In ,
on 05/14/2012
at 10:34 AM, "McKown, John" said:
>About as smoothly as a Baja race.
I don't know anything about Baja races, but I assume from your comment
that they're painful.
>I still have scars.
I missed the initial release of DF/EF, and after reading the feedback
I was quite happy t
On 05/13/12 14:27, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In<1336770284.12924.20.camel@localhost>, on 05/11/2012
at 05:04 PM, David Andrews said:
So expanding the max number of generations much past 255 is
problematic with the current key design. I guess IBM could walk
in a new catalog forma
Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 1:28 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: ### of GDG Entries
>
> In <1336770284.12924.20.camel@localhost>, on 05/11/2012
>at 05:04 PM, David Andrews said:
>
> >So expanding the max number of g
In <1336770284.12924.20.camel@localhost>, on 05/11/2012
at 05:04 PM, David Andrews said:
>So expanding the max number of generations much past 255 is
>problematic with the current key design. I guess IBM could walk
>in a new catalog format (by e.g. allowing more than one GDS per
>extension
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 11:43 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
> In <9a5727782f43d643b484c4d0dca637a303610...@dfle30.ent.ti.com>, on
> 05/10/2012
>at 08:12 PM, "Donnelly, John" said:
>
> >Is there any way to create or pretend to create a GDG base greater
> >than 255...
>
> No. Has anybod
On Fri, 11 May 2012 16:16:03 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
>At 00:58 -0500 on 05/11/2012, Mike Schwab wrote about Re: ### of GDG Entries:
>
>>We have Mobius that creates report files with the date and time as
>>part of the file name. Huge numbers of 1 track datasets.
&g
At 00:58 -0500 on 05/11/2012, Mike Schwab wrote about Re: ### of GDG Entries:
We have Mobius that creates report files with the date and time as
part of the file name. Huge numbers of 1 track datasets.
Why not make them members of a PDS? The member name would be XDDDHHMM
where X is the year
l Gilmartin
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 11:41 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: ### of GDG Entries
>
> On Fri, 11 May 2012 11:43:33 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
> >
> >The suggestion to create datasets with a timestamp in the name seems
> >lik
On Fri, 11 May 2012 11:43:33 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>
>The suggestion to create datasets with a timestamp in the name seems
>like your best bet in the meantime.
>
However, that suggestion treads perilously close to the topic of
many an inflammatory thread hereabouts.
-- gil
-
In <9a5727782f43d643b484c4d0dca637a303610...@dfle30.ent.ti.com>, on
05/10/2012
at 08:12 PM, "Donnelly, John" said:
>We have a business application that creates literally 100s of
>GDGs a day;
ITYM 100's of GDS's a day in the same GDG.
>Is there any way to create or pretend to create a GDG ba
ular intervals suggestion.
From: "Donnelly, John"
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: ### of GDG Entries
Thankyou all
John Donnelly
Texas Instruments SVA
2900 Semiconductor Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95051
408-721-5640
408-4
We have Mobius that creates report files with the date and time as
part of the file name. Huge numbers of 1 track datasets.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
> At 20:12 + on 05/10/2012, Donnelly, John wrote about ### of GDG Entries:
>
>> We hav
At 20:12 + on 05/10/2012, Donnelly, John wrote about ### of GDG Entries:
We have a business application that creates literally 100s of GDGs a
day; please don't ask.
Is there any way to create or pretend to create a GDG base greater than 255...
Why not concatenate all of them dail
ursday, May 10, 2012 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: ### of GDG Entries
Thankyou all
John Donnelly
Texas Instruments SVA
2900 Semiconductor Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95051
408-721-5640
408-470-8364 Cell
john.p.donne...@ti.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-
W dniu 2012-05-10 22:12, Donnelly, John pisze:
We have a business application that creates literally 100s of GDGs a day;
please don't ask.
Is there any way to create or pretend to create a GDG base greater than 255...
g
NO. THE LIMIT IS 255.
However...
a) you can live with rolled off generation
, 2012 2:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ### of GDG Entries
Hi John,
I have had I similar GDG 'thing'. It would be helpful to know more details...
In my case, we were receiving a widely varying number of reports that we were
to backup and print for our customer. We scheduled
Hi John,
I have had I similar GDG 'thing'. It would be helpful to know more details...
In my case, we were receiving a widely varying number of reports that we were
to backup and print for our customer. We scheduled the print job to run every 8
hours. The operations staff fit the actual printi
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Donnelly, John wrote:
> We have a business application that creates literally 100s of GDGs a day;
> please don't ask.
> Is there any way to create or pretend to create a GDG base greater than
> 255...
>
>
Short answer: No. Max GDG limit is 255.
A GDG dataset with
3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ### of GDG Entries
We have a business application that creates literally 100s of GDGs a day;
please don't ask.
Is there any way to create or pretend to create a GDG base greater than 255...
John Donnelly
Texas Instruments SVA
2900 Semiconductor
Short answer... NO.
The data can be kept after it rolls off the GDG, but it is "just a file"
at that point and must be referenced by the fully
qualified DSN e.g. x.y.x.gvnn
We have a business application that creates literally 100s of GDGs a
day; please don't ask.
Is there any way to create
We have a business application that creates literally 100s of GDGs a day;
please don't ask.
Is there any way to create or pretend to create a GDG base greater than 255...
John Donnelly
Texas Instruments SVA
2900 Semiconductor Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95051
408-721-5640
408-470-8364 Cell
john.p.donne
21 matches
Mail list logo
