Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
I wasn't joking when I jumped over Y2K and went to Y10K, it has not caught
on, but today is 09/05/02008. Why is everyone waiting?
The ISO standard is 2008-09-05. Among other things it has the
advantage of making date sorting faster by reducing three fields
to one.
Ted,
Agreed. And if it's conditional then it doesn't even get executed for
datasets with the right naming standards.
Ron
The cost for doing this is a lot less than people believe.
Stupid coding is still a problem; normal coding doesn't cost that much.
Eric,
For your 2nd LPAR, have you considered simply cloning the existing system
and disabling the products that may cause you grief with your licenses or
MIPS usage? I think it will make your Basic Sysplex a lot easier to build
and maintain in the long run.
You've already figured the need to
Strange things happened when I executed the code below.
After I entered 2 for OPTS to ran OBJ_D2, I could never leave the loop.
But if I comment out the OUTTRAP statements, everything will go fine.
So could anyone explain what OUTTRAP has done to my loop?
Thanks in advance.
--- Neo wrote:
DO FOREVER
WHEN OPTS = X
OBJ_D2:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 09:07:09 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
--- Neo wrote:
WHEN OPTS = X
X = OUTTRAP(COMP_VAR,5,CONCAT)
explicit definitions of non-local variables. The simplest fix is
to change the original WHEN to OPTS = 'X'
A strong concurrence. Generally eschew unquoted
A vendor has requested I update my GRS entries to the following statements:
RNLDEF RNL(CON) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSVTOC)
RNLDEF RNL(CON) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSZVVDS)
My current statements are:
RNLDEF RNL(EXCL) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSZVVDS)
RNLDEF RNL(EXCL) TYPE(GENERIC)
Oops - I forgot to add
We are z/OS V1.9 running 5 LPARs in a SYSPLEX all shared dasd.
A vendor has requested I update my GRS entries to the following statements:
RNLDEF RNL(CON) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSVTOC)
RNLDEF RNL(CON) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSZVVDS)
My current statements are:
Greg Shirey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The DUMPCONDITIONING parameter of the DFSMSdss COPY FULL command allows
both the source and target volumes to remain online after a full volume
copy operation, thus creating an interim copy for a subsequent dump to
tape that can be done using the same
Ron,
Thanks for the information. As I said in an earlier post, we don't have
DFDSS, so I can't do dumpconditioning. I will take your
statement, This is the problem with the 2nd LPAR backup method - it's
an accident waiting to happen., and show it to my boss. That might
be enough leverage
What tooling are bringing in that the vendor is going to be using TDMF, LDMF,
FDRPAS, FDRMOVE or something else?
You definitely need to treat SYSVTOC and SYSZVVDS the same.
I convert all RESERVEs now but previously converted these two to reduce impacts
of storage management activities. You
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 10:50:13 -0400, Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A vendor has requested I update my GRS entries to the following statements:
RNLDEF RNL(CON) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSVTOC)
RNLDEF RNL(CON) TYPE(GENERIC) QNAME(SYSZVVDS)
My current statements are:
RNLDEF
Sharon,
What error messages are you getting? Is it just the IBM1521I message?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lopez, Sharon
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S
Eric,
The answers will depend on your design. Will the 3rd system be a standalone
system that is only used for backup and restore, or do you want the existing
two systems to directly access the backup datasets for restore?
If it's the first case, then I would say you don't want to share
Mark,
I converted SYSVTOC, SYSVVDS and SYSIGGV2 on a three way MAS back when we
were still on parallel channels. The MIM file was on 3880-23 and really
loved that cache, but the benefits were substantial, especially during the
batch run hardware reserves on VTOCs and catalogs were a major pain.
I will probably dynamically add those QNAMES to MIM to manage for a night
during batch, monitor and turn them off again in the morning.
MIM (and GRS) is a lot more efficient in handling SYSVTOC and SYSVVDS, now.
When I first started using MIM (long before CA [or even Legent]), we were told
to
Converting SYSIGGV2 was to solve some soft embrace issues we were hitting.
There was an issue, years ago, with SYSIGGV2 and SYSVVDS.
It was to do with timing.
The accessing of the catalogue and the VVDS on the same pack was one after the
other.
Sometimes (rarely), another system would poke in
Hi,
in a few days version 7.17 of SHOWzOS will be available at www.cbttape.org
FILE#492
on the update site http://cbttape.org/updates.htm
This version includes support for z/OS R10.
What's new
*$717RS1107
* Implement
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA22267
Not new but Kathy Walsh talked about this HIPER APAR OA22267 in session 2500 at
SHARE in San Jose. It was closed about 10 months ago.
Multiple instances of TDUMP (Transaction Dump) can lead to central and aux
shortages and potentially
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 12:09:46 -0700, Ron Hawkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
I converted SYSVTOC, SYSVVDS and SYSIGGV2 on a three way MAS back when we
were still on parallel channels. The MIM file was on 3880-23 and really
loved that cache, but the benefits were substantial, especially during
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 20:01:06 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will probably dynamically add those QNAMES to MIM to manage for a night
during batch, monitor and turn them off again in the morning.
MIM (and GRS) is a lot more efficient in handling SYSVTOC and SYSVVDS, now.
When I first
In a MIM environment? How many systems? I know you like to measure things,
so did you measure it or was it just a gut feel.
It was a 5-way MIMplex that matched the SYSPLEX and the MAS. Control dataset in
the CF.
All processors were maxed out.
MIM was using about 2% of each image.
After the
Eric,
It would seem that when planning and budgeting for the storage upgrade, your
management failed to factor in what software would be required to leverage the
technology being acquired.
My thinking is that this was something that the IBM salesman might not have
addressed and his only concern
Yes, that's the only error message. I can get it to work with 0m and 60m. IBM
PL/I level 2 is telling me that the new compiler needs about 100m to run. It
will run with 6m on my 1.9 base system that was generated in Jan. 08. It
doesn't run with 6m after I applied 700+ ptfs to my 1.9 system.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Eric,
DFDSS should be part of DFSMS. FDR is a pay for.
No, DFSMSdss is a priced optional feature, presumably because of the
existence of at least one comparable ISV product (like FDR).
So you
Yes, that's the only error message. I can get it to work with 0m and 60m.
For storage below the 16M line, both 0M and 60M allocate all that's available.
(Actually, any figure above 16M allocates all below, unless you have an exit
controlling it).
So, how big is your below the line private.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kenneth E Tomiak
I wasn't joking when I jumped over Y2K and went to Y10K, it
has not caught on, but today is 09/05/02008. Why is everyone waiting?
Heck, by then we should be on the Star Date calendar. :-)
Similarly, DFSMShsm DFSMSrmm are priced optional features too.
Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory Services
Sydney, Australia
Asia/Pacific representatives for
Innovation Data Processing, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Stephen Mednick wrote:
Eric,
It would seem that when planning and budgeting for the storage upgrade, your
management failed to factor in what software would be required to leverage the
technology being acquired.
My thinking is that this was something that the IBM
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Stephen Mednick wrote:
Similarly, DFSMShsm DFSMSrmm are priced optional features too.
Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory Services
Sydney, Australia
as is DFSMStvs (transactional VSAM).
--
Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: An EIN stein.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]@sbcglobal.net, on
09/04/2008
at 09:57 AM, Ron Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rant on
Isn't it about time the ISMF developers realized that Mod 4 is not the
limit to the number of lines on a screen! G...
rant off
Especially since IBM has had ISPF support for 62 line
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/04/2008
at 07:04 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well, as unaccustomed to hearing me praise MVS as readers of this list
are, I have free choice between MVS and CMS. I rarely touch CMS:
While I refer to CMS as Clumsy Monitor System, I've wanted a
Ron,
Thanks for all the good information. We only have one Shark box. The Lpar I
am setting up will only be used for backups, and will probably be shut down the
rest of the week. Actually, I kind of like the idea of nothing shared. All we
would need would be a separate pool of 3590 tape
Thanks, you find the problem.
Now I remember I didn't quote X because I wanted the opts to be case
insensitive.
I'll choose another variable name for OUTTRAP statement.
Thanks again for your help.
在2008-09-06 21:07:09，Gerhard Postpischil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写道：
--- Neo wrote:
DO FOREVER
34 matches
Mail list logo
