can he get rid of the dynamic allocation he's doing, or does he need
it to retrieve potentially migrated data sets? He might
In a message dated 7/1/2005 9:23:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There won't be any politics involved either, it's just basic law
enforcement. Not even politicians are above the law. Are they.
Some will always be above the law; e.g., those who make laws usually
My bad - I got two replies back on my earlier request but managed to delete
one of them. I still have the reply from Mark Regan (Thanks, by the way),
but whoever sent me the other reply regarding a listserv for WebSphere,
could you resend it?
Thanks.
Rex
-Original Message-
From:
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 08:47:25 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roland, let me know how that upgrade goes. I was unofficially
warned aginst going to 6.1 (although that was several months ago),
so we are sticking with 6.0 still for now.
Any specific problems with 6.1, or just a general
If you go to the Z/OS publications pages, there is a recent pointer to a new
book in the works:
Introduction to the New Mainframe: Z/OS Basics == SG24-6366
It's still in Draft mode, with a date of May 27, 2005 (so far).
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/zoslib/pdf/zosbasic.pdf
the pup would like to know your source for such elegant quotes.
Bill Fairchild (7/1/2005 10:29 AM) wrote:
..
..
..
[Anacharsis] laughed at him [Solon] for imagining the dishonesty and
covetousness of his countrymen could be restrained by written laws, which
were like spiders' webs, and would
In a message dated 7/1/2005 10:51:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the pup would like to know your source for such elegant quotes.
I replied via private email to this lest the thread be overloaded and shut
down. Suffice it to say that my source was NOT an IBM
I have an address in the extended nucleus. Is there any way to determine
which module it is in? The only sophisticated tool on my 2.10 system is
Omegamon II.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
It wasn't me, but you might try USERS.WEBSPHERE.ORG:
To subscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the command
(paste it!):
SUBSCRIBE WEBSPHERE
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex R.
Sent: Friday, July
Bulletin: Microsoft To Pay IBM $775M In Antitrust Settlement
Microsoft and IBM have agreed on a $775 million settlement in IBM's
private antitrust case against Microsoft.
http://www.computerworld.com/newsletter/0,4902,102916,00.html?nlid=BNA
See NUCLKUP BYADDR in the asm ref,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Finding Nucleus module name
I have an address in the extended
Try the MXI NUC command at http://www.rocketsoftware.com. MXI is freeware.
Regards,
John Kalinich
Conmputer Sciences Corp
Schwarz, Barry
Hmm. Let me change you question. Where could I look for a message
recently posted?
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the
archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Thanks, Sam
Knutson, Sam wrote:
Hmm. Let me change you question. Where could I look for a message
recently posted?
What if he was referring to an off-list reply?
--
-
| Edward E. Jaffe|
In a message dated 7/1/2005 12:04:30 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have an address in the extended nucleus. Is there any way to determine
which module it is in? The only sophisticated tool on my 2.10 system is
Omegamon II.
Pretty sure TMON/MVS can do it. It
In a message dated 7/1/2005 12:24:37 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm. Let me change you question. Where could I look for a message
recently posted?
There's also the archives at bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
posted at the bottom of every post. Can do by
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:36:29 -0400, Stocker, Herman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In SDSF I have set as:
PREFIX=* DEST=(ALL) OWNER=HERMAN SORT=End-Date//D End-Time//D SYSNAME=
If I change the set the prefix to a job name and level the owner the
display
is empty. Not until I have set the owner to
Now IBM can afford to implement all the wonderful ideas on this list, such
as unbogusizing VSAM statistics and bringing all the outsourced jobs home.
Yaayyy!!!
Bill Fairchild
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Fairchild
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM wins $850M from M$!
Now IBM can afford to implement all the wonderful ideas on
this
OK. 50 lashes with the wet noodle. I am new to this list as well and
haven't used the archives - in fact completely forgot they are there. I am
duly chastened.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Finnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Couldn't he use the catalog CSI to get the DSCRDT2 (cataloged date)? Of
course this will be incorrect if the data set gets re-cataloged at a later
date.
DanD
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 10:24 AM
Subject: Re:
Very timely posts.
I just got NCS 6.1 loaded down.
Waiting for the VM side to verify the toleration mtce is on before I
start it up on the TEST LPAR.
Roland's post is a good heads up.
Alan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
If a number less than ALL indicates a need for action, then surely the
greater number which would represent ALL if known could indicate a
greater need for action.
Now, I really don't know how the statistics in question, even when
accurate, translate into a need for action. But someone may have
We got a similar whisper with 5.0/5.1 - but was rescinded within a couple of
months.
We had to get V6 installed in a bit of a hurry when it was made known that a
8500 was about to come in the door, and needed a LIBGEN. Haven't had any
problems with that, haven't looked at 6.1 yet.
Shane ...
...
If a number less than ALL indicates a need for action, then surely the
greater number which would represent ALL if known could indicate a
greater need for action.
Now, I really don't know how the statistics in question, even when
accurate, translate into a need for action. But someone may
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 05:00:10 +1000, ibm-main [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We got a similar whisper with 5.0/5.1 - but was rescinded within a couple
of
months.
Just the opposite here. When were ready to migrate from 4.1, we were
told not to trust a release ending in 0 and waited for 5.1.
We had to
Isn't that why we have an SMF Type 64 record?
The delta in the LISTCAT VSAM statistics correctly reflects the activity
to the VSAM data set between two points in time, as long as you compare
between two points where the VSAM file is closed and also know there
are no intervening OPENs
2GB/sec, but not if you want to use more than 5 at a time...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ben Alford
Sent: Thursday, 30 June 2005 11:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ESCON to FICON conversion(R)
If your
HDS's Shadowimage has had Consistency Groups for almost two years now, and
it is implemented in the hardware. There is also AT-Time Split for
Shadowimage which gives you point in time consistency across multiple boxes
- also implemented in the hardware.
Other solutions:
I didn't know about
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 03:24:51 -0700, mary george [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Can any one guide me on how to use IPCS on VTAM dump?
...
That's a bit too vague of a question. Is this an abend dump? A console
dump to get: config data? VTAM internal trace data? to find a VTAM loop?
VERBX VTAMMAP
From: Patrick O'Keefe
If my shop had ordered the licensed doc I could be more specific. (:-(
With z/OS it's all up on Resoucelink these days Pat.
An access code would have been shipped with the order - dial in and download
it yourself.
Talk to the (MVS) guys that do the SMP work.
Shane ...
On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:32 PM, Bill Fairchild wrote:
Now IBM can afford to implement all the wonderful ideas on this list,
such
as unbogusizing VSAM statistics and bringing all the outsourced jobs
home.
Yaayyy!!!
Bill,
and in addition putting back jobcat/stepcat.
Ed
Well I don't care about the .0 or .1 :-))
I care about the orphan ESCA (memory leak) I seen.
Hopefully this will be fixed in 6.0 or 6.1.
I share all the info regarding this topic with our StorageTek guy and he listen
and is surprised
about the SL8500 problems. Thanks a lot for this info !!!
Hi folks,
Sam Golob done a great job and SHOWzOS is now available. I verified the archive
and it looks fine.
FILE#492 contain the source among others
FILE#614 contain several LOAD version in case of older HLASM versions or other
back level issues.
www.cbttape.org
V712 is still under
The problem in practice with filtering mechanisms like PREFIX, DEST, OWNER,
as well as the much more powerful FILTER command, is that the settings are
pervasive across displays and across sessions (saved in your profile).
I found years ago that nine times out of ten, I needed to look at an 'out
why ?
i'm now doing 6.1 in a hurry ...
- ravi.
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 01:15:13 +0200, Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our MVS folks working on the NCS 6.1 upgrade.
Roland, let me know how that upgrade goes. I was unofficially
warned aginst
On Jul 1, 2005, at 7:51 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/30/2005
at 10:55 PM, Joe Zitzelberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
TSO/ISPF is about as least common denominator as you can get.
The Sun rises in the East. ISPF is not the issue. The issue is the
contents
51 matches
Mail list logo
