We are facing the following CICS Abend frequently.
12.00.47 STC04122 +DFHSR0622 CICSPPT An attempt to overwrite the ECDSA has
caused the abend which follows
12.00.56 STC04122 +DFHSR0001 CICSPPT An abend (code 0C4/AKEA) has occurred
at offset X'' in program PTPPT00.
12.00.56 STC04122
We are in the process of converting from IBM VTS's to STK VSM's. STK has
recommended that we use tapereqs to accomplish this task. I am not quite
clear on what we code in the ACS routines to get it into STK or do we code
everything to go to STK and based on criteria we set in Tapereq we go back
Steve,
You might want to take a look RESMIL value in the GRS config. If you went
with the default config parm, that value would be RESMIL(10). Although we
don't run DB2 here, we did see a performance improvement when we lowered this
value to RESMIL(1).
If you're able, take a look at GRS
L R15,CVTPTR
L R15,CVTCSRT-CVTMAP(,R15) x'220'
L R15,24(,R15) CSR slot for 31 bit callers (X'18')
L R15,X'160'(,R15) which service ???
--
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jeevan ibm
We are facing the following CICS Abend frequently.
12.00.47 STC04122 +DFHSR0622 CICSPPT An attempt to overwrite
the ECDSA has caused the abend which follows
12.00.56 STC04122 +DFHSR0001 CICSPPT An
The service is : BPX1SPM
See : SA22-7803 USS Assembler Callable Services Reference
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
www.rs.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: 08 November 2005 08:35
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
In a message dated 11/8/2005 7:40:02 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Most frequent cause is a program attempting to write to storage to which it
is not allowed to write. In your context, I'm guessing that you run CICS
with STGPROT(YES), the transaction that is
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 04:39:19 -0600, John Benik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are in the process of converting from IBM VTS's to STK VSM's. STK has
recommended that we use tapereqs to accomplish this task. I am not quite
clear on what we code in the ACS routines to get it into STK or do we code
Hi all,
Under IMS V6R1 and CICS V4R1,I've recentley converted one of Databases to
DEDB.But this Database related Transactions have very long response time and
IMS status code = FW.
How can i solve this problem?
(I'ver set the NBA and OBA in procedures IMSFP and IMSBATCH to 1024,but the
Ever since the shop was opened in 1999, we have had a web based service
from IBM that allowed only basic APAR searches and electronic problem
reporting of 'software defects'. We could download PTF's.
There was no charge.
Now the web navigation has changed such that I can no longer
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 9:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBMLINK et al.
Ever since the shop was opened in 1999, we have had a web
based service
from
Do you have an IBM ID? One of those that uses your e-mail address. If so,
then try this link:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/support/zseries/zos/downloading.html
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent:
Hi list,
Last few days we have a strange problem
VTAM CPU usage is increased by 50%
and we can't determine the cause ...
When we analyzed the VTAM CPU utilization
using Omegamon we saw that a
module: ISTLUCRT is the main
module causing the high CPU usage.
We couldn't find almost any information
Friends
It would like a help of you, when I enter in the panel of DB2TOOL option
1(DB2 System Catalog), later option K, and in front of a packages I inform
the command SQ, I am receiving the following error message,
IBM0534S ONCODE=8094 Protection exception
From compile unit
Go to http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1VM63203
This will solve your problem
Dan Ponta
System Engineer
Host Access Solutions
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
Thanks for your help.
I already checked IBM site, and the link
is relevant for Z/VM and not for Z/OS, also
problem description states S0C4 abend,
that we don't have.
Any other ideas?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Interesting. That link worked. Not only worked, but allowed me access to
ETR. I could look at my PMR's.
Tends to support my suspicions that it is a web navigation issue.
Could someone navigate to this page and tell me what the service is
called in IBMeze? (Sorry about the wrap).
I guess this makes the term light year for distance meaningless,
doesn't it? Or if not meaningless, at least, relative...h
Ed Gould wrote:
http://www.eet.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=173403017
--
For
It just means that the writing on the bottom of the rear-view mirror makes
more sense!
Objects in mirror may be closer than they appear.
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:53:43 -0600, Steve Arnett wrote:
I guess this makes the term light year for distance meaningless,
doesn't it? Or if not meaningless,
Ted,
Sorry for a very late reply - I've been swamped with follow-ups to my GDPS
question.
My team would be very interested in talking to you about your experience,
and the project you now have underway. Could you spare some time for that?
Also ,if you know of anyone with skills in this arena that
- Original Message -
From: Hal Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 10:24 AM
Subject: IBMLINK et al.
Ever since the shop was opened in 1999, we have had a web based service
from IBM that allowed only basic APAR searches and
I think you might be referring to the techsupport site.
The web pages have changed, but the apar searches are at
http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/set2/srchBroker/views/srchBroker.jsp?rs
=112
I think most of it has been moved to something called download and support
but
it's a chore to get
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:53:43 -0600, Steve Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I guess this makes the term light year for distance meaningless,
doesn't it? Or if not meaningless, at least, relative...h
...
Nope. Still meaningful. A light year has always been based on the spead
of light in
Nobody answered so I'll jump in:
Gil wrote:
I'm considering, as an alternative to compress, a tactic of copy/rename/
DEFINE ALIAS. ...
Experiment shows that when I do the rename; create new version; DEFINE ALIAS;
their
aliases continue to refer to the obsolete content by its new
name rather
In a message dated 11/8/2005 2:57:46 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
of light in a vacuum. Everything with an index of refraction greater than
a vacuum's slows light. A piece of glass does that. IBM figured out how
to control and modify the effect, not just achieve
Hi,
I've done this before but can't get it to work now. I'm trying to pass an
EXEC PARM field to a batch COBOL program. I have the following:
LINKAGE SECTION.
01 LS-PARM.
05 LS-PARM-DATA-LENGTH PIC 9(04) BINARY.
05 LS-PARM-DATA PIC X(100).
PROCEDURE DIVISION USING
Craig,
The hex 40C makes me think you have the length field incorrectly coded.
Should it be a COMP-3 field instead of a BINARY field?
Lizette Koehler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:35:40 -0500, Craig Kittendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've done this before but can't get it to work now. I'm trying to pass an
EXEC PARM field to a batch COBOL program. I have the following:
LINKAGE SECTION.
01 LS-PARM.
05 LS-PARM-DATA-LENGTH PIC 9(04)
If your LE run-time option CBLOPTS is OFF, then the format of the parm
should be 'run-time/user-data'. Try PARM='/JFIPJFIA'.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Craig Kittendorf
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:36
I always used s9(4) comp not binary.
don't remember what binary does right now
Mike
On 11/8/05, Craig Kittendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've done this before but can't get it to work now. I'm trying to pass an
EXEC PARM field to a batch COBOL program. I have the following:
LINKAGE
BINARY is equivalent to COMP. COMP-3 would be packed decimal. The parm
length is half word binary.
Thanks
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:47 PM
To:
PARM='/DATAHERE' will attempt to pass DATAHERE to the LE runtime.
Thanks,
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ray Mullins
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Passing PARM to
PARM='/JFIPJFIA' would pass JFIPJFIA to the LE runtime.
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Imbriale, Donald (Exchange)
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Passing PARM to
Binary is equivalent to COMP.
Thanks,
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mike Bell
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Passing PARM to COBOL.
I always used s9(4) comp not
I *strongly* recommend using COMP-5 - just in case IBM ever allows for LARGE
parms (and this would work with any setting of the TRUNC compiler option).
However, COMP, BINARY, and COMP-5 should all work exactly the same as long
as MVS only allows for a 100 character maximum (and as long as you are
The last post mentioned CBLOPTS which does determine whether or not the
user data should come before or after the /. However, there is another
interesting (and new to me) comment at:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ceea5160/2.2.2.8.
1
In the case of
Check out the REWRITE822HEADER option.
Henning Terkelsen wrote:
Hi All
My mails generated by SMTP MVS are getting rejected by groupwise 7
mailserver with the following reason code :
10:49:28 3A6 DMN: MSG 890 Refused sender: @NODENAME.IDATA:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (1)
Groupwise guru's says that
Charles Macniven wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone aware of a Free Network Performance monitor to replace a small
subset of the functions available with Tivoli NPM.
I'm only interested in NCP line usage (%Busy, Total Bytes xferred),
NCP CPU %Busy and %Buffers used.
Cheers,
Charles MacNiven.
I just had this problem yesterday and had a workaround implemented on
the mainframe SMTP. Your novell/grpwise administrator is wrong. This
problem probably happenned to you after they applied some maintenance to
GWIA 6.5x or higher. We also use the grpwise internet agent as our relay
server. The
39 matches
Mail list logo
