Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-04-14 Thread Roger Bolan
Think before you print "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 04/13/2008 05:11 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List To IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc Subject Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English)) I

Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-04-14 Thread Martin Packer
That doesn't necessarily make them DEAD. And with B2H there's a certain element of continued vitality. Slight, mind you. :-( Martin (who uses Bookie and B2H every day) Martin Packer Performance Consultant IBM United Kingdom Ltd +44-20-8832-5167 +44-7802-245-584 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless

Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-04-14 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/04/2008 at 06:26 PM, Roger Bolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Would you guys stop talking about DCF (Document Composition Facility, >5748-XX9) a.k.a. Script in the past tense? It is still available for >z/OS, z/VM, and z/VSE. Yes, but aren't DCF, BookMaster and

Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-03-07 Thread Edward Jaffe
Roger Bolan wrote: Some Information Development groups don't even produce BookManager format output but produce some books in PDF format only now. Eclipse-based Infocenters are the "in thing" now. It's all XML based. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd,

Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-03-07 Thread Roger Bolan
I don't know for sure about that book, but yes, a lot (if not all) of the Information Developers I know now use workstation based tools instead of BookMaster and DCF. Some Information Development groups don't even produce BookManager format output but produce some books in PDF format only now

Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-03-07 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 3/7/2008 12:25:50 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: being enabled. This feature was available from OS/390 1.2 (or 1.3 maybe) till OS/390 2.10. The residual effect is that there is still Enablement checking which must now be used on DCF, but you no l

Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-03-07 Thread Roger Bolan
I think you're thinking of the OS/390 Softcopy Print feature. While BookManager books can be built from DCF source books, there are other flavors of BookManager Build that I think can build from other types of source material. The OS/390 Softcopy Print feature, on the other hand, was for pri

Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-03-05 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 3/5/2008 1:17:11 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: workstation products. I don't think the details are confidential, but I don't know them beyond what I just said. I briefly looked into using the "workbench" some time ago. >> But isn't the z/OS Bo

Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-03-05 Thread Robert Wright
Edward Jaffe wrote: What software do they use? It's a mixture of internal tools and some commercially-available SGML workstation products. I don't think the details are confidential, but I don't know them beyond what I just said. I briefly looked into using the "workbench" some time ago.

Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-03-05 Thread Edward Jaffe
Alan Altmark wrote: I'm not sure why you're tying book format to DCF. DCF is rarely used with System z publications, as book maintenence and formatting were moved to workstations years ago. The tools can produce a variety of output formats, depending on the requirement. What software do

Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-03-05 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 21:26:25 -0600, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Alas, whenever I search for a z/Series PoOP online in HTML/Book format >as opposed to PDF, I conclude that some department within IBM thinks >of DCF only in the past tense. Has PoOP authoring abandoned DCF for >a compet

Re: DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-03-04 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:26:32 -0700, Roger Bolan wrote: >Would you guys stop talking about DCF (Document Composition Facility, >5748-XX9) a.k.a. Script in the past tense? It is still available for >z/OS, z/VM, and z/VSE. > http://www.infoprintsolutionscompany.com/internet/wwsites.nsf/vwwebpublishe

DCF (was Re: System z10 announcement (in English))

2008-03-04 Thread Roger Bolan
Would you guys stop talking about DCF (Document Composition Facility, 5748-XX9) a.k.a. Script in the past tense? It is still available for z/OS, z/VM, and z/VSE. http://www.infoprintsolutionscompany.com/internet/wwsites.nsf/vwwebpublished/dcfhome_z_us --Roger ---