Hello,
Thank you for your answer.
I tried to make a change in NFSATTR : readtimeout(90) to readtimeout(30),
and now everything is fine!
Regards.
Marc.
2012/3/20 Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:11:54 +0100, Marc Manuel wrote:
I've just setup the nfs server on
In addition to giving folks their own user directories, the root should be
Read/Only to prevent anyone from writing to it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:10 PM
To:
In 8f672be771329649a9eb59c7d9d6a2d9521e8...@den-xmail01.den.ofi.com,
on 03/19/2012
at 10:56 PM, Lester, Bob bles...@oppenheimerfunds.com said:
With todays' modern disk arrays, is there any reason (z/OS based or
other) that response time for my Mod54s is consistently higher than
for my Mod9s?
In blu149-w6439eb5eaae44dec128d41a1...@phx.gbl, on 03/20/2012
at 12:24 PM, Dave Salt ds...@hotmail.com said:
That URL would then seamlessly open in the users browser.
How do you get access to a browser on a PC from a z/OS application?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
In 4f68a626.9050...@trainersfriend.com, on 03/20/2012
at 09:45 AM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com said:
Of course, he has his agenda. But an interesting insight, eh?
Insight? I'd call it propoganda. Take Reading a newspaper everyday
spends 20% less carbon-dioxide than reading an
In
a90e503c23f97441b05ee302853b0e62640222e...@fspas01ev010.fspa.myntet.se,
on 03/20/2012
at 12:15 PM, Thomas Berg thomas.b...@swedbank.se said:
Is there a way to get internet links to work from 3270 using PCOM ?
E g You have the text: http://ibm.com in a panel, click on it
and the link
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:05:25 -0500, gsg wrote:
Can someone please explain execution velocity for Workload Manager, I'd really
appreciate it.
If you're really asking if anyone can explain the (sometimes bizarre) results,
then I think the short answer is *NO*.
Not without a lot more data re your
I got the correct answer from Geoff Roussel, IBM:
From within PCOMM:
Edit - Preferences - Hotspots
Tick the Execute URL box, and you should be good to go.
+
from the help for PCOMM:
Note: Personal Communications supports the following URL types:
file://
ftp://
gopher://
http://
https://
Back in early February, I sent off this comment to the redbooks site:
comment
To whom it may concern,
-
This feedback concerns redbook z/OS Version 1 Release 13 Implementation,
SG24-7946-00, which is described still to be in Draft status.
-
Recently I wanted to check on what z/OSMF was all
To all except the rude Wizard of Lodz and any others who routinely discard my
posts
... From within PCOMM:
... Edit - Preferences - Hotspots
... Tick the Execute URL box, and you should be good to go.
I bet it's impossible, ...
I *guess* he lost his bet!
... however there is Norwegian 3270
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:11:30 +, Graham Harris wrote:
... could be polluting all your processor caches a lot
more than you were experiencing previously on 3 CPs, which could lead to
increased overheads in the OS managing higher levels of cache-misses under
the covers.
The operating system
Everyone is missing the point. Let me rephrase.
What do most users and managers think when they hear or use the phrase copy
data at xxx number of MB/sec.? Do they think that means the theoretically
fastest possible rate at which data can be transferred under ideal conditions,
or the actual
May be there is a reason as to why you are gettign so many different answers.
In my case, the question I normally get from management is: how much is it
going to cost us to maintain a copy our application XXX data at our DR location?
I change this into a problem of money and budgets.
I figured
In
77142d37c0c3c34da0d7b1da7d7ca3475...@nwt-s-mbx1.rocketsoftware.com,
on 03/20/2012
at 10:12 PM, Bill Fairchild bfairch...@rocketsoftware.com said:
What exactly does MB/second mean when referring to how much data
can be copied from a DASD to a tape?
It normally refers to the data that
The problem is different people will have different assumptions. What I would
do is provide clarification in the documentation of what is being done and how
you are measuring data volumes. You may want to put out multiple messages, one
an actual amount processed, another with the theoretical
EDUCATION.
User education. One should sched some light, explain the user the
complexities of the storage, data netto, data brutto, etc.
BTW:
I have a paper for upper level management which explains such
differences. In simple points:
- RAID takes one disk for parity (you pay for N+1 and get
Hi all,
Does ACIF still free in zOS 1.12 ?
We're trying to migrate to zOS1.12 from 1.7 (in which ACIF is Free as part of
PSF).
Thanks.
Best Regards.
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
AFAIK ... NO ACIF is a chargeable item circa z/OS 1.9...
snip
Hi all,
Does ACIF still free in zOS 1.12 ?
We're trying to migrate to zOS1.12 from 1.7 (in which ACIF is Free as
part of PSF).
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Mike,
Wouldn't you expect this to show up as ENQ contention rather than an
increase in DASD service time?
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:52 PM
To:
From: shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
How do you get access to a browser on a PC from a z/OS application?
Using the ISPF Workstation Agent (WSA.EXE).
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html
On Saturday, March 17, 2012 10:11:20 AM UTC-5, R.S. wrote:
MP3000 Service Guide is SY24-6155 - easily found online. It even has
the default Support Element logon passwords - Woo-Hoo!
Thank you for the hint.
BTW: the passwords are well known and have always been documented.
Default
What can be done to prevent REXXX programs from being so CPU intensive
Thanks,
Tim Brown
Systems Specialist - Project Leader
Central Hudson Gas Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com
Phone: 845-486-5643
Fax: 845-486-5921
Cell:
I won't get into a lather about USS vs. UNIX but then maybe IBM will have to
change all their manuals. For example, SC27-2353-01 - OMEGAMON XE on z/OS Users
Guide (and nearly anything to do with monitoring) refers to USS in regards to
Unix System Services although in this manual it does make a
Rewrite them into COBOL? grin
The REXX compiler would likely be helpful. But if, like me, you're stuck with
using normal, intepreted, REXX, then about the only thing you can do is try to
do as few operations as possible. Likewise, try to use powerful functions
instead of simplier ones. They'll
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Tim Brown tbr...@cenhud.com wrote:
What can be done to prevent REXXX programs from being so CPU intensive
Can you be less specific?
Seriously, what are you asking about? What makes you think a Rexx program
is CPU-intensive? What is it doing? Your question, as
On 3/21/2012 9:38 AM, Tim Brown wrote:
What can be done to prevent REXXX programs from being so CPU intensive
Thanks,
Tim Brown
Systems Specialist - Project Leader
Central Hudson Gas Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: tbr...@cenhud.commailto:tbr...@cenhud.com
Phone:
Thank goodness IBM is spending time correcting USS atrocities rather than
improving z/OS Unix.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
ronjhawk...@sbcglobal.net (Ron Hawkins) writes:
I'm afraid sequential pre-fetch kinda of makes your point invalid for
sequential IO.
when ibm first came out with full-track cache (3880-13/sheriff) ... it
advertised a 90% hit rate ... based on 3380 track, 10 records per track
and sequential
LOL - I know that only a very short list of people will ever be truly
confused by USS (unformatted system services) and USS (unix system
services) references... the cat hearding reference is awesome and
very appropriate... since the cat is out of the bag.
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Look at your code design and remember that REXX arrays are associative.
Every access to an array element is a search for the full variable name
with the index as part of the name.
One of our performance people was concerned that my REXX job took 6 hours
to run. I was loading a large file into
Assume that you have protected your data sets and z/OS Unix files with your
security package, Unix permissions and ACLs, etc so that z/OS userids have
proper access. It is still likely that you don't want to allow some of
these files to be transferred using FTP.In this case, the FTP FTCHKCMD
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:38:03 -0400, Tim Brown tbr...@cenhud.com wrote:
What can be done to prevent REXXX programs from being so CPU intensive
1) License the REXX compiler and run compiled REXX. This may help, but of
course YMMV depending on what your execs are doing. A loop in a compiled
All,
According to the documentation from SHARE, arithmetic functions , compiled will
see the speed up in execution, not I/O...
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Mar 21, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012
On 3/21/2012 8:38 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
Since the Wizard of Lodz is so keen on directing the list
manager to perceived - and certainly in one case totally
invented - malpractice on the behalf of other list
contributors[1], I would like to propose that it is a
hand-on-heart rule that any poster
Very nice!
Jim Link | ITM II | Technical Operations
State of Nevada | Department of Administration | Enterprise IT Services
T: (775) 684-4308 | F: (775) 684-4324 | E: jl...@admin.nv.gov
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ah, this brings back memories of SET AUTOCASE, a mod I wrote almost 30 years
ago for XEDIT. When AUTOCASE was ON (and CASE U was in effect), a line entered
in all lowercase would be uppercased; a line entered with a mixture of upper
and lower was left unchanged. If the latter was in error,
Amen, heaven forbid the improve unix systems services, btw I have worked Vtam
and unix, so amen brothers and sisters I ave seen the Chris light, teasing
Chris .
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Mar 21, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Kirk Wolf
... could be polluting all your processor caches a lot
more than you were experiencing previously on 3 CPs, which could lead to
increased overheads in the OS managing higher levels of cache-misses under
the covers.
The operating system does not get involved in cache misses.
When the
m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com (Tom Marchant) writes:
To look at it another way, cache exists because main storage is very
slow compared to the processor speed. Without cache, the processor
would not be able to execute instructions nearly as fast as it could.
Cache allows data from main storage to
Hi Tim,
You may want to look at what may be keeping huge amounts of data in memory
see if there's a way to pre-sort aggregate it. If you are not seeing a lot of
I/O, the code may very well be reevaluating entire [sets of] arrays with each
record.
The sort packages will far outperform an
I once greatly improved a Rexx routine exploiting the associative Rexx
array. It was some extract from a TMS report. It was originally written like
any other array with a subscript variable. And a lot of for loops.
I changed it to use the main key (in this case the tape volser) as the
Are you sure they are CPU intensive, and not simply slow? We had this
problem a year or two back, and it turned out we had PDSEs mixed with PDSs
in our SYSEXEC concatenation. When we made everything PDS, suddenly the
REXXs ran fine.
David de Jongh
-Original Message-
From: IBM
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:53:34 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I once greatly improved a Rexx routine exploiting the associative Rexx
array. It was some extract from a TMS report. It was originally written like
any other array with a subscript variable. And a lot of for loops.
I changed it to
We are finally being allowed to use Internet Service Retrieval for downloading
our software and service, and I have a general question to those who have been
using it. I have done several downloads of Shopz orders using RECEIVE
FROMNETWORK, and I notice that it is very slow. An order of about
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 1:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: rexx cpu intensive
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:46:47 -0500, Robert Heffner wrote:
We are finally being allowed to use Internet Service Retrieval for downloading
our software and service, and I have a general question to those who have been
using it. I have done several downloads of Shopz orders using RECEIVE
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:04:34 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
Much of my growth in this field has been slow and steady.
The Rexx associative array realization is one of the aha moments I still
remember.
You can code FORTRAN in any language. You will sometimes
be told that if your Rexx, Lisp, C++,
A way to simulate this is to accumulate the stem elements to a string and
then iterate through them.
If jobs is a string of job names...
n = words(jobs)
do i = 1 to n
job = word(jobs, i)
if stem_var.job = ?.
Other_stem.job = 'foo'
etc.
Thank you and have a Terrific day!
Jonathan
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:40:12 -0500, Jonathan Goossen wrote:
A way to simulate this is to accumulate the stem elements to a string and
then iterate through them.
If jobs is a string of job names...
o Sometimes you haven't control over this: the compound
may be defined by a host environment
It really depends on what you're doing with REXX that's causing it to munch
CPU. I associate CPU usage with slow processing, and since I'm not the perf
tune guy, I really only care about how long I have to wait for my code to
execute to completion and do so without adversely affecting others.
I experienced a similar performance gain by swapping a iterative REXX stem
compare with a ISPF Edit Macro search. Instead of performing a one at a time
comparison through 1+ records, a FIND loop on the first 7 characters, then
6, 5, 4, etc turned a couple of thousand iterations to about 4
51 matches
Mail list logo
