On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:59:21 -0800 Henry Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Logan, David wrote:
: Even with my AXSET, I still get a S052/319 ABEND at the ETCRE macro. I
: have no idea why. My code looks right based on what I think I know. What
: am I doing wrong?
: MODESET
setup, e.g, again, ATSET.
Raymond Wong
Boston,? MA
-Original Message-
From: Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 2:24 am
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:59:21 -0800 Henry Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
it, or disclose it
to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and
then destroy it.
From: Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 2:24 am
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:59:21 -0800 Henry
With all of your help, and a bit of blood and sweat, I got a system LX working.
Thanks all for your aid!
David Logan
-Original Message-
From: Thomas, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: 12/18/07 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
I chose using an SVC, but that seems like a
HUGE overkill in order to issue two entire macros (ATSET and LXSET.)
This did not gibe with what has been asked for (in part since there is no
LXSET, although there is LXRES).
If you are truly trying to gain authorization to issue ATSET and LXRES then
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 5:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
I chose using an SVC, but that seems like a
HUGE overkill in order to issue two entire
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:51:56 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Apologies, you are right...I was writing from memory, and
:mis-remembered. The client needs an AXSET and an ETCON. The only way to
:issues AXSET and ETCON seems to be in supervisor state. The only way for
:a problem program
, December 17, 2007 6:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:51:56 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Apologies, you are right...I was writing from memory, and
:mis-remembered. The client needs an AXSET and an ETCON. The only way
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:19:07 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:I believe I understand the ETDEF options. Took me a bit, because the
:authorization and execution key parameters are a bit complicated.
Why not show what you specified?
:But this fact remains: The client only needs to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 6:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:19:07 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
I believe I understand the ETDEF options. Took me a bit, because the
authorization and execution key parameters are a bit complicated.
But this fact remains: The client only needs to issue an ATSET, which does
require authorization
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 7:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
David,
Believe me this is possible as I use it for my products :
(o) APF-auth server code
Do not reserve an AX - use AX=1.
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:39:11 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:OK, if I don't need an ATSET for a non-system LX, why did my PC crash
:with a S0C2? Do I not want to AXRES/AXSET in my server if I use a system
:LX?
:
:Here is my XMS setup from the
Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Logan, David
Sent: 17 December 2007 14:11
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
SSWITCH=NO means you put your
PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 8:10 am
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
SSWITCH=NO means you put your system LX PC routine into common storage?
LPA or LOAD GLOBAL=YES? Having the system LX validate the client and set
up the non-system LX makes sense.
You also
Logan, David wrote:
Apologies, you are right...I was writing from memory, and
mis-remembered. The client needs an AXSET and an ETCON. The only way to
issues AXSET and ETCON seems to be in supervisor state. The only way for
a problem program to gain access to supervisor state code seems to be
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
12/17/2007
at 07:51 AM, Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If this is true, I don't see any way to get around an SVC to allow
clients access to my service.
Unless you write a subsystem. That may be overkill for your application,
but it's not that hard.
--
: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
12/17/2007
at 07:51 AM, Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If this is true, I don't see any way to get around an SVC to allow
clients access to my service.
Unless
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:39:11 -0500, Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, if I don't need an ATSET for a non-system LX, why did my PC crash
with a S0C2? Do I not want to AXRES/AXSET in my server if I use a system
LX?
Here is my XMS setup from the service:
...snipped...
To run my system LX
passed in that is retrieved from a name/token call.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Walt Farrell
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:17:40 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Actually, my server and client code all work fine with a non-system LX,
:so I had not felt the need to post my client code. Not only that, but my
:client code is virtually non-existent. All I did was write the LX value
: Basic Cross Memory questions
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:17:40 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Actually, my server and client code all work fine with a non-system
LX,
:so I had not felt the need to post my client code. Not only that, but
my
:client code is virtually non-existent. All I did
Logan, David wrote:
Even with my AXSET, I still get a S052/319 ABEND at the ETCRE macro. I
have no idea why. My code looks right based on what I think I know. What
am I doing wrong?
MODESET MODE=SUP,KEY=ZERO
GETAXDS0H
LA6,1
AXSET AX=(6)
MVC
...snip...
If the service provider knows who the clients will be, it can SRB over to
them.
But why do you object to using a system LX?
P.S. SVC's are so passé.
...snip...
I object to a system LX partially because it's philosophical, and partly
because there are a limited number of system
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 10:50:34 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:...snip...
:If the service provider knows who the clients will be, it can SRB over to
:them.
:But why do you object to using a system LX?
:P.S. SVC's are so passé.
:...snip...
:I object to a system LX partially because
and use it right from the get-go?
David Logan
-Original Message-
From: Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: 12/16/07 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 10:50:34 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Logan, David
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 5:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Basic Cross Memory questions
I see one of my questions answered, and even with that, not entirely. So
with that, let's jump in. I have three:
(1
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:28:18 -0600 David Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:I see one of my questions answered, and even with that, not entirely. So
:with that, let's jump in. I have three:
:(1) This one has been partially answered, but what is the *best* way for a
:problem state program to get XMS
28 matches
Mail list logo
