The OMVS TSO command is still a convenience for people primarily using
foreground TSO. A separate telnet session is not always convenient,
and in some cases[1] not even possible.
You're right. But, using a unix shell through a 3270 data stream
interface the way TSO provides it, is a PITA, IMHO.
Kirk,
UTE is an abbreviation for an Australian pick-up truck. If you use it in
this list as you suggest all the aussies will have no idea what you are
talking about.
Ron (with tongue firmly in his cheek).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi,
I have few files in my desktop to FTP it to mainframe. When i type FTP
XXX from the dos i get a message as
C:\Documents and Settings\255209\JCLftp 10.237.5.102
Connected to 10.237.5.102.
220-FTPD1 IBM FTP CS V1R6 at xxx2800, 09:42:34 on 2011-05-05
220 Connection will close if idle for
Hi,
With regard to:
I have few files in my desktop to FTP it to mainframe. When i type FTP
XXX from the dos i get a message as
C:\Documents and Settings\255209\JCLftp 10.237.5.102
Connected to 10.237.5.102.
220-FTPD1 IBM FTP CS V1R6 at xxx2800, 09:42:34 on 2011-05-05
220 Connection will
Rob - although since there's a risk he may not actually pick up a post
addressed to him I guess this is purely for the archives
The expressions to which I refer in the quoted post are described in the only
relevant IBM web site of which I am aware which deals with these matters,
namely
Mike
A small risk of initiating a tangential discussion here which ideally would
require
a new - but linked - thread. We'll see.
Racking my brains for other such devices, ...
was not intended to refer to typewriters but rather SNA devices requiring the
use of the Unformatted System
Mike
Thanks for noting this - although I'm not sure that the UNIX-to-UNIX Copy
Program initialised to UUCP adds a great deal to the discussion!
I guess the point is that this page is deficient in not defining a distinct set
of
letters to use as an abbreviated form of UNIX System Services.
The issue is that the moment we try typing ftp we dont get the logon
prompt and it ends up with a message Connection closed by remote host.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Terry Sambrooks terry.sambro...@btclick.com
wrote:
Hi,
With regard to:
I have few files in my desktop to FTP
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För Mark
Zelden
Skickat: den 4 maj 2011 20:29
Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Ämne: Re: SV: USS vs USS
On Wed, 4 May 2011 18:33:27 +0200, Thomas Berg thomas.b...@swedbank.se
wrote:
FWIW, I
Peter,
I am curious about your last statement. While I can understand not allowing
telnet/rlogin, what would be the reasoning for denying SSH access?
Rob Schramm
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4)
peter.hunke...@credit-suisse.com wrote:
The OMVS TSO command is still a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
Maybe its time to have two lists -
Already been tried. IBM-MAIN-OT atrophied and died.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Let me offer up another acronym that fits this discussion: TMN (Too Much
Noise).
These endless discussions of minutiae are one of the reasons that many people
don't follow this list. Personally I just tend to do mass deletes from my
IBM-MAIN mailbox but that is getting tedious due to the
I am curious about your last statement. While I can understand not
allowing telnet/rlogin, what would be the reasoning for denying SSH
access?
Can't tell you (I think it was Shmuel that brought up this arument).
I can think of:
- Installation doesn't want to install SSH daemon software.
-
Greetings all. Just wanted to give folks a heads up on an issue we
encountered last week. We are converting HFS's to zFS's and came across an
issue where TCPIP's Pagent is unable to use sysplex aware rw mode zfs's. IBM
says it was also a timing issue (at IPL time) but I suspect it may occur any
I might understand (due to I don't want to set it up) not setting up SSH.
But are there any installations not running TCP/IP these days?
Rob Schramm
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4)
peter.hunke...@credit-suisse.com wrote:
I am curious about your last statement. While
Mary Anne,
What is your chosen solution to deal with the issue?
1) bring up PAGENT late in IPL
2) let PAGENT come up with default and install proper policy after IPL
3) remove shared file system
--
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Engineer
Hi,
We are seeing a paging increase after upgrading to z/OS 1.11.
Has anyone else seen this?
TIA
Gadi
לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי החברה וזכויות החתימה בה, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם
החברה, מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורשי החתימה של החברה, הנושא את לוגו
It is my recollection that one of the CICS SVC modules needs to be in
NUCLSTxx. Any chance that this is the one you re having a problem with?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Are you sure that -all- the ports are open on the firewall? FTP actually uses
three ports: the 'well know port' for initial contact and to negotiate a
control port. The control port is used for the handshake and later to negotiate
a data port.
Unless you have specified otherwise, the control
Hi,
We are seeing a paging increase after upgrading to z/OS 1.11.
Has anyone else seen this?
TIA
Gadi
When we went from 1.9 to 1.11 we saw this effect. We were directed to a GRS
PTF. I would open an ETR with IBM to see what other things they might have on
this issue.
This has helped to
I have quite a bit of experience using FRBACKUP, so feel free to contact me
if you have questions.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:14 PM, George Rodriguez
george.rodrig...@palmbeachschools.org wrote:
I've already started the investigation on how to get the job done and
you're
right, it's not a
I'm posting this mostly to say thanks for all the good
information/discussion/laughs over the last few years.
I'm now supposed to be 80% AIX, 20% MVS (or successor), so I just don't
have the time to tune in to the Chris Mason show every morning anymore.
Sorry Chris - I'm not saying you're
On Thu, 5 May 2011 15:23:19 +0530, jagadishan perumal
jagadish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have few files in my desktop to FTP it to mainframe. When i type FTP
XXX from the dos i get a message as
C:\Documents and Settings\255209\JCLftp 10.237.5.102
Connected to 10.237.5.102.
220-FTPD1 IBM FTP
Rob, we did several things. We are going with NORWSHARE for this zfs.
Pagent comes up via TCPIP, and the network guy wants it that way. We
suggested putting it in OPS but were shot down.
We changed the IPSEC default from Deny all to allow all.
We changed the automatic update time to a huge
Chris,
I have gone out of my way to respond to this, and this will be my only
comment. Your objection to using USS when referring to z/OS Unix System
Services seems to be rooted in the concept that it does matter since it
can cause ambiguity. However, you made this complaint about the TLA
On Thu, 5 May 2011 08:10:33 -0500, Jeff Holst jeff.ho...@fiserv.com wrote:
It is my recollection that one of the CICS SVC modules needs to be in
NUCLSTxx. Any chance that this is the one you re having a problem with?
The OP mentioned SVC 216. That is a type 3, not the CICS type 6 nuc SVC.
On Thu, 5 May 2011 07:26:59 -0400, Rob Schramm wrote:
I am curious about your last statement. While I can understand not allowing
telnet/rlogin, what would be the reasoning for denying SSH access?
Of course and alas, SSH is not in the base installation.
-- gil
On Thu, 5 May 2011 08:55:15 -0400, Rob Schramm wrote:
I might understand (due to I don't want to set it up) not setting up SSH.
But are there any installations not running TCP/IP these days?
Some of our lab systems don't; they rely on shared DASD. Described
as an economy measure. Is TCP/IP
On Thu, 5 May 2011 08:55:15 -0400, Rob Schramm wrote:
I might understand (due to I don't want to set it up) not setting up SSH.
But are there any installations not running TCP/IP these days?
I should add we have SSH installed but not successfully configured
on some of our systems because we
I hate to see you or anybody leave. I find value in the folks that share
their experiences and knowledge.
Have you thought about setting NOMAIL or one of the DIGEST options by any
chance? That may reduce the inbox clutter, and still keep your subscription
if you found a subject you wanted to
On Wed, 4 May 2011 11:50:01 -0700, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have been reading a new(?) book called Real World IBM z Stories.
It talks specifically about companies (with names) of system z success stories.
It also talks about 3 univesities that teach OS's that run on System z.
I got my
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jeff Holst
It is my recollection that one of the CICS SVC modules needs to be in
NUCLSTxx. Any chance that this is the one you re having a problem
with?
Not likely. That one is DFHHPSVC, and is needed only if
I too, hate to see someone leave due to a high level of noise on the
list.
Most e-mail clients allow you to set criteria or rules to send certain
mail straight to the trash. If there are topics or posters you are not
interesting in seeing, send that to the trash and keep participating in
what is
On Thu, 5 May 2011 08:47:30 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Some of our lab systems don't; they rely on shared DASD. Described
as an economy measure. Is TCP/IP for z/OS a separately priced
item?
Yes. Along with a some other base components that have competitive
Listers:
We have an IBM 6262 mod D22 impact printer that was converted from bus/tag
to coax. We have connected the printer
to the coax side of a protocol converter box and the tcp/ip side of the
converter box to our mainframe.
What we want to do is print using PSF but the printer does not
There's a CPU hit ptf for *master* doing work on available frames queue.
It might show up as a paging issue on your system. Might want to check it
out.
Chip Grantham | Ameritas | Sr. IT Consultant | cgrant...@ameritas.com
5900 O Street, Lincoln NE 68510 | p: 402-467-7382 | c:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 5 May 2011 08:55:15 -0400, Rob Schramm wrote:
I might understand (due to I don't want to set it up) not setting
up SSH.
But are there any installations not running TCP/IP these days?
I
Gil,
Using Ported Tools OpenSSH does not *require* /dev/random, but if you
don't have it it falls back to a slow ssh-rand-helper thing. In
OpenSSH, this is used for PRNG during initialization of a session
(only).
Its a PITA that z/OS doesn't include a secure software /dev/random,
like every
Using the hardware is optional, there's a software implementation too.
Some smaller lpars may not have enough cpu share to drive the software
process though in Ported Tools 1.1, I know that this was the case with
some of our sandbox lpars that experienced chronic timeouts. IBM
remedied this in
Helpful and a bit weird all at the same time. Wouldn't it have been easier
to just fix the PRNG issue in the first place by creating a ssh_rand_helper
that used an assembler module to gather entropy.. than creating an option to
deal with the slow PRNG with OpenSSH?
Rob Schramm
On Thu, May 5,
Hello,
can you pls tell me a way to see all versions of a certain abar ??
Many thx, A,.Cecilio.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
I should mention that this on the /tmp filesystem. TCPIP creates a
/tmp/stackname.pagent.tmp, so that when it is
modified PAgent will be notified.
MA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Mark,
I did ftp from tso/ispf from the option 6 and i got the below error :
EZA1450I IBM FTP CS
V1R6
Open message catalog fails 'EDC5129I No such file or directory.'. Using
interna
l
messages
EZA1554I Connecting to 10.237.5.102. port 21
220-FTPD1 IBM FTP CS V1R6 at zos2800, 14:35:36
W dniu 2011-05-05 16:08, Chase, John pisze:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jeff Holst
It is my recollection that one of the CICS SVC modules needs to be in
NUCLSTxx. Any chance that this is the one you re having a problem
with?
Not likely. That
Gadi
When we migrated from z/OS 1.9 to 1.11 we were hit by APAR OA33307 which
caused excess paging.
Description
-
At z/OS R11, if system is 2Gig REAL, RSM will schedule an SRB
( IAXUO IARUOGBS ) to perform Frame Steal operations running
under the *MASTER* asid if a PageFix against
I don't the missing file is a serious problem.
Check the server logs. This appears to be something in the basic set up.
Try your FTP command with -D and -V sub commands.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
W dniu 2011-05-05 16:08, Chase, John pisze:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jeff Holst
It is my recollection that one of the CICS SVC modules needs to be
in
Hi,
I have executed the given command : the output are as below :
with -d
CY2046 ftpSocks:
entered
CY1939 findSocks:
entered
CY0911 ftpStart: start parm and ftp.data processing is
complete
GU1089 chkVerRel: system information for CTS2: z/OS version 1 release 6
(2066)
EZYFT25I Using
IBM Announcement 909-120 states:
Effective June 30, 2010, IBM® will withdraw from marketing the IBM System
z9® Business Class (z9TM BC) and System z9 Enterprise Class (z9 EC), all
models,
features, and upgrades.
We purchased a 2096 with Q02 capacity (335MIPs/47MSU) in 2008. It is
currently
Wayne
When I get bored preparing replies, I check to see what other work is piling
up, typically handled chronologically. This one however is easy since all the
answers are out there in recent posts so it can jump the queue!
I have gone out of my way to respond to this, ...
Much appreciated!
On Thu, 5 May 2011 20:13:06 +0530, jagadishan perumal
jagadish...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark,
I did ftp from tso/ispf from the option 6 and i got the below error :
EZA1450I IBM FTP CS
V1R6
Open message catalog fails 'EDC5129I No such file or directory.'. Using
interna
l
messages
EZA1554I
After typing tso omvs, i get the below error message :
FSUM2055I The OMVS command cannot use the message
catalog.+
FSUM2056I Function = catopen(), catalog name = '/usr/lib/nls/msg/C/
fsumucat.cat
, return value = -1, errno = 129 (X'0081'), reason code = 0594003D,
descrip
tion = 'EDC5129I No
On Wed, 4 May 2011 21:03:24 -0500, Chris Mason
chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
This was and continues to be a technical exchange about proper words.
Unlike with a rose, we don't have smell to guide us.
Oh, I can smell it alright...
Art
I'd say the key might be:
CZ0390 ftpOpen: no security mechanism is specified
Since the server is the one that performs initial authentication, I'd focus
there.
The missing file is a separate issue, I think.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Withdrawal occurred *last* year: 2010. Elvis has already left the
building. You cannot upgrade the machine in any way regardless of
sourcing. It's IBM's long time policy.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
Morning, Gadi.
My (small) test system is still firmly at 0%, but my (larger, still not
big) Prod system went from 0% to ~8%.
Cheers,,,Steve
Steven F. Conway, CISSP
LA Systems
z/OS Systems Support
Phone: 703.295.1926
steve_con...@ao.uscourts.gov
From:
גדי בן אבי gad...@malam.com
To:
I'd wait for IBM's year end specials and get a new box. IBM can be pretty
aggressive on pricing and has been known to put a new box deal on the table
that actually costs less than many upgrade paths.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Mainframiacs,
User experience sessions at SHARE are among the most valuable and well-attended
sessions at the conference. They have been at the very core and foundation of
SHARE since 1955 and continue to differentiate SHARE from other System z
conferences. We learn from each other.
I have the same issues with purchased, but inactive capacity.
IBM actually gave us 1 year to activate the purchased but inactive
capacity. That window ends on 6/30/2011. We have to order the activation
microcode by 6/30 and have 30 days from shipment to activate it. If not
we lose it.
I
W dniu 2011-05-05 17:10, John Thinnes pisze:
[...]
Several questions.
Has anyone lost capacity they purchased because of this IBM policy?
I don't know, but I think that WLC has eliminated most reasons to
downgrade the machine (other vendors use similar licensing)
Are there 3rd party
W dniu 2011-05-05 17:01, Chase, John pisze:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
W dniu 2011-05-05 16:08, Chase, John pisze:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jeff Holst
It is my recollection that one of the
Hal,
Actually that isn't it (I don't think anyway). I have been following the
thread and tried the same FTP command. Mine works fine, and I get the same
security message. The thing I find interesting is that there doesn't appear to
be any logon message. Here are the final few lines of an
On Thu, 5 May 2011 20:58:53 +0530, jagadishan perumal
jagadish...@gmail.com wrote:
After typing tso omvs, i get the below error message :
FSUM2055I The OMVS command cannot use the message
catalog.+
FSUM2056I Function = catopen(), catalog name = '/usr/lib/nls/msg/C/
fsumucat.cat
, return value =
I forgot about 'pre-purchased' capacity. We did that a few years ago and
never got around to activating the CP we had paid for by the drop-dead
date. We ended up having to model-upgrade to get more capacity. OTOH IBM
gave us credit for the extra CP when pricing the new model.
Any CP or memory
I was also looking at the missing challenge from the local security. However,
'security' does not always mean that. It can also mean things like encryption.
The OP appears to fail in the handshake somewhere after the session security is
established but before the credential challenge. It is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
W dniu 2011-05-05 17:10, John Thinnes pisze:
[...]
Are there 3rd party companies that can provide the upgrade service?
Yes. IMHO the simplest way is to purchase another machine from second
hand market. The
Skip,
IBM has stated that we can upgrade to our purchased capacity until
06/30/2011. However, I have not seen an IBM announcement that explicitly
states this.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
As I indicated in my previous post, a one-year grace period for an
already-purchased upgrade is probably standard. From our experience,
however, you should not count on any extension beyond that. Marketing was
very firm on this point. And no third-party entity can skirt the rules
because IBM
Cross-posted to IBMVM,LINUX390, IBMMAIN for those who are
interested in updates via hour-long, no-charge webcasts.
Feel free to register to listen to one of the two live
calls on Thurs. May 12 or listen to the automatic replay in about
a week.
(remember there's also a linux webcast on May 10/11,
I got the following info from one of our security folks today about a potential
security exposure with the HMC. Is it valid that the HMC has a RIP listener
active, or could I potentially turn it off? Any info about this would be
helpful
so I can get the security scan group off my back.
The HMC is a closed appliance with only minimal configurability by the
customer. I would open a service call and refer the matter to IBM. If this is
really a risk then they should jump all over it.
My $0.02.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On 5 May 2011 16:42, Todd Burrell z...@cdc.gov wrote:
Description :
The remote RIP listener accepts routes that are not sent by a
neighbor.
This cannot happen in the RIP protocol as defined by RFC2453, and
although the RFC is silent on this point, such routes should probably
be ignored.
Universally understood? If that were true there wouldn't be any debate,
would there?
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 14:16, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
Don
We are not dealing with a language - that would be another campaign such as
getting rid of the stupid misuse of issue or issues
Port Scanner is my bet.
Rob Schramm
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
On 5 May 2011 16:42, Todd Burrell z...@cdc.gov wrote:
Description :
The remote RIP listener accepts routes that are not sent by a
neighbor.
This cannot happen in the RIP
Universally understood? If that were true there wouldn't be any debate,
would there?
Bingo!
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Or Qualys
BobL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Rob Schramm
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 3:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: RIP issue with HMC - security violation?
Port Scanner is my bet.
Rob Schramm
On
Robert Birdsall wrote:
I'm posting this mostly to say thanks for all the good
information/discussion/laughs over the last few years.
I'm now supposed to be 80% AIX, 20% MVS (or successor), so I just don't
have the time to tune in to the Chris Mason show every morning anymore.
Sorry Chris -
Check out Infoprint Server instead of PSF to send non-AFP files to a
printer. With the optional transforms, you can even convert AFP into PDF,
Postscript, or PCL.
--Roger
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Roberto Halais roberto.hal...@gmail.comwrote:
Listers:
We have an IBM 6262 mod D22 impact
Todd,
Have you enabled Routing in the HMC network configuration, there is a check box for this, just turn
it off. Also check in Network Diagnostic Configuration to show what UDP ports are listening.. is 520
there?
Cheers
Roy
Todd Burrell wrote:
I got the following info from one of our
Hi,
The output of /d omvs,f is
-D OMVS,F
BPXO045I 06.30.26 DISPLAY OMVS 234
OMVS 000D ACTIVE OMVS=(00,FS)
TYPENAME DEVICE --STATUS--- MODE
TFS 3 ACTIVE RDWR
NAME=/dev
PATH=/SYSTEM/dev
MOUNT PARM=-s 4
TFS 2
Since your IBM 6262 printer is now TCP/IP-attached, have you tried sending
it a small test job using z/OS's LPR command?
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Resident Enterprise Architect
Value Creation Complex Deals Team
IBM Growth Markets (Based in Singapore)
E-Mail: timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com
Ted MacNEIL said:
I shall continue to use USS to relate to z/UNIX.
When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, 'it
means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.
I must add: not if you expect me to understand you.
Dale Miller
dalelmil...@comcast.net
Ted MacNEIL said:
I shall continue to use USS to relate to z/UNIX.
When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, 'it
means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.
I must add: not if you expect me to understand you.
Since I'm not the only one, including IBM,
Hi Ron,
If a VSAM dataset is allocated with a candidate list of volumes
VOLSER=(VOL001,VOL002,VOL003 ), the datset will allocate to the first volser in
the list, then the next, etc. The catalog entry will show all of the volumes,
even if there is no VTOC entry there yet . Back a few years
Releasing space at close can be handled in the management class by
specifying Partial release with Yes Immediate (YI) or Conditional Immediate
(CI) if you want to ensure that data sets have secondary allocation before
the space is released. This does not require the space management function
Dear all
Is there any ways to monitor unused ,overallocated space and extents for
PS,VSAM and PO by JCL or Tools?
Thanks a lot!
Best Regards,
Jason Cai
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
---SNIP
Suggestion:
1. It depends on PS datasets, IMO. If you do MOD then do not release space. If
mod is not used then sure why not release space (for ps). I was at a shop that
was infamous for being tight with the $$ and we ran a release job everynight
after
Hi Bill,
I have a similar requirement to yours with CA-Topsecret. I was encouraged
after reading some information about a product called: Tivoli zSecure
Admin. According to its User Reference manual, The Tivoli zSecure Admin
RACF Offline function provides the possibility to issue most RACF
Maybe a half 3380-3 pack out of say 20 mod 3's.
Hard to save something that didn't exist.
3380's didn't exists with -#'s.
They were 'S' -- the original -- not dual-ported, D -- dual, E -- double, J --
singles quad-ported, K -- triple quad.
No numbers.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Is TCP/IP for z/OS a separately priced item?
Yes.
Actually, no.
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Resident Enterprise Architect
Value Creation Complex Deals Team
IBM Growth Markets (Based in Singapore)
E-Mail: timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com
90 matches
Mail list logo
