In a message dated 6/25/2008 11:16:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You might not ask... but I was still trying. And I found one that should do
the
trick! "D OMVS,W" (D OMVS,WAITERS)
>>
Wonder if it could be opened as 'Integrity APAR'?
**
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:03:07 -0500, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>You might not ask... but I was still trying. And I found one that should
do the
>trick! "D OMVS,W" (D OMVS,WAITERS)
>
>D OMVS,W
>BPXO063I 10.30.08 DISPLAY OMVS 136
>OMVS 000F ACTIVE OMVS=(M8)
>MOUNT LA
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:11:17 -0700, Patrick Falcone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks Mark. You gotta wonder what happened to this support. It had to be
working at some point, you would think. I wonder where it dropped.
>
It worked for HFS, never for zFS apparently (what was IBM thinking?).
And
Thanks Mark. You gotta wonder what happened to this support. It had to be
working at some point, you would think. I wonder where it dropped.
I'm laughing and I'm not gonna ask if there are any more commands that were
issued or need to be for that matter. I promise!
Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROT
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:55:16 -0700, Patrick Falcone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I agree and out of pure morbid curiosity, at this point, did you happen to
issue a 'D GRS,C'? And if so did Latch Number 87 come back, a quiesce latch
for a zFS file system. Just curious if other zFS support may be lac
I agree and out of pure morbid curiosity, at this point, did you happen to
issue a 'D GRS,C'? And if so did Latch Number 87 come back, a quiesce latch for
a zFS file system. Just curious if other zFS support may be lacking..
Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:41:
I agree... two years and counting...
There is no mention of this update on the z/OS 1.8 or 1.9 buckets either.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GE
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:41:13 -0500, Ramiro Camposagrado
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The following section was added to the DFS/SMB section of the PSP buckets
>for z/OS 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, and 1.7, as a result of a PMR that I have opened with
>zFS development in regards to this issue. I guess they are
I just thought that *maybe* I could catch you not checking that *F*M! :-)
If done from the driving system then I would venture this a problem since the
*F*M states that the returned status should be quiesced.
Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:55:49 -0700, Patri
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:06:14 -0500, Mark Zelden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:55:49 -0700, Patrick Falcone
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>You would think that the returned *status* from 'D OMVS,F' would be
>'quiesced' instead of 'active' but then again I just stumbled upon t
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:55:49 -0700, Patrick Falcone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You would think that the returned *status* from 'D OMVS,F' would be
'quiesced' instead of 'active' but then again I just stumbled upon the below.
>
> 'D OMVS,F,e' where 'e' is exception.
>
Yes I tried that (I did loo
You would think that the returned *status* from 'D OMVS,F' would be 'quiesced'
instead of 'active' but then again I just stumbled upon the below.
'D OMVS,F,e' where 'e' is exception.
Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:12:50 -0700, Patrick Falcone
wrote:
>Hi Ma
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:12:50 -0700, Patrick Falcone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Mark,
>
> I'm not sure if this has been mentioned/considered but did you try 'D
OMVS,F'?
Yes. Mentioned in my OP (I wrote "no OMVS display command, nor any MODIFY
ZFS command ").
Here is a maintenance zFS I jus
Hi Mark,
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned/considered but did you try 'D OMVS,F'?
Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was just called about a problem on our WAS development LPAR that turned
out to be a quiesced WAS config ZFS. Much to my dismay, there is no operator
command I ca
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:54:17 -0400, Veilleux, Jon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>o now to my question. Does anyone know a way to figure out how
>to display what zFS files are quiesced without going into z/OS UNIX and
>using zfsadm (like from the
>>
>
>You can always run the zfsadm command in bat
>o now to my question. Does anyone know a way to figure out how
to display what zFS files are quiesced without going into z/OS UNIX and
using zfsadm (like from the
>
You can always run the zfsadm command in batch.
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
This e-mail may contain c
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:31:02 -0500, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>So now to my question. Does anyone know a way to figure out how
>to display what zFS files are quiesced without going into z/OS UNIX and
>using zfsadm (like from the console)?
>
>If not... this looks like a job for... sy
I was just called about a problem on our WAS development LPAR that turned
out to be a quiesced WAS config ZFS. Much to my dismay, there is no operator
command I can find that shows a quiesced ZFS. No OMVS display command,
nor any MODIFY ZFS command. The only hint at all is this message on the
c
18 matches
Mail list logo
