Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Because of the record lenght, I'm not able to use the tso edit function.
Why not?
ISPF EDIT supports up to 250.
...
It would require his TSO session to allocate virtual memory in excess of
75 MB for Edit to load his file into memory. Although Dave indicated
the problem
I have a 500,000 record text file with a record length of 150 bytes. I'm tring
to find some way of splitting it in two. Because of the record lenght, I'm not
able to use the tso edit function. I'm sure I have the solution somewhere.
Thanks,
Dave
Dave,
I have a 500,000 record text file with a record length of 150 bytes.I'm
tring
to find some way of splitting it in two. Because of the record
lenght, I'm not
able to use the tso edit function. I'm sure I have the solution
somewhere.
Thanks,
Dave
I would use IDCAMS repro.
repro
Dave Guthrie of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 08/06/2007 08:48:16 AM:
I have a 500,000 record text file with a record length of 150 bytes.I'm
tring
to find some way of splitting it in two. Because of the record
lenght, I'm not
able to use the tso edit
Sort has several features, by count, by key and a sort of every other.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dave Guthrie
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Split a large file into two
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John P Kalinich
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 9:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Split a large file into two parts
Dave Guthrie of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 08/06/2007 08:48:16 AM:
I have a 500,000 record text
I use Syncsort to do this.
SORT FIELDS=COPY,STOPAFT=25
OUTFIL FILES=01
END
SORT FIELDS=COPY,SKIPREC=25
OUTFIL FILES=01
END
The above needs two passes over the input data set.
This will do it in one pass:
//ICETOOL1 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Reda, John
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 10:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Split a large file into two parts
Your solution will work but it requires 2 passes of the data. Try this
instead, it only requires 1 pass.
SORT FIELDS=COPY
OUTFIL FILES=01,ENDREC
John Reda of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote
on 08/06/2007 09:30:54 AM:
I need to amend my post, it should be:
SORT FIELDS=COPY
OUTFIL FILES=01,ENDREC=25
OUTFIL FILES=02,STARTREC=250001
I spotted this after reading Peter Hunkeler's post.
John Reda
Dave Guthrie wrote on 08/06/2007 06:48:16 AM:
I have a 500,000 record text file with a record length of 150 bytes.I'm
tring
to find some way of splitting it in two. Because of the record lenght,
I'm not
able to use the tso edit function. I'm sure I have the solution
somewhere.
Dave,
Here's a
I have a 500,000 record text file with a record length of 150 bytes. I'm
tring
to find some way of splitting it in two. Because of the record lenght, I'm
not
able to use the tso edit function. I'm sure I have the solution somewhere.
Thanks,
Dave
If you have DFSORT try this:
Because of the record lenght, I'm not able to use the tso edit function.
Why not?
ISPF EDIT supports up to 250.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Ted MacNeil of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 08/06/2007 11:38:23 AM:
Because of the record lenght, I'm not able to use the tso edit function.
Why not?
ISPF EDIT supports up to 250.
Edit supports lrecl up to 32760.
Regards,
John K
Of John P Kalinich
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 11:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Split a large file into two parts
Ted MacNeil of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 08/06/2007 11:38:23 AM:
Because of the record lenght, I'm not able to use the tso
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John P Kalinich
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 11:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Split a large file into two parts
Ted MacNeil of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM
I can create and edit an lrecl 32760 file. It doesn't like VBS.
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the
sender by reply e-mail and then delete this
Tom Kelman wrote:
Then why when I try to edit or browse an SMF file on disk
(LRECL=32760)
do I get the message Invalid Record Length. I just tried it.
John Kalinich wrote:
Maybe it is variable spanned format?
Regards,
John K
Yes, it is VBS. Then why doesn't the error
Tom Kelman wrote:
Then why when I try to edit or browse an SMF file on disk
(LRECL=32760)
do I get the message Invalid Record Length. I just tried it.
John Kalinich wrote:
Maybe it is variable spanned format?
Regards,
John K
Yes, it is VBS. Then why doesn't the error
Tom Kelman of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 08/06/2007 01:27:18 PM:
Tom Kelman wrote:
Then why when I try to edit or browse an SMF file on disk
(LRECL=32760)
do I get the message Invalid Record Length. I just tried it.
John Kalinich wrote:
-snip--:
Then why when I try to edit or browse an SMF file on disk (LRECL=32760)
do I get the message Invalid Record Length. I just tried it.
-unsnip-
Probably because most SMF files are VBS-format, which, to my
Kelman, Tom wrote:
Then why when I try to edit or browse an SMF file on disk (LRECL=32760)
do I get the message Invalid Record Length. I just tried it.
If you are talking about the file created by the SMFDUMP
program, it creates files with an LRECL of 32767. The BLKSIZE
is 32760 and they are
On 6 Aug 2007 11:27:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Tom Kelman wrote:
Then why when I try to edit or browse an SMF file on disk
(LRECL=32760)
do I get the message Invalid Record Length. I just tried it.
John Kalinich wrote:
Maybe it is variable spanned format?
22 matches
Mail list logo
