Hi,
just curious for now, but we may soon need to do this for real. Has anyone got
this running on z/OS?
I did a quick archive search on knockd but drew a blank. I couldn't find
much in the IBM sites either.
thanks,
Peter Bishop
HP Australia
for port knockd site:IBM.com. Google
has a bunch of hits.
HTH.
Linda
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 28, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Peter Bishop peter.bis...@eds.com wrote:
Hi,
just curious for now, but we may soon need to do this for real. Has anyone
got this running on z/OS?
I did a quick archive
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 23:13:37 -0500, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
All in all, it appears to me that the developers weren't sincerely
motivated to make Unix System Services work as it should. It's
a half-hearted (is
Also see the PR/SM Planning Guide which has a good discussion called
Capping in a single logical partition.
---start quote
In order to use capping for an LP on a CPC where there is a need for only
one active LP using shared CPs, you must define and activate a second
dummy LP. The dummy LP must
On Mon, 3 May 2010 13:48:38 +0300, Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.com wrote:
we are trying to use an ftp client on z/os
using a job to get datasets larger than 4 GB from a windows server after we
succesfully send the Datasets to the windows FTP server .
when trying to get the Datasets back to
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 08:50:13 -0700, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
For decades, I have recommended those wishing to establish a so-called
bronzeplex, use a CONSTD definition like the one we use:
CONSTD,DLOG=ON,SYN=(8,*),PLEXSYN=(HQ3A)
There used to be (or so I thought) special
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:29:27 -0700, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
What is your CONSTD definition? What do you see when issuing 'D OPDATA'
on the local?
P01 is a local... Here's the D O display, I've snipped the non-JES3 bits
P01= SYSVUSER +GSVX014I (VTAM.SM0504) SM0504
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 15:11:50 -0500, Chris Craddock crashlu...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, yeah I know. I know. There will be spluttering replies about software
bills, yada yada - trust me I've heard it all. My question back is, if
you're paying for a high availability platform and not leveraging it,
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:41:09 -0400, Dazzo, Matt mda...@pch.com wrote:
Thanks Dave.
Does anyone know if there is any kind of sample pgm provided by ibm that
will perform a java call from the mvs environment? Thanks Matt
The response from the 'java -version' command is pasted below. Does
this
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:44:21 +0300, #1490;#1491;#1497; amp;#1489;#1503;
#1488;#1489;#1497; gad...@malam.com wrote:
Hi,
A few months ago we replaced our Sysplex Timer (9037-002) with STP.
We have two z890s. Each z890 has a production LPAR and a test LPAR. The
production LPARs form one basic
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Peter Bishop
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Changing system time when using STP
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:44:21 +0300, #1490;#1491;#1497; amp;amp;#1489;#1503;
#1488;#1489;#1497; gad...@malam.com wrote:
Hi
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:04:46 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
Recently two subchannels sets became available on new mainframes.
However my question regards how the number of subchannels is defined.
For example:
1 LPAR on CPC(single CSS) and 2000 devices gives 2000 subchannels
//STEP10 EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH,
// PARM='SH ENV ; CD /ETC ; LS -LA'
ENV: FSUM7351 not found
CD: FSUM7351 not found
LS: FSUM7351 not found
Any thoughts on why my BATCH JAVA does not work, but my TSO JAVA does?
Could it be that the commands are capitalised? Or is that just from the
Hi,
you can also disable them which will save maintenance costs. Basically the
IFL is still there on the core but PR/SM can't use it.
We had to do relinquish one to avoid adding a book. The IFL was taking up a
PU slot that we needed more for a general-purpose CP than an IFL at that time.
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:36:47 -0600, BOB COSBY bob.co...@nfc.usda.gov wrote:
Google is not very helpful.
1. What is the Mps to Ghz conversion for our mainframe - i.e. we have a
2094-S08 505 processor for mainframe applications that has 1,721 MIPS.
2. How many virtual Linux servers would
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:43:11 -1000, Stephen Y Odo step...@hawaii.edu wrote:
Can you elaborate on that point? And cite documentation for it?
I mentioned that to my bosses in one of my many attempts to sell
Linux/IFL to my management. The way I understand it, if we purchase,
say, a z10 BC with
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:48:29 -0600, Kopischke, David G.
dgkopisc...@oppenheimerfunds.com wrote:
Greetings,
I'm researching using HYPERPAV on some new Hitachi disk we're
getting.
I'm coming across mixed indications of whether HYPERPAV is supported on
non-IBM DS8* arrays. I read one post in the
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:14:27 -0500, Dave Kopischke
dgkopisc...@oppenheimerfunds.com wrote:
Excellent Do you happen to know if this is an additional cost
feature of
z/OS or Hitachi ??? Not that it matters a whole lot. I'm going to pursue it
anyway
No extra cost on z/OS. I believe
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:42:25 -0500, Frank Swarbrick fswarbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone out there use ICSF (Integrated Cryptographic Service Facility) for
encryption between self and Visa/Mastercard/ATMs? I'm specifically curious
about how PIN mailer processing is done. (If it is done!) We
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:18:26 -0400, Neal Eckhardt neckha...@penntraffic.com
wrote:
Ok, we just got a z9, and I'm browsing through the HMC stuff. I have
accessed the HMC application through my web browser so I can capture
some screen prints for updated documentation.
While playing around, I tried
Hi,
you should see the message in both LPARs as Skip says.
Google is pretty handy, I found this
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/resources/servers_eserver_zseries_zos_racf_pdf_racf_v2r1_installation_implementation_gg244405.pdf
Seems to be an old manual, but does show the steps required,
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:35:09 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
By default, SDSF STatus panel seems to display jobs in
chronological order. How can I reverse this and see them
most recent on top? There seems to be no column on which
I can SORT % D to accomplish this.
BTW, I
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:54:13 -0400, Martin, Mike mike.mar...@ncsecu.org wrote:
All,
We are using STP but we are not using an External Time Source. We have
two mainframes; a Preferred Time Server and a Backup.
I am trying to come up with the steps required to use our company's NTP
server as
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:34:51 -0500, Mauri Kanter itzuv...@013.net.il wrote:
Good morning HMC fans:
I downloaded snipl
I tried to find the hwmcaapi library for zLinux in resourcelink without
success.
Someone that can point me to the exact url ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Mauri.
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:07:32 -0400, P S zosw...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I'm showing my RACF ignorance in a big way, obviously! That
doesn't bother me, I can take it.
The issue is code that currently generates some data objects (they're
all small) and caches them in HFS. Someone said, They should
HyoungSeok,
what some others have tried to tell you is that you need to send a mail to
the list server and not the list.
So, send a note with the same subject GET IBM-MAIN INFO to
lists...@bama.ua.edu. You can see these instructions at the bottom of the
postings of people who post via the web
Before I got here the TODs on the CPCs had always been set to local time, so
it might be just a historical quirk at some installations based on the
original installation choice many years ago.
I remember when we changed from TOD=LOCAL to TOD=GMT+offset about 10+ years
ago. Painful, but the
Yep, you definitely need Coupling Links. And the STP feature is a priced
one, about the same (perhaps slightly less) than the Timer.
The redbooks Shane mentioned are the go. There's quite a bit to it.
cheers
Peter
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:41:43 +1000, Shane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote:
And I
Hi,
I believe the answer is no, but will be interested to hear if anyone has
accomplished this as we'd love to be able to do it here to get over a
short-term hump.
best regards
Peter Bishop
Opinions are my own and not my employer's
is that it's no different than a stand alone tape would be. In
other words, it's a 'direct feed' from the tape to the host.
Peter Bishop peter.bis...@eds.com 02/26/09 7:07 PM
Yes, that sounds about right.
I'm more familiar with STK terminology, and in STK-speak our problem seems
Hi,
if I understand your question correctly, the short answer is yes.
I think you're asking whether the mainline process in the concurrent server,
after having got a good response to its SELECT which means that a client has
made a connection to its listening socket, then passes this socket to
Have you read the fine manual called OSA Express Guide and Reference (doc
# SA22-7935-05)?
Chapter 10 has a section on performance data which mentions the RMF
interfaces and then refers you off to the RMF manuals. It also discusses
how to use the HMC to get a quick overview if that's all you
Hi,
it's not a direct answer to your question, but when the network folk found
it too hard to stop this on one of my sessions (don't know why, something to
do with USSTAB), I just decided to have it print to file rather than a printer.
Naturally, I never print that particular file, and it just
33 matches
Mail list logo
