Re: LOGREC logstream question

2009-11-03 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:48:38 +0100, Miklos Szigetvari wrote: >Hi > >Thank you Mark. >I don't think we have a "well behaved" system. My statement was a joke of course. I would expect something in logrec - the minimum would be IPL records. >I try to use via batch as >//ACCIN DD DSN=SYSPLEX.LOGRE

Re: LOGREC logstream question

2009-11-03 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
"Mark Zelden" wrote in message news:... > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:43:25 +0100, Miklos Szigetvari > wrote: > > >Hi > > > >I while ago I have converted the LOGREC to LOGSTREAM. > >Seems to me no any recording to the LOGREC logstream, I see a feww > >entries from the time of the > >conversion to

Re: LOGREC logstream question

2009-11-03 Thread Miklos Szigetvari
Hi Thank you Mark. I don't think we have a "well behaved" system. I try to use via batch as //ACCIN DD DSN=SYSPLEX.LOGREC.ALLRECS, // SUBSYS=(LOGR,IFBSEXIT) I got back the records from the time I have converted to logstream (three monts ago) Currently not very important

Re: LOGREC logstream question

2009-11-03 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:43:25 +0100, Miklos Szigetvari wrote: >Hi > >I while ago I have converted the LOGREC to LOGSTREAM. >Seems to me no any recording to the LOGREC logstream, I see a feww >entries from the time of the >conversion to LOGSTREAM. >No any error message in the console, the LOGREC

LOGREC logstream question

2009-11-03 Thread Miklos Szigetvari
Hi I while ago I have converted the LOGREC to LOGSTREAM. Seems to me no any recording to the LOGREC logstream, I see a feww entries from the time of the conversion to LOGSTREAM. No any error message in the console, the LOGREC medium is LOGSTREAM and is in CONNECTED status (z/OS 1.10) -- M