Empirical testing shows this is being done automatically by z/OS.
Wouldn't it be an intergrity issue with z/OS in a sysplex if it did
not do it automatically? Wouldn't you expect a strong hint in one of
the planning/installation/customization books if there was a need
for action? I would.
--
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:17:35 +0200, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Empirical testing shows this is being done automatically by z/OS.
Wouldn't it be an intergrity issue with z/OS in a sysplex if it did
not do it automatically? Wouldn't you expect a strong hint in one of
the
Have a look :
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6490689.html
I don't get it.
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
SCKPF
John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
USA
_
Find a local pizza place, movie theater, and moreĀ
.then map the best route!
SCKPF
OK. What is it?
Bob Shannon
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john
gilmore
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 7:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sysprog Action Makes STCKE Unique
SCKPF
John Gilmore
Ashland, MA
Could it be
HLASM - SCKPF = Set ClocK Programmable Field. The opcode of the SCKPF
instruction is X'0107'
Lizette
SCKPF
OK. What is it?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 07:54:21 -0400, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be
HLASM - SCKPF = Set ClocK Programmable Field. The opcode of the SCKPF
instruction is X'0107'
yes
I think it is to set the last 2 bytes of the stcke value in order to make
sure that the value is unique
SCKPF
Are you suggesting that your systems programmer needs to write
code to issue SCKPF, or is there a config setting that should be used?
From: john gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sysprog Action
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:28:23 -0400, J R wrote:
SCKPF
Are you suggesting that your systems programmer needs to write
code to issue SCKPF, or is there a config setting that should be used?
Have so many z/Series been sold that the 16-bit field couldn't simply
be shipped preset from the factory in
snip-
SCKPF
Are you suggesting that your systems programmer needs to write
code to issue SCKPF, or is there a config setting that should be used?
unsnip--
Someone, somewhere, has to write a (probably
J R wrote:
SCKPF
Are you suggesting that your systems programmer needs to write
code to issue SCKPF, or is there a config setting that should be used?
Empirical testing shows this is being done automatically by z/OS.
Just now, I executed STCKE on three different systems in the same
, if potentially everyone needs to do it,
it's ludicrous that it's not a PARMLIB setting.
From: Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sysprog Action Makes STCKE Unique
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:59:37 -0500
.
From: Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sysprog Action Makes STCKE Unique
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:09:09 -0700
J R wrote:
SCKPF
Are you suggesting that your systems programmer needs to write
The results Edward Jaffe posted are of course entirely correct and
reproducible for simple, vanilla sysplexes. There are, however, some more
complex situations in which default prefix values do not ensure uniqueness.
I have asked the client for whom I resolved one such problem to authorize my
john gilmore wrote:
... your systems programmer must do some work to ensure that STCKE
values are in fact unique; and my recent experience with several
client sysprogs is that they don't do it because they are not yet
aware that that they must.
What must they do?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix
15 matches
Mail list logo
