On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 21:58 -0600, Brian Westerman wrote:
I sent it because when we started the previous beta, I received more than 20
emails from people on the list that complained that they didn't know about
the beta in enough advance time and thus were not allowed to participate
because of
Arturo A Arca wrote:
I did a search on Course ES210 and came up empty/not found. I too would be
very interested in attending and/or doing an online course..
OK, my fault.
The course was renamed to SS21. You can search for SS21, SS210, SS212
(version 2 of SS21). The version of the course is
Ted, this is basically what Brian uses this discussion group for, to
advertise his products and services.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apologize if you have already received the email on this, but Syzygy is
announcing our BETA testing of the next
gsg wrote:
We have a job that has a posting step that runs 6-7 minutes last year. We
noticed that the job more than doubled starting with the first processing day
of 2008. The application owners swear that no changes were made on there
side and the systems guys swear that no changes were
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:21:25 -0600, Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I need to exchange files with an agency that uses sftp and SSH-2. From
looking at the archives and the TCP/IP Implementation red book (vol 2, std
apps), I am unclear whether I can use ftps and AT-TLS or am stuck with sftp.
I took the original posting as a call for help. He needs assistance with
beta testing. I think that is an excellent use of this group and an
excellent attitude from a vendor.
/Tom Kern
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Has anyone run into this Excel error when trying to use IBM's RMF
Spreadsheet Reporter?
I get a popup that reads:
| Error Message
| -
| File access error occurred.
| Additional information: You are attempting to open a file type that is
| blocked by your registry policy setting.
I didn't save the email, but the fine folks who support and maintain the
RMF Spreadsheet Reporter pointed me to the Microsoft document on how to
fix it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Saturday, March
---snip---
An application group is doing a stress test against a CICS region,
using batched instream commands via an IEFBR14 job to invoke a user
transaction. Some of the MODIFY commands are being rejected with
message IEE342I MODIFY REJECTED-TASK BUSY.
-snip---
We have a similar issue in our shop. The midrange area wants tapeless. the
Mainframe side TAPE.
We have a VTS and ATL. We use the product DRVI to stack the VTS Tape backups
to an real tape and ship it offsite for DR purposes. Tape is cheap.
-snip
I haven't been following this but has anyone suggested setting up a CTC
between the LPAR's. The connection is setup over Escon channels.
---unsnip
That will make a very reasonable physical connection; the next step is
Rick Fochtman wrote:
That will make a very reasonable physical connection; the next step is
to configure software to actually use it. :-)
I vote for a NJE connection, with routing JECL where appropriate. It's
a LOT less prone to error than trying to do spool OFFLOAD and LOAD.
The OP
In a message dated 3/8/2008 11:03:41 A.M. Central Standard Time, r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
vote for a NJE connection, with routing JECL where appropriate. It's a
LOT less prone to error than trying to do spool OFFLOAD and LOAD.
Shared spool may be out for valid reasons.
Guess if all
Leitner, Timothy wrote:
All,
How many places have implemented tapeless backup environments? I
don't mean virtual tape that has tape on the back-end but no tape at
all. We are exploring different options and the wintel side of the house
is heading down the totally tapeless path. That makes me
Brian and Shane,
I guess it doesn't bother me a whole lot about Brian's posting. I know
opinions vary from don't care at all to foaming at the mouth for the audacity
to do such a horrible thing. But Shane, you're right - the list owner Darren
should get involved. All such postings should
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:21:53 -0800, Edward Jaffe
The OP indicates that he already has TCP/IP connectivity between all
LPARs and FTP servers running on each. Therefore, the JES FTP interface
should be available without any additional configuration. (Though I
would highly recommend specifying
Gilbert Cardenas wrote:
Hello all, I am looking for ideas on ways to transfer reports/sysouts from one
JES2 spool on one lpar to another lpar.
The current method I am using is to use a JES offload dataset to offload the
report(s) and then reload them on the other lpar. This works okay but
Leitner, Timothy wrote:
All,
How many places have implemented tapeless backup environments? I
don't mean virtual tape that has tape on the back-end but no tape at
all. We are exploring different options and the wintel side of the house
is heading down the totally tapeless path. That makes me
For those of you that are friends, you should know that Bob Richards had
a MAJOR heart attack on Mondy. Yesterday, he underwent quadruple bypass
surgery. The prognosis, as of this afternoon, is very good. Things are a
little bit slower in recovery, due to the fact that Bob was a heavy
smoker,
Hi Listers,
Does anyone know if there is supposed to be a bucket
available for z/OS 1.9 that is used by the ePSP Tool? Have been to the
url (http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/set2/psp/srchBroker)
and then as part of the pull-down list for the z/OS operating system
buckets it
I'm new...to this list and at my new job...
Question about setting the clock:
Haven't IPL'd in 4 months, so tonight I'm going to IPL the production z/OS 1.7
LPAR and similar test LPAR (each a monoplex) to pick up a new
SYS1.PARMLIB(CLOCK00) with a different offset to Greenwich Mean Time (7
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:37:58 -0600, Roger Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Listers,
Does anyone know if there is supposed to be a bucket
available for z/OS 1.9 that is used by the ePSP Tool? Have been to the
url (http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/set2/psp/srchBroker)
and then as
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:45:28 EST, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guess if all you got is PFCSKs DEST='IP:ipaddr' might suffice w/o NJE
quote JCL Reference
DEST=destination
The destination subparameter for JES2 is one of the following:
LOCAL|ANYLOCAL
'IP:ipaddr'
name
| Nn
|
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 14:31:26 -0800, Gregory Pinkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new...to this list and at my new job...
Question about setting the clock:
Haven't IPL'd in 4 months, so tonight I'm going to IPL the production
z/OS 1.7 LPAR and similar test LPAR (each a monoplex) to pick up a
new
Gil,
- Thanks a ton. No coupling facility from what I'm told, GRS via couple
dataset (I'm used to MIM via CTC, so this is new to me too). I just want to
prove periodically an IPL works, I know it's not necessary. I just haven't
seen one at this site since I started here, and I want to
Gilbert Cardenas wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:45:28 EST, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guess if all you got is PFCSKs DEST='IP:ipaddr' might suffice w/o NJE
quote JCL Reference
DEST=destination
The destination subparameter for JES2 is one of the following:
LOCAL|ANYLOCAL
'IP:ipaddr'
Hi folks,
Want to confirm that, at z/OS 1.7, RMF Monitor III is not able to identify
delays due to PDSE latch contention.
We had a lot of batch jobs, all hung, with RMF showing them all 100%
Unknown delay.
Before I go chasing IBM I just wanted to check that this is still the same at
later
Zahir,
Maybe you should go back and look at the problems that I have helped people
with, or maybe look at the programs that I have on the CBT Tape, or talk to
one of the people at one of the sites that I have performed contracts at
before you decide that I am only using the site for marketing.
I
Setting up NJE really isn't that difficult. I can send you a short set of
directions for how to set it up if you want. If your systems are both on
the same physical processor (2 LPARs), and if it's a z-series box with an
OSA/e or similar, it's even easier.
I would bet that your systems people
Brian,
you've got my vote, keep up the good work and just ignore these morons who are
fortunately in the minority.
Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory Services
Sydney, Australia
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/06/2008
at 10:27 PM, Brian Westerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'll past the email below
It would be better to make a tombstone announcement with *NO* promotional
material and a link to your web site for details.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/08/2008
at 04:23 PM, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
For those of you that are friends, you should know that Bob Richards had
a MAJOR heart attack on Mondy.
I'm sure that there are many like me who know him only from the list but
would still like to know the
unlike the people who don't sign their email or use a non-company address to
post to the list.
Some companies have a policy against making public statements using corporate
e-mail accounts.
Some people are also unemployed, so how can they use a corporate account?
-
Too busy driving to stop for
you've got my vote, keep up the good work and just ignore these morons who are
fortunately in the minority.
Because people have a different opinion than you does not make them morons.
Also, calling somebody a moron does not invalidate their opinion.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
34 matches
Mail list logo
