Use this macro to copy one or multiples lines after N lines in a block
of lines(created by two labels)
1.Select the line(s) to copy by the C or CC/CC line command
2.create the block with two labels (.A and .B in different lines
command)
3. issue BETW 1 .A .B in the primary command to copy the
But is it an open manhole ?
__
Thomas Berg Specialist IT-U SWEDBANK
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Skickat: den 10 september 2008 19:45
Till:
I will be out of the office starting 09/10/2008 and will not return until
09/17/2008.
For Customer related requests please email MF Storage Mgmt
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
For IBM related requests please use the MF Storage Request Database.
Otherwise I will respond to your email upon my return
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/18/2008
at 04:16 PM, Big Iron [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A timer unit (or a CPU second)
A timer unit is a unit of time, not a unit of CPU consumption. It has
nothing to do with the SRM. It's also well and truly obsolete; I don't
know why they're still using it.
--
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/04/2008
at 04:40 AM, Victor Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is there a best practice?
Yes - don't.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/18/2008
at 08:10 PM, Jan Vanbrabant [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
IMS TYPE07 log record CPU timer-unit field, DLRTIME, indeed allows to
capture the CPU time used by a running transaction. This execution time
is expressed in so-called Timer Units (TU) .
Bletch!
TU is a
Every response to my query seems to have missed the point and put the cart
before the horse.
I don't disagree that it is desirable to have a list service for
name/tokens. What I question is the need.
Since a list service does not exist, it seems pretty clear to me that you
should not take an
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:44:37 -0300 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/10/2008
: at 05:52 PM, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:Not at all. One can cooperate without volunteering information.
:If I see you walking into an open manhole and say
It seems to me that people wouldn't have gone through the effort of writing
code to list name/tokens if there was an easier way to accomplish what they
needed. If vendors waited for IBM to produce GUPI interfaces for everything
they need, there would be no vendor code.
Bob Shannon
Rocket
As i see it, the need is the same as for
all other application data: debugging purposes.
(And maybe auditing needs.)
Regards,
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist IT-U SWEDBANK
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Creating the list of macros for the UCLIN step is a completely manual process -
I don't know a way to automatically do this and skip the UCLIN step. I would
be interested in hearing if someone else has a better idea!
You can use additional JCLIN to avoid the UCLIN. Specifically, if you
In a message dated 9/10/2008 6:20:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also you can hire a lawyer to sit in the conference room with you and the
auditors if you think it's going to escalate to that level of a conundrum.
Wouldn't that by itself be tantamount to
In a message dated 9/10/2008 6:20:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I see you walking into an open manhole and say nothing, is that
cooperation?
Insufficient information given to answer. E.g., how far away are you? How
fast is he walking? Is there someone
Sigh -- a sysprog is always expected to know how to do everyone else's
job better than they.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour
J.)
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 12:40 PM
Not even close; that's a classic false
I realize this is a bit off-topic, but perhaps someone is processing this file
and has this information or could point me to another source.
We are planning on using a download file from our credit card processor (Global
Payments, Inc) of our credit card activity. This is a fixed length,
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:54:30 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
And, BookManager format -- as rendered by Library Server -- provides the
all-important HTML via browser format. I can post a link to a manual
reference right here on IBM-MAIN and everyone can read it without having
to download some gigantic
Davis, Kriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I realize this is a bit off-topic, but perhaps someone is processing
this file and has this information or could point me to another source.
We are planning on using a download file from our credit card
This is a bizarre response, Peter. Several of us have documented our
need for a name/token list/search service, a need that we've felt
strongly enough about to actually go to the trouble of writing
complicated workarounds to your failure to fulfill that need. What
more do you want by way of
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:47:46 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Expanding upon Brian's example:
++USERMOD(HASPUEX) REWORK(2008159).
++VER (Z038) FMID(HJE7740).
++JCLIN.
//ASSEM01 EXEC PGM=IEV90
//SYSPUNCH DD DSN=amp;PUNCH(HASPUEX)
//SYSINDD *
(complete assembler source code
However, if you include the full source, won't SMP/E generate GENASM
entries for all macros, not just the JES2 ones? I think that the latter may
be the intent here. Also, will SMP/E detect macros that invoke other
macros, like the JES2 $MODULE macro commonly used in JES2 exits?
Maybe one could
This just came up. I've taken a fast look in the manual, but haven't seen
anything. Is there a way in DFSMShsm on z/OS 1.8 to segragate the migrated
datasets onto separate tape volumes, based upon the STORCLAS or STORGRP
assigned to the migrated dataset? What we want to do is to have a separate
thanks Brian
what MY unix folks are telling me is that there should be a '*' following
the last '/' at the end of the command - however - i when backed and looked
as far back as feb 2007 - the command executed successfully WITHOUT the '*'
at then end - i just never knew the command was there
(to
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:23:10 -0400, Chris Hoelscher wrote:
what MY unix folks are telling me is that there should be a '*' following
the last '/' at the end of the command - however - i when backed and looked
And what do they know? With the '*' it removes (most of) the contents
but leaves the
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:07:41 -0500, Arthur Gutowski wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:47:46 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Expanding upon Brian's example:
++USERMOD(HASPUEX) REWORK(2008159).
++VER (Z038) FMID(HJE7740).
++JCLIN.
//ASSEM01 EXEC PGM=IEV90
//SYSPUNCH DD
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:37:33 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
I've done something like this:
//SMPCNTL DD DATA,DLM=amp;amp;
Sorry about the mangling of the ampersands by the listserv's web interface.
This should be slightly better:
//SMPCNTL DD DATA,DLM=$$
++USERMOD(HASPUEX) REWORK(2008159).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Barry
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 6:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another ICETOOL challenge
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:07:16 -0500, Bass, Walter W
[EMAIL
I find that the new manual software offerings confusing and unusable.
When I installed z/OS 1.7, I copied the softcopy CD to my hard drive.
Identified those manuals (PDF form) that I would use by subject matter.
Copied them to an appropriate folder that were named according to
subject matter.
snip
This just came up. I've taken a fast look in the manual, but haven't
seen
anything. Is there a way in DFSMShsm on z/OS 1.8 to segragate the
migrated
datasets onto separate tape volumes, based upon the STORCLAS or STORGRP
assigned to the migrated dataset? What we want to do is to have a
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:54:09 -0700, Mark Yuhas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find that the new manual software offerings confusing and unusable.
When I installed z/OS 1.7, I copied the softcopy CD to my hard drive.
Identified those manuals (PDF form) that I would use by subject matter.
Copied them
I did try that. None of the macros called by $MODULE were detected
and GENASM'd. And getting the associated with the exit is the whole
point of the exercise.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Big Iron
Sent: Thursday,
Anybody know when the Softcopy librarian September 2008 books will
available. I would like to download the z/OS 1.10 books but not one by one.
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
Sent: 11 September 2008 17:24
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS Documentation - again
On Thu, 11 Sep
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:26:05 -0700, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did try that. None of the macros called by $MODULE were detected
and GENASM'd. And getting the associated with the exit is the whole
point of the exercise.
What in you code those macros in a dsect? Or maybe in some
We use an IBM VTS and also use OpenTech's Tapecopy/VDR. I direct all our
ML2 tapes to a special vault code - DRH2. Our other virtual DR tapes get
sent to other DR* vault codes. TapeCopy/VDR is set up to sweep up all the
DR vault codes and then stacks like vault codes together on our 3592
What if SMP/E automatically (with an option) used the ADATA for this
and perhaps other purposes?
I try to use computers as computers. Manually building special JCLIN (or
for that matter code that is never actually assembled) is asking for
trouble down the road when the real code changes and the
I have a need to turn off TSO broadcast msg's being sent...
Why?
The easiest is to remove the NOTIFY keyword from the JCL.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
not jcl---started task and nje's is my main concern...
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
I have a need to turn off TSO broadcast msg's being sent...
Why?
The easiest is to remove the NOTIFY keyword from the JCL.
That might be simplest, but not necessarily easiest (how many 1000s
of jobs
not jcl---started task and nje's is my main concern...
Started Tasks and NJE is JCL.
Why are you notifying from started tasks?
Why do you want to stop it?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
My shop is now the proud owner of a HDS 9990V. We are however novices in the
use of TDMF which the vendor has proposed as the transfer agent between our old
and new DASD.
Can anyone point me to TDMF documentation?
Has anyone run into any issues using TDMF on live data?
Any issues with HSM
Ron -
If you are referring to the MVS SE commands that are issued to tell the TSO
user that a job has been added to the job queue or output queue on a remote
NJE node, we eliminate them by using our automated operations package
to cancel the SE command. A very long time ago, I had asked IBM
My shop is now the proud owner of a HDS 9990V. We are however novices in the
use of TDMF which the vendor has proposed as the transfer agent between our
old and new DASD.
Most of the time, the vendor includes conversion as part of the acquisition.
If he didn't, or you negotiated it out, you're
David,
My shop is now the proud owner of a HDS 9990V. We are however
novices in the use of TDMF which the vendor has proposed as the
transfer agent between our old and new DASD.
Can anyone point me to TDMF documentation?
Has anyone run into any issues using TDMF on live data?
Any issues
Not being very good with the Unix stuff, can some kind sole help me with this?
UA41051 HOT7740 GIM23911E 19 LINK-EDIT PROCESSING FAILED FOR MODULE
FSUMXCPI IN LMOD FSUMSCPI IN THE SFSUMBIN
LIBRARY. THE RETURN CODE WAS 12. THE
SEQUENCE NUMBER
I believe that IBM is now the owner of TDMF.
I don't remember what name IBM has given their version of the product
James (Jim) Chappell
503 745-7841
503 349-5603(cell)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daimler Trucks North America LLC
If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately
Thanks Edward.
I have already constructed a REXX to access to Spool via FTP ...
I have managed to copy a SYSOUT to PDS.
Thanks again.
Atte.
Alvaro Quintupray.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ingenieria de Sistema.
Fono: (562) 420-8149
Fax:(562) 420-8017
-Mensaje original-
De: IBM
Make sure that you have DDDEF entries for SFSUMBIN and SIOEHLMD that
point to valid datasets or USS files.
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday,
Looks like you don't have the permission for that directory or file. The
EF036032 reason code indicates your userid does not have the authority or
permissions to access that file.
Scott Evans
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:08:34 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:
SMPE Help
Hi,
How can I change the default INTRDR assignments for ISPF to
//? DD sysout=(A,INTRDR),DEST=DUMMY
Summary: I want to change the default print location of all jobs to DUMMY
without inserting a route print card into every job submitted.
Anton
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Not being very good with the Unix stuff, can some kind sole help me with this?
Then my zFS root file gets
IOEZ00337E zFS kernel: non-terminating exception 2C3 occurred, reason
EA66010D abend psw 477C1400 98E28C9E IEA794I SVC DUMP HAS
Jim, John, Ted, Thank you for your responses.
Yes, the data conversion is part of the package, we just had some questions as
to how the process worked.
Regards,
Dave O'Brien
From: Ted MacNEIL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 9/11/2008 2:54 PM
To:
On 11 Sep 2008 11:15:21 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John) wrote:
Why?
The easiest is to remove the NOTIFY keyword from the JCL.
That might be simplest, but not necessarily easiest (how many 1000s
of jobs might have to be changed?).
That's when it's good to have someone who knows REXX.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Anton Britz wrote:
Hi,
How can I change the default INTRDR assignments for ISPF to
//? DD sysout=(A,INTRDR),DEST=DUMMY
Summary: I want to change the default print location of all jobs to DUMMY
without inserting a route print card into every job
ok---I'll get back to problem
broadcast filing up with msg's that report(s) numerious of them
have been transefered via NJE and it notifies our CA7 of success..
how can I stop SEND/Notifies being sent to ca7 and filing up broadcast
dataset?
assuming ca7 has a tso id...
job that
Limit the number of concurrent volumes you move with TDMF (probably 5 volumes).
It is a parameter in TDMF. This is very important for I/O intensive volumes
For JES2 checkpoint, you need to be careful. Read the book or work with z/OS
support group on this. If you move one volume/one checkpoint
I do have the ROOT mounted R/W
I did not change my service directory from when it was last used in July with
the first pass of maint.
I will open an ETR with IBM but had hopes that someone else may have already
run across this problem.
The ID I am running under is already Super User so I
David,
My shop is now the proud owner of a HDS 9990V. We are however
novices in the use of TDMF which the vendor has proposed as the
transfer agent between our old and new DASD.
Can anyone point me to TDMF documentation?
Has anyone run into any issues using TDMF on live data?
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:53:29 -0700, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if SMP/E automatically (with an option) used the ADATA for this
and perhaps other purposes?
I try to use computers as computers. Manually building special JCLIN (or
for that matter code that is never actually
broadcast filing up with msg's that
You can prevent the dataset from filling up. Submit a batch TSO job that
issues a LISTBC command. It will pull from broadcast dataset and write to
SYSTSPRT file of the job.
Pedro Vera
We are currently going from one EMC Storage array to another. We are running
their product zMigrator which is LDMF which is based on TDMF.
Basically we have not had any issues moving live volumes with this utility.
Our applications (DB2 and CICS) are up and running while their data is being
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:00:57 -0400, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not being very good with the Unix stuff, can some kind sole help me with this?
UA41051 HOT7740 GIM23911E 19 LINK-EDIT PROCESSING FAILED FOR MODULE
FSUMXCPI IN LMOD FSUMSCPI IN THE SFSUMBIN
We are not doing anything. The vendor is controlling all of the migration.
We monitored the first few migrations, then we left them alone.
The jobs ran in the background, and nobody noticed.
Of course, it helped that we were moving from ESCON to FICON.
The only issue was we couldn't migrate
Limit the number of concurrent volumes you move with TDMF (probably 5
volumes). It is a parameter in TDMF. This is very important for I/O intensive
volumes
We didn't have problems, and each job moved 50 at a time. We did have high I/O
intensity.
For JES2 checkpoint, you need to be careful.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:14:20 -0500, scott evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like you don't have the permission for that directory or file. The
EF036032 reason code indicates your userid does not have the authority or
permissions to access that file.
It was EF036052 not EF036032 .
--
One further question:
We currently use FDR to backup our Z/VM and Linux volumes.
Since the volumes are accessible to Z/os, will we be able to move VM and Linux
volumes using TDMF?
Thanks,
Dave
We currently use FDR to backup our Z/VM and Linux volumes.
Since the volumes are accessible to Z/os, will we be able to move VM and Linux
volumes using TDMF?
You have a vendor supplied consultant doing the moves.
Why don't you ask them?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
I was not aware of the technique explained below by Kurt Quackenbush - I
always learn something when I post to IBM-MAIN - Thanks!
However, in a JES2 user exit environment, with JES2's particular sensitivity to
exact JES2 macro expansions, Dave points out that when using Kurt's
suggestion, the
I went back and re-read, realizing it may be time for me to get glasses. Not
a whole lot of information regarding a 6052, I even checked on IBMLink. If
the dismount/remount doesn't shake it loose of the error, definitely sounds
like a PMR. It was EF036052 not EF036032 . -- Mark Zelden
under my tso I can issue ptofile nointercom and it stops.
guess I'm missing something on ca7 ...
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged
What makes you think that we haven't? We have. Their responsiveness is less
than desired, besides the accumulated experience on this Listserv gives me a
better sense of peace of mind than a vendor's assertion.
The vendor in this case is not HDS. Just want to make that clear to protect the
David,
One further question:
We currently use FDR to backup our Z/VM and Linux volumes.
Since the volumes are accessible to Z/os, will we be able to move VM
and Linux volumes using TDMF?
Thanks,
Dave
Dang, you made me look at the manual. The name of the manual is
Installation and
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:21:58 +, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a specious argument,
No, you just don't understand it.
I don't know why I occasionally bother with you and your insults.
But, you're wrong!
because my e-mail client (and many oithers) can be set to receive
text
Thanks John, Hopefully at some point I'll have access to the manual.
From: John Kington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 9/11/2008 4:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TDMF Questions
David,
One further question:
We currently use FDR to backup
I can generate or manually build the JCLIN, but I still don't get a MOD
entry for my exit that will eliminate the GIM44402W message.
*NONAME* ASM IEV90ASSM ZJ01USEP ASSEMUPDATED ASSEMBLER
INPUT REPLACED
$ENTRY MAC
Thanks John, Hopefully at some point I'll have access to the manual.
Unless you're going to become a TDMF expert, why do you need access to the
manual?
That's what your expert's for.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For
What makes you think that we haven't? We have. Their responsiveness is less
than desired, besides the accumulated experience on this Listserv gives me a
better sense of peace of mind than a vendor's assertion. The vendor in this
case is not HDS. Just want to make that clear to protect the
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:29:17 -0500, scott evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went back and re-read, realizing it may be time for me to get glasses.
Not a whole lot of information regarding a 6052, I even checked on IBMLink.
If the dismount/remount doesn't shake it loose of the error, definitely
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 07:28:24 -0400, Peter Relson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I don't disagree that it is desirable to have a list service for
name/tokens. What I question is the need.
Since a list service does not exist, it seems pretty clear to me that you
should not take an approach that
Hi all !!!
Anybody know about to use the RMF Spreadsheet Reporter in windows and
Host.I need to make a graphical reports based in RMF of CPU, DASD,
STORAGE, PAGING and so on...
Thanks any help
Arueira /Barnack
Support Team z/OS
under my tso I can issue ptofile nointercom and it stops.
I think you will stop seeing them, but network job status messages are
still queued for you in your broadcast dataset. They are there until you
issue LISTBC NON (often done as part of your logon process).
Pedro Vera
Well, I've got the extract of the macros from ADATA working, now I'm
trying to figure out how to pull the CSECT(s) or what ever I need on
that first line of ASM JCLIN, from the ADATA.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian
--snip---
For documentation, and if book manager is out, that means I will have to
content with the pdf files. :-( But I don't have to like it.
---unsnip--
Complete agreement, Barb.
It appears I was wrong and I offer my apologies to IDP again. FDR
is't a product I install here. I took the installers word for what I
claimed and did not check further. Actually, Innovation is sending me
another CD for myself (Thanks Pat) and I am sorry if my remarks caused
anyone to doubt the
Hi,
You can find the tool at
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/rmf/tools/. You can review
the tutorial if you click on overview mid-way down the page. It will not
work with Xcel 2007.
Good luck.
Jorge Arueira Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news: [EMAIL
In a message dated 9/11/2008 5:01:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can review the tutorial if you click on overview mid-way down the
page. It will not work with Xcel 2007.
Right. It's just a series of EXCEL or LOTUS macros defined to do RMF window
of a few
--snip--
It appears I was wrong and I offer my apologies to IDP again. FDR is't a
product I install here. I took the installers word for what I claimed
and did not check further. Actually, Innovation is sending me another CD
for
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
Reading between the lines I see you saying Submit a Requirement
and justify it. Maybe that requirement should come from users of
the tools that currently use the unsupported techniques. They
would be the ones hurt when the unsupported
I will be out of the office starting 09/11/2008 and will not return until
09/15/2008.
I will respond to your message when I return.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
Been trying to figure this one out in the manuals and searching the net,
but no luck.
I have a few transaction name groups for my JES2 batch jobs. So far, in
general, things have worked pretty well, but suddenly there is a
Production job that someone wants to run at Discretionary. Of course
See how much region was used by looking at the IEF374I message VIRT and EXT
numbers for when it works and when it fails.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lopez, Sharon
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:46 PM
To:
Have you looked at the IKJTSOxx member in PARMLIB.
Maybe there is an option in the SEND section that might help.
Subject: Re: TSO broadcast
ok---I'll get back to problem
broadcast filing up with msg's that report(s) numerious of them
have been transefered via NJE and it notifies our
I wonder if sub-rule in the Classification Rules will help?
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:09 AM, John Mattson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Been trying to figure this one out in the manuals and searching the net,
but no luck.
I have a few transaction name groups for my JES2 batch jobs. So far, in
John,
If the job has a constant name, just insert a TN rule for that job
preceding the TNG for the rest.
HTH,
Steve Samson (Yes, I'm still around and lurking)
John Mattson wrote:
Been trying to figure this one out in the manuals and searching the net,
but no luck.
I have a few transaction
- CWNA Certified Wireless Network Administrator
Offi...http://www.booktube.info/2008/08/cwna-certified-wireless-network.html
- Microsoft Office Project Server 2007 The Complete
...http://www.booktube.info/2008/08/microsoft-office-project-server-2007.html
- Microsoft Office Access 2007
Although I was instructed by monotone to report the error, as attached,
I also want to report a different bug.
When it starts up, monotone does not check for the existence of the
directory ~/.monotone.
It does not complain, and it does not silently try to build the
directory.
Instead, at the end
94 matches
Mail list logo
