@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FDRABR ARCHIVE
No, or I've misunderstood the FDR doc. If you specify
catalog retention against the two TAPE DD's, FDR doesn't
assign an expire date to the archive dataset. The archive
will exist until it is uncataloged.
That's why I need two archive steps. One does
, May 19, 2008 9:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FDRABR ARCHIVE
Dave,
In my shop we routinely recall datasets that were migrated 4 to 10
years
ago. From your post below you are arbitrarily changing your retpd from
NOLIMIT (or don't delete) to 1 year.
Have you checked
] On
Behalf Of Joseph Butz
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 7:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FDRABR ARCHIVE
Hi Dave,
Regarding this:
|What I don't have as yet is a useful equivalent to HSM recycle.
But
| I'm using virtual tape with 99,999 available volumes.
FDRABR
@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FDRABR ARCHIVE
Dave,
In my shop we routinely recall datasets that were migrated 4 to 10
years
ago. From your post below you are arbitrarily changing your retpd from
NOLIMIT (or don't delete) to 1 year.
Have you checked with your users? How about legal? One would
snip
What I don't have as yet is a useful equivalent to HSM recycle. But
I'm using virtual tape with 99,999 available volumes.
/snip
You will use those up faster than you think. I would suggest (as a
minimum) at least another 100K volsers, and preferably another 200K
volsers.
Good luck!
One other thing, I was forced to make 2 copies to get a longer
retention on copy 2.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Eden
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: FDRABR ARCHIVE
@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FDRABR ARCHIVE
snip
What I don't have as yet is a useful equivalent to HSM recycle. But
I'm using virtual tape with 99,999 available volumes.
/snip
You will use those up faster than you think. I would suggest (as a
minimum) at least another 100K volsers
where FDRABR pays attention to SMS rules.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph Butz
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FDRABR ARCHIVE
Hi Tom,
I don't see a record of support being contacted
to Nolimit then the data owner did not want his/her
data automatically deleted.
From: Gibney, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 5/19/2008 6:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FDRABR ARCHIVE
Sounds like Joseph is correct. I am finishing
Is anyone using FDRABR to archive SMS managed datasets? The doc says
that the COPY1 expiration date is calculated using the F1 DSCB Last Ref Date
and the MGMTCLAS LEVEL 1 Days Non-Usage if there is not a specific RETPD
specified for the dataset. I do a simulate and datasets with no RETPD
Hi Tom,
I don't see a record of support being contacted on this, so I only have
this information to go on.
Section 51.01 is the ABR Archive section that discusses the options for
Archiving. In the SMS-Managed Volumes section, it references Section 70
to review in addition to Section 51.
11 matches
Mail list logo
