Dear Barbara,
Thank you very much for your reply.
Only this one IMS structure failing.
X'B400' in size of the structure is : size()
The latest changes we upgrade our CF from z9 to z10. (2094 to 2097)
2011-04-11
Thanks and Regards,
Mohd Shahrifuddin Ahmad Masri,
Room 209,
Hi,
For running a stored procedure from the DB2CONNECT, we were getting an error
as
DSNU003I DSNUTILS - NOT INVOKED APF AUTHORIZED For getting removing this
error. The IBM manual has suggested few things like
The DSNUTILS or DSNUTILU load module is link edited with AC(1)
The DSNUTILS or
You relink the object module. Check that manual.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:55 AM, jagadishan perumal
jagadish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
For running a stored procedure from the DB2CONNECT, we were getting an error
as
DSNU003I DSNUTILS - NOT INVOKED APF AUTHORIZED For getting removing this
The z/OS Planned Outage Avoidance List
I meant without an IPL.
The z/OS Planned Outage Avoidance List redbook
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247328.pdf
explains very well how to configure your System z HW and z/OS in order
to add Central Storage to a LPAR *without* IPL.
Have a
Hi,
we have a VSAM linear data set which is allocated read/write to an ASID.
Now, the extents have to be moved to another VolSer without affecting the
ASID. How to do? IDCAMS ALTER ADD/REMOVEVOLUMES or REPRO do not
seem to work for VolSers with allocated extents that are opened.
Thank you,
Thanks Walter,
This information is good for the future, but right now, I'll have to perform an
IPL if I want to increase the storage.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Walter Marguccio
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011
Do you have any third party tool? to do so...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
AC=Access code does come with the linkedit step..however i certainly
suggest you to cross check your apf list and joblib/steplib again and see
from where the load module is being picked ..it's showing to me load module
being picked is not apf authorize...
Ravi,
I have added all the WLM Load modules to APF library
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Ravi Gaur gaur.ravi2...@gmail.com wrote:
AC=Access code does come with the linkedit step..however i certainly
suggest you to cross check your apf list and joblib/steplib again and see
from where the
Mark Zelden wrote:
Use RACF LOGOPTIONS ALWAYS for OPERCMDS class.
(playing devil's advocate a bit here)
You may do that, but cool off please... ;-D
Why? Do you insist on logging all access to everything from your system
programmers (not just commands - data sets, other resources).
Yes,
Ifrom name dsnload it looks to me db2 ... Cud you send jcl of your stc/
job and output of d prog,Apf
Sent from my iPhone
On 11-Apr-2011, at 5:13 PM, jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ravi,
I have added all the WLM Load modules to APF library
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:40
W dniu 2011-04-11 10:33, Walter Marguccio pisze:
The z/OS Planned Outage Avoidance List
I meant without an IPL.
The z/OS Planned Outage Avoidance List redbook
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247328.pdf
explains very well how to configure your System z HW and z/OS in order
to
I was asked to make the necessary changes to make additional storage available.
We are running a z10BC with 16GB of storage.
We currently have 4 LPARS.
They all have 3 GB defined.
I would like to add 1 GB to each of the production LPARS (we have 2), and be
able to add more storage to one of them
Ravi,
Output of /D PROG,APF is
ENTRY VOLUME DSNAME
1 Z16RS1 SYS1.LINKLIB
2 Z16RS1 SYS1.SVCLIB
3 LPRJ15 MICFOC.LOADLIB
4 LIB001 MICFOC.SASC.LINKLIB
5 Z16RS2 ING.SEVIMOD7
6 Z16RS1 SYS1.SHASLINK
7 Z16RS1 SYS1.SIEALNKE
8 Z16RS1 SYS1.LPALIB
9 Z16RS2 IOE.SIOELMOD
We currently have 4 L
We are running a z10BC with 16GB of storage.
We currently have 4 LPARS.
They all have 3 GB defined.
I would like to add 1 GB to each of the production LPARS (we have 2),
and be able to add more storage to one of them if the need arises.
What should I specify in the
This information is good for the future, but right now, I'll have to perform an
IPL if I want to increase the storage.
Sent wirelessly from my BlackBerry device on the Bell network.
Envoyé sans fil par mon terminal mobile BlackBerry sur le réseau de Bell.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
* Finally, to make the list, the cool thing has to be taught in one or
more of our courses
+ So we name a cool feature and can also show you where to learn how
to
use it
(Of course, one can
Do you have a system trace in the dump? If so, do any of the PSW's point to
application program code other than the looping paragraph?
-Original Message-
From: John McKown [mailto:john.archie.mck...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 10:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re:
What should I specify in the reserved storage section?
You need to do some reading/thinking.
Should I specify 1GB for each LPAR?
Only for those you wish to use this capability.
Is this storage reserved during Activate, or just when I vary it online?
Just when varied online.
I've never liked
My take on this whole discussion - which is why I'm not replying to anyone
in particular - is it's high time we educated people again on what the
rules are. (And, no, I don't crisply know what they are myself.) :-(
Martin
Martin Packer,
Mainframe Performance Consultant, zChampion
Worldwide
This is just too good to pass up. It's is an very good way to show children (or
managers) how some of the simpler sorting algorithms work.
http://www.i-programmer.info/news/150-training-a-education/2255-sorting-algorithms-as-dances.html
bubble sort, shell sort, insert sort, select sort
by the
On 4/11/2011 7:05 AM, McKown, John wrote:
This is just too good to pass up. It's is an very good way to show children (or
managers) how some of the simpler sorting algorithms work.
http://www.i-programmer.info/news/150-training-a-education/2255-sorting-algorithms-as-dances.html
bubble sort,
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 20:50:41 -0500, Scott Fagen scottfagen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Best way to set up for the TSO CONSOLE command is to activate OPERCMDS in
your security product and set up the OPERPARM segments in the users who need
to use the facility. See:
Years ago I was asked (told) to look at a S0C4 that had occurred in
SyncSort, which I maintained in our shop. SyncSort was being invoked by a
COBOL program. I was assured that there had been no changes to the COBOL
program in several months', so it could not be the fault of the application
(or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Andy Coburn
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 10:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Address space proliferation
Limiting the number of instances to the number of CPs is an interesting
Does JES cut any SMF records that record TCP/NJE outbound activity? I
Does JES cut any SMF records that record TCP/NJE outbound activity? I can find
the inbound activity in the SMF26 records, but I have not be able to find the
equivalent for outbound to another node.
Thanks,
Mark Regan
I cannot imagine the dangers you live under in Israel.
Richard, Vickie, and Randy Pinion
--- shai.h...@gmail.com wrote:
From: shai hess shai.h...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: MFNetDIsk and living in Ashdod
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 21:02:35 -0700
HI,
Tonight we have
timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) writes:
I've known HP in its sales pitches to make a lot of fuss about
endianness as reason why it would be oh-so-difficult for an HP-UX
customer to move to Linux on X86, or for a Linux X86 customer to move
to (or add) Linux on System z, depending
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:53:27 +0800, ibmnew ibm...@163.com wrote:
Thanks for your help.
You're welcome
Could you share your SHUTSYS STC to me?
It is basically the same thing, but in z/OS 1.10 I split out the shutdown
PDS member at the end so I can have a REIPL option.
//SHUTSYS PROC
It's a long shot, but since z/OS 1.9 you have had to opportunity to move some
control blocks above the line.
Here is a description of one of the potential issues:
On ZOS 1.9 if DIAGxx specifies CBLOC VIRTUAL31(IHALCCA,IHAPCCA)
and all CP's are CONFIGed OFFLINE and then ONLINE, and any SRB
Has ANYONE out there besides IBM personnel gotten this beast to work? I have
tried THREE times from scratch and every time I fail at a different spot.
There seems to be too many working parts to get this thing going and I
honestly don't see how this is going to make mainframes easier to use if it
Hi Steve! I havd tried a couple times, without much luck. If you could be so
kind as to forward me a copy, I would be happy to tell you that I have done
it!
*don*
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.comwrote:
On 4/8/2011 5:43 PM, Dave Salt wrote:
In my
On 4/11/2011 10:08 AM, Donald Johnson wrote:
Hi Steve! I havd tried a couple times, without much luck. If you could be so
kind as to forward me a copy, I would be happy to tell you that I have done
it!
*don*
U. You realize you posted to the list and not me directly,
right? And what is it
McKown, John wrote:
This is just too good to pass up. It's is an very good way to show children
(or managers) how some of the simpler sorting algorithms work.
Or PHB!
Thats sorta very good, that will sort out those sort-wannabe programmers...
;-D
bubble sort, shell sort, insert sort, select
We have it working but it is not the easiest install. Not what I would call
simplification. Do you have REXX ALTLIB installed?
Once it is up and running the incident log function is fairly useful.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Sorry about that...I thought I cleared the To list, but...mea culpa!
*don*
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.comwrote:
On 4/11/2011 10:08 AM, Donald Johnson wrote:
Hi Steve! I havd tried a couple times, without much luck. If you could be
so
kind as to
Don,
Are you looking for chapter 6 of the SimpList user guide that explains how to
install and connect to the ISPF workstation agent? If so, please send me an
email off-list and I'll be happy to send you a copy.
Regards,
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
-- Forwarded message --
From: shai hess shai.h...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: MFNetDIsk and living in Ashdod
To: rpin...@netscape.com
HI Richard,
Very important to me to say that we feel secure to live in Ashdod, Israel.
That was spontaneous
Mike,
What's going on here is that the library SYS1.SEAGALT (REXX Alternate Support
Library) is missing from your linklist concatenation. Update that and the
compiled REXX execs that live in SYS1.SAXREXEC can be used. z/OSMF needs these
for the incident log task.
/Brad
-Original
Elardus Engelbrecht on IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 04/11/2011 09:52:11 AM:
Nice music too. Wonder what DFSORT ... people would say while
dancing?
To paraphrase Fred Astaire: I will sort, but I won't dance - don't ask
me. :-)
Frank Yaeger - DFSORT Development
Hello,
I am applying RSU on my z/OS system and I have completed
the apply check steps, in file allocation table SMPE is gonig to apply
changes in root file system also. But as of now my system is running
with this file system. There is no volser defined against the root file
Your report appears typical. Are you questioning the absence of a VOLSER for
PATH/PATHHFS in the report or something else?
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
SAURABH KHANDELWAL
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011
Make a clone of your root and other target Unix System files and mount at
/Service. Update DDDEFs accordingly.
It is not a good idea to point SMP/E at operational running files.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Hello,
When I did the apply check, I got the file allocation report,
which talks about the changes going to apply on these particular dataset.
My root file system is OMVS.SYSE18.ROOT, which is going to
modify as per the report. I am using this root file system . So I
Q1 - The third value in the subparameter (the third 10) is the amount of space
reserved for the directory. Since only partitioned datasets have directories,
the system knows the DSORG is PO.
When the third parameter is omitted, the system DOES KNOW the dataset is not
partitioned. But, as
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of SAURABH KHANDELWAL
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 12:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SMPE apply RSU with SMPE changes
Hello,
When I did the apply check, I got
In my opinion, and I think IBM's as well, you should __NEVER__ apply
maintenance into running libraries unless you are certain that you know exactly
what you are doing. Why? Because sometimes some APAR will hit multiple modules
which reside in different libraries in such a way that you will get
SAURABH KHANDELWAL wrote:
Hello,
When I did the apply check, I got the file allocation report, which
talks about the changes going to apply on these particular dataset.
My root file system is OMVS.SYSE18.ROOT, which is going to modify as per
the report. I am using this root file system . So I
Q2 What's wrong of the ACS routing below:
SELECT
WHEN ((DSN = ABSPPS) AND
(DSORG NE 'PO') AND
(DSORG NE 'VS') AND
(DSORG NE 'IS') AND
(DSORG NE 'DA')) SET DATACLAS = 'DCPS'
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:25:20 +0530, jagadishan perumal
jagadish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
For running a stored procedure from the DB2CONNECT, we were getting an
error
as
DSNU003I DSNUTILS - NOT INVOKED APF AUTHORIZED For getting removing
this
error. The IBM manual has suggested few things
These are the most common APF issues I have seen over the years.
1) loosing APF
Probably getting knocked out of authorization. If any library in a JOBLIB
or STEPLIB is not APF, then the whole list is marked as not apf so it
then doesn't matter whether you think you have an authorized library
Why do you think you cannot relink these modules with AC(1)? The binder
accepts its outputs, load modules or program objects, as inputs. The operation
is trivial.
John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA
Anyone have the answer to the above subject...we're thinking MVS/ESA 4.3 but
cannot confirm...
TIA...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
EXCELLENT point. Frequency of patches, per se, proves nothing. Can be
bad design: Windows was designed without a security system. (Well,
certainly very little). So was Linux. So was MVS. Remember the first
RACF and why CA had such an easy time selling CA-1? Can be sign of
Kaizen constant
Most of your Micro$oft and Linux errors are due to the C language
defining an end of string as x'00', and the programmer forgetting to
check the lenght of the input against the buffer. The the hacker
sends a malformed string to that function and overlays the program
code and takes control.
On
Patrick,
I believe it was new with OS/390 V1R1 (see page xxxv of
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/download/IEA1E242.pdf)
This makes sense to me because OS/390 was a repackaging of MVS that included
basic elements and optional features in a single monolithic delivery.
IFAPRDxx
I added it and now I'm getting the message in the izusetup.sh -finish log
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
mike.a.sch...@gmail.com (Mike Schwab) writes:
Most of your Micro$oft and Linux errors are due to the C language
defining an end of string as x'00', and the programmer forgetting to
check the lenght of the input against the buffer. The the hacker
sends a malformed string to that function and
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:49:44 +, john gilmore wrote:
Why do you think you cannot relink these modules with AC(1)? The binder
accepts its outputs, load modules or program objects, as inputs. The
operation is trivial.
... Unless it was previously linked with the EDIT=NO option.
-- gil
I am troubled. I didn't pay much attention to the beginning of the
thread, but I would spend more time wondering how a vendor supplied
module that isn't AC(1) when it should be (if indeed it should be) than
on how to relink it AC(1). If it should have come AC(1) and is now not,
how do I know it's
Dave Gibney's anxieties about how a module that should be AC(1) came to be
shipped as something else are entirely understandable; but with more experience
he will come to be more cynical.
Modules designed only for a reentramt environment can lose that attribute;
those that should be AC(1) can
I know perfectly well how to do such a relink. I still would be looking
to properly copy the correct IBM or ISV from the correct properly
maintained target library rather that relinking on the fly. Unless of
course it's o'dark thirty and the system is falling around my ears
because of some
Does below info help?
A.3.8.1 Accounting Records (SMF)
System management facilities (SMF) is a function of MVS that allows the
collection and recording of various types of system and job-related
information. This information is recorded in the form of a number of
different records,
I believe it was new with OS/390 V1R1 (see page xxxv of http://
publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/download/IEA1E242.pdf)
This makes sense to me because OS/390 was a repackaging of MVS that
included basic elements and optional features in a single
monolithic delivery. IFAPRDxx was
I know number of people have replied to your post however could not hold
myself would like to reiterate NEVER apply maintenance to your running
system libraries...
It's a well defined procedure to clone your sysres,hfs or any other program
products packs to new packs and mount the new HFS
Hi,
Is it Possible to re-map it to DSNUTILB ?
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Rob Schramm rob.schr...@gmail.com wrote:
These are the most common APF issues I have seen over the years.
1) loosing APF
Probably getting knocked out of authorization. If any library in a
JOBLIB
or STEPLIB is
Well, let's not skew the kiddie's brains too much..
Endian- ness, in the context used in these posts, refers to BYTE
order not BIT order.
The bit-order *within each byte* is still most significant on the
left in both big- and little- endian systems.
Another wrinkle: In the x86 world
From: gra...@ase.com.au
The bit-order *within each byte* is still most significant on the
left in both big- and little- endian systems.
So the Chief bit is on the left? ;-)
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
[re-sent to correct my bit numbering from 32,31,.. to 31,30,.. :-( ]
Well, let's not skew the kiddie's brains too much..
Endian- ness, in the context used in these posts, refers to BYTE
order not BIT order.
The bit-order *within each byte* is still most significant on the
left in both big-
Ravi, thanks for your reply. I was told a Softek product may provide
this function as part of data migration support. But no, we just have z/OS
and a couple of Redbooks, Whitepapers and the ringing sound of IBM sales
representatives that z means zero downtime. Now we have to move the
Dave, Dave,.. :-)
So the Chief bit is on the left? ;-)
I'll take that as a sign that I've said enough!
Graeme
At 03:03 PM 12/04/2011, you wrote:
From: gra...@ase.com.au
The bit-order *within each byte* is still most significant on the
left in both big- and little- endian systems.
So
to have anwer for manual z/OS planning and installation manual Appendix D :
Making a copy of your software system(cloning) and z/OS Unix system
services planning guide having index of Installing services in to HFS
should help here..
72 matches
Mail list logo
