Duh!!! my EE connection is still not working..
Did change BN=YES. dfined new ADJCLUST for the remote network on this
gateway SSCP.
on displaying ADJCLUST
IST2207I DEFINED TABLE FOR remote_network
IST2209I BNDYN = LIMITED FROM ADJCLUST TABLE
Munif
Duh!!! my EE connection is still not working..
But you said it your first post that your Enterprise Extender (EE) connection
was working and that it was supporting CP LU to CP LU sessions.
I expect that what you mean is that you still haven't managed to cause your
CICS LU to CICS LU
Thank Chris (Mason)
You are a living encyclopaedia.
I was required another CDRSC entry to get it going. Now my next bigger
headache. we are migrating from old DDN link to enterprise extender and Other
party will not give *some new* applications (non production) to test it. As a
mainframer,
Munif
I can see now that you are trying to run your sessions both in a subarea
environment, using SNI and an APPN environment. This is a bit dangerous!
There used to be a VTAM developer who always used to warn customers from
trying to run with subarea and APPN in parallel.
Since you say your
Dear listers
I have got CP - CP sessions going between two different mainframe networks,
lets say NETA.A and NETB.B using Enterprise extender, and now would like to
establish connectivity between two CICS - CICSA (running on NETA.A) and
CICSB(running on NETB.B). What do i need to define:
A)
...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Munif Sadek
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 4:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: VTAM - CICS definitions
Dear listers
I have got CP - CP sessions going between two different mainframe networks,
lets say NETA.A and NETB.B using Enterprise extender, and now would
Munif
Let us restate - one hopes accurately - your configuration:
You have a VTAM node with NETID=NETA and SSCPNAME=A and another
VTAM node with NETID=NETB and SSCPNAME=B. Having created Enterprise
Extender (EE) definitions successfully in both VTAMs, you have established a
connection between
applids are known on both sides of the link,
There should not be any problem connecting.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Munif Sadek
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 4:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: VTAM - CICS
Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chris Mason
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: VTAM - CICS definitions
Eileen
The network has to be able to find the remote CICS APPLIDs on each lpar so
probably cdrsc definitions are needed on both
9 matches
Mail list logo
