Non sms with a 14 track vtoc just so you don't have 13 tracks left for
another dataset.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
snip
Just curious as to a general consensus, do you use SMS for spool
I am out of the office until 09/05/2011.
I will respond when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 27
Aug 2011 to 28 Aug 2011 (#2011-240) sent on 8/29/2011 0:00:01.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
Hi
Just curious
What do you expect to see in a monitoring dashboard ?
As we are a small test shop, I have limited ideas, what would be
important to see
On 8/26/2011 9:30 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
To all,
Many many THANKS to all who replied to me on this list and also offline.
All
In
f255efe0ecf08c4a9c1db6aff423541716483...@ch2wpmail1.na.ds.ussco.com,
on 08/27/2011
at 11:22 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com said:
ITYM free rein.
Yes. Which is why spill chuckers often don't catch errors.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Just curious
All right. I'm glad you asked! :-D
What do you expect to see in a monitoring dashboard ?
You can look in the first posting of the original thread, but I repeat here
something similar after having discussions with a lot of persons and looking at
websites
We are migrating our CA-1 TMSXITJ accounting exit from OS/390 (where it was
called TMSUX2J) to z/OS 1.11. The exit needs to find the TCB for the batch job
mounting the tape. What has worked in the past is
USING PSA,R0
L R3,PSAAOLD
USING ASCB,R3
L
No, never have.
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 14:50:01 -0700, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Just curious as to a general consensus, do you use SMS for spool volumes?
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
In an effort to remain positive
Useful Systems Specialist
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 23:56:06 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Unsubstantiated subsystem selection.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com
Sender:
Did we have to start this again?
Bob Shannon
Rocket software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
dfHSM goes to great lengths (I have seen the code) to preserve
CREATE/REF dates as these are critical in SMS management.
IOW, recovery from backup will preserve CREATE/REF dates. Recover from
Migration will preserve only the CREATE date. The REF date will be set
to the recall date
HTH,
snip
Barry, either PSATOLD or PSAAOLD should work. Why do you think you're getting
a random TCB? The only thing
I can think of is perhaps IEFUJI is too early and you're getting the info for
the initiator, not the address space. But I can't recall that having changed.
What version of CA1 are you
In
b282be35b5a4494894d4ecfba2bf7847180f58d...@xch-nw-17v.nw.nos.boeing.com,
on 08/29/2011
at 05:52 AM, Schwarz, Barry A barry.a.schw...@boeing.com said:
Unfortunately, under z/OS it produces the address of a random TCB.
We tried changing the code to obtain the TCB address directly from
Is anyone on this list currently utilizing a zIIP engine with the below
software products and were there benefits on purchasing the zIIP engine?
IDMS Release 17
DB2 Version 9
FOCUS Version 7.6.10
Our agency is exploring the possibility of purchasing a z196 405 with a zIIP
engine.
If by own TCB of a job, you mean the job step TCB of the currently
executing step which is either the current TCB, or some TCB for which
the current TCB is a subtask (or other descendant), then the following
should find the TCB:
USING PSA,R0
L R3,PSATOLDCurrent TCB (zero for
I can address the IDMS 17 product - IT DEPENDS - if you use IDMS predominately
as a back end to CICS or other front-ends - then I would say the answer is YES
- we have seen tremendous savings in our CVs that run 700 million
transactions/week - 99% of the work was zIIP eligible, and 33% of that
I can speak only for DB2. When we implemented that V9, we saw immediate
benefit on one LPAR: the one that heavily uses distributed DB2, i.e.
queries coming in remotely from other servers. zIIP has little benefit for
local queries such as CICS or (batch) TSO. There is zIIP usage by some DB2
On 08/29/2011 12:56 AM, MONTERO ROMERO, ENRIQUE ELOI wrote:
Hi,
Why to preserve or change the date of the dataset?
An user had a library (PDS) with the incorrect BLOCKSIZE, so the HSM backup/migrate
did not work for this dataset, we asked to the customer to fix the dataset using
standard
Even using Spanned (record format is S) or Undefined (record format is U) Cobol
(Enterprise COBOL 4.2) appears to not allow a record length more than 32K:
32 IGYGR1224-E The maximum calculated record size of file
WIRE-DOCUMENT-FILE was greater than the maximum allowable size
You could write a little one-time-shot Assembler subroutine to handle this
file and return the records to the calling COBOL program.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 12:05 PM
Bob
You can analyze the potential value of the zIIP engine by turning on PROJECTCPU
in PARMLIB(IEAOPTxx). This switch has z/OS generate the eligible fields into
the SMF data. If you're a member of SHARE or CMG you can find a paper I've
presented a number of times: zIIP and zAAP Eligible Time
On 8/29/2011 11:05 AM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Even using Spanned (record format is S) or Undefined (record format is U) Cobol
(Enterprise COBOL 4.2) appears to not allow a record length more than 32K:
32 IGYGR1224-E The maximum calculated record size of file
WIRE-DOCUMENT-FILE was greater
Unbelievable, Shannon Spits!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
We have a zIIP and are DB2 V9. A recent PTF allowed DDF offload of 60% but you
need to read this to understand how it really works.
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/bit.listserv.ibm-main/2011-03/msg00061.html
Bill Johnson
From: Cosby, Bob bob.co...@nfc.usda.gov
To:
As I recall, QSAM/BSAM can have a logical record 32K. But __only__ if
it is VBS and __ONLY__ if you process each logical segment separately in
your own code. That is, you cannot request that QSAM merge the segments
together into a single logical record for you. The reason being that
each segment
Hello list,
Someone, know, if have a command that show who is using the CSA , and ESQA
áreas from ZOS ?
We are running ZOS 1.12.
Thanks very much
Sergio Lima Costa
Atenção: Esta mensagem foi enviada para uso exclusivo do(s) destinatários(s)
acima
I know there is an RMF screen that will show you all that, but I can't
remember exactly which one.
2011/8/29 Sérgio Lima Costa sergio.co...@cetip.com.br
Hello list,
Someone, know, if have a command that show who is using the CSA , and ESQA
áreas from ZOS ?
We are running ZOS 1.12.
Hello Sergio,
Through RMF monitor 3 you can get this information.
Access RMF interface, option 3 (Monitor III), option 3 (Resource) and option
10 (STORC Common storage summary)
Regards,
Roberto Pacheco
4bears Technologies
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hello Sergio,
At RMF III, option 'Resource', and in Storage you have two reports:
10 STORC Common storage summary(SC)
11 STORCRCommon storage remaining (SCR)
Also you have VSTOR postprocessor reports.
Best regards,
Álvaro.
2011/8/29 Scott Rowe
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 11:38:29 +0530, amit wrote:
i believe your answer points to the Value and range in JES sysparms...can
you set that value to 999:)?
I'm mystified that a JES sysparm should appear in the publication cited,
z/OS V1R12.0 Communications Server IP Configuration Reference
Hi,
We have a client (a small University) who we provide (steeply) discounted
software support services for, who would like to move their OS from a z/10 LPAR
(a very small LPAR on a much larger facility), to their own small z/114. They
are not able to convert to z/OS 1.10 or above right now
Nope.
Linda
- Original Message -
From: Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 2:50:01 PM
Subject: Spool volumes and SMS
Just curious as to a general consensus, do you use SMS for spool volumes?
Ed
Gil,
It#39;s not a jes arm. It#39;s a permanent restriction .
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Hello,
We have recently installed a DS6800 and it was working until Friday and DS6800
went down hard after a power hit on Friday evening.
After powering it back on Saturday morning, we are unable to IPL from our z9 as
we are receiving a A UNIT CHECK WAS DETECTED. There are no other messages
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Sonny Gupta sgu...@maintec.com wrote:
Hello,
We have recently installed a DS6800 and it was working until Friday and
DS6800 went down hard after a power hit on Friday evening.
After powering it back on Saturday morning, we are unable to IPL from our z9
as
34 matches
Mail list logo
