Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I want to make verbatim copies of some IEBCOPY-unloaded PDSes,
verifiable by checksum to satisfy administrative concerns.
Since IEBCOPY will copy PDSU-to-PDSU, I thought it was the logical
choice, since IEBCOPY understands the format of PDSes, both
resident and unloaded.
Richbourg, Claude wrote:
Good morning all,
I am pondering the difference, (Performance-Disaster Recovery-More/Less
volumes), for JES2 spool datasets.
We are at z/OS 1.7 in one dev LPAR and I am starting the
cloning/building process for our production LPAR.
We are a mid-size shop with
Hi ALL,
Use P.3.4 to have a look at member list in PDS. In some PDS, you can see
there member size, but some are not.
How to add or show all member's size in a PDS?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
skip
The STDENV dataset (which has to be a RECFM=VB and possibly LRECL=256). I
support a number of systems which are country specific but share the same
configuration files so I decided to use an MVS symbol for TZ. The symbols
correspond to the military/aviation timezone codes for Central
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 04:05:03 -0500 Jeff Guan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Hi ALL,
:Use P.3.4 to have a look at member list in PDS. In some PDS, you can see
:there member size, but some are not.
:How to add or show all member's size in a PDS?
There ain't nothing native in the PDS directory that
Tom_Marchant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are saying that XP is four orders of magnitude more stable than 3.1?
That means on the order of 10,000 times better. It's not.
Yeah yeah, ok, not a full order of magnitude but you knew what I meant. Sheesh.
...phsiii
Hello!
I have just seen in an APAR the term SPC (System Programmer's C).
What is it?
I'm sure I should know it, I'm sorry...
Thank you very much!
Víctor.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 05:34:48 -0400, Phil Smith III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are saying that XP is four orders of magnitude more stable than 3.1?
That means on the order of 10,000 times better. It's not.
Yeah yeah, ok, not a full order of magnitude but you knew what I meant.
Sheesh.
Yeah,
Multi file system zfses are not going to be supported in a future
release of z/OS. Don't go there.
Jon
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Sunday, September
Is there a way to temporarily suspend getting E-Mails from the list
server or do I have to unsubscribe while I am on vacation?
Thanks,
Jon
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged
Go to the controlling page and you can turn it off. I did recently, but
don't remember exact steps.
Daniel McLaughlin
ZOS Systems Programmer
Crawford Company
PH: 770 621 3256
*
Veilleux, Jon L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Hi,
We are doing a GDPS pre-study.
On Site-1 we have 2 footprints with 2 (I)CFs, running production.
Disks are PPRC connected to the disaster recovery (DR) site: Site-2.
GDPS requires a K-sys (controlling system) at Site-2, preferably with a
CF, and making part of the SAMEe (production) sysplex
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 07:33 -0400, Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
Is there a way to temporarily suspend getting E-Mails from the list
server or do I have to unsubscribe while I am on vacation?
Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: SET IBM-MAIN
NOMAIL.
When you get back, use MAIL
Just
Is the z/OS Expo version of SCIDS 99.% as boring as it was in
Baltimore?
Pinnacle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan Vanbrabant wrote:
Hi,
We are doing a GDPS pre-study.
On Site-1 we have 2 footprints with 2 (I)CFs, running production.
Disks are PPRC connected to the disaster recovery (DR) site: Site-2.
GDPS requires a K-sys (controlling system) at Site-2, preferably with a
CF, and making part of the
snip
You answered yourself. PREFLIST.
In case of further investigation: you can have multiple CFRM policies
with different PREFLISTs.
snip
Assuming it is a GRS star:
if he loses site1 with a CFRM policy without a site2 CF, he loses the
controlling system, too. That is surely a disadvantage.
Jan wrote:
...snip
Is there a way to *prevent* that structures will be put into this 3-rd CF
at DR site-2 in *NORMAL OPERATION mode*, i.e. when the whole production is
running in site-1?
We think it can't be accomplished with just specifying the PREFLIST,
listing the preference order of CFs that
Oh, I forgot about bit notation. To ignore the
sign nibble (last 4 bits), you'd want to use
2.4 (2 bytes and 4 bits) instead of 2.5.
Thanks for catching my error. Good to have corrections in the archives.
And now I'm not likely to make that mistake again.
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:25:16 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 04:05:03 -0500 Jeff Guan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Hi ALL,
:Use P.3.4 to have a look at member list in PDS. In some PDS, you can see
:there member size, but some are not.
:How to add or show all
On Monday, 09/11/2006 at 06:54 EST, John P Kalinich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is the z/OS Expo version of SCIDS 99.% as boring as it was in
Baltimore?
Since the System z Expo doesn't have the moral equivalent of SCIDS, you
can't really compare. Like SHARE it does have a couple of
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:37:01 -0500, Tom Marchant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:40:18 -0400, Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
HFS datasets hold a single USS file system, while zFS can hold multiple
file systems.
Didn't I see a recommendation from IBM a year or two ago not
Mark,
In ISMF, page 5 of the Data Set Selection Entry Panel will allow for
selecting only clusters. The prompt is Entry Type - put EQ for Rel Op
and CLUSTER for the value. Of course, this list will be limited by the
values chosen on the first panel (Volume or Catalog Name).
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Re. Paolo Cacciari saying:
Obviously, I assume that your Data Centers are not involved in a Dispersed
Parallel Sysplex.
It *IS* about a GDPS config, Paolo,
with the K-sys controlling system in the C/R site.
Jan
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Paolo Cacciari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 20:01:56 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At 12:32 -0500 on 09/08/2006, Tom Marchant wrote
about Re: How to find source of JES2 change:
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:36:31 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Look like an idea for a JES Mod or
Jan wrote:
It *IS* about a GDPS config, Paolo,
with the K-sys controlling system in the C/R site.
Jan
...snip
Jan,
in this case, assuming that the only active system in the D/R site is
K-sys, what I suggested is still applicable
.
BINARY order of magnitude? :)
Bob Lawrence
DBA
Boscovs Dept Stores LLC
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 6:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: Fatuities (was 'Another
MVS runs on the bare metal.
Wanna buy a bridge?
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.co.uk
+44 7833 654 800
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
As the underlying access method for HFS is PDSE,
No longer true. At one time, PDSE and HFS shared a lot of code, but
they were separated quite a few years ago. But it is probably true that
a bug in PDSE could show up in HFS, and vice versa.
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:40:18 -0400, Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
HFS datasets hold a single USS file system, while zFS can hold multiple
file systems.
Didn't I see a recommendation from IBM a year or two ago not to put multiple
file systems into a zFS? A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/11/06 7:43 AM
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 07:33 -0400, Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
Is there a way to temporarily suspend getting E-Mails from the list
server or do I have to unsubscribe while I am on vacation?
Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: SET IBM-MAIN
NOMAIL.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/10/2006
at 09:09 AM, Clark F Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What models and was it other than just data and instruction?
Burroughs: B6500, B6700, B7500, B7800, etc. The tag bits constrained
how a word was interpreted for both data and instructions.
RCA: CDP, 601.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/11/2006
at 04:05 AM, Jeff Guan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Use P.3.4 to have a look at member list in PDS. In some PDS, you can
see there member size, but some are not.
You can display ISPF statistics and load module directory information,
but not the actual module
Okay, I know (hope) I'll see this in the manual, but would like to
ask ahead of time. IF HFS is indeed going away and zFS is the way to
go, does that mean there is a shared zFS ala HFS?
At 11:47 AM 9/11/2006, you wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:40:18 -0400, Bruce Black
Gee, in one of his replies to Phil Payne, he mentions one of your articles
and links to the Isham Research web site. Seems human enough to me. If it's a
bot, it's good enough to pass a Turing test.
Jon
snip
However Anne or Lynn could answer us confirm or deny.
Lynn ?
Can you answer us,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
09/09/2006
at 06:37 PM, Tommy Tsui [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is it possible to consolidate all P-series machine into a single
Z9-109 machine .. ... how about i-series
You'd have to rewrite your workload. Each platform supports unique
instruction architectures and unique
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/10/2006
at 01:04 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Didn't such tagging extend to data types, fixed vs. floating, so an
attempt to perform a floating point operation on a fixed point field
was detected as an error?
For the B6500 and descendants in
On 11 Sep 2006 09:01:16 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/10/2006
at 09:09 AM, Clark F Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What models and was it other than just data and instruction?
Burroughs: B6500, B6700, B7500, B7800, etc. The tag bits constrained
how a
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:38:03 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
For the B6500 and descendants in distinguished among, e.g., single
precision, double precision, code and various types of descriptors.
...
Requires a paradigm shift
Much more than just that
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 07:45:00 +0200, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
Are you using UNIX System Services heavily ??
Yes.
What for ??
Corporate email (Lotus Domino), some websphere - application server,
business integration message broker,...
Thanks Barbara,
I'm going to go with
Uh Oh! The dreaded ancient computer history thread has evolved again. And
to think that I started it too.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee Wisconsin
414-475-7434
- Original Message -
From: Clark F Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Burroughs: B6500, B6700, B7500, B7800,
Telefunken TR4 and TR440, which had two tag bits for each 48 bit word
of storage. The bits where represented in the registers, too.
The meaning was
0 - binary floating point
1 - binary fixed point
2 - instructions
3 - other, like decimal or char
Some instructions, like Load (in German: B =
The Telefunken machines I mentioned in the other post also were designed with
ALGOL in mind. Someone once called the TR4 a hardware representation of ALGOL.
I wouldn't go this far, but indeed there are lots of machine instructions
inspired by ALGOL logic (and ALGOL compiler's needs).
I have a
IIRC if you install via ServerPac you have the option of specifying HFS
or ZFS only for those files that will allow it. I just installed z/OS
1.6 and went with zFS on everything except a COBOL filesystem. User
filesystems are still HFS but I'll tackle that later.
Ken Porowski
AVP Systems
Whatever their site is I'm deeply envious of how
comprehensive its contents are. The design must be
such that:
1. It's readily update-able.
2. It's readily search-able, in that a reference to the
1978 version of the ABC Frammis get quoted
rather instantly.
3. Seeming non-redundant, though I
and.. nope.. my mistake.. that was for a different issue with CSA..
should have double checked with the person who told me...
This fix is still in the works... Sorry Sam...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
I use a sysres cloning process for service. For HFS style root I use the 2
step DFDSS copy and restore. Can I just repro the ZFS VSAM files? If not,
what is the process? I manually converted a root using the dialog process,
but I don't want to have to do that each time.
Thanks
---
[This
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:47:00 -0400, Ken Porowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
User
filesystems are still HFS but I'll tackle that later.
Assuming your automount policy creates an HFS for new users, you can simply
change it to create a zFS. Automount will figure out which it is and mount
Brian France wrote:
Okay, I know (hope) I'll see this in the manual, but would like to ask
ahead of time. IF HFS is indeed going away and zFS is the way to go,
does that mean there is a shared zFS ala HFS?
Who said HFS was going away?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
Víctor de la Fuente wrote:
I have just seen in an APAR the term SPC (System Programmer's C).
What is it?
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/CBCPG170/1.1.11
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
In a message dated 9/11/2006 10:04:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Who said HFS was going away?
You did!
Not true. zFS is the replacement for HFS, which has been stabilized.
--
For IBM-MAIN
Ed Finnell wrote:
In a message dated 9/11/2006 10:04:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Who said HFS was going away?
You did!
Not true. zFS is the replacement for HFS, which has been stabilized.
I might very well have accurately stated that HFS has been
Anyone have the number for attendance of SHARE in Baltimore?
Someone emailed me offline and said it was low. Can anyone confirm/
clarify the numbers?
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Hello
I have a requirement in which based on the day we need to execute the step
ie for eg if it is monday then we need to execute the sep2 or else or other
days we need to skip this step and execute the other step/ Please any one
how this can be coded in the jcl
Forwarded to the list - Russ, can you change you return address please
???.
I would think my opinions on non-SMP delivery should be well known.
IMHO CA-1 has been very good with regard to SMP for quite a while
now. Somewhat of a beacon in that corporation.
If it (unloaded, non-SMP delivery)
I had a request from a client today, asking when CA-1 would stop being
delivered in SMP/e format and would be a simple library-download. From my
other talks with clients, I thought everyone wanted products delivered in
SMP/e format. And this was the first time I had seen a request to go
backwards
Write your self a program (rexx, clist, asm etc.) that will run as
step-1 and will generate a return code based on the day of week. the
rest of the job will be conditioned on this step RC.
Itschak
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
56 matches
Mail list logo
