THANK YOU SO MUCH
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
R.S.
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 4:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 3590 Tape error when vol=ser not specified
W dniu 2011-02-24 22:19, Greg Caserta
I have a problem on z/OS 1.10. I run two types of UNIX work. The first is batch
job work which fork()'s. The second is interactive work such as TSO OMVS or
Telnet. Unfortunately, WLM has no way that I can find to assign said work to
different service classes. I wish that the fork()'ed address
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:52:31 -0600, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
I have a problem on z/OS 1.10. I run two types of UNIX work. The first is
batch job work which fork()'s. The second is interactive work such as TSO
OMVS or Telnet. Unfortunately, WLM has no way that I can find
-Original Message-
snip
So are you saying your default (which production falls into)
is what your
forked process is falling into?
What about classifying by accounting information? Have you looked at
help in the dialogs. Strangely enough, the help is Work
Qualifiers for
USS
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:23:25 -0600, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
-Original Message-
snip
So are you saying your default (which production falls into)
is what your
forked process is falling into?
What about classifying by accounting information? Have you looked
Art wrote:
We look for... DFSVC000 (SVC)
Close. DFSVC000 is the SCD control block which at +C has an SVC
instruction with the IMS type-2 SVC as the SVC number.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
This seems like a pretty common exercise but I can’t find any meaningful
information on it. We have an offsite location that was bin managed so we have
numerous bins defined for the location. But now the location is no longer bin
managed and I’m trying to remove the bins from RMM, all of which
We have a XCF-local system with no access to a coupling facility. However, we
would like to run CICS/TS 4.1 with DASD-only logging.
Can we create a COUPLExx parmlib member with LOGR only ?
Or do we need all five COUPLE facilities ?
All,
Has anyone used the IBM Tivoli Advanced Catalog Management for z/OS to
move catalog entries for open files to a new catalog? Especially for
files that are open for a long time after they are moved... like CICS
VSAM files?
Mike Martin
/PREThis email may contain confidential and
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:42:08 -0600, Arthur Gutowski
aguto...@ford.com wrote:
Since JOB C/I and execution are not guaranteed to happen on the same
system in a MAS, if the value for a given symbol is different on each, when do
you want to resolve the symbol? Some will say at C/I, others will say
Unless you are a running an ancient MVS release, 'XCF-Local' no longer
exists. Single systems must now run as Monoplex. That being said, there is
no problem running a system in Monoplex mode, which allows system logger
to write to DASD-only data sets.
Although it may not suit your needs, you
Daniel Allen pisze:
We have a XCF-local system with no access to a coupling facility. However, we
would like to run CICS/TS 4.1 with DASD-only logging.
Can we create a COUPLExx parmlib member with LOGR only ?
Or do we need all five COUPLE facilities ?
No, and no.
You have to create two CDS
The term is in the z/OS 1.12 manual called 'Setting up a SYSPLEX'. IBM has not
updated their information.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Skip Robinson
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Daniel Allen dal...@serena.com wrote:
We have a XCF-local system with no access to a coupling facility. However,
we would like to run CICS/TS 4.1 with DASD-only logging.
Can we create a COUPLExx parmlib member with LOGR only ?
Or do we need all five COUPLE facilities ?
Don't you have a
I know these CDS types:
ARM
BPXMCDS
CFRM
LOGR
SFM
WLM
What's the 7th type?
Luke
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
R.S.
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 12:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Moving from XCF-local
Sysplex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Rabbe, Luke
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Moving from XCF-local to single-system sysplex environment
I know these CDS types:
ARM
OMVS
snip
I know these CDS types:
ARM
BPXMCDS
CFRM
LOGR
SFM
WLM
What's the 7th type?
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
At 22:33 +0100 on 02/24/2011, R.S. wrote about Re: 3590 Tape error
when vol=ser not specified:
So, your OS/390 *thinks* that your 3590 does have autoloader.
Lack of autoloader casues surprise and message. However AFAIR it doesn't
hurt. You can simply ignore the messages.
Or has your Systems
At 14:34 -0600 on 02/24/2011, McBride, Catherine wrote about Re:
Question about wiping a DS8100:
Yes, using the web-based Storage Manager application to change the ranks
from one format to another will certainly work.
I was told that changing from one format to the other 3 times would be
best.
THANKS ALL !
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Robert A. Rosenberg
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 2:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 3590 Tape error when vol=ser not specified
At 22:33 +0100 on 02/24/2011,
Plus, unlike a PC drive, on the DS8100 the data is stripped over multiple
drives. Making data recovery on individual drives an exercise in futility.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.comwrote:
At 14:34 -0600 on 02/24/2011, McBride, Catherine wrote about Re:
W dniu 2011-02-25 20:35, Robert A. Rosenberg pisze:
At 22:33 +0100 on 02/24/2011, R.S. wrote about Re: 3590 Tape error when
vol=ser not specified:
So, your OS/390 *thinks* that your 3590 does have autoloader.
Lack of autoloader casues surprise and message. However AFAIR it doesn't
hurt. You
EXCELLENT HELP THANKS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
R.S.
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 3590 Tape error when vol=ser not specified
W dniu 2011-02-25 20:35, Robert A.
I think that OMVS is already covered by BPXMCDS, but definitely sysplex
aka XCF CDS is missing.
Just to complement: XCF is mandatory, while BPX aka OMVS aka (no! USS
agan?) is not, it depends on configuration and needs.
The other optional CDSses are SFM and ARM. CFRM is mandatory when you
want
It really depends upon how stringent the requirements are in the shop
where the person who posted the original question works. Here we have
some additional requirements, other shops may not.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
According to sources at IBM:
The security environment that you get when AXREXX is invoked under a
console that is not logged on lacks an OMVS segment
so you need to logon w/ a userid that is properly defined.
So if you want to create a SYSREXX command and want the operators to be
able to issue
On 2/25/2011 11:23, David G. Schlecht wrote:
This seems like a pretty common exercise but I can’t find any meaningful
information on it. We have an offsite location that was bin managed so we
have numerous bins defined for the location. But now the location is no
longer bin managed and I’m
XCF (sysplex) - the key one.
Stan Weyman
Senior Software Engineer
stan.wey...@emc.com
EMC² (508)249-3966
where information lives
It is wise to keep in mind that neither
success nor failure is ever final...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
BPXMCDS is the OMVS CDS type Allan.
Stan Weyman
Senior Software Engineer
stan.wey...@emc.com
EMC² (508)249-3966
where information lives
It is wise to keep in mind that neither
success nor failure is ever final...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:10:47 +0100, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
WLM was already discussed - theoretically
you can live without it, but the system is crippled.
Not really. Especially if you you have enough capacity.
The OP looked like a vendor, and just as my onepack system
Many thanks to everyone for the great discussion on this topic! Does anyone
have any thoughts on the cache? Do I need to worry about clearing that? If
so, does anyone have any ideas on how to do that?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Does anyone have any thoughts on the cache? Do I need to worry about clearing
that?
No.
If so, does anyone have any ideas on how to do that?
Just turn it (the C/U) off.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
--
For IBM-MAIN
Just got zOS 1.11 implemented (huzzah), and noticed that after my SAF
conversion most everything works right except the Applications programmers
cannot overtype the output Class and DESTN fields on the output screen.
Sysprog and OPS group get overtype as before the upgrade. Been comparing
the
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r10/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zos.r10.isfa500/isf4cs8049.htm
Protecting SDSF functions.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 7:32 PM, John Mattson john_matt...@ea.epson.com wrote:
Just got zOS 1.11 implemented (huzzah), and noticed that after my SAF
conversion
34 matches
Mail list logo
