Hi, Frank,
I don't know why the web interface to IBM-MAIN does not allow quoting the
original post, but your subject line says what needs to be said.
I'll offer to you the same "advice" I offered to Walt Farrell of RACF
Development when he announced his retirement:
"Whatever you choose to do i
On 5/19/2012 8:20 PM, Pinnacle wrote:
Let me know if I missed any. Clearly we still have a way to go for 24/7.
100%, 99%, 98.4%, 97.5%, 97.4%: clearly trending in the wrong direction. The
average up-time so far in 2012 is 98.46% ... not even two nines.
Of course, things look far worse if yo
I compiled the following list of IBMLink outages in 2012, and the %
availability (total hours - outage hours/total hours * 100) for calendar
year 2012.
February 18-19 (12-hour outage)99.0% availability
March 2-3 (12-hour outage)98.4% availability
May 4-7 (54-hour outage)97.5
In <4fb69a54.7050...@phoenixsoftware.com>, on 05/18/2012
at 11:52 AM, Edward Jaffe said:
>Seriously, I remember OS/2 had a similar issue. Before you could
>write down the information about a catastrophic trap, it would
>restart and blow away the screen. There was a special CONFIG.SYS
>parame
In , on 05/18/2012
at 12:54 PM, Doug Fuerst said:
>Are we saying that we cannot look at the current PSW, get the WSC,
>and look it up?
No, she's saying that she can't get to the associated messages.
>I've been looking at WSC's since System 360 days.
Those are not the issue.
--
Shmu
Yes. My description would have been better if I had written "took those
values from
the SYS statement" instead of "took their defaults from the SYS statement".
BTW, I'd
like to know when SYSIN applies too. Time for an RCF / manual update.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services -
Ah, Mark, quite possibly! Thanks. Yes. Looking at my system, I see, for
example
SUBSYS(STC,INTERVAL(SMF,SYNC)) -- SYS
SUBSYS(STC,DETAIL) -- SYS
SUBSYS(STC,EXITS(IEFUSO)) -- PARMLIB
SUBSYS(STC,EXITS(IEFUJP)) -- PARMLIB
Looking then at the member I see
SYS(NOTYPE(14:19,62:69),EXITS(IE
What do you see for SYS on your output? I think SYS means it is subsystem
parms
that took their defaults from the SYS statement. IOW, if you code something
like
SYS(EXITS(IEFU83,IEFU84,IEFU85),DETAIL)
SUBSYS(OMVS,INTERVAL(003000))
all the exit parms for OMVS will come from the SYS statement
Would you think that SYS was shorthand for SYSIN? Can anyone point me to the
doc for how SMF parms are read from SYSIN?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Terry Sambrooks
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 10:01 AM
To: IBM-M
Hi Charles,
I believe the answer to your question was provided by Jonathan Goossen in
his reply of 18th May.
The System Commands manual indicates that the output from the command is
displayed as message IEE967I.
This manual states that
"orig
The origin of the keyword parameter, which is one
Doesn't anyone know the answer to this?
I'm sure some of you think it is the world's stupidest question. Let me
assure you I did not post this question just so I could see my name in print
on IBM-MAIN. I am trying to write product documentation. I need to write "if
you see X, change Y thusly." I a
I prefer to have system solution, which would allow me to view/manage
TEXT FILE. It's far more convenient than using video camera.
And in fact I miss the facility.
BTW: I haven't investigated it: I have some 3270 emulator which allow to
view few previous screens - sometimes usable for ISPF activ
12 matches
Mail list logo
