Phil Payne wrote:
You can turn any feature or the lack of a feature into a benefit with enough
marketing. Look
at the inanity surrounding the very ordinary iPhone.
Exactly. I could argue my cell phone is more accessible for blind --
or even just aging -- people because it has keys.
--
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 2:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL
In a message dated 11/8/2007 9:47:00 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is IBM Main down?
This is a test message.
IBM-Main is not down as far as I can determine. It's downness for others is
undetermined.
Bill Fairchild
Franklin, TN
I think the GP engines generally are priced at around twice the price of
the specialty engines.
And add to the MSU cost of IBM and third party software
Not necessarily nowadays, and it's a very important point to understand.
The world has changed.
If you're on IBM VWLC (Variable Workload
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:37:15 -0500, Pinnacle wrote:
Run the UNLOAD command to get the DDDEF's in UCLIN format. Then you'll have
to hack the UCLIN yourself to add VOLUME and UNIT parms, and run the UCLIN
through SMP/E.
What data sets will SMP/E create NEW?
If SMP/E creates the data sets, must
John,
Apologies, I keep on forgetting that the '8' just signals the above the
line, you and Tom and all the others are quite correct with the
x'7fff', I have it now... it is a pitty that IBM did not use the
lowest bit to signal the line... x'0001' for 24-bit and x'0002'
for 32-bit, it
Last one...
I have not checked this for myself yet, and probably won't have the time
in the next few weeks... In theory... If I allocate 200 bytes of storage
at x'7f00', and my program, the way some Cobol programs are, writes
1600 bytes there, what would the addresses be, would it jump across
GP = $$$
ICF = $$
IFL or IFA = $
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 1:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: zAAP question
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Is IBM Main down?
This is a test message. If this had been a real message, then various of
the members could argue as to whether or not this message contained any
intelligence.
Alas, this is only a test message, similar to a sharp stick, with which
to poke the IBM Main server to see if it will
New documentation with some of the secrets and internal of this product.
People are testing and people are working with these product.
www.mfnetdisk.com
thanks,
Shai
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
If You have an example of a work-around for the partial word replacement
I would be grateful for that. Note that a change in existing copys is not an
option.
(If that would change the field names or other functional changes.)
You cannot use nested COPY statements with COPY REPLACING. (IBM)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Van Dalsen, Herbie
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
Last one...
I have not checked this for myself yet, and
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: 08 November 2007 04:12 nm
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL
While we don't have SA, we use regular NetView to do this. You have to run the
NetView Event Automation Services (EAS) started task. If you need additional
assistance, join the NetView Yahoo group at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetView/
The IBM NetView people also participate in this
Jumping from 4 to 25 Gb isn't a good idea, but if I have 4 Gb used and 4
unused I think there's no difference in adding, say, 2 Gb (so using 6 Gb
as total). Consider we have bursts or spikes in paging and for instance
our DB2 isn't performing well even if 'all runs well' as someone say.
I assume (but could be mistaken) that you are trying to replace a part of a
string rather than a COBOL text word. Besides the fact that there are
work-arounds for doing partial word replacement, you might be interested
that the current ('02) standard DOES allow for replacing a leading or
trailing
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Phil Payne wrote:
You can turn any feature or the lack of a feature into a benefit
with
enough marketing. Look at the inanity surrounding the very ordinary
iPhone.
Exactly. I could argue my cell
OA22716
WLM INITIATORS DO NOT START WHEN THERE IS NO CPU USING OR DELAY
APAR status
OPEN
Error description
Problem is the same as described in OA19711. OA19711 changed
the algorithm in IRAPAQUE. But the change also needs to be done
in IRAPABQD.
When a service class is missing its goal and
Mark,
I wrote some similar REXX last December, during our end of year change freeze.
Because of our procedures/standards, I know the VOLSER format of all our
target/dlib/smpe volumes. Passing a volser mask for target and dlib volumes,
and knowing the standard smpe volsers, the code finds all
If you are a CA MICS customer and have the MICS DASD component, there is
a CATCHECK=Y option with the VCC (VTOC/Catalog Collector) - very efficient.
I have a few MICS customers I support who run a weekly VCC with the option
on (left off for the regular daily runs) and then their Monday AM MICS
You should have the PTFs for z/OS APAR OA17114 installed if you are
using paged fixed buffers in DB2 V8. Not having it was one of the
causes of a z/OS outage here when a DB2 DBA accidently overcommitted
storage to DB2.
APAR Identifier .. OA17114 Last Changed 07/07/03
IRA400E
Hi,
Any one ever tried to forward console msg to TEC using SA/Netview?
We need to know some detail about how this is working and how to config
it.
Say we want to forward all VTAM msgs start by IST*** to TEC.
With Utmost Sincerity
ZHANG, Jie [Andy] 张��
TSS, zSoftware, SWG, IBM China
[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Bill Klein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 10:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Fw: COBOL COPY statement w REPLACING...
I assume (but could be mistaken) that you are trying to replace a part of
a string rather than a
I've been lurking this site for many years and, up to this point, had nothing
significant to contribute, however; the news of Bruce's passing really had an
impact. It is unusual to have an individual of Bruce's caliber so accessible,
and will to share his immense storage management knowledge
Why would anyone ever use uncatalogued data sets?
Multiple SMP/E zones with the same named datasets on different volume
sets.
One could use an alias (like the SSAs that server pac generates), but I
prefer to know that when I set a boundary to a particular zone, that the
right set of data sets
In a message dated 11/8/2007 10:02:17 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have not checked this for myself yet, and probably won't have the time
in the next few weeks... In theory... If I allocate 200 bytes of storage
at x'7f00', and my program, the way some Cobol
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 08:43:03 -0800 Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:There is also a one-page hole at 7000. (Another handy
:implementation choice made by your friendly-neighborhood z/OS developers!)
Interesting. Is that hole documented?
Is there any 24 bit virtual address which is
Anyone got a copy of copytree that they can send me. I've been to the unix
tools and toys page and it is listed on there under the link for unix tools
but if I go to that page it isn't there aggg.
Jim McAlpine
Van Dalsen, Herbie wrote:
Last one...
I have not checked this for myself yet, and probably won't have the time
in the next few weeks... In theory... If I allocate 200 bytes of storage
at x'7f00', and my program, the way some Cobol programs are, writes
1600 bytes there, what would the
This message arrived in my inbox about 45 minutes after sending it. And
that was after contacting the BAMA EDU help desk to ask questions. I had
gone to the web site and noticed that it was not showing any postings
for 8-NOV-07.
Bill Klein's COBOL copy message was the first to show up, at about
Rick,
Ummm, the same person who figured out it was cheaper to just build all
the ATM's with the same keypad, whether they were a drive-up one or one
in the wall at the mall?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Hi,
Does anyone know what product this is ? It's an IBM product, I can't
find anything on IBMLINK that discribes the product.
TIA
Dean
Dean Montevago
Sr. Systems Specialist
Visiting Nurse Service of New York
(212) 609 - 5596
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim, at least as far back as z/OS 1.4, copytree is now being shipped by IBM in
the '/samples' directory. You no longer need to go the the Tools and Toys
page.
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 17:33:41 +, Jim McAlpine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone got a copy of copytree that they can send me. I've
Dean Montevago wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know what product this is ? It's an IBM product, I can't
find anything on IBMLINK that discribes the product.
TIA
Dean
Dean Montevago
Sr. Systems Specialist
Visiting Nurse Service of New York
(212) 609 - 5596
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Report
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:58:10 -0600 Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:And what intellectual paralytic decided that drive-up ATM's had to have
:Braille keys? DU
Nothing wrong with that - if placed on the passenger side, not the driver
side.
--
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
snip---
You can turn any feature or the lack of a feature into a
benefit with
enough marketing. Look at the inanity surrounding the
very ordinary
Thanks Mark.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 1:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RMDS
Dean Montevago wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know what product this is ? It's an IBM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 12:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: RMDS
Hi,
Does anyone know what product this is ? It's an IBM product, I can't
find
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:58:10 -0600 Rick Fochtman wrote:
:And what intellectual paralytic decided that drive-up ATM's
had to have :Braille keys? DU
Nothing wrong with that - if placed on
The High level Assembler accepts and uses an OPTABLE parm which lets
you limit the valid op codes to an architecture level such as XA or
370 (and optionally list the valid OP codes at that level). The Disassembler
(ASMDASM) has a comparable ÓPTABLE option which Specifies the operation
code table
I am playing catch-up from fighting (and still fighting) Vista x64 fires on my
own computer that has blocked my reading of e-mail...and I find this.
I don't do me too type stuff, but here I must.
Bruce was an excellent (and that word is not encompassing enough) contributor
to this list; I have
Thanks John.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 1:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RMDS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL
In a message dated 11/8/2007 9:47:00 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is IBM Main down?
It was, but the three finger salute made it all better. I was mentioning
Parker Brothers and Monopoly but doesn't seem as funny today
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
Sent: 08 November 2007 04:20 nm
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
In a message dated 11/8/2007 10:02:17 A.M. Central Standard
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Knutson, Sam) writes:
You should have the PTFs for z/OS APAR OA17114 installed if you are
using paged fixed buffers in DB2 V8. Not having it
snip---
You can turn any feature or the lack of a feature into a benefit with
enough marketing. Look
at the inanity surrounding the very ordinary iPhone.
Exactly. I could argue my cell phone is more accessible for blind --
or even just aging --
Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
Ummm, the same person who figured out it was cheaper to just build all
the ATM's with the same keypad, whether they were a drive-up one or one
in the wall at the mall?
A bunch of low-life attorneys made a ton of money on this. But, it
turns out that the braille
Lynd, Eugene (Contractor) (J6C) wrote:
The High level Assembler accepts and uses an OPTABLE parm which lets
you limit the valid op codes to an architecture level such as XA or
370 (and optionally list the valid OP codes at that level). The Disassembler
(ASMDASM) has a comparable SPTABLE option
And a lot of the roads have those bumps between the lanes.
Aren't they for Braille driving?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 12:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: High
On 8 Nov 2007 09:59:30 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Fochtman) wrote:
And what intellectual paralytic decided that drive-up ATM's had to have
Braille keys? DU
Who wants to pay for the companies to supply two sets of ATM keys, one
which can be used anywhere, and the other can only be
Hi,
Someone I know say the way to set in omegamon for cics so a transaction
automatically cancel after an excessive consuming of resources.
--
Hélio José da Silva
Depto. Software Básico
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 12:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RMDS
[...]
RMDS is Report Management and Distribution System or
something like
that. It
(Cross-posted to IBM-VM and IBM-MAIN)
A buddy asked me:
At a previous employer, someone had an article, poster or something (I know -
real specific - it was 15+ years ago) that tried to put the time for computer
events into perspective. It started with the quickest instruction (RR) having a
In a message dated 11/8/2007 12:46:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Who wants to pay for the companies to supply two sets of ATM keys, one
which can be used anywhere, and the other can only be used in walk-up
ATMs?
Which is also why we now have assembly and
Rick Fochtman wrote:
And what intellectual paralytic decided that drive-up ATM's had to have
Braille keys? DU
My bank has a prominent sign at the entry to the drive-in lane
Caution - Watch for pedestrians using ATM. And I've used it
both ways.
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT
In a message dated 11/8/2007 12:55:16 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tried to put the time for computer events into perspective.
A 100-MIPS processor can execute 100 million average instructions per secon
d, so one average instruction takes one hundred-millionth
In all the years since this post, has anyone come up with a new, good,
foolproof way to have one LPAR in a JES2 SYSPLEX only run SYSPROG jobs
during a test window?
$P XEQ seems to work great to run no batch at all
$T JOBCLASS affects the other LPARs as well as this one.
$T
In a message dated 11/8/2007 11:59:26 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And what intellectual paralytic decided that drive-up ATM's had to have
Braille keys?
Doncha think it was same one that said standards and interchangeability were
cheaper than maintaining
I'm surprised no one pulled this tidbit up to remember Bruce. From
Google:
Top posters:
All time
4471 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3769 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3622 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Notice Bruce is #3 on the all-time list with 3622 posts, only
following
our very own mainframe historian
- Original Message -
From: Jousma, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: Bruce Black passed away
I'm surprised no one pulled this tidbit up to remember Bruce. From
Google:
Top posters:
All time
4471 [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 6:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 11/08/2007
06:23:58 PM:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 11/08/2007
12:24:52 PM:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 08:43:03 -0800 Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:There is also a one-page hole at 7000. (Another handy
:implementation choice made by your friendly-neighborhood z/OS
-Original Message-
From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Even got the capitalization right!!!
YES!!
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.isham-
research.co.uk/mainframe_2008.html
Check out
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:53:36 -0500, Jousma, David wrote:
We expect that now that you are going part-time. :-)
Yeah, part time:
Cast out the line, Check IBM-Main
Reel in a fish, Check IBM-MAIN
Cast out the line again, Check IBM-Main
Pop the top on a frosty one, Check IBM-Main
That
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 11/08/2007
07:20:09 PM:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 6:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above
Most I dealt with in the mid-1980s were Tandem NonStop.
Later,
Ray
--
M. Ray Mullins
Roseville, CA, USA
http://www.catherdersoftware.com/
http://www.mrmullins.big-bear-city.ca.us/
http://www.the-bus-stops-here.org/
German is essentially a form of assembly language consisting entirely of
Roland Schiradin wrote:
doesn't make sense to me. If an instruction exists in the code the
disassembler
should decode them based on the latest level of possible opcodes. Why
would
you limit this?
It's all a guess. One would typically assume that, if you're
disassembling code that runs on a
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:43:23 -0600, Roland Schiradin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
doesn't make sense to me. If an instruction exists in the code the disassembler
should decode them based on the latest level of possible opcodes. Why would
you limit this?
It's useful to limit the opcodes understood,
At 11:58 -0600 on 11/08/2007, Rick Fochtman wrote about Re: High
order bit in 31/24 bit address:
And what intellectual paralytic decided that drive-up ATM's had to
have Braille keys? DU
The one who decided that if they were in a car, they'd be in the back
left seat behind the
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:14:42 -, Van Dalsen, Herbie wrote:
Apologies, I keep on forgetting that the '8' just signals the above
the
line, you and Tom and all the others are quite correct with the
x'7fff', I have it now... it is a pitty that IBM did not use the
lowest bit to signal the
Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
Any idea which opcodes are duplicates? Where are the vector facility
opcodes documented?
I don't know about official IBM documentation, but Abe Kornelis has an
excellent overview at his hlasm.com site. Check this out:
http://www.hlasm.com/english/opcd00.htm
Not sure if this helps but I had a two step method that worked
What I did was setup the JESPARMS so all Jobclasses but 1 were specified
SCAN=YES (so anything submitted was scanned as though TYPRUN=SCAN was specified
on the jobcard) and we, the SP's, knew what that 1, non SCAN=YES, class was.
-Original Message-
From: Edward Jaffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 3:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OPTABLE option of Disassembler
David Cole wrote:
Because sometimes opcodes change meanings? Correct me if I'm wrong,
but it seems to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OPTABLE option of Disassembler
David Cole wrote:
Because sometimes opcodes change
Hi Gene,
doesn't make sense to me. If an instruction exists in the code the disassemble
should decode them based on the latest level of possible opcodes. Why would
you limit this?
Roland
The High level Assembler accepts and uses an OPTABLE parm which lets
you limit the valid op codes to an
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:14:42 -, Van Dalsen, Herbie wrote:
Apologies, I keep on forgetting that the '8' just signals the above the
line, you and Tom and all the others are quite correct with the
x'7fff', I have it now... it is a pitty that IBM did not use the
lowest bit to signal the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 6:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
Thompson, Steve wrote:
You did say dedicated. And it certainly appears to me to
On Nov 8, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:58:10 -0600 Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:And what intellectual paralytic decided that drive-up ATM's had
to have
:Braille keys? DU
Nothing wrong with that - if placed on the passenger side, not
David Cole wrote:
Because sometimes opcodes change meanings? Correct me if I'm wrong,
but it seems to me that some of the new opcodes that came out in the
late 90s were the same as some of the old vector processor opcodes. ...
I never knew that! I always assumed all new opcodes were
Because sometimes opcodes change meanings? Correct me if I'm wrong,
but it seems to me that some of the new opcodes that came out in the
late 90s were the same as some of the old vector processor opcodes. ...
Dave Cole REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cole Software WEB PAGE:
We expect that now that you are going part-time. :-)
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Darren
And what intellectual paralytic decided that drive-up ATM's had to have
Braille keys?
The one that decided it was cheaper to make one kind of key-pad, than to make
specialty ones.
Just plugplay.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
[...]
RMDS is Report Management and Distribution System or something like
that. It takes reports from the SPOOL and places them in VSAM files,
possibly indexing and or subsetting them. Users can then logon and look
at their list of reports and view them or print them.
Without this product,
Vista X64 ? ..
You did not get the X128 version it's got less BLACK holes in it...
and no ZIIP/ZAAP processors.
Anton
Ray Mullins wrote:
I am playing catch-up from fighting (and still fighting) Vista x64 fires on my
own computer that has blocked my reading of e-mail...and I find this.
Anyone on the list going to the viewing tonight?
Ken Porowski
AVP Systems Software
CIT Group
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
Radoslav,
The advantages of having such a software product are as follows:
- Report archival: An important production report is preserved for a certain
period of time, as long as you / the law requires.
- Online viewing: A user can view a report on the screen instead of having
to wait for the
Bob,
Using just WLM? Not that I know of.
Using just one class of initiators that only SYSPROGS know are there,
and stopping/starting them on a schedule, might get you there, but it's
far from foolproof.
JES2 exits can get you there (to help make the one jobclass thing
foolproof).
Thruput
In a message dated 11/8/2007 1:02:40 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A Direct Access Storage Device read of a 4K
block, if the data is not in the DASD Subsystem's cache, would take at
least
one millisecond, which is ten to the minus three power seconds. The
You could set up a Scheduling Environment for Sysprog jobs (ONLY) and
another one for everything else that's batch. During normal operation
both are active on all sysplex LPARs. During the test window, turn OFF
the Everything Else environment on the LPAR you're testing on, leaving
only the
We had a little mail glitch with our primary mail server yesterday.
All is well now. Sorry for the delays or burps.
Darren
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Thompson, Steve wrote:
This message arrived in my inbox about 45 minutes after sending it. And
that was after contacting the BAMA EDU help desk to ask
I'm surprised no one pulled this tidbit up to remember Bruce. From
Google:
Top posters:
All time
4471 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3769 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3622 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3419 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2507 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2217 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2104 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2088 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2041
I am planning to, at least at this point in the day.
Art
At 02:15 PM 11/8/2007, Ken Porowski wrote:
Anyone on the list going to the viewing tonight?
==
Art Celestini Celestini Development Services
Phone: 201-670-1674
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OPTABLE option of Disassembler
David Cole wrote:
Because sometimes opcodes change
In a message dated 11/8/2007 6:21:04 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the MVS world, if a Problem State program attempts to modify 0xxx
(where x is 0-512 decimal and regardless of the content of the current
base register) and LAP is on... So it is not truly
I first met Bruce back in the mid/late 80's as part of a local NaSPA
chapter (SPONJ - Systems Programmers of New Jersey). He stuck with us
as long as we lasted (2 years or so, the memory is fading) and even held
a few meetings at Innovation in Little Falls. He was always supportive
of us in
From a Hasselblad brochure:
The Hasselblad 6 x 6 cm ( 2 1/4 x 2 1/4) square format uses size 120 film and
the square
format eliminates the need to turn the camera sideways for landscape or
portrait.
It's very nearly Friday now.
I travel very frequently from Sheffield Midland Station with a
YES!!
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.isham-research.co.uk/mainframe_2008.html
Check out the capitalization in the second paragraph. Posted in July 2005 -
OVER TWO YEARS
AGO - and as accurate
today as the day it was written.
Anyone still subscribing to Gartner? Why?
You'll all hear
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:07:15 -0600 Tony Harminc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:43:23 -0600, Roland Schiradin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:doesn't make sense to me. If an instruction exists in the code the
disassembler
:should decode them based on the latest level of possible
Hi all,
Does anyone remember, or have any details about a product called Arbiter?
It was a kind of client-server thing which (as best I can remember) allowed
host apps to see PC hard disks as DASD. This was a way of sharing data
between PCs to the Host - save data on local hard disk, then
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 11/08/2007
12:24:52 PM:
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
