Re: z/Architecture Reference Summary

2008-10-20 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Steve Comstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But $173.82 for 84 pages? Plus shipping. No more worries about the Dow Jones. I'm sitting on gold! http://www.rvdheij.nl/fullhouse.jpg -Rob -- For

Re: IBM's Project Big Green Spurs Global Shift to Linux on Mainframe

2007-08-03 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:23:32 -0500, Eric Chevalier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, that's certainly good news about System z hardware. But I don't see very many jobs opening up for *z/OS* Systems Programmers as a result of this project. But it may help reduce job closings for z/OS folks. Linux on

Re: OT Funny IT Movie

2007-07-02 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:32:23 +0200, Birger Heede [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is said that both danish and dutch sounds like a throat desease and thus easily can be mixed up :-) Fortunately we can all be right now, since according to my Danish friend: It is fluent Norwegian with Danish subtitles.

Re: Testing System Programmer Capabilities

2007-06-27 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 6/27/07, Kenneth E Tomiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If this company being asked to test the SysProgs is legit, they could always corrupt their own system, then back up the dump to tape and ask the SysProg to shoot the bug they caused by doing unnatural acts. Those things get much less

Re: Security vs knowledge [was: RE: how to list LE options]

2007-06-22 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 6/22/07, J R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the JES2 Init deck, you can specify clear text passwords for RJE lines. That is a great reason for specifying UACC(NONE). That sounds like a great reason for not keeping the JES2 Init deck in PARMLIB. Yes, indeed. Otherwise someone with an approved

Re: The USS Heresy (was Patents, Copyrights, Profits, Flex and Hercules)

2007-06-22 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 6/23/07, Tom Marchant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... z/Linux ... verboten (for legal reasons ... ). It is? What legal reasons? Back then, someone else owned the trademark. But since your rights to a trademark vanish when you don't use it, I would not be surprised if that problem