Pinnacle pisze:
- Original Message - From: R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: STGADMIN.ADR.DUMP.TOLERATE.ENQF
W dniu 2011-02-04 00:33, Frank Swarbrick pisze:
Interesting.
I'm not clear where
you are c
I was able to delete the old linklib once I cycled LLA.
you are correct, and I wrote something wrong:
I doubt you can delete old.linklib which belongs to LNKLST00.
If neither LLA nor XCFAS have their hands on old.linklib, you can delete the
dataset.
However, I seem to remember
We are just using NETVIEW and everything was working perfectly until
last week.
There is no timer elements found when I issued the LIST command.
Regards,
Chokalingam
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Barkow, Eileen
Sent:
I have found the below message in the netview log after the printer
start command.
DSI208I TIME EXPIRATION - ID= 'SYS50161' - CMD= 'MVS $SPRT981'
DWO338I CONSOLE NOT OBTAINED FOR TASK AUTO1. CONSOLE AUTO1 IS ALREADY IN
USE.
Regards,
Chokalingam Thangavelu
-Original Message-
From:
Getting an 500 Internal Server Error this morning. Is anyone else
getting the same error?
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
Surrounding yourself with dwarfs does not make you a giant
--
For IBM-MAIN
The = only means that the command should be processed at the first primary
panel up the chain.
The x is just a common command to exit from a panel menu. It is not hard-coded
in ISPF but must appear in the zsel=trans logic in the panel.
The ; simply simulates the ENTER key.
If you have nested
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 01:08:38 -0800, Walter Marguccio wrote:
If neither LLA nor XCFAS have their hands on old.linklib, you can
delete the dataset.
No. You can do a SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE to free the ENQ that
XCFAS has and you can either stop LLA or otherwise get it to release
the old.linklib
You are not too paranoid. That is good practice. All LINKLIST changes should be
handled just before an IPL for safety.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 11:17 PM
To:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Interesting.
I'm not clear where this is documented, but I'll see what my RACF
admin has to say.
Basically, I tried in our prod LPAR to backup (DUMP) a file that was
currently open to CICS; thus the
If neither LLA nor XCFAS have their hands on old.linklib, you can
delete the dataset.
No. You can do a SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE to free the ENQ that
XCFAS has and you can either stop LLA or otherwise get it to release
the old.linklib data set. That does *NOT* mean that it is save to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Getting an 500 Internal Server Error this morning. Is anyone else
getting the same error?
Same error in Chicagoland. I'm SO-O-O surprised. :-|
-jc-
Here in CT also
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chase, John
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 8:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLINK Down?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
You can use the Netview EXCMD command to assign the MVS command to a different
auto operator or autotask assigned to
Another console. To make it simple, leave the current command in place and add
another one to the other
Operator - at most duplicate start commands will be issued.
EXCMD
MA down as well...
Stan Weyman
Senior Software Engineer
stan.wey...@emc.com
EMC² (508)249-3966
where information lives
It is wise to keep in mind that neither
success nor failure is ever final...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
WE are having a problem with our printer(wont name the brand), but we have
all of last nights processing in the spool and need to get it out and print
some of the standard report.
We have CA-Dispatch but only a few jobs are setup with online viewing.
Is there a way to retrieve the output from jes
Don't have access to IBM link, however try
http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Troubleshooting
for normal research.
ETR's, etc. of course will require IBMLINK.
snip
Getting an 500 Internal Server Error this morning. Is anyone else
getting the same error?
/snip
Larry:
You can use FTP to retrieve reports from JES spool. See this link:
http://www.lbdsoftware.com/Submitting_Jobs_using_FTP.pdf
http://www.lbdsoftware.com/Submitting_Jobs_using_FTP.pdfThere is a section
for retrieving from JES spool.
Roberto
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Larry Macioce
Roberto,
I saw something simular to this before I asked the question.
In that and this example it looks as if the jobname you want to retreive must
by the users name +1 character (much like sdsf 3.8) .
Or am I reading too much into it??
Thanks
mace
http://www.workers.com.br/manuais/pdfs/tcpacces/tcptn05.pdf
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Larry Macioce mace1...@gmail.com wrote:
WE are having a problem with our printer(wont name the brand), but we have
all of last nights processing in the spool and need to get it out and print
some of
(much like sdsf 3.8)
ISPF 3.8
SDSF has no such option.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Tom Marchant wrote:
begin snippet
BLSUXTOD is an IPCS exit service routine that seems to pass back
mm/dd/ hh:mm:ss.ff
Not something I'd want to do arithmetic with.
/end snippet
He is right on both counts. This is the formatted character-string output that
BLSUXTOD produces, and it is
A 1000 pardons option 3.8 in ispf
Mace
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
The discussion of the ECT parameter of TIMEUSED on the thread STCK vs
TIMUSED got me to wondering. I am currently using TCBTTIME in a product
rather than TIMEUSED. The advantages of TCBTTIME as I see it are (1) has to
be very low overhead and (2) I can do it directly in C without linking to
If you are on z/OS 1.10 or above and have SDSF installed, the following REXX
program copies SPOOL output to sequential disk datasets (or UNIX files).
/* REXX */
PARSE ARG JOBNAME HLQ .
IF JOBNAME='' THEN JOBNAME='*'
HLQ=STRIP(HLQ,'B',')
IF HLQ='' THEN HLQ='SYSJO'
XX=ISFCALLS('ON')
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:39:37 +, john gilmore wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
begin snippet
BLSUXTOD is an IPCS exit service routine that seems to pass back
mm/dd/ hh:mm:ss.ff
Not something I'd want to do arithmetic with.
/end snippet
He is right on both counts. This is the formatted
Oh! I forgot to mention that you can ftp directly from the JES SPOOL to a
desktop, but you need all the JESSPOOL profiles set up correctly. On your
desktop:
ftp zos
userid
password
ascii
quote site filetype=jes jesowner=* jesjobname=
dir
get Jnnn output.file.name
===
transcript below:
Looks like its back up.
On 02/04/11 09:14, Staller, Allan wrote:
Don't have access to IBM link, however try
http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Troubleshooting
for normal research.
ETR's, etc. of course will require IBMLINK.
snip
Getting an 500 Internal Server Error this morning.
TCBTTIME is *not* updated when task is actually dispatched and executing on a
CPU, only when it gets interrupted by something like WAIT.
TCBTTIME will not include any fancy CPU stats either (Enclave SRB, zIIP and
zAAP).
Also, I do not believe that TCBTTIME is a GUPI field.
However, for a
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:21:31 -0800, Donnelly, John P
john.p.donne...@nsc.com wrote:
...we need to start the IBM-MAIN equivalent of the Darwin Awards...
Tom M. once told me a story about the DD DUMMY of the Day/Week/Year
awards at a past shop. I think there was a plaque or a trophy that went
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
TCBTTIME is *not* updated when task is actually dispatched and executing on
a CPU, only when it gets interrupted by something like WAIT.
TCBTTIME will not include any fancy CPU stats either (Enclave SRB, zIIP
and
Charles,
Related to your comment: have you looked at the new assembler gcc-style
inlining in xlc on z/OS?
I'm starting to have some fun with it; in some cases it eliminates the need
for Metal-C and in many it can replace writing XPLINK assembler leaf
routines.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 11:02 -0500, Arthur Gutowski wrote:
Tom M. once told me a story about the DD DUMMY of the Day/Week/Year
awards at a past shop. I think there was a plaque or a trophy that went
along with it...
We have a trophy that gets passed around, and which the recipient is
In 269952.46594...@web114720.mail.gq1.yahoo.com, on 02/04/2011
at 01:08 AM, Walter Marguccio walter_marguc...@yahoo.com said:
see old.linklib being deleted under their nose.
They're perfectly happy; it's not their dog. OTOH, *you* might not be
happy with the results. I wouldn't do it unless
In 47594.94673...@web114719.mail.gq1.yahoo.com, on 02/03/2011
at 01:24 PM, Walter Marguccio walter_marguc...@yahoo.com said:
However, even if you purge LLA and issue SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE
(freeing the dataset from the XCFAS), I don't think you can delete
your old.linklib.
You can; it
...we had a Boyd Award that was rotated among the group based on the last one
to @$%up...an ugly little dinosaur thing...
...HR heard about it(?) and we had to discontinue the practice...
...a ceremony was conducted at the local watering hole and I was selected as
the permanent custodian...What
@Kirk: I looked at it. I played a little with the in-line TRT to replace an
strchr() or similar. I did not see any performance improvement and backed it
out. (Note *I did not see* a performance improvement; not there was no ...
It may have been below my threshold of measurement.)
@Rob: It's not
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
@Chris: Interesting. Do you suppose the technique you describe is cheaper
than TIMEUSED with ECT?
Hard to tell without benchmarking it and I wouldn't offer a
prediction. *HOWEVER* if you are of a mind to sample relevant
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:02:50 -0600, Arthur Gutowski wrote:
Tom M. once told me a story about the DD DUMMY of the Day/Week/Year
awards at a past shop. I think there was a plaque or a trophy that went
along with it...
It was called the axe. A very light weight black plastic tube about four
feet
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:38:12 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
My granularity is CPU time used over hours spent 99% in a wait state.
@Chris: Interesting. Do you suppose the technique you describe is cheaper
than TIMEUSED with ECT?
Maybe the TCBTTIME as of the last time you were dispatched is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Andrews
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 11:02 -0500, Arthur Gutowski wrote:
Tom M. once told me a story about the DD DUMMY of the Day/Week/Year
awards at a past shop. I think there was a plaque or a trophy that went
From: hobbitt druidl...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:43:48 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Feb 4 2011 11:43 am
On Feb 1, 10:41 pm, jayare...@hotmail.com (J R) wrote:
The JCL User's Guide is more specific on this. It explicitly states:
if you code ROUND as the last subparameter in
Anyone ever notice the sloppy column alignment in the legend following a D
M=CPU command. Is there a technical reason they couldn't line things up? They
didn't notice it was wrong during testing? I know this is a nit. But stuff
like this bugs me. OK. Thanks for listening to my pedantic rant.
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:03:26 -0800, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
Anyone ever notice the sloppy column alignment in the legend following a D
M=CPU command. Is there a technical reason they couldn't line things up?
They
didn't notice it was wrong during testing? I know this is a
On 2 February 2011 09:50, W. Kevin Kelley wkkel...@optonline.net wrote:
WTOs, WTORs and WTLs have always been restricted to a subset of code-
page 037 character set 697. Specifically, the following characters:
A through Z
0 through 9
characters + * / , . ( ) ' - = : % ? ; and blank
You are correct sir
I am going to implement the code the way you described in the previous e-mail
Critical piece of code
So It would interesting to see time usage thankx for your help
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
You can also use the SDSF XDC line command at least as far back as OS/390 2.10
to get the data into a dataset.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Larry Macioce
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 5:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
At 10:13 -0600 on 02/04/2011, Chris Craddock wrote about Re: TIMEUSED
versus TCBTTIME:
All true and good sensible stuff too. For a quick and dirty (and fairly
light weight) way to coerce the system into updating it there's always this
old trick...
WAIT ECB=PHONY
(do
On 2/4/2011 1:52 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
I may be thinking of a private better WAIT Macro
You must be.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
On 2/4/2011 8:13 AM, Chris Craddock wrote:
All true and good sensible stuff too. For a quick and dirty (and fairly
light weight) way to coerce the system into updating it there's always this
old trick...
WAIT ECB=PHONY
(do stuff)
DS 0F
PHONY DC
Cross-posted to Linux-390, IBMVM, and IBM-Main
All,
wiki.linuxvm.org has been under attack for about the last week from spammers
and vandals. I think I've got it largely under control for now. The attackers
seemed to be using a zombie net, so a _lot_ of IP addresses are now blocked at
the
Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 2/4/2011 8:13 AM, Chris Craddock wrote:
All true and good sensible stuff too. For a quick and dirty (and fairly
light weight) way to coerce the system into updating it there's always
this
old trick...
WAIT ECB=PHONY
(do stuff)
On 5/02/2011 12:38 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
@Kirk: I looked at it. I played a little with the in-line TRT to replace an
strchr() or similar. I did not see any performance improvement and backed it
out. (Note *I did not see* a performance improvement; not there was no ...
It may have been below
The REXX signal statement is a VARIANT of the PL/I signal statement. A
typical, trivial, traditional example of its use of in PL/I is
On endpage(outfile) begin ; /* start new page: eject, increment page number,
put title block at top of new page */
. . .
end ;
open file(outfile)
On 5/02/2011 10:56 AM, john gilmore wrote:
outer: do . . . ;
. . .
inner: do . . . ;
. . .
innermost: do . . . ;
. . .
leave ; /* leaves innermost */
. . .
leave outer ;
. . .
end innermost ;
. . .
end inner ;
. . .
end outer ;
54 matches
Mail list logo
