Daniel McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'll read up on this. We created the SYS1.VOLCAT.V4 entry and recycled
OAM,
but there is still some kind of disconnect between TLMS and scratching
the
tapes. Maybe they'll get picked up by tomorrow's library runs?
Hi Tom,
thanks for your explanation. That was basically what I already knew and what
WLM development told me in 5000 words or more.
That product not only sets several timers per address space, they also pop all
at the same time. (I looked at a system trace table of 1.5s length, and for
this
Ray,
thanks for your explanation. I have spent two days (together with my VTAM
colleague) attempting to understand what the parm in relation to the health
check actually *mean*, never mind the sloppy documentation for 'DISPLAY CSM'
which is that way in the VTAM books, too. Plus the VTAM book
Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi Tom,
thanks for your explanation. That was basically what I already knew
and what WLM development told me in 5000 words or more.
That product not only sets several timers per address space, they also
pop all at the
Hi all,
I just noticed that the ALLOCAS address space is utilizing between 25% and 30%
of our system. Since this system has 3 cpu's.
Is there a way to restart ALLOCAS without an IPL?
Does anyone know of such a problem?
TIA
Gadi Ben-Avi גדי בן אבי
z/OS Systems
Und Barbara schriebt:
And then comes Martin and makes me get out the dictionary! :-)
And as I always do whenever in a German-speaking country I must apologise
for my English. :-)
Right before saying and just because you're speaking in German doesn't
mean it's encrypted. :-)
MFG, Martin
I see the problem and the consequences, but I think your conclusion and
originally already the title are not and cannot be correct: it shouldn't
matter to WLM whether tasks want to play by WLM's rules or not. WLM
should manage the tasks, whether they want to play along or not. Where
is the rule
Mark Zelden wrote:
[...]
If that were to happen, SMF is the least of my problems. DB2
archives go to virtual tape and as soon as all of the alternate logs
fill up, DB2 stops.
We can create what if scenarios all day that will cause problems.
By why limit those to virtual tape? We've had
Once again I am hitting a stumbling block with coding an ACLE in TPX. If
anyone knows how to get this to work I would be grateful. Or if this would
be better posted on a different Newsgroup, let me know. There does not seem
to be a forum for CA-TPX so am starting here.
I have a simple ACLE to
Hi Walter,
I have a similar configuration to your system, a Baby Z9 (26 mip). During
recent cost cutting measures, I replaced Netview with AF/OPER. AF/OPER
appears to be stabalized, but it has the automation functions I need and IBM
support. I continue to use Tivoli Workload Schedular
Thanks for all the responses, supplying the ALET(s) was the part I was missing.
Much appreciated!
Roland Martin
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:19:03 -0500, Tom Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:37:48 -0500, Roland Martin wrote:
I would like to use IARVSERV to share memory
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:28:06 +0200, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fact is that I am stuck with a very bad PI (and I cannot really do anything
about it in WLM), and when the fines are due to be paid (because we didn't
deliver on time) or the customer complaints come in, it's my head that
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:42 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
Do you have enough engines and capacity where bursts won't hurt other
workloads? If so, I might be inclined to run this work in SYSSTC (I assume
discretionary won't work for this since you mentioned on time) and then
WLM doesn't have to
- Original Message
From: Mark Neal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark,
I have a similar configuration to your system, a Baby Z9 (26 mip).
During
recent cost cutting measures, I replaced Netview with AF/OPER. AF/OPER
appears to be stabalized, but it has the automation functions I need
and
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:51:59 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, I met STK outages, but not DASD outages. Modern DASD is fully
redundant, CF outage - that's why we have spare CF. Sysplex is
redundant, but usually single HSC CDS set serves multiple sysplexes. We
don't have spare STK
Lizette did you call level 1 support and were they able to assist you?
( Sent from blackberry)
Glenn Havelock
Cell 908 398 7726
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed Oct
Mark Zelden wrote:
[...]
To your points above... the VSM hardware is just as fully redundant as
DASD (it *is* DASD). The SL8500 library is fully redundant (but even
problems with the back end physical drives don't keep the VSM from
creating new output tapes and reading in tapes from the
Had the pleasure of fighting through another user friendly ISV
install in the last few days.
BMC being my tormentor in this case.
Interesting side issue arose.
Started tasks are now in STCJOBS - the jobcards of which are for
entities currently unknown to RACF.
So I created alias entries in the
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:39:26 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, if you have a lot of SMF data (btw: how much SMF
do you have ? Just curious),
I am not going to try and figure it out with 25 production / development
LPARs (sandbox LPARs just dumps to DASD GDGs and we keep about 30
Hi, All,
I couldn't find anything relevant to the problem du jour in the
archives or the CS for z/OS 1.7 TCPIP Implementation Volume 2 Redbook,
so..
I'm able to employ SSL/TLS for FTP using the Bluezone FTP client, but
only if I configure it to use port 21 and AUTH_TLS. I cannot get it
Will try cross posting here too..
- Forwarded by Ron Wells/AGFS/AGFin on 10/17/2007 09:07 AM -
Ron Wells/AGFS/AGFin
10/17/2007 09:05 AM
To
IBM TCP/IP List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: FTPS
Anyone out there run across following...
Running z/OS1.7...
setting up---trying
Leonard D Woren wrote:
David Cole wrote on 12/31/2006 5:57 AM:
It [z/XDC] probably is a quite adequate tool for other environments
when the application code does not have ESTAE's that sometimes retry).
Yes, z/XDC is at least that.
But for myself and my customers (a fairly large number these
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 09:14 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
Thoughts ???.
Can you not just define BLOGGS.* in the STARTED class, and assign an
appropriate userID in STDATA?
I could (and have), but I wasn't looking for a work-around. I am
looking for an explanation how this could occur.
I'll get
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane
Had the pleasure of fighting through another user
friendly ISV install in the last few days.
BMC being my tormentor in this case.
Interesting side issue arose.
Started tasks are now in STCJOBS - the
Yes I have gotten LV1 support. However, I was hoping maybe someone in the
group may have already seen something like this and provide another avenue of
attack.
Lizetet
Lizette did you call level 1 support and were they able to assist you?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ron Wells
Will try cross posting here too..
- Forwarded by Ron Wells/AGFS/AGFin on 10/17/2007 09:07 AM -
Ron Wells/AGFS/AGFin
10/17/2007 09:05 AM
To
IBM TCP/IP List [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc
Subject
jc
following is the ftpdata I have for ring...and as far as RACF guy...it is
set
KEYRINGFTPS.SECURE.FTP.RING
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be
A friend of mine received this email below. I am cutting out the
reference to his web site as I don't want to give him any free
publicity. But it seems that SHARE is participating in this spam.
It is not *CLEAR* that SHARE is really the culprit but I guess it is
reasonable to guess that
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:42:01 +0200, #1490;#1491;#1497;
#1489;#1503; #1488;#1489;#1497; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-snip-
Is there a way to restart ALLOCAS without an IPL?
No. However there shouldn't be much running there. Do you have any
information as to what's executing and burning the CPU?
-jc-
as for properly config'd in RACF ??? we do not know...1st time we have
been through it...going by manual...sometimes not good...
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the
I have to ask: why you care? You can control FTP's behavior in FTPSDATA
and FTPCDATA respectively.
I also am curious about your reference to 'implicit' secure FTP. FTP
negotiates the session security starting from in the clear to the
maximum supported by both sites. You can set a floor above in
Good Morning List - We have recently gone short of aux storage, this is after
we installed a new BMC DB2 monitor/collector.
I can see that the DB2DBM1 is taking up a lot of storage. What I want is to
compare this with data from before we started firing up the collector.
I know that you can
Mark,
the JES2 fix for the **TEMP** problem on z/OS 1.7 is apar OA18183,
PTF UA31385. It is now marked PE and needs apar OA20643, 1.7 PTF
UA35583 to get it on today.
You can get rid of the **TEMP** jobs with a JES2 WARM start. Quick
start and HOT start won't get them though.
This problem
John, I think IBM no longer recommends port 990, see II13516.Also, most
of our grief with ftps came from firewall issues. Connection refused was
a common error when the z/OS firewall was not allowing that incoming
traffic. We favor ssh over ftps. Is your Bluezone client internal to
your
In a message dated 10/17/2007 10:09:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This problem sounds like deja vu all over again. We were the first
to report it.
Yeah, must be an echo in the regression tests? Seems like this crops up
about every 5th release of MVS/VM so
When a full DASD volume dump is restored to another DASD volume, the
datasets for the indexed VTOC and VVDS reflect the name of the volume ID
that the copied was from. What is the consensus from this group of what
should be done to reflect the correct names?
Should the index be purged and
I would capture a dump from the asid and look in the SYSTRACE.
Perhaps more the one dump to compare the results (e.g. CPU-Time)
Roland
Hi all,
I just noticed that the ALLOCAS address space is utilizing between 25% and
30% of our system. Since this system has 3 cpu's.
Is there a way to
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:44:22 +1000, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting side issue arose.
Started tasks are now in STCJOBS - the jobcards of which are for
entities currently unknown to RACF.
So I created alias entries in the STCJOBS library for the current
(known) STC names pointing to the
McKown, John wrote:
The question I have is how to get SDSF to access the JESA system. I think
that I'll need to use the 1.6 version of SDSF due to the JES2 dependancies in
the SDSF code. True? I am just not figuring out how to do this. The closest
that I've come up with is a second TSO proc
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 09:14 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
Thoughts ???.
Can you not just define BLOGGS.* in the STARTED class, and
assign an
appropriate userID in STDATA?
I could (and have), but I
We moved a production z/OS 1.7 system to a z9 BC this weekend. On Monday, we
had to put it back on our z/890. Our sand box has been running just fine on
the z9 since it was installed about a week ago.
The problem we had was with a PC based application that uses APPC / LU 6.2
through a WinNT
If you specify multiple-volume by default, for example five volumes,
then there will be five EXCP segments created in every SMF 30 record
for every DD in this data class, even though only one volume was used.
Those extra segments exist even when not allocated to a DEVNR, and
thus are useless.
For
Patrick,
What version of z/OS or os/390 are you on?
Are you seeing IRA messages? If so, could you show us some?
If there are IRA messages, I would issue the command D ASM to see what my page
packs look like. It sounds that you might be paging. Which means you might
not have sufficient real
Re: Subject: Re: RACF quirk.
From: Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:25:47 -0500
The above thread is similar to my problem. Whereby at IPL z/OS starts
S SYSLOGP (P = name of LPAR), and that task starts, but
Rather than rolling out 2 different versions of sdsf to the world, why
not have the output from the secondary(backleveled JES) all routed via
NJE to the primary jes? Then you would only need to logon via special
proc to debug problems(hopefully not too often).
Lizette Wrote:
It sounds that you might be paging. Which means you might not have
sufficient real storage.
Going short on memory is going to be bad going forwards - especially for
DB2, especially for z/OS Release 8, and especially if you don't have a
really beefy paging subsystem.
And
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jousma, David
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: embarressing SDSF question.
Rather than rolling out 2 different versions of sdsf to the
Gotcha, mis-understood the situation.
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be
privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark H. Young
Re: Subject: Re: RACF quirk.
The above thread is similar to my problem. Whereby at IPL
z/OS starts S SYSLOGP (P = name of LPAR), and that task
starts, but then ends.
What is running on the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
I have to ask: why you care? You can control FTP's behavior
in FTPSDATA and FTPCDATA respectively.
We perceive a need to be able to accommodate both secure and unsecure
FTP without having to specify
You can always run the RMF Post Processor to read the offloaded SMF data.
though I am not sure you can read the current MAN files with it.
You have to dump (not clear -- leave that up to your normal processes) the
current files before you can process it with ERBRMFPP.
-
Too busy driving to
START FTPD, which runs for a few seconds, fires up FTPD1 as a UNIX job, then
ends. FTPD1 stays up (visible in SDSF) until explicitly stopped.
This is how z/OS emulates UNIX processes.
Some are invoked by fork() which leaves the 'parent' task running. All invoked
this way will terminate when
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSLOGx1 Task Name in z/OS 1.7
START FTPD, which runs for a few seconds, fires up FTPD1 as
Ray,
thanks for the vrey helpful explanation. I try to build a list
instead of answering in general.
1. Our IVTPRM contains (IBM defaults)
FIXED MAX(120MB)
ECSA MAX(120MB)
I now know why IVT5539I stay the MAX ECSA is 92638K but
IVT5538I shows the correct value. You're right the
ECSA in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joel Ivey
John, I think IBM no longer recommends port 990, see II13516.
Thanks. Very informative. Back to square two. :-)
-jc-
--
For
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: embarressing SDSF question.
snip
AFAIK, third party software which are reading JES2
Time for a new vendor! Their price may comde down rather quickly after
that!
snip
Nope. The vendor has specifically stated that the release that we have
only supports the R4 format of the checkpoint.
And I've validated that by looking at their interface and changing it
to use the z2 format
Running a secondary JES2 to support printing is a venerable tradition. Back
in the day when 3800 printers first came out, the device support embedded
in JES code was flaky. Keeping the subsystem running was a nightmare.
Hardware problems--or software problems that failed to handle the hardware
McKown, John wrote:
We have some very old software which takes SPOOL output from JES2 and
sends it to a specialized server. This software cannot tolerate the z2 level of
the JES2 checkpoint, only the R4 format.
AFAIK, third party software which are reading JES2 SPOOL are usually supplied
with
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: embarressing SDSF question.
Time for a new vendor! Their price may comde down rather
This is how we have TLS setup for FTP on z/os 1.7.
;
; SECURITY OPTIONS
;
SECURE_MECHANISM TLS
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:39:48 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can always run the RMF Post Processor to read the offloaded SMF data.
though I am not sure you can read the current MAN files with it.
You have to dump (not clear -- leave that up to your normal processes) the
current
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wissink, Brad [ITSYS]
This is how we have TLS setup for FTP on z/os 1.7.
;
; SECURITY OPTIONS
Further to what I said the other day, there is much better documentation
in this area available in the z/OS R.9 manuals.
See
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/MartinPacker?entry=more_on_coupling_facility_async
for a little more on that.
(Sorry to S+P+A+M the list with a blog
I can ship my ftpparms---attach...would like another set of eye look at
them...also can get list from our racf guy...we both are new at trying to
set this up...
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential
so--- -jc- Brad..
you have one(1) server running for both secure and non--??
or is it the ftpdata parms you point to..?
besides above questions the following is what I get when trying to get
connected...can not / do not..understand where we are going wrong..
BPXF024I (STC1) Oct 17 13:10:20
You're specifying TLSPORT 990 in tcp (ftpsdata I think), and 990 in the
bluezone ftp connection config, correct? You're starting a separate ftpd
for the 990 port?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
How is it done?
Any pitfalls/limitations?
Examples will be greatly appreciated.
TIA
Jerry
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Can someone (or SEVERAL someones) who understand(s) IOS etc take a look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_Control_Block and this talk page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Unit_Control_Block and contribute to
them both.
In particular I'm concerned with the question raised as to who
?? Should you not have a separate ftpd for 990 traffic? Can one ftpd
process listen on both 21 and 990 at the same time?
You're specifying TLSPORT 990 in tcp (ftpsdata I think), and
990 in the
bluezone ftp connection config, correct? You're starting a
separate ftpd
for the 990 port?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joel Ivey
You're specifying TLSPORT 990 in tcp (ftpsdata I think), and
990 in the
bluezone ftp connection config, correct? You're starting a
separate ftpd
for the 990 port?
Yes. No.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Support, DUNNIT
SYSTEMS LTD.
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Zapping HFS files
How is it done?
Any pitfalls/limitations?
Examples
Listers,
We've recently acquired a Shark and are experimenting with Flashcopy on
z/OS 1.7.
When we do a COPY FULL (with DUMPCONDITIONING specified and with or
without FCNOCOPY), message ADR369D is generated, causing the operator to
have to respond U for write access a VTOCIX data set on the
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 10:43 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
You started FREDDY, so that's what RACF knows about. It sounds like you
really have a started JOB, not a started PROC, and that BLOGGS has a
//BLOGGS JOB statement in it. If you're starting that via START FREDDY,
then I -think- that
Nope. Sorry to say, but that was the way they were listed in the sample
we used originally to get started.
Brad Wissink
Information Technology Services
Iowa State University
515-294-3088
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Greg,
You can code/use the IEAVMXIT MCS exit to automate this reply.
I can give you a copy of our source code for a quick jump start on this. Please
contact me off-list if you want a copy.
HITACHI
DATA SYSTEMS
Raymond E. Noal
Senior Technical Engineer
Office: (408) 970 - 7978
On Oct 17, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Staller, Allan wrote:
Time for a new vendor! Their price may comde down rather quickly after
that!
snip
Nope. The vendor has specifically stated that the release that we have
only supports the R4 format of the checkpoint.
And I've validated that by looking at their
On Oct 17, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:
Running a secondary JES2 to support printing is a venerable
tradition. Back
in the day when 3800 printers first came out, the device support
embedded
in JES code was flaky. Keeping the subsystem running was a nightmare.
Hardware problems--or
We are a small shop looking to migrate from a single LPAR 2066-001 to a
z9. On a normal day we hit 100% CPU utilization for several hours during
Prime Shift (8AM-4PM). The Prime shift workload consists of production
online work (CICS, IMS and DB2) from our business community, development
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:41:43 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
HUH? What do you mean by that, exactly? If you want to zap the CONTAINER
file, then AMASPZAP will do that by CCHHR. Your gun, your foot - have
fun. If you mean that you want to zap an UNIX file (for instance,
/etc/hosts), remember that UNIX
This was definitely about 3800 device support. Historically JES2 had
controlled a slew of peripheral devices: printers, punches, TP, RJE, NJE.
The code to handle I/O to these devices was included in JES2 modules. The
3800 was a logical candidate but a most unfortunate one. The 3800 was far
more
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:41:43 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
HUH? What do you mean by that, exactly? If you want to zap the CONTAINER
file, then AMASPZAP will do that by CCHHR. Your gun, your foot - have
fun. If you mean that you want to zap an UNIX file (for instance,
/etc/hosts), remember that UNIX
Hi Bob,
I can't speak for others, but when I copied volumes, I usually used FDR. If
I remember correctly, it always left the name for the VTOC and VVDS the
same. I just ignored it and never had a problem. I only had this problem
on copying RES packs. I would copy IPLRES to ALTRES. Then
datasets for the indexed VTOC and VVDS reflect the name of the volume
That has never been a problem.
Since they're not catalogued, the names are meaningless.
They are found (through the VTOC) by TTR, not by name.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10/13/2007
at 10:05 PM, Andrew McLaren [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
(*Once I was solemnly informed by an IT manager that only two operating
systems exit for IBM mainframes: MVS and VM! What? No DPPX/370?? :-)
No ACP, no DOS, no IX/370, no MTS, no OS/VS1, no SVS, no
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10/10/2007
at 05:11 PM, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
BUILDPDB?
Shirley you jest. Or, at least, the last time I looked there was nothing
there to manage SMF dumps, just to convert SMF data to SAS. The closest
I've seen was SLR, whatever they're calling it these
On Oct 17, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:
This was definitely about 3800 device support. Historically JES2 had
controlled a slew of peripheral devices: printers, punches, TP,
RJE, NJE.
The code to handle I/O to these devices was included in JES2
modules. The
3800 was a logical
Shirley you jest
Can't you be nice to anybody?
Honey? Flies? Vinegar?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Look into zPCR from IBM. Just the tool you need. Start with this link
http://www.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/PRS1381.
Best regards,
Al
Al Sherkow, I/S Management Strategies, Ltd.
Consulting Expertise on Capacity Planning, Performance Tuning,
WLC, LPARs, IRD and LCS Software
Look into zPCR from IBM.
zPCR is not necessarily that strong.
There are no (as yet) measurements above 24 CP's.
There is a lot of straight lining.
There are a lot of workloads that were measured on one generation, that didn't
get it on the next; there are others that didn't make it until
Hi Ted --
That may be true, but John has one CP and is looking at 2 CPs, so straight
lining at 24 CPs is far in his future. Also he wants free or low cost.
Respectfully,
Al
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
That thing needs some updating... Problem is, where does one begin?
Allocation, perhaps the TIOT, then the UCB...?
Anyway, I added some commentary.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Martin Packer
Sent: Wednesday, October 17,
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/17/ibm_q3_results/
Services, software soar but mainframes really hurting
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:38:12 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Note that the well-known port in either case is for the control
connection; the data connection is randomly assigned in either case.
The randomly part is often the cause of failure of secure ftp through
firewalls. They
Mark and Shane,
Do you have enough engines and capacity where bursts won't hurt other
workloads? If so, I might be inclined to run this work in SYSSTC (I
assume discretionary won't work for this since you mentioned on time)
and then WLM doesn't have to manage it.
thanks for that suggestion. It
95 matches
Mail list logo
