Re: IBM Announcements Today

In <4da4b490.7030...@bremultibank.com.pl>, on 04/12/2011 at 10:22 PM, "R.S." said: >So, IBM simply closed way for "independent vendor" blades. No. >What does it mean??? Management covers a multitude of sins. >Yes, centralized management could be a value added, but it's NOT >crucial for t

Re: IBM Announcements Today

W dniu 2011-04-13 08:26, Marian Gasparovic pisze: [...] It is the controlling logic that makes it integrated, in this case zManager. It's still "managemnet for management". While centralized management is fine, it's still not crucial for the applications to run. (see also end of my post)

Re: IBM Announcements Today

Radek, with every integrated solution you can say you can buy individual things and put them together. Of course. It is the controlling logic that makes it integrated, in this case zManager. Power blades in zBX - I don't think there are other than IBM Power blades, IBM decided to support one kind o

Re: IBM Announcements Today

I'm well aware of the distinction. The "zEnterprise System" may be composed of both. When they are managed as one, they will come to be seen as "one". At least that seems to be IBMs fervent wish. Shane ... On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:54:29 -0400 "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" wrote: > Read it carefully.

Re: IBM Announcements Today

W dniu 2011-04-12 21:33, Marian Gasparovic pisze: cabinet. Even connected to the mainframe using dedicated link. What's the value added? ISAO (IBM Smart Analytic Optimizer) is probably first application running on zBX. Couldn't it run on "loosely connected" powerBlades? (To be more accurate: pa

Re: IBM Announcements Today

> cabinet. Even connected  to the mainframe using dedicated link. What's the > value added? ISAO (IBM Smart Analytic Optimizer) is probably first > application  running on zBX. Couldn't it run on "loosely connected" > powerBlades? (To be more accurate: part ot ISAO runs on z/OS+DB2, part runs > on

Re: IBM Announcements Today

In <4da445df.6070...@bremultibank.com.pl>, on 04/12/2011 at 02:30 PM, "R.S." said: >What's the value added? Management. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Cong

Re: IBM Announcements Today

In <1302611570.4da4467279...@postoffice.tpg.com.au>, on 04/12/2011 at 10:32 PM, Shane Ginnane said: >Really ?. Yes. > Read it carefully. Note the distinction between "zEnterprise 196 (z196)" and "zEnterprise BladeCenter Extension (zBX)". -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Re: IBM Announcements Today

Really ?. The IBM zEnterprise System includes the zEnterprise 196 (z196), the zEnterprise BladeCenter Extension (zBX) with its integrated optimizers and/or select IBM blades, and the Unified Resource Manager (zManager). . Shane ... On Tue, Apr 12th, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Matthew Stitt wrote: > Read

Re: IBM Announcements Today

W dniu 2011-04-12 14:23, Matthew Stitt pisze: Read closely, don't just scan it. Windows is being supported if you want to run it on an x blade server. It does not mean Windows will run on the z server platform in any environment. Well. 10 years ago it was also possible to install & run windo

Re: IBM Announcements Today

Read closely, don't just scan it. Windows is being supported if you want to run it on an x blade server. It does not mean Windows will run on the z server platform in any environment. On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:15:18 -0300, Carlos Bodra - Pessoal wrote: >http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.js

IBM Announcements Today

http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.jsp?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/8/897/ENUS111-078/index.html&breadCrum=DET001PT022&url=buttonpressed=DET001PT116&page=1000&paneltext1=DET001PEF011&user+type=EXT&lang=en_US&InfoType=AN&InfoSubType=CA&InfoDesc=Announcement+Letters&panelurl=index.wss%3Fbuttonpre

Re: IBM Announcements URL

d. > New Ipswich, NH 03071-3922 > 603.878.1148 Fax 603.925.1978 > >-jc- > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > >Behalf Of Craig Dudley > >> Sent: Wednesday

Re: IBM Announcements URL

d. New Ipswich, NH 03071-3922 603.878.1148 Fax 603.925.1978 >-jc- > > >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On >Behalf Of Craig Dudley >> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 2:27 PM >

Re: IBM Announcements URL

ent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 2:27 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Fwd: Re: IBM Announcements URL > > Hi Ed, > > <http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/index.wss> > > >---SNIP- > >I tried again this morning and got through with no

Fwd: Re: IBM Announcements URL

Hi Ed, >---SNIP- >I tried again this morning and got through with no issue. Try it again and see if it now works for you. Still same problem with Safari 5.0.2 & Firefox 3.6.11 on Mac OS X 10.6.4. -- Craig Dudley Systems & Com

Re: IBM Announcements URL

--- On Tue, 10/19/10, Craig Dudley wrote: From: Craig Dudley Subject: IBM Announcements URL To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Date: Tuesday, October 19, 2010, 1:44 PM Hi, I am trying to access the IBM announcements web page at: <http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/index.wss> -

Re: IBM Announcements URL

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:12:35 -0400, Cheryl Walker wrote: >The link work fine for me using Safari 5.0.2 on a Mac. > >I also use this for z/OS - http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/news.html > >Cheryl > >== >Cheryl Watson >Watson & Walker, Inc. >www.watsonwalker.com >941-266-

Re: IBM Announcements URL

LOGOFF lists...@bama.ua.edu -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Re: IBM Announcements URL

As of midnight central it is still not working on Safari. Ed --- On Tue, 10/19/10, Gates, Guy wrote: From: Gates, Guy Subject: Re: IBM Announcements URL To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Date: Tuesday, October 19, 2010, 1:49 PM Hi, I sent them an Email and got this reply... Hello Guy Gates: We

Re: IBM Announcements URL

raig Dudley wrote: Hi, I am trying to access the IBM announcements web page at: <http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/index.wss> using Firefox 3.6.10 or Safari 5.0.2 on Mac OS X 10.6.4 and am getting a blank browser window. This problem just started last week. This URL works on my Windows XP

Re: IBM Announcements URL

Works fine for me (Chicago area) using IE 8. -jc- > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Craig Dudley > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 1:44 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: IBM Announcements URL

Re: IBM Announcements URL

t: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 1:44 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IBM Announcements URL Hi, I am trying to access the IBM announcements web page at: <http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/index.wss> using Firefox 3.6.10 or Safari 5.0.2 on Mac OS X 10.6.4 and am getting a blank browser window. T

IBM Announcements URL

Hi, I am trying to access the IBM announcements web page at: <http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/index.wss> using Firefox 3.6.10 or Safari 5.0.2 on Mac OS X 10.6.4 and am getting a blank browser window. This problem just started last week. This URL works on my Windows XP version of Firefox

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

Paul Gilmartin wrote: * SDSF now provides job and output management for JES3, Wow! (Should I have known this earlier?) You might have guessed it since they rewrote everything to use JES-neutral SSI 80 to gather job-related information. Some of the ensuing problems have been discusse

Re: Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:59:26 -0400, Pamela Christina in warm & sunny Endicott NY wrote: > >You can find the ann-let text on your favorite geo announcement site, >or you can also look on the z/VM site info/changes page. > > http://www.vm.ibm.com/siteinfo/change.html > * SDSF now provides job an

Some IBM Announcements for z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE (Aug 5, 2008)

For the participants of IBMVM, LINUX-390, and IBMMAIN who are interested in z/OS, z/VM, and z/VSE... The following announcements were made today IBM z/VM V5.4 - Extending virtualization technology for System z IBM z/OS V1.10 offers new scalability, performance, availability, economics, and solut

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:50:47 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >On 04/10/2008 at 08:08 AM, Edward Jaffe ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >>Keep in mind that ServerPac is an SMP/E "bypass". It _restores_ SMP/E >>zones rather than installing into them. > >Keep in mind that you are talking abo

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/10/2008 at 08:08 AM, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Keep in mind that ServerPac is an SMP/E "bypass". It _restores_ SMP/E >zones rather than installing into them. Keep in mind that you are talking about a specific step within ServerPac, not about the ser

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

snippage For the above two reasons, I always advise customers to install MXI into its own TGT and DLIB zones - however the final choice is always down to them. end of snippage Would rather spend an extra few hundred cylinders of space and isolate my products than mix them up and try to undo a

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel McLaughlin Sent: 14 April 2008 11:55 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements) Regarding same ISV products in a common zone. Some products I have seen in the past have intersecting modules and can

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

Regarding same ISV products in a common zone. Some products I have seen in the past have intersecting modules and can result in issues depending on the final linklist order. Daniel McLaughlin Z-Series Systems Programmer Information & Communications Technology Crawford & Company 4680 N. Roy

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:57:17 -0500, Tom Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:39:31 -0500, Patrick O'Keefe wrote: > >> >>... under no circumstances >>would ever have its product installed in with other products in the >>same CSI. > >Could you be a little more specific about w

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

Tom Marchant wrote: On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:39:31 -0500, Patrick O'Keefe wrote: ... under no circumstances would ever have its product installed in with other products in the same CSI. Could you be a little more specific about what you mean by this? Are you referring to the target/DLI

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:39:31 -0500, Patrick O'Keefe wrote: > >... under no circumstances >would ever have its product installed in with other products in the >same CSI. Could you be a little more specific about what you mean by this? Are you referring to the target/DLIB zones or the global? Wha

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:08:34 -0700, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >... >Keep in mind that ServerPac is an SMP/E "bypass". It _restores_ SMP/E >zones rather than installing into them. This might be OK for a complete >reinstall of z/OS. But, I submit that this is *not* the preferred, >op

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:08:34 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote: >Yous [sic] premise that ServerPac is somehow exemplary might be your opinion [..] Thus the and . I have not yet had the priviledge of installing the aforementioned product, but I hear from my teammates it's not too shabby, though some

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:28:12 -0300, Clark Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 10 Apr 2008 16:26:17 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: > > >>In October 2000, a man I greatly admire and respect kindly wrote: >>http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0010&L=ibm-main-archives&P=R3449&I=1. >> >>O

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 04/11/2008 08:05:09 AM: > -- Information from the mail header > --- > Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > Poster: "Chase, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject:

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe > > Shane wrote: > > Excellent !!! - did he say excellent ???. > > Perhaps one day I'll bump into Mr. Jaffe in a bar somewhere > and coax > > out of him who this mystical (mythical ???) vendor might be .

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

rk Morris > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 6:28 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements) > > On 10 Apr 2008 16:26:17 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: > > >Shane wrote: > >> Excellent !!! - did he say excellent ???. >

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

On 10 Apr 2008 16:26:17 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >Shane wrote: >> Excellent !!! - did he say excellent ???. >> Perhaps one day I'll bump into Mr. Jaffe in a bar somewhere and coax out >> of him who this mystical (mythical ???) vendor might be ... ;-) >> > >In October 2000, a

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

Shane wrote: Excellent !!! - did he say excellent ???. Perhaps one day I'll bump into Mr. Jaffe in a bar somewhere and coax out of him who this mystical (mythical ???) vendor might be ... ;-) In October 2000, a man I greatly admire and respect kindly wrote: http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:20:14 +1000, Shane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 08:08 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote: > >> But, I know of at least *one* ISV whose flagship >> product's install procedures are continually rated "excellent" by its >> customer base! > >Excellent !!! - did he sa

Re: Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 08:08 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote: > But, I know of at least *one* ISV whose flagship > product's install procedures are continually rated "excellent" by its > customer base! Excellent !!! - did he say excellent ???. Perhaps one day I'll bump into Mr. Jaffe in a bar somewher

Re: SMP Packaging: was IBM announcements

Allow me to dissent. All vendor install packaging (especially the "helpful" installers) are misguided and below par. Most are significantly worse than that. Serverpac is the best of a bad lot - take that as faint praise or a backhanded compliment - whatever.

Installers (Was: IBM announcements)

Arthur Gutowski wrote: Since SMP/E is required to do any z/OS installation and maintenance, and ServerPac Dialog is all but required, and CBPDO is relatively integrated into SMP/E... Is there any hope of IBM integrating the ServerPac application into SMP/E? Is there any hope that ISV's will

SMP Packaging: was IBM announcements

On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 09:01 -0500, Arthur Gutowski wrote: > Since SMP/E is required to do any z/OS installation and maintenance, > and ServerPac Dialog is all but required, and CBPDO is relatively integrated > into > SMP/E... Is there any hope of IBM integrating the ServerPac application into

Re: IBM announcements

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:59:03 -0400, Ken Porowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >If history serves as any lesson, most attempts at any type of >installation dialog usually fails (CA-AGGRAVATOR anyone?) as well as >most other OEM installers. Give me an install lib and a list of jobs to >run and I'll b

Re: IBM announcements

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/09/2008 at 10:09 AM, Ken Porowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >I was thinking more along the lines of a local (z/OS based web) interface >instead of the current ISPF dialogs. I'm sure that Shane was as well, and that he is concerned about the track record of such re

Re: IBM announcements

I never said it would be better, I was just wondering if that was going to be the direction for what used to be done in ISPF dialogs. Things like ServerPac, Health Checker, Omegamon installer. If history serves as any lesson, most attempts at any type of installation dialog usually fails (CA-AGG

Re: IBM announcements

On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 10:09 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote: > I was thinking more along the lines of a local (z/OS based web) > interface instead of the current ISPF dialogs. A poorly designed (web) interface is a poorly designed interface. What gives you faith it will be any better designed just beca

Re: IBM announcements

Ken Porowski wrote: I was thinking more along the lines of a local (z/OS based web) interface instead of the current ISPF dialogs. Ken Exactly! -Original Message- Shane Ken Porowski wrote: Does this mean that things like ServerPac dialogs are going the way of the web? Gawd I

Re: IBM announcements

I was thinking more along the lines of a local (z/OS based web) interface instead of the current ISPF dialogs. Ken -Original Message- Shane Ken Porowski wrote: > Does this mean that things like ServerPac dialogs are going the way of > the web? Gawd I hope not. It took about 6 years to

Re: IBM announcements

On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 15:52 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote: > Does this mean that things like ServerPac dialogs are going the way of > the web? Gawd I hope not. It took about 6 years to get Link2000 to the AP region. And how many complaints about the (web) IBMLink have there been in the last couple of

Re: IBM announcements

Does this mean that things like ServerPac dialogs are going the way of the web? -Original Message- Walt Farrell Steve Comstock >The weekly IBM announcement letters are out. One that caught my eye: > >IBM System Services Runtime Environment for z/OS V1.1 > > From the description it looks

Re: IBM announcements

On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:41:15 -0600, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >So I couldn't write my own code / HTML and use this product >to run a web site for a corporate intranet or the public internet? >It only works with IBM-supplied or IBM-blessed applications? > That's what the announceme

Re: IBM announcements

Walt Farrell wrote: On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 11:50:01 -0600, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The weekly IBM announcement letters are out. One that caught my eye: IBM System Services Runtime Environment for z/OS V1.1 From the description it looks like it might be a non-WebSphere version of

Re: IBM announcements

On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 11:50:01 -0600, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The weekly IBM announcement letters are out. One that >caught my eye: > >IBM System Services Runtime Environment for z/OS V1.1 > > From the description it looks like it might be a >non-WebSphere version of Apache / Tomca

Re: IBM announcements

Hi Steve, I had the same thought when I read that IBM announcement letter. When I read the IBM announcement letter: 208-076, that product IBM System Services Runtime Environment for z/OS seems to fit. We don't have that IBM TPC for z/OS product. Glenn Miller

IBM announcements

The weekly IBM announcement letters are out. One that caught my eye: IBM System Services Runtime Environment for z/OS V1.1 From the description it looks like it might be a non-WebSphere version of Apache / Tomcat for z/OS. (Wouldn't that be a kick?) It's a no charge item, but requires z/OS 1.9.

Re: IBM announcements

On 1/16/08, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Did you just click on the Go button for > "Jump to most recent announcement letters"? > > Or did you type in 3490 in the Keywords search box > and click Go? I got: > > End of service: Machine Type 3490, selected models > announcement lette

Re: IBM announcements

ubject: Re: IBM announcements Jim McAlpine wrote: > On 1/16/08, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Jim McAlpine wrote: >> >>>Anyone got a url for the IBM Announcements web site. >>> >>>Jim McAlpine >> >>Try this: >> >>h

Re: IBM announcements

d was lucky enough to get the right one on top! Rex -Original Message- On 1/16/08, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jim McAlpine wrote: > > Anyone got a url for the IBM Announcements web site. > > > > Jim McAlpine > > Try this: >

Re: IBM announcements

Jim McAlpine wrote: On 1/16/08, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jim McAlpine wrote: Anyone got a url for the IBM Announcements web site. Jim McAlpine Try this: http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/index.wss Kind regards, -Steve Comstock The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

Re: IBM announcements

On 1/16/08, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jim McAlpine wrote: > > Anyone got a url for the IBM Announcements web site. > > > > Jim McAlpine > > Try this: > > http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/index.wss > > > Kind regards, > >

Re: IBM announcements

Jim McAlpine wrote: Anyone got a url for the IBM Announcements web site. Jim McAlpine Try this: http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/index.wss Kind regards, -Steve Comstock The Trainer's Friend, Inc. 303-393-8716 http://www.trainersfriend.com z/OS Application development made e

IBM announcements

Anyone got a url for the IBM Announcements web site. Jim McAlpine -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http

More IBM Announcements (July 18 and July 25, 2006)

1. I missed this one last week, but it's interesting. Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES), including mainframe Linux, is now available for ordering through IBM: http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/2/897/ENUS206-172/ENUS206-172.PDF Linux itself is free software, remember. (It's perfectly

Re: IBM Announcements

Steve Comstock wrote: OK, so where do you go these days to find the current week's announcements? http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/OIX.wss -- - | Edward E. Jaffe|| | Mgr, Research & D

Re: IBM Announcements

Bruce Black wrote: or go to IBM Offering Info http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/OIAccess.wss which includes anouncements, sales manual, and more Ah, good. I like that a little more than the iSource approach. Thanks. Kind regards, -Steve Comstock

Re: IBM Announcements

or go to IBM Offering Info http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/OIAccess.wss which includes anouncements, sales manual, and more -- Bruce A. Black Senior Software Developer for FDR Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300 personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tech support: [EM

Re: IBM Announcements

Pommier, Rex R. wrote: Sign up for IBM announcements at the following page: http://www.ibm.com/isource I believe it is the third screen of the sign-up where you can tell IBM to e-mail you a summary of the announcements with each announcement as a hyperlink. Rex I'm already subscribed.

Re: IBM Announcements

Sign up for IBM announcements at the following page: http://www.ibm.com/isource I believe it is the third screen of the sign-up where you can tell IBM to e-mail you a summary of the announcements with each announcement as a hyperlink. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe

IBM Announcements

OK, so where do you go these days to find the current week's announcements? I used to have link that would take me directly to the latest list of announcments. It has stopped working. I went to IBMLink and got: " The My IBMLink page that you have requested has been removed. We have replaced it

Fw: IBM announcements

t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > On 28 Jun 2005 06:01:45 -0700, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richards.Bob) wrote: > > >Can someone reply with a link to the IBM Announcements - US letters? > > How about this link: > > http://www.i

Re: IBM announcements

: IBM announcements On 28 Jun 2005 06:01:45 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richards.Bob) wrote: >Can someone reply with a link to the IBM Announcements - US letters? How about this link: http://www.ibm.com/news/usalet/ It seems to get redirected to: http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/apilite?inf

Re: IBM announcements

On 28 Jun 2005 06:01:45 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richards.Bob) wrote: >Can someone reply with a link to the IBM Announcements - US letters? How about this link: http://www.ibm.com/news/usalet/ It seems to get redirected to: http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/apilite?infotype=an&i

Re: IBM announcements

Richards.Bob wrote: Steve, I got *that far* before. It is when I click on an announcement on that page that the problem occurs. Bob Huh. Strange, 'cause it works for me. Oh well, I see you got your problem solved. Kind regards, -Steve Comstock -

Re: IBM announcements

Steve, I got *that far* before. It is when I click on an announcement on that page that the problem occurs. Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAM

Re: IBM announcements

y, June 28, 2005 9:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] IBM announcements Ken, I could not get that link to work either. Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Porowski, Ken Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005

Re: IBM announcements

announcements Here's what I use http://tinyurl.com/don9f -Original Message- Richards.Bob Can someone reply with a link to the IBM Announcements - US letters? The link I have brings up the first page and when I select an announcement, I get "Page cannot be displayed" for a www6

Re: IBM announcements

2005 9:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] IBM announcements Ken, I could not get that link to work either. Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Porowski, Ken Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:11 AM T

Re: IBM announcements

Ken, I could not get that link to work either. Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Porowski, Ken Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject:Re: IBM announcements Here's w

Re: IBM announcements

Here's what I use http://tinyurl.com/don9f -Original Message- Richards.Bob Can someone reply with a link to the IBM Announcements - US letters? The link I have brings up the first page and when I select an announcement, I get "Page cannot be displayed" for a www6. ur

IBM announcements

Can someone reply with a link to the IBM Announcements - US letters? The link I have brings up the first page and when I select an announcement, I get "Page cannot be displayed" for a www6. url. It has been this way for a few weeks, I think. Bob Richards Technologist Enterprise