Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 9:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to format the current linkage stack for a SLIP dump taken
in SRB mode?
Barbara Nitz wrote:
> Use IPCS :-) option 3.5, look for the symptom
Barbara Nitz wrote:
Use IPCS :-) option 3.5, look for the symptom string (after confirming the
correct DAE data set) and type a T in that line. IPCS does the rest,
sysplex-wide.
Oh yeah. I forgot all about that interface. It requires an AUTHCMD entry
for ADYOPCMD in IKJTSOxx. Too bad it s
Ed,
>I can never remember the name of the REXX I have to run to work with
>DAE. (I don't have it on an ISPF menu.) When I get lazy, I usually just
>type "/T DAE=01". :-)
Use IPCS :-) option 3.5, look for the symptom string (after confirming the
correct DAE data set) and type a T in that line. IP
Barbara Nitz wrote:
Ed,
I bet your customer wasn't happy when you asked to reproduce the problem and
give you another dump! To many customers(including me) it usually sounds like
an excuse unless given a good explanation *why* storage is missing.
Large shop; old school; know their stuff! W
Peter corrects my sloppy wording
> The idea's right, but one minor detail: SLIP will have "issued" SDUMP.
with a more detailed (and more accurate) explanation worthy of any
mathematician! :-) May I blame this on not being a native speaker? (Shane
always assures me I may not :-( )
Ed,
I bet you
Peter Relson wrote:
By the time slip got around to scheduling the actual dump request,
that SRB had already run to completion
The idea's right, but one minor detail: SLIP will have "issued" SDUMP.
SDUMP will have done SUMLST processing, and SDUMP will have "scheduled" the
rest of the dump.
>And as far as I know, an SRB does not get automatically suspended
>just because the PER hardware detects a hit.
Definitely true. PER is no more than a program check. After processing the
PER interrupt control continues at the PER address (unless you've directed
SLIP to do something different, such
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 04/09/2008
04:20:11 AM:
> I certainly would hope that the system automatically SUMLISTs the
linkage
> stacks. Does the SLIP SL operand support indirect address off of control
> registers?
The linkage stack should be in the SUMDUMP.
VERBX SUMDUMP pr
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:24:09 +0200 Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>>Not at all. There is no "SRB" to find as the SRB block only exists while >it
is on a queue. Once dispatched it is simply data.
:>>The registers are consistent with the point of the trap.
:>I believe that I said that. My
Binyamin,
>Not at all. There is no "SRB" to find as the SRB block only exists while >it
>is on a queue. Once dispatched it is simply data.
>The registers are consistent with the point of the trap.
I believe that I said that. My explanation wasn't really for you, it was more
for those that kept
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:07:32 +0200 Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>First, as Ed pointed out, an SSRB will only be generated when the SRB has to
wait for something like a lock or get willingly suspended. The reason Tom has
only seen ssrbs in his dumps may well be that they're scheduled w
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:15:59 -0400 "Craddock, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:>Barbara Nitz writes a nicely detailed summary
:>> In that case no amount of summ format will get you the exact linkage
:>stack
:>> formatted automatically, as far as I know (unless the SRB abended and
:>SRB-
:>> to-
Ed,
>On the bright side, people developing brand new SRB-mode infrastructures
>get lots of hands-on practice with taking SADUMPs and IPLing their
>systems. What fun! :-)
You mean we have to expect more questions about sadumps on ibm-main? :-)
The type that says 'the necessary data are not in th
Barbara Nitz wrote:
First, as Ed pointed out, an SSRB will only be generated when the SRB has to
wait for something like a lock or get willingly suspended. The reason Tom has
only seen ssrbs in his dumps may well be that they're scheduled with the local
lock (or some other lock) held, and that
Barbara Nitz writes a nicely detailed summary
> In that case no amount of summ format will get you the exact linkage
stack
> formatted automatically, as far as I know (unless the SRB abended and
SRB-
> to-task percolation was done, I think).
Linkage stacks get used and reused with such high freq
First, as Ed pointed out, an SSRB will only be generated when the SRB has to
wait for something like a lock or get willingly suspended. The reason Tom has
only seen ssrbs in his dumps may well be that they're scheduled with the local
lock (or some other lock) held, and that isn't available when
amin Dissen
:>Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 9:45 AM
:>To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
:>Subject: Re: How to format the current linkage stack for a SLIP dump
:>taken in SRB mode?
:>On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:32:49 -0500 Tom Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:>wrote:
:>:>In every dump I&
stack for a SLIP dump
taken in SRB mode?
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:32:49 -0500 Tom Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:>In every dump I've seen, all SRBs are present in the form of SSRBs.
Why
:>this is the case I'm not one hundred per cent certain. But it works
for
:>me. Perha
an IF SLIP while the SRB mode
code was active?
:>-Original Message-
:>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
:>Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
:>Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:27 AM
:>To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
:>Subject: Re: How to format the current l
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Why should there be an SSRB? The code running in SRB mode is active at the
time the SLIP(IF) hit.
Unlike a TCB, there is no control block to represent an SRB while it
runs. An SSRB has to be created (acquired from an ESQA cell pool) every
time the SRB waits.
--
Edw
ware
Sugar Land, TX
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to format the current linkage stack for a SLIP dump
taken in SRB mode?
On Tue,
reate an SSRB for the unit of work?
:>-Original Message-
:>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
:>Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
:>Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 5:14 AM
:>To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
:>Subject: Re: How to format the current linkage stack for a SLIP d
Tom Harper wrote:
They should be formatted out towards the top of the SUMMARY FORMAT REGS
display.
Minor correction "REGS" should be "regs". The FORMAT option of the IPCS
SUMMARY subcommand tolerates but ignores a "REGS" keyword as part of the
invocation syntax. Formatting of registers i
, April 08, 2008 5:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to format the current linkage stack for a SLIP dump
taken in SRB mode?
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 21:08:58 -0400 "Craddock, Chris"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:>Jim Mulder said
:>Binyamin said
:>> > Is there
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 21:08:58 -0400 "Craddock, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:>Jim Mulder said
:>Binyamin said
:>> > Is there something easier than looking at the home address space
:>storage
:>> off
:>> > of CR15?
:>> CBF cr15value ASID(x'homeasid') STR(LS)
:>...or go to option 6 and iss
Jim Mulder said
Binyamin said
> > Is there something easier than looking at the home address space
storage
> off
> > of CR15?
> >
>
> CBF cr15value ASID(x'homeasid') STR(LS)
...or go to option 6 and issue "summ format regs". IPCS will format all
of the linkage stack entries that exist for al
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 04/07/2008
04:28:50 PM:
> Is there something easier than looking at the home address space storage
off
> of CR15?
>
CBF cr15value ASID(x'homeasid') STR(LS)
Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY
---
Is there something easier than looking at the home address space storage off
of CR15?
--
Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize
28 matches
Mail list logo
