DFHSM QUESTION - REORG OF MCDS

2009-04-20 Thread John Dawes
Good Day,   We have a new client on board.  I have noticed that the MCDS is at 93%.  I have never reorged the HSM cds's (for this client).  I would like to know if my reorg job is okay.  Please let me know if I am missing anything or spot something irregular? /*  

Re: DFHSM QUESTION - REORG OF MCDS

2009-04-20 Thread Bruno Sugliani
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:08:18 -0700, John Dawes jhn_da...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Good Day,   We have a new client on board.  I have noticed that the MCDS is at 93%.  I have never reorged the HSM cds's (for this client).  I would like to know if my reorg job is okay.  Please let me know if I am

Re: DFHSM QUESTION - REORG OF MCDS

2009-04-20 Thread Walter Marguccio
- Original Message From: John Dawes jhn_da...@yahoo.com.au I would like to know if my reorg job is okay. John, you might want to check ARCSTRST in SYS1.SAMPLIB. Here you find a job named HSMPRESS used to reorganize the xCDS using the EXPORT/IMPORT commands of IDCAMS. I used it

Re: DFHSM QUESTION - REORG OF MCDS

2009-04-20 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - REORG OF MCDS On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:08:18 -0700, John Dawes jhn_da...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Good Day, We have a new client on board. I have noticed that the MCDS is at 93%. I have never reorged the HSM cds's (for this client). I

Re: DFHSM QUESTION - REORG OF MCDS

2009-04-20 Thread Lizette Koehler
And select a time when you can take down all of the DFHSM STCs that share the datasets. I would not run the backup part until DFHSM was down in all places it needs to be. I usually wait until my xCDS dataset is closer to 98% full to reorg. One reorg usually last me a year or so. We are not

Re: DFHSM QUESTION - REORG OF MCDS

2009-04-20 Thread John Dawes
Thanks to all who responded.  The MCDS grew from 92% to 93% over the last 5 days. I looked at the SYS1.SAMPLIB(ARCSTRST).  I noticed that when it does the IMPORT command, it is importing to a .NEW.  This is confusing.  I am not sure as to the reason for this.    //SYSIN DD *

Re: DFHSM QUESTION - REORG OF MCDS

2009-04-20 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 09:32 -0500 on 04/20/2009, Bruno Sugliani wrote about Re: DFHSM QUESTION - REORG OF MCDS: Are you sure you want to reorg your CDS ? I thought good practice was not to do that because you 'll end up splitting ci/ca for inserts for few weeks, thus having performance impact. You minimize

Re: DFHSM QUESTION - REORG OF MCDS

2009-04-20 Thread Traylor, Terry
Remedy Queue: tis-hs-mstg (602) 977-5154 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of John Dawes Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 7:08 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: DFHSM QUESTION - REORG OF MCDS Good Day,   We have a new client