...@bama.ua Subject
.edu Re: RECEIVE ORDER ERROR
04
Brian Peterson wrote:
Yet another problem I never saw because I always use CONTENT(ALL) instead of
CONTENT(RECOMMENDED) for RECEIVE ORDER.
http://alabamamaps.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0904L=ibm-mainP=R14311
You too could see the light and choose to move to using CONTENT(ALL)..
If I did
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:05:47 -0700, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
Brian Peterson wrote:
Yet another problem I never saw because I always use CONTENT(ALL) instead of
CONTENT(RECOMMENDED) for RECEIVE ORDER.
http://alabamamaps.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0904L=ibm-mainamp;P=R14311
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Brian Peterson wrote:
Yet another problem I never saw because I always use CONTENT(ALL)
instead of
CONTENT(RECOMMENDED) for RECEIVE ORDER.
Chase, John wrote:
If I did that, wouldn't I have all of the PTFs that haven't yet gone
through CST?
Yes, but you can APPLY by SOURCEID(RSU*).
Right now, I just RECEIVE ORDER CONTENT(RECOMMENDED), whatever comes
back comes back, and I APPLY *all* of it with a canned job stream
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Chase, John wrote:
If I did that, wouldn't I have all of the PTFs that haven't yet gone
through CST?
Yes, but you can APPLY by SOURCEID(RSU*).
Right now, I just RECEIVE ORDER CONTENT(RECOMMENDED), whatever comes
back comes back, and I APPLY *all* of it with a
Richard Peurifoy wrote:
If you want to apply all RSU maintenance, you can specify
RSU* on the APPLY.
How does the RSU SOURCEID find its way to a PTF I previously
RECEIVEd? Does SMP/E add missing SOURCEIDs automatically when I do
RECEIVE ORDER?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
Hold data would add the SOURCEIDs after the PTF is received.
Thanks
John Eatherly
How does the RSU SOURCEID find its way to a PTF I previously
RECEIVEd? Does SMP/E add missing SOURCEIDs automatically when I do
RECEIVE ORDER?
Eatherly, John D[EQ] wrote:
Hold data would add the SOURCEIDs after the PTF is received.
OK. In that case, the suggestion is that I use RECEIVE ORDER
CONTENT(ALL) and use APPLY SOURCEID(RSU*) to ensure only recommended
maintenance gets applied. All other received service waits in my PTS
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Richard Peurifoy wrote:
If you want to apply all RSU maintenance, you can specify
RSU* on the APPLY.
How does the RSU SOURCEID find its way to a PTF I previously
RECEIVEd? Does SMP/E add missing SOURCEIDs automatically when I do
RECEIVE ORDER?
I can't speak to
Ed,
If you start at
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/servicetst/
and sniff around and about, you'll eventually find most of the answers you're
looking for.
Bob
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Richard Peurifoy wrote:
If you want to apply all RSU maintenance, you can specify
RSU* on
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:11:43 -0700, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
Chase, John wrote:
If I did that, wouldn't I have all of the PTFs that haven't yet gone
through CST?
Yes, but you can APPLY by SOURCEID(RSU*).
Right now, I just RECEIVE ORDER CONTENT(RECOMMENDED), whatever
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:38:57 -0700, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
Richard Peurifoy wrote:
If you want to apply all RSU maintenance, you can specify
RSU* on the APPLY.
How does the RSU SOURCEID find its way to a PTF I previously
RECEIVEd? Does SMP/E add missing SOURCEIDs
Mark Zelden wrote:
Not any extra work at all. It's just changing where the filter is.
Currently you filter at the source by selecting CONTENT(RECOMMENDED).
If you change to CONTENT(ALL) and change your APPLY JCL to
SOURCEID(RSU*), you are applying the same service. The PRO is that
you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:11:43 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Chase, John wrote:
If I did that, wouldn't I have all of the PTFs that haven't yet
gone
through CST?
Yes, but you can APPLY by
Yet another problem I never saw because I always use CONTENT(ALL) instead of
CONTENT(RECOMMENDED) for RECEIVE ORDER.
http://alabamamaps.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0904L=ibm-mainP=R14311
You too could see the light and choose to move to using CONTENT(ALL)..
Brian
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:00:52
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:09:48 -0500, Field, Alan C. wrote:
I've asked our developers to investigate what we can do to clear up
this problem with the cancelled PTF that is co-req'd by the PTFs in
SDM and DSS. HSM PTF's UA46642 UA46641 UA46640 were created and now
closed COR, and these supercede
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 10:07
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: RECEIVE ORDER ERROR
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:09:48 -0500, Field, Alan C. wrote:
I've asked our developers to investigate what we can do to clear up
this problem with the cancelled PTF that is co-req'd by the PTFs in
SDM and DSS
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:08:35 -0500, Field, Alan C. wrote:
Here's more of the explanation:
Order B8456491 was Rejected at 06:50:56 04/23/2009/TEXT
TEXTUA46439
(CO-REQ) --- Fix not found/TEXT /COER_REJ
.
From the above, the order failed as Co-Req UA46439 was not found.
Looking at UA46439, it has
Been getting this all weekend trying RECEIVE ORDER with
CONTENT(RECOMMENDED). Am I the only one?
HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error.
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:33:27 GMT.
Server: IBM_HTTP_Server/6.0.2.33 Apache/2.0.47 (Unix).
Content-Length: 797.
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8.
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 21:01
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: RECEIVE ORDER ERROR
Been getting this all weekend trying RECEIVE ORDER with
CONTENT(RECOMMENDED). Am I the only one?
HTTP
Field, Alan C. wrote:
Ed,
No. I opened a problem with IBM. The problem is caused by a DFHSM PTF.
[snip]
I downloaded these PTFS then my RECEIVEORDER worked.
That did it! Thanks!
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA
Thanks to everyone who responsed to our Receive Order problem.
We added GLOBALTCPIPDATA, GLOBALIPNODES, and COMMONSEARCH for RESOLVER.
It fixed the problem and our Receive Order ran fine.
Also, we authorized the PING command by added it to AUTHCMD in IKJTSOxx.
Dick
Very helpful information
: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, 27 October, 2006 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: Receive Order Error
With the SYSTCPD DD statement, we got this response -
READY
PING INETSD01.BOULDER.IBM.COM
CS V1R7: Pinging host INETSD01.BOULDER.IBM.COM (207.25.253.62)
READY
END
Unable to open
which need to
open raw sockets, such a program being PING needing to run protocol ICMP.
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: Brian Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, 27 October, 2006 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: Receive Order Error
doesn't work.
That helps resolve (sic) the issues here.
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: Gibbons, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, 30 October, 2006 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: Receive Order Error
As far as I can tell. Internet
Message -
From: Brian Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, 30 October, 2006 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: Receive Order Error
Mark, you're absolutely right. I've been looking at the books and they
can
set up a global search order using
be very happy if I was wrong
however. We don't have our tcpd data in the standard search order.
Mark
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:33:02 -0500
From:=?iso-8859-1?Q?Brian_Peterson?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Receive Order Error
OK - This result shows that the SYSTCPD DD statement
Order Error
OK - This result shows that the SYSTCPD DD statement is required for your
RECEIVE job, and should fix your problem where RECEIVE is unable to
resolve
the inetsd01.boulder.ibm.com address - the unknown host error.
0:04 -0500, Dick Renneke wrote:
With the SYSTCPD DD statement, we got
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:22:10 -0800, Gibbons, Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... The only method I've found that works is to have the data be found
in the standard tcp search order. I'm not sure what the standard search
order is (tcp config reference lookup a while back) but it will find:
for client and orderserver. I'd be very happy if I
was wrong however. We don't have our tcpd data in the standard search
order.
Mark
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:33:02 -0500
From:Brian Peterson
Subject: Re: Receive Order Error
OK - This result shows that the SYSTCPD DD statement is required
The other message that we see are -
CY1178 ftpStart: client operating in IPv4 only mode
CZ0251 ftpOpen: entered
SC0432 initConnection: entered
SC0508 initConnection: Calling getaddrinfo() with inetsd01.boulder.ibm.com
SC0517 initConnection: getaddrinfo() resptr 0 rc 1/EDC9501I The name does
not
Aha - that's the problem. Make sure that batch jobs such as your SMP/E
RECEIVE command job include a valid DNS hierarchy.
As is often the case, there's a bunch of different ways to specify this,
but one way, which I use on my system, is to code a SYSTCPD DD statement,
pointing to a parameter
We added the SYSTCPD DD statement to the SMPE job but got the same
messages.
SC0508 initConnection: Calling getaddrinfo() with inetsd01.boulder.ibm.com
SC0517 initConnection: getaddrinfo() resptr 0 rc 1/EDC9501I The name does
not re
solve for the supplied parameters. (errno2=0x112B)
Unknown
Simplify. Makes problem determination easier.
What happened when you ran the PING test?
Brian
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:44:44 -0500, Dick Renneke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We added the SYSTCPD DD statement to the SMPE job but got the same
messages.
SC0508 initConnection: Calling getaddrinfo()
]
.EDU Subject
Re: Receive Order Error
10/27/2006 01:21
OK - This result shows that the SYSTCPD DD statement is required for your
RECEIVE job, and should fix your problem where RECEIVE is unable to resolve
the inetsd01.boulder.ibm.com address - the unknown host error.
So, if you add SYSTCPD to your RECEIVE job, you should expect to get some
result
Well, for dumbsorry about my previous reply.
I ran debug=yes myself, and discovered that...
CY1170 ftpStart: socket() failed on AF_INET6 - EDC8114I Address family not
supported. (errno2=0x11B3005A)
...is a normal message. Your real error must have come later.
From my debug=yes run,
38 matches
Mail list logo
