Re: How often IPL a production LPAR (any good practice)

2009-09-09 Thread Ron Hawkins
Tim, I was based in both Hong Kong and Singapore from 1993 until 2007, and I've worked all through that hemisphere except Japan (though I work for a Japanese company). I think I know a bit about IT and Mainframe in the Asia market :-) Ron -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe

Re: Library Lookaside

2009-09-09 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
How do you mean? We are talking about caching directories. VLF caches objects (loadmodules, clists, catalog entries etc.), not directory entries. This is LLA's job. Kees. Chris Craddock crashlu...@gmail.com wrote in message news:b0c6f15b0909082121k3a99a39fu8490f3b5297f3...@mail.gmail.com...

Query about DATACLAS from program

2009-09-09 Thread Miklos Szigetvari
Hi Any program interface to query, if a dataset has a DATACLAS or not ? -- Miklos Szigetvari Development Team ISIS Information Systems Gmbh tel: (+43) 2236 27551 570 Fax: (+43) 2236 21081 E-mail: miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com Info: i...@isis-papyrus.com Hotline: +43-2236-27551-111

Re: Library Lookaside

2009-09-09 Thread Ron Hawkins
Chris, Isn't it LLA that does all the heavy lifting? The CPU time and IO counts certainly suggest it. I read it as LLA that measures Fetch Performance and decides what objects will be placed in the CSVLLA and VLF just acts as a container for the CSVLLA Dataspaces. I also read a few weeks ago

Re: Query about DATACLAS from program

2009-09-09 Thread Rob Scott
IGGCSI00 - see the DFSMS Managing Catalogs manual Rob Scott Developer Rocket Software 275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA Tel: +1.617.614.2305 Email: rsc...@rs.com Web: www.rocketsoftware.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: Sysplex Basic Question

2009-09-09 Thread Barbara Nitz
Eric, Can you set up a sysplex so that both machines have everything running on each CPU in the plex, and when one system crashes the other will automatically take over everything? In theory: Yes. With the exception of the running transaction. That one will get terminated. I said 'in theory',

Re: Query about DATACLAS from program

2009-09-09 Thread Miklos Szigetvari
Hi Yes, I'm using IGGCSI00, but the question is for a nonexsiting dataset, can I decide , it has DATACLAS, and will get DATACLAS paramters (as it is defined) or I have to define default DCB paramters Rob Scott wrote: IGGCSI00 - see the DFSMS Managing Catalogs manual Rob Scott

Re: CA-VIEW (SARBCH)

2009-09-09 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:37:35 -0300 carlos roberto visconde cvisco...@ig.com.br wrote: :You d`ont have authorization (RACF). RACF does not cause an S047. The program requires APF and is being invoked in such a way that it is not receiving it. :2009/9/8 Gerry Anstey gerry.ans...@jpmorgan.com : :

Re: Library Lookaside

2009-09-09 Thread Martin Packer
IIRC it's BOTH LLA and VLF that do the heavy lifting... LLA buffers directories in its own address space and passes modules via class CSVLLA to VLF. That's how I learnt it in 1988. It may have changed since then but - as it's an area I have a special interest in - I'd hope to have caught any

Re: Query about DATACLAS from program

2009-09-09 Thread Rob Scott
There might be a way to do this with the SMS SSI interface (I am not sure) - however this is a licensed interface and not available to normal customers. I should also point out that IGWASMS is an alternate to using IGGCSI00 - but again this depends on the dataset actually existing. You can use

Re: DYNAMNBR

2009-09-09 Thread R.S.
Paul Gilmartin pisze: I see: 16.6.2 z/OS V1R7.0 MVS JCL Reference ___ 16.6 DYNAMNBR Parameter 16.6.2 Subparameter Definition n Specifies a value used to calculate the maximum number of data

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread George Rodriguez
The only reason we did that was because the conversion of one release to another started almost 2.5 years ago. Remember that I said that the problem wasn't the installation of the system but rather the application testing. That's what took us so long to go from v1.4 to v1.7. Thanks for all

Re: Query about DATACLAS from program

2009-09-09 Thread Miklos Szigetvari
Hi Thank you Rob The problem occurs with C/C++ runtime, as it assigns some default DCB attribs to a newly created dataset If I would know if it gets theDCB attribs from theDATACLASS or not I, I can decide to set the defults to ZERO(i.e. let DATACLAS) or set some other defaults. Rob Scott

Re: Sysplex Basic Question

2009-09-09 Thread Richards, Robert B.
Eric, IIRC from my last company, we had redundancy across two CECs using CICS and DB2 data sharing. It was configured in such a way as to be able to take a hit on one CEC and keep on trucking. We provided multiple, identical, concurrently operating CICS regions and DB2 subsystems to which CICS

Re: Sysplex Basic Question

2009-09-09 Thread Scott Chapman
Yes, but there are some significant caveats. First off, the users that are logged on to the CICS TOR on the failing system will be knocked off and have to log back on. Assuming there's a VTAM generic in place, that should be no big deal--they'll get directed to the surviving TOR and can

Re: Seperate LPARs for Prod and Test or a single LPAR for both

2009-09-09 Thread Scott Chapman
By test do you mean sysprog test or application test? I'm a firm believer that you need a sysprog sandbox to install the latest releases and try out new things. We actually have a separate sandbox sysplex so any sysplex-wide things we might need to play with won't affect production. However,

Use of RETAIN

2009-09-09 Thread Daniel McLaughlin
OK...I'm a bit baffled and readily admit it. I've created an EXEC in REXX to create a 12 step job to dump 420 DASD volumes to one 3592. Step one runs along fine and stacks all the volumes, 35 of them, fine in the first step. When the next step starts it belches on the tape so I know it's not

Re: Use of RETAIN

2009-09-09 Thread Tim Brown
fyi, heres what I use, I just have 10 vols but same concept Just pass the dasd volser to the proc. //DUMPVOL PROC //DISK1DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=VOL1.,DISP=SHR //DISK2DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=VOL2.,DISP=SHR //DISK10 DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=VOL10.,DISP=SHR //TAPE1DD

Re: Use of RETAIN

2009-09-09 Thread Daniel McLaughlin
OK...I think I see that retain needs to be on each TAPE DD card and refer to the previous step. I thought once I declared that on the first tape statement in the next step that each tape within that step would automatically grab the tape. vol=(,retain,prev.step.tape) on first file, second

Re: Use of RETAIN

2009-09-09 Thread Tim Brown
Mine is a one step job ! Step01 is the only step. Tim -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]on Behalf Of Daniel McLaughlin Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 7:48 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Use of RETAIN OK...I think I see

Re: Use of RETAIN

2009-09-09 Thread Daniel McLaughlin
I see the pattern though and will try it out...thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: Query about DATACLAS from program

2009-09-09 Thread John Kington
Miklos, The problem occurs with C/C++ runtime, as it assigns some default DCB attribs to a newly created dataset If I would know if it gets theDCB attribs from theDATACLASS or not I, I can decide to set the defults to ZERO(i.e. let DATACLAS) or set some other defaults. Would it be possible for

WEBCAST: Transaction Segregation and Security for IBM-Supplied CICS Transactions

2009-09-09 Thread Doc Farmer
NewEra Software will be hosting two webcasts in September to discuss Transaction Segregation and Security for IBM-Supplied CICS Transactions. The webcast will feature Doc Farmer, Senior Security Specialist at InfoSec, Inc. and a member of NewEra's Security Advisory Board, and will touch on

Re: Use of RETAIN

2009-09-09 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 9/9/2009 6:48:17 A.M. Central Daylight Time, daniel_mclaugh...@us.crawco.com writes: The fog is lifting a little. Beware falling rocks? Should be preceding step in all instances. //STEP02 EXEC BACKUP,DDPREP=STEP01,DDLAB=2 //STEP03 EXEC

Re: Use of RETAIN

2009-09-09 Thread Scott Barry
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 06:31:27 -0500, Daniel McLaughlin daniel_mclaugh...@us.crawco.com wrote: OK...I'm a bit baffled and readily admit it. I've created an EXEC in REXX to create a 12 step job to dump 420 DASD volumes to one 3592. Step one runs along fine and stacks all the volumes, 35 of them, fine

Re: Sysplex Basic Question

2009-09-09 Thread Staller, Allan
snip Can you set up a sysplex so that both machines have everything running on each CPU in the plex, and when one system crashes the other will automatically take over everything? Say you have SYSA and SYSB /snip YES! It takes some work and some money. There are application changes to be made to

Re: CA-VIEW (SARBCH)

2009-09-09 Thread Staller, Allan
AFAIK, CALL cannot be used from TSO for APF authorized execution, because the TSO CALL command is not authorized. Check the CBT tape. I know there are a few programs there that will do what you want to accomplish, an APF authorized CALL. snip I do this every day. I use CALL with the fully

z/OS 1.11 (and COBOL 4.2) new features summary

2009-09-09 Thread Steve Comstock
Here's something I've been doing on an annual basis for the last four or five years. Hope you find it interesting / helpful. Feel free to pass it on to your people if you think they might find it useful... I've been updating all the courses I'm responsible for to reflect changes brought about

Re: Query about DATACLAS from program

2009-09-09 Thread Miklos Szigetvari
Hi John Kington wrote: Miklos, The problem occurs with C/C++ runtime, as it assigns some default DCB attribs to a newly created dataset If I would know if it gets theDCB attribs from theDATACLASS or not I, I can decide to set the defults to ZERO(i.e. let DATACLAS) or set some other

Re: z/VM GDDM install

2009-09-09 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:43:57 +0200, J D Cassidy s...@jdcassidy.net wrote: I am looking for a document with the title How to activate GDDM-REXX LY33-6080. The various references to the above on IBM's websites comes back with 'document not found'.. Since you are licensed and the product is still

Re: Seperate LPARs for Prod and Test or a single LPAR for both

2009-09-09 Thread Clark, Kevin
GSG, It seems on the surface to be a prudent topology to have dedicated resources for production (1 LPAR) and isolation from TEST/DEVL workloads (another LPAR). WLM has made significant inroads into controlling workloads on a single LPAR, so there are no real resource distribution issues. With

Re: CA-VIEW (SARBCH)

2009-09-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:39:01 -0500, Staller, Allan wrote: AFAIK, CALL cannot be used from TSO for APF authorized execution, because the TSO CALL command is not authorized. Check the CBT tape. I know there are a few programs there that will do what you want to accomplish, an APF authorized CALL.

Re: UNNUM

2009-09-09 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 3:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: UNNUM On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:50:45 -0400, Pinnacle wrote: I've always used NUM

Re: z/OS 1.11 (and COBOL 4.2) new features summary

2009-09-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 06:44:40 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote: * Apparently the new FILEDATA=RECORD and EATTR did not make the ALLOCATE command, although they did make JCL There ought to be a Requirement for this, and for support by BPXWDYN. * TSO: with LOGONHERE support, you can logon /

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:30:35 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.com wrote: My question is why waste the time/effort to go to from v1.4 to v1.7 only to get one year of support when going to v1.8 would seem to be the same time/effort and would result in a number of years of support. It is

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread Walter Marguccio
- Original Message From: George Rodriguez rodrigu...@palmbeach.k12.fl.us The only problem with this method is that I sometimes need a wait between commands... Is there anyone else using this method? If not, are you willing to share whatever you use? For startup, as well as shutdown,

HSM: ABACKUP

2009-09-09 Thread Arturo
I would like to know if anyone is aware of a command that can be issued in real time to display what dataset is being backed up by ABACKUP while it’s executing. Example: Job issues: SUBMIT ABACKUP(X) EXEC AGGREGATE X is backing up 200 datasets. But job J needs file z

Re: z/OS 1.11 (and COBOL 4.2) new features summary

2009-09-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 06:44:40 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote: * New FILEDATA type for z/OS UNIX files: FILEDATA=RECORD creates files with each record having a four byte prefix (x'00' followed by three byte record length) Of course, this is incompatible with a similar facility in FTP, isn't

Re: z/OS 1.11 (and COBOL 4.2) new features summary

2009-09-09 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 9:23 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: z/OS 1.11 (and COBOL 4.2) new features summary On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 06:44:40 -0600,

XML system services error

2009-09-09 Thread Steve Comstock
I'm trying to process a schema using the xsdosrg command from XML system services. Here's what happens: === xsdosrg -v -o /u/scomsto/schema1.osr /u/scomsto/schema1.xsd OSR file: /u/scomsto/schema1.osr Number of schemas: 1 Schema file: /u/scomsto/schema1.xsd [--- Calling gxluInitOSRG ---]

Re: Sysplex Basic Question

2009-09-09 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:42:25 -0500, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com wrote: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:11:25 -0400, Joel Wolpert j...@perfconsultant.com wrote: If I recall correctly there is a big hit (10-20% overhead) for the first 2 systems in a sysplex when doing DB2 datasharing. After that the

Re: XML system services error

2009-09-09 Thread Bernd Oppolzer
I don't know what xsdosrg is, but there are such a lot of variants of schema syntax possibilities that I always find it a good idea to check XSD schemas with XSD validators which are available across the web for free. I have written such a program by myself, generating from the XSD another

Re: z/VM GDDM install

2009-09-09 Thread Tony Harminc
2009/9/9 Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:43:57 +0200, J D Cassidy s...@jdcassidy.net wrote: I am looking for a document with the title How to activate GDDM-REXX LY33-6080. The various references to the above on IBM's websites comes back with 'document not found'..

Re: z/OS 1.11 (and COBOL 4.2) new features summary

2009-09-09 Thread Clark Morris
On 9 Sep 2009 07:39:14 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 9:23 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: z/OS 1.11 (and COBOL

Re: XML system services error

2009-09-09 Thread Erik Janssen
Hello Steve, XML System Services User's Guide and Reference should give the answer. http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r10/index.jsp? topic=/com.ibm.zos.r10.gxla100/gosc.htm In your case 7067 means: Unable to load the specified schema. So there is must be a problem with your schema

CONVERTV to NONSMS error

2009-09-09 Thread Jim McAlpine
I'm getting the following error converting a volume to nonsms - ADR497E (001)-CATLG(05), A CATALOG ERROR OCCURRED WHILE CONVERTING CLUSTER DB2C.DSNDBC.DSNDB06.DSNOFX02.I0001.A001 TO NONSMS. RETURN CODE IS 048, REASON CODE IS EC-128 the IDC3009I message says the following

XML System Services - different error

2009-09-09 Thread Steve Comstock
Solved the first problem. Too embarassing to admit. Anyway, still not there. Now we get: === xsdosrg -v -o schema1.osr schema1.xsd OSR file: schema1.osr Number of schemas: 1 Schema file: schema1.xsd [--- Calling gxluInitOSRG ---] [--- Calling gxluLoadSchema ---] #1 FATAL -

Re: z/OS 1.11 (and COBOL 4.2) new features summary

2009-09-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:59:34 -0300, Clark Morris wrote: Sigh. Conway's law strikes again. Yeah - why IBM didn't make FILEDATA=RECORD have the same format as VB really upsets me. This new one basically prefixes a logical record with a fullword length in the range of 0..1677215 instead of VB's

Re: XML System Services - different error

2009-09-09 Thread Erik Janssen
Hello Steve, My guess is: Get rid of the / in line 08, so xsd:element name=itemName type=xsd:string minOccurs=0 Regards, Erik Janssen. 08 xsd:element name=itemName type=xsd:string minOccurs=0/ 09 xsd:simpleType 10 xsd:restriction base=xsd:nonNegativeInteger 11

Re: XML System Services - different error

2009-09-09 Thread Bernd Oppolzer
The xsd:element in line 8 is an empty tag, so the xsd:element in line 14 is wrong. This is why the error occurs. The xsd:element in line 8 should not be an empty tag. Regards, Bernd Steve Comstock schrieb: Solved the first problem. Too embarassing to admit. Anyway, still not there. Now we

Re: Seperate LPARs for Prod and Test or a single LPAR for both

2009-09-09 Thread Natarajan Mohan
GSG, There is no reason to run system in basic mode anymore. I am sure you have configured your system in LPAR Mode. I don't think one answer would suffice for your request. What type of machine are you running on? how many mips? uni-processor? In the minimum you would need a system test

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip--- There is VTAMAPPL. We use that, it has PAUSE nn etc. Use it to start all our STCs and put appropriate PAUSEs in the commands. Also used to automate shutdown.

Re: Sysplex Basic Question

2009-09-09 Thread Eric Bielefeld
Thanks Barbara, Bob, and Scott. Your replies refreshed my memory and answered my questions. I thought of the fact that you have to make application changes to fully implement the takeover, but I didn't think of it until after I posted my question. As Barbara pointed out, setting up

Re: Seperate LPARs for Prod and Test or a single LPAR for both

2009-09-09 Thread Doc Farmer
Pros: Cheap Cons: Higher risk to production data being copied/misused. Cons: Higher risk to production data if test programs used against it. Cons: Serious complaints from internal/external auditors. Cons: Potentially violates segregation of duties. Cons: Potentially violates need to know access

Re: Use of RETAIN

2009-09-09 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip- OK...I'm a bit baffled and readily admit it. I've created an EXEC in REXX to create a 12 step job to dump 420 DASD volumes to one 3592. Step one runs along fine and stacks all the volumes, 35 of them, fine in the first step.

Re: z/OS 1.11 (and COBOL 4.2) new features summary

2009-09-09 Thread Kirk Wolf
FYI - here's an APAR describing the new function: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA25204 What is interesting to me is that it looks like the word containing the record length *does not* add 4 for the length of the prefix word itself. This is astonishing, since it is otherwise

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread George Rodriguez
Thanks for all the input suggestions that you've all provided. When I presented the idea to my co-worker, he very graciously said to me, why not keep it simple? I'll start VTAM and TCPIP and once both are up, we'll tell the Operator to enter the command S IVPRDR,M=STARTUP. To which my answer was,

ICF Catalog Backup Strategy

2009-09-09 Thread Richard Sandford
For D/R, we are using fdr and flashcopy to dupe our production dasd, then back it up to tape later in the night. As the datasets on these vols are in all different user-catalogs, how can we keep these flashed vols in line with the ICF catalogs. Do we need to flash them also? If so how would

Re: How often IPL a production LPAR (any good practice)

2009-09-09 Thread Guy Gardoit
Another point to consider is hardware maintenance. We schedule MCL upgrades to each machine once a quarter - each machine in a different quarter. MCL upgrades may or may not require IPLs (or PORs).If you have multiple machines in a correctly designed parallel sysplex, the effect may be less

Re: JES3 CONSTD SYN= and PLEXSYN=

2009-09-09 Thread Arthur Gutowski
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:43:32 -0500, Santosh Kandi ska...@ti.com wrote: Ed, we are on z/OS 1.9, with 2 jesplexes in a Parallel sysplex. CONSTD,EDIT=(],^,;,@),SYN=(8,*),PLEXSYN=(%) D OPDATA(snip): * JES3 J12SYSTEMNO PURGE * JES3 J11SYSTEM

Re: ICF Catalog Backup Strategy

2009-09-09 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip--- For D/R, we are using fdr and flashcopy to dupe our production dasd, then back it up to tape later in the night. As the datasets on these vols are in all different user-catalogs, how can we keep these flashed vols in line

Re: Seperate LPARs for Prod and Test or a single LPAR for both

2009-09-09 Thread Ted MacNEIL
There is no reason to run system in basic mode anymore. Especially since basic mode is no longer supported (z/990 and later, I believe). - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: ICF Catalog Backup Strategy

2009-09-09 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Segregate your production datasets/non-prod datasets into separate user catalogs and make sure the production catalogs are on volumes being flashed/backed up/restored at the hotsite? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of

Re: XML System Services - different error - solved

2009-09-09 Thread Steve Comstock
Bernd Oppolzer wrote: The xsd:element in line 8 is an empty tag, so the xsd:element in line 14 is wrong. This is why the error occurs. The xsd:element in line 8 should not be an empty tag. Regards, Bernd Thanks, Bernd, and Erik too. However, when I do that I then get: ERROR:

TSSO use of NETVIEW

2009-09-09 Thread Ward, Mike S
Hello all, I thought I had read that TSSO uses or used part of Netview ICCF I think. Is this still true? == This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread Howard Rifkind
In my comment what I should have made clear was that on the older system everything is in sync with the older level and the newer system everything in in sync for the upgraded system. If I didn't make that clear then I should have...sorry about that. --- On Wed, 9/9/09, Mark Zelden

Re: TSSO use of NETVIEW

2009-09-09 Thread Chris Mason
Mike There's a touch of Are you *still* beating your wife? about this! a. NetView is a rather large set of programs which includes the capability to set up system automation such that you can have totally silent running (with the aid of the MPF function). I know because I used to do this with

Re: TSSO use of NETVIEW

2009-09-09 Thread Ward, Mike S
OOPS, I meant to key NCCF and stuck an I in there by mistake. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Mason Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 2:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: TSSO use of NETVIEW Mike There's

SDSF Display Active Server Indicator

2009-09-09 Thread Ruegsegger, Jeff
Can someone advise as to what exactly the SDSF Display active panel column SERVER indicates. The help states: Indicates if resource goals are being met. I've sent an ETR to IBM but since I don't have Q A support they are trying to get me to pay for clarification of their documentation.

Re: z/OS 1.11 (and COBOL 4.2) new features summary

2009-09-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:15:07 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote: FYI - here's an APAR describing the new function: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA25204 What is interesting to me is that it looks like the word containing the record length *does not* add 4 for the length of the prefix word

How to define stand-alone 3590 tape drives in SMS?

2009-09-09 Thread Wayne Bileci
Would anyone be able to tell me the specifics of how to define the necessary SMS constructs SG,SC,DC to define and use one or two stand alone 3590 tape drives in SMS. The 3590 needs to get allocated preferably for a scratch request based on ACS datasetname filtering? Thank You, Wayne

Re: SDSF Display Active Server Indicator

2009-09-09 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ruegsegger, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 3:22 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: SDSF Display Active Server Indicator Can someone advise as to what exactly the SDSF

Re: How to define stand-alone 3590 tape drives in SMS?

2009-09-09 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Wayne Bileci Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 3:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: How to define stand-alone 3590 tape drives in SMS? Would anyone be able to tell me the

Sytem Managed Buffering

2009-09-09 Thread gsg
We are looking at implementing SMB and I'm wondering how do you know if SMB is kicking in for a dataset? Is there a message stating SMB is active for this dataset? Also, is there any problems with SMB and datasets that are used by CICS. I think most of our CICS online files utilize LSR, does

Re: TSSO use of NETVIEW

2009-09-09 Thread Chris Mason
Mike NCCF certainly makes a bit more sense. However, TSSO automation is still independent of NetView automation which can be traced to a development of the NCCF component of NetView. It's not clear what you had in mind with your original post but if it is asking whether NetView is required in

Re: TSSO use of NETVIEW

2009-09-09 Thread Ward, Mike S
I was wondering because in @FILE404 in the pds I found this statement: An interface to the Network Communication Control Facility (NCCF) allows the network operator to use TSSO as a command processor, issuing and receiving operating system commands at the NCCF terminal. Note that NCCF is now an

Are compression services (CMPSERVS) eligible for zIIP/zAAP execution?

2009-09-09 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
As the subject asks, are the z/OS compression/decompression services (CMPSERVS in a Strobe performance report) eligible for zIIP/zAAP execution? We don't have any zIIP/zAAP engines so I am wondering if CMPSERVS could be offloaded to them. The immediate task is reducing the CPU consumption of a

Re: JES3 CONSTD SYN= and PLEXSYN=

2009-09-09 Thread Edward Jaffe
Arthur Gutowski wrote: SYN= Specifies a set of prefixes (or synonyms) to be used as SYSTEM scoped command prefixes. A command entered with a SYSTEM scoped prefix will execute on the system on which the command is entered. It used to be that if you issued a JES3 INTERCOM with an

Re: Are compression services (CMPSERVS) eligible for zIIP/zAAP execution?

2009-09-09 Thread Edward Jaffe
Farley, Peter x23353 wrote: As the subject asks, are the z/OS compression/decompression services (CMPSERVS in a Strobe performance report) eligible for zIIP/zAAP execution? The CMPSC (COMPRESSION CALL) instruction works just fine on zAAP and zIIP. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software

Re: How to define stand-alone 3590 tape drives in SMS?

2009-09-09 Thread Russell Witt
Wayne, John has given you the basics. But I was curious. Why do you want to define the 3590's to SMS? Do you already have some inside an IBM robot and want to allocate some tape files to the outside drives (offsite backups for example)? Russell Witt -Original Message- From: IBM

Re: TSSO use of NETVIEW

2009-09-09 Thread Chris Mason
Mike Note that NCCF is now an integrated part of Netview. And has been since about 1986, 23 years by my reckoning. How ancient is this TSSO product? So it seems I was wrong in saying TSSO was *independent* of NetView. The reason I was wrong is however instructive. An interface to the

Re: TSSO use of NETVIEW

2009-09-09 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
Chris Mason wrote: comprehensive functions for my silent running automation. In other words there may have been a short period in the history of NCCF/NetView when TSSO offered the cleverest way - maybe the only way - decently to automate MVS, that is, better than using the internal reader for

Re: TSSO use of NETVIEW

2009-09-09 Thread Chris Mason
I thought I hadn't been as stupid as is here implied! if you insist on doing all your automation though NetView's command facility is what I said before the part quoted. Some royal misrepresentation through selective quoting going on here! There is a lot - did I say a lot? - to be said for

Denver SHARE Presentations on linuxvm.org - Ten More

2009-09-09 Thread Mark Post
Cross-posted to Linux-390, IBMVM, and IBM-MAIN I've received ten more Linux and z/VM presentations. Thanks to all the speakers that have contributed. Session Presenter Title 2190Mario Held Linux on System z Performance Update - Part 1 z10, CPU and Memory 2192Mario

Re: Are compression services (CMPSERVS) eligible for zIIP/zAAP execution?

2009-09-09 Thread Russell Witt
Peter, Just because a service can be eligible for a zIIP does not mean it will be offloaded to one if you obtain a zIIP processor. There are the environmental restrictions. The eligible workload must be run in an SRB enclave that is identified as being zIIP eligible. If the batch job that is

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread Brian Westerman
Sorry for the blatant plug, but there also is SyzCmdZ which contains all of the features of each of the command scripting products mentioned and many more. Info at WWW.SyzygyInc.NET Brian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: Seperate LPARs for Prod and Test or a single LPAR for both

2009-09-09 Thread Edward Jaffe
Natarajan Mohan wrote: There is no reason to run system in basic mode anymore. Modern hardware no longer supports basic mode. It's not a choice you get to make. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318