HI,
I am in processing and planing and development of a big change in the way
MFNetDisk handle emulation.
Until now each CCW was sent to PC to be process in PC.
Each CCW require TCP read and write operation.
The new feature which I plan now and I have in mind is to stack many CCWS
until
What kind of dataset it is? Try looking at the ICF Catalog record via
processing
SMF Type 60-65 ...MXG/SAS if you have can be handy in generating
reports..also on the basis of type 15...
snapshot of type 15
Record type 15 is written for non-VSAM direct access, or VIO tape data sets
that are
Michael
I was wondering if there is an API or if it is possible to get this
information
by SNMP...
This was a fascinating suggestion!
It looks like a suggestion that someone steeped in the ways of UNIX might
imagine but not one for someone used to the ways of z/OS and its
predecessors.
W dniu 2011-05-21 21:13, Binyamin Dissen pisze:
On Thu, 19 May 2011 17:42:12 -0400 Kirk Talmanrkueb...@tsys.com wrote:
:In my notes I also have DBLT = DeadBolt
Sad to say, but it never made it out the door.
Just for record purposes: there is also polish security product called
PIES (dog).
Hello everyone,
I need to install RRS onto my LPARS however in doing the defines for the RRS
datasets I ran out of space in the system logger datasets. My question if I
switch over to the secondary logger dataset and then delete and redefine the
primary logger dataset and then switch back to
I'll go this far out: when it comes to XCF thangs like couple data sets
and CF structures, you should *always* make changes *dynamically* unless
you're in the middle of a crisis where IBM Level 2 specifically instructs
otherwise.
After 15 years of widespread parallel sysplex deployment,
I have posted new maintenance for z/XDC. For details please visit our
Facebook page. You can find it by going onto Facebook and searching
for ColeSoft.
Thank You,
Dave Cole REPLY TO: dbc...@colesoft.com
ColeSoft Marketing WEB PAGE: http://www.colesoft.com
736 Fox Hollow Road
On Sun, 22 May 2011 16:53:50 -0400, David Cole dbc...@colesoft.com wrote:
I have posted new maintenance for z/XDC. For details please visit our
Facebook page. You can find it by going onto Facebook and searching
for ColeSoft.
Thank You,
Dave Cole REPLY TO: dbc...@colesoft.com
Greetings!
Is anyone using BIM-EDIT (originally from B. I. Moyle Associates, now
CSI International) on z/OS? If so, what version/release of z/OS is it
running under? Are you also using BIM-EDIT/XP, the Windows client for
BIM-EDIT?
Regards,
Joe Lenz
TTI, Inc.
Fort Worth, TX
Wow This is list very quiet. Hope you are all doing okay.
Lizette
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
Yeah, Lizette I agree really quiet, unusually so ..
Scott J Ford
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Sun, May 22, 2011 10:51:55 PM
Subject: It got very quiet
Wow – This is list very quiet. Hope you are all doing
I agree with Al: it's per machine. After all the per machine calculations
are made, there's a final step before billing: adding up the per machine
peak 4HRAs for any qualifying Sysplexes.
There are some relatively unsurprising conclusions you can draw if you want
to maximize efficiency:
1.
Have a hangover from the end of the world party
They Lied...
Shane
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Scott Ford
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 12:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: It got very quiet
Hi ,
Sorry this is not JES3 issue but I need your help , we are running DB2/CICS/IMS
on two z9 CPU's SYSPLEX with shared dasd's. We use to pay license for only one
CPU for These products but SBM (IBM agent in Saudi Arabia) want to charge these
products for all CPU's.
Please someone can help
Facebook ... professional - interesting juxtaposition Mark.
I'm also not a customer (would love to have a play as I've said before)
- this info would make more sense (IMHO) announced and linked
(internally) off the homepage rather than hidden unannounced in a txt
file for the applicable release
Uh-oh - is that Barbara I hear charging in from stage calling out
I tried to warn you all ... ?
:-)
Shane ...
On Sun, 22 May 2011 19:55:03 -0700 Edward Jaffe wrote:
A few months ago, we brought up z/OSMF under z/OS 1.12. Applying
service this weekend made it totally unusable. It turns out
The products are licensed to the particular z/9 physical processor, and
charges are dependent on MSU's of the z/9 (or z/10, or z/196, etc.) The only
way to pay for only one z/9 would be to only run the products on a single
z/9, and not the other. There may be a Sysplex pricing model, but it would
A few months ago, we brought up z/OSMF under z/OS 1.12. Applying
service this weekend made it totally unusable. It turns out our
configuration files have been wiped out!
...
I'm not sure if this is what I would necessarily call 'progress', but
it's definitely a brave new world out there.
Stephen,
see chapter 5 of the Unix Planning Guide. HFS and zFS still need to be
stated within MOUNT parameter. But basically they are ignored. I assume,
for the newer functions like ALTROOT, IBM just omitted this TYPE-option.
Cheers
Michael
Von:Dr. Stephen Fedtke
Or, we're the only ones left. There's a rumor that the most annoying
posters have left us in peace.;-)
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
20 matches
Mail list logo
