August 2009 12:01
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SDSF PREFIX Enhancement (UK44477)
Well, I am glad two friends of mine can have a laugh at my expense. :-)
However, bad subject line or not, the example in UK44477 *was not*
complete in its intended purpose. I never knew of UPRO1GPF in 1.9 as I
Hi David,
Thanks for the pointers. I'll follow-up.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Tidy, David (D)
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SDSF PREFIX Enhancement (UK44477)
Hi Bob
other nice enhancements have been overlooked.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 5:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SDSF PREFIX Enhancement (UK44477)
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16
: Thursday, July 30, 2009 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SDSF PREFIX Enhancement (UK44477)
We did actually implement this from z/OS 1.9 onwards, and it was via an
entry in ISFPRM parmlib member:
PROPLIST NAME(GLOBPROP) /* Group ISFOPER properties */
PROPERTY NAME
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:39:12 -0500, Chris Craddock
crashlu...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Call me a wuss, but I just type FILTER ? and get a fairly i
ntuitive series of panels.
.
Ok Skip, You're a wuss.
:-)
...
Note that Chris comes emerges from lurkdom only when the most
technical of responses is
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
This SDSF enhancement automatically adds an asterisk to the PREFIX
command where the prefix is less than eight characters.
Untrue. This APAR adds it to the operand of H or ST commands.
I applied this PTF, assembled/linked the sample ISFUSER into
ISF.SISFLOAD,
If you really want the generic search character added to the PREFIX command,
yes. You need to turn on UPRO1GPF. I have
SY00090
00654130
* SY00090
00654140
* This code
Mark Zelden wrote:
If you really want the generic search character added to the PREFIX command,
yes. You need to turn on UPRO1GPF. I have
SY00090
00654130
* SY00090
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:11:43 -0400, Bob Rutledge deerh...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
If you really want the generic search character added to the PREFIX command,
yes. You need to turn on UPRO1GPF. I have
SY00090
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:11:43 -0400, Bob Rutledge deerh...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
If you really want the generic search character added to the PREFIX command,
yes. You need to turn on UPRO1GPF. I have
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:59:04 -0400, Bob Rutledge deerh...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
big snip
Bob (Richards) indicated that he wanted the generic character appended to
prefix, I pointed out that the PTF in question was for something else. Or at
least that was my intention.
UPRO1GPF came along in 1.9
This SDSF enhancement automatically adds an asterisk to the PREFIX
command where the prefix is less than eight characters.
I applied this PTF, assembled/linked the sample ISFUSER into
ISF.SISFLOAD, re-invoked SDSF and saw no change. Has anyone else tried
this and got it to work?
The sample
Discussion List Subject
ibm-m...@bama.ua SDSF PREFIX Enhancement (UK44477)
.edu
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:49:48 -0400, Richards, Robert B.
robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote:
Am I missing something else here?
Was a refresh of LLA done? Maybe logoff and back on as well?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Absolutely. Even IPL'ed. No joy.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John P Kalinich
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 11:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SDSF PREFIX Enhancement (UK44477)
Did you issue the F LLA
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:05:50 -0400, Richards, Robert B.
robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote:
Absolutely. Even IPL'ed. No joy.
Bob
Do you still have the SMP/E listing around? Did you apply it to the SISFLOAD
you are using?
--
For
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:49:48 -0400, Richards, Robert B.
robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote:
This SDSF enhancement automatically adds an asterisk to the PREFIX
command where the prefix is less than eight characters.
I applied this PTF, assembled/linked the sample ISFUSER into
ISF.SISFLOAD,
Yes
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Patrick Lyon
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 11:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SDSF PREFIX Enhancement (UK44477)
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:05:50 -0400, Richards, Robert B
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: 30 July 2009 17:16
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SDSF PREFIX Enhancement (UK44477)
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:49:48 -0400, Richards, Robert B.
robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote:
This SDSF enhancement automatically adds an asterisk to the PREFIX
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:49:48 -0400, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
This SDSF enhancement automatically adds an asterisk to the PREFIX
command where the prefix is less than eight characters.
Hmmm. This restores behavior that I remember from when I
first encountered SDSF.
And it restores agreement
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:59:00 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
After the APAR, will there be any way to select job ABC,
but not ABCDEF or ABCXYZ?
Yes.
S ABC
I usually use SELECT rather than PREFIX to alter the list.
--
Tom Marchant
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:14:08 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:59:00 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
After the APAR, will there be any way to select job ABC,
but not ABCDEF or ABCXYZ?
Yes.
S ABC
I usually use SELECT rather than PREFIX to alter the list.
I tried it. It shows not
Re: SDSF PREFIX Enhancement
(UK44477)
07/30/2009 01:57
PM
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.comwrote:
Call me a wuss, but I just type FILTER ? and get a fairly intuitive series
of panels.
.
Ok Skip, You're a wuss.
:-)
--
This email might be from the
artist formerly known as CC
(or not) You be the judge.
Subject
.edu Re: PREFIX misuse (was: SDSF
PREFIX Enhancement (UK44477))
07/30/2009 01:14
---snip---
This SDSF enhancement automatically adds an asterisk to the PREFIX
command where the prefix is less than eight characters.
I applied this PTF, assembled/linked the sample ISFUSER into
ISF.SISFLOAD, re-invoked SDSF and saw
26 matches
Mail list logo
