I am trying to determine what the difference in response to these two CA1
messages are. The CA1 Messages manual has
IEFTMS7 IPL DATE MORE THAN 8 DAYS FROM LAST IPL
IEFTMS3 PREVIOUS IPL DATE = date
IEFTMS8 VERIFY DATE = date OR 'HELP'
Reason: The current system date is eight or more days beyond
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:13:05 -0500, Lizette Koehler wrote:
IEFTMS7 IPL DATE MORE THAN 8 DAYS FROM LAST IPL
IEFTMS3 PREVIOUS IPL DATE = date
IEFTMS8 VERIFY DATE = date OR 'HELP'
Reason: The current system date is eight or more days beyond the
last BrightStor CA-1
initialization date.
Action:
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:13:05 -0500, Lizette Koehler wrote:
IEFTMS7 IPL DATE MORE THAN 8 DAYS FROM LAST IPL
IEFTMS3 PREVIOUS IPL DATE = date
IEFTMS8 VERIFY DATE = date OR 'HELP'
Reason: The current system date is eight or more days beyond the
last BrightStor CA-1
If I remember correctly (and I don't remember if I do ;-), this may have been
with the product since UCC1 days. Anyway, (and this I definitely remember),
years ago we used to run without any UPS whatsoever, not in any form. We took
hard power hits fairly often and the machine would forget
You remember correctly, those messages have been with the product since
UCC1 days.
Linda Mooney wrote:
If I remember correctly (and I don't remember if I do ;-), this may have been with the product since UCC1 days. Anyway, (and this I definitely remember), years ago we used to run without any
PARM=NODATE to the TMSINIT proc.
Russell Witt
CA 1 L2 Support Manager
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 12:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Differences in IEFTMS7 and IEFTMS8
I
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:34:01 -0600, Russell Witt wrote:
Second (to address Tom's and Richard's complaint) we did realize that IPL's
were not done on a regular weekly basis at all sites anymore. We added a
PARM=NODATE to TMSINIT years ago to prevent any WTOR's from being
issued. With
PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 9:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Differences in IEFTMS7 and IEFTMS8
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:34:01 -0600, Russell Witt wrote:
Second (to address Tom's and Richard's complaint) we did realize that IPL's
were not done
At 19:34 -0600 on 11/11/2008, Russell Witt wrote about Re:
Differences in IEFTMS7 and IEFTMS8:
So, if you want to assume that the system-date is always correct and
eliminate the WTOR's simply add PARM=NODATE to the TMSINIT proc.
This still does not answer the question that was raised about
9 matches
Mail list logo
