I looked at my goodies file & found:
try not to use IMP-1, use I2 for LOVEd ones
I like all the points made by Mark.
>
But from my experience at a lot of shops, I think many of them just
used IMP=1 for just about everything considered "production online". ...
Then they would (misguidedly) try
>A hypothetical question. What are the major implications of changing
>the sysplex name? What are the gotcha's?
>- a fairly large parallel sysplex with > 15 participating lpars
>- 60+ terabytes of DASD, mostly SMS managed
>- SMSPLEX same scope as SYSPLEX
>- Sysplex restart
>I would say the majority of shops I went into way overused IMP=1 and
>at the same time underused IMP=5.
>But from my experience at a lot of shops,
>I think many of them just used IMP=1 for just about everything considered
>"production online". All CICS regions, all DB2 subsystems, MQ, etc. Then
>It worked by pure chance - the OP was "lucky" that the workarea storage
was zeroes.
>
>Once the un-initialized storage was dirty - then there was a chance that
WTO would complain about invalid bit settings.
Easiest test for this is to turn on dirty getmain - I had a hard time time,
too,
to fi
Ted,
I agree with you about SLA's etc.
But this is an investigation about how we partition a huge tablespace that
is reaching the size limit.
The tablespace will be unavailable to the users during the copying and we
are trying to find the best copy processing to reduce the outage. The
On Nov 24, 5:04 pm, Gaur wrote:
> On Nov 24, 5:15 am, stars...@mindspring.com (Lizette Koehler) wrote:
>
>
>
> > I forgot the last part
> > In ISPF mode, it can be annoying.
>
> > It looks like a WAD and something IBM is not looking at correcting.
> > Apparently they like annoying.
>
> > Lizette
>
At
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r9/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zos.r9.ieav200/bpfind.htm
(As usual, watch the wrap.)
and printed in the MVS DG there is a table that relates module prefixes to
components and products; and among the many instances of module prefixes listed
Thanks All. I installed it on a Windows XP machine, and then copied the
directory c:\program files\xmitmgr to my Windows 7 PC and it works like a
champ. Just the installer was having a problem.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.ed
Hi Gilbert,
I have installed and supported VPS/VPSIP/DRS/DRSIP/VSV and VMCF in my shop
since 1998. As David mentioned, VPS exit 8 handles automated reset/retries
quite well, it is well documented, and can be easily customized if needed .
We have the same problem you have plus the vast m
Jousma, David wrote:
A hypothetical question. What are the major implications of changing
the sysplex name? What are the gotcha's?
We've renamed sysplexes more than once. IIRC, the biggest hassle was
having to rename/recreate all of the data sets with &SYSPLEX in their name.
I assume it
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
> Of Jacky Bright
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 November 2009 7:49 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Extracting GDG Base
>
> Business Operation Department has requested to extract all GDG base
You could also use IGGCSIRX in SYS1.SAMPLIB and the option H or B to
extract all gds/gdgs. I think it is documented in DFSMS Managing
Catalogs.
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:08:23 -0600, McKown, John
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:ibm-m...@b
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:08:23 -0600, McKown, John
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jacky Bright
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 2:49 PM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
>> Subject: Extracting GDG Base
>>
>> Bus
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jacky Bright
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 2:49 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Extracting GDG Base
>
> Business Operation Department has requested to extract all
> GDG b
>If you are referring to the dynamic internal service classes that WLM
creates, those only apply to a server topology (like CICS and IMS
with transaction goals). WLM has no way of knowing the inter-dependencies
of other address spaces.
Yes. You're correct.
If you need to exploit this, you MUST h
All,
A hypothetical question. What are the major implications of changing
the sysplex name? What are the gotcha's?
Assumptions:
- a fairly large parallel sysplex with > 15 participating lpars
- 60+ terabytes of DASD, mostly SMS managed
- SMSPLEX same scope as SYSPLEX
-
Business Operation Department has requested to extract all GDG base dataset
names from the system. Is there any utility by which I can have these
details from the catalog ?
JAcky
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acc
Fortunately (?), our developers ensure that we (the three groups
mentioned) are always kept on our toes, despite efforts at education,
etc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:14 P
Here are all of our setting in rsed.envvars. I deleted the comments to
make the listing shorter
JAVA_HOME=/usr/lpp/java/J6.0
RSE_HOME=/usr/lpp/rdz
_RSE_LOCKD_PORT=4036
TZ=EST5EDT
LANG=C
PATH=/bin:/usr/sbin
_CEE_DMPTARG=/tmp
STEPLIB=NONE
_RSE_SAF_CLASS=/usr/include/java_classes/IRRRacf.jar
Dave, same as yours RSE_HOME=/usr/lpp/rdz Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Jousma, David
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 2:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: RSE daemon server startup
We are running RDz
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:05:59 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>I see nothing wrong with making Production Online all IMP=1, but there is
no need to f*rt around with the velocities.
>The WLM is smart enough to figure out which sub-system is dependent on which.
>It just creates pseudo-classes to manage t
We are running RDz
What about RSE_HOME=/usr/lpp/rdz
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.8497
-Original Messag
Tripped over another no charge product needed to order a z/OS ServerPac.
Bob Richards, on staff, stumbled over this one which everyone should check if
you have the no charge license.
[5655-S28] z/OS Management Facility 1.11.00 English (US)
The above needs to be licensed. It is a $0 charge, bu
I'm looking to assist a coworker who is installing Rational Developer for
System z and having a lot of fun, if you know what I mean. So to try and save
the little bit of sanity he has left I suggested we post a question here.
When starting the RSE task we get the messages below. The rsed.envvars
Following up on a previous thread -
We are currently 'tapeless' in that our primary DR strategy is near real time
dasd mirroring via XRC. Tape is used for local PIT backup/restore and for
secondary PIT offsite sotrage.
We are looking at a VTS to expand that capacity. However, someone here
men
>This area of DB2 performance management is challenging but extremely
>interesting and needs to pull together expertise from the DBAs, sysprogs and
>DASD specialists.
Too many people get hung up on the technical aspects.
Rather than worrying about:
How many write engines?
How is the Defined Ex
>Some of that is probably true. But from my experience at a lot of shops,
I think many of them just used IMP=1 for just about everything considered
"production online".
>All CICS regions, all DB2 subsystems, MQ, etc.
>Then they would (misguidedly) try and use velocity to make some distinction
with
No. I said that eight was the maximum MA capabilitiy in the year 2000. It may
be larger now. Ask your vendor.
Yes, I meant Multiple Allegiance. It also applies when all I/Os are from one
system. Or if they come from eight different systems. The microcode checking
for extent collisions inv
I think that was just the limit for the Shark (2105), it varies by
subsystem architecture.
>>> Terry Draper 11/24/2009 11:50 AM >>>
Bill and John,
Thanks for your reply.
You said that eight was the maximum for MA. Did you mean Multiple
Allegiance, i.e. accesses from multiple systems. Does
It certainly depends on what you are trying to accomplish. That
"performance
expert" (who lives near me now) never said NO IMP=1; but rather reserve it
for
mission-critical work, short- important transactions, and emergency work.
If you
put a lot of work into IMP=1, there is no UP when you need to
We don't have SA or DRS/TCPIP but if there is a VPS exit that can do
this automatically then I will definitely let the VPS administrator look
into this to see if we can use this instead.
Thanks for all the suggestions,
Gil.
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:45:28 -0500, David Andrews
wrote:
>On Tue, 2
Bill and John,
Thanks for your reply.
You said that eight was the maximum for MA. Did you mean Multiple
Allegiance, i.e. accesses from multiple systems. Does this also apply when all
I/Os are form one system?
I understand how things work, its just the undocumented bits that are
dif
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:09 -0500, Gilbert Cardenas wrote:
> We use VPS to route print from the mainframe to the windows server
> and when the server goes down for maintenance etc, the vps printer
> goes into an error status cause it can't communicate with the printer.
> I can't rely on the netwo
I see no technical reason to not put anything in importance 1. The only thing
that matters is the relative importance. Importance 1 does not mean anything
special.
HOWEVER! I can see why you would not want to much there. If you put many of
your important workloads in importance 1 and you found
We use IBM SA and I have trapped several of the VPS error msgs in the system
automation table and perform automatic resets in VPS and
other products when the errors occur. I am not sure how to do this with
regular Netview without SA, but with SA you can issue
modify commands to VPS and obtain t
Maybe writing out a status record to a sequential file on the mainframe
everytime you poll the printer. Keep printer-id, date, time, return code ,
etc in that record. Then make a ISPF appl to access those records and make
it viewable.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Gilbert Cardenas <
gilbertcar
On Nov 24, 7:01 am, George wrote:
> > George:
> > It might help if you give the details of the parameters you are using
> > for CTGPL, CTGFL, etc.
> > I happened to be working on a different problem in this area, so I
> > tried to recreate your problem.
> > The returned list is the same regardless
Hi Charlie,
What you are seeing with the reporting of Dead Blocks is expected and normal.
Regards,
Jeff Bruner
L2 CA Librarian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:23:16 -0600, R Hey wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It's been recommended NOT to use Imp 1 in WLM.
>
>My client has been using Imp1 for online CICS.
>
>Im planning to change it to use Imp2 buy changing all Imp to Imp+1.
>
>Can you think of any potential problems/issues?
>
>TIA,
>Rez
>
>
When I came here there was work defined in Imp1-3, and nothing in 4-Disc, and
this is not the first time I;ve seen such things. Now the only thing I have in
Imp 1 is STCHIGH, which includes the *DBM1, *MSTR, *DIST and other "server"
address spaces, but no "user" work.
>>> Mark Zelden 11/24/20
I have the need to monitor the status of an lpr printer running on a
windows server from the mainframe.
We use VPS to route print from the mainframe to the windows server
and when the server goes down for maintenance etc, the vps printer
goes into an error status cause it can't communicate wi
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:57:34 -0800, Patrick Falcone
wrote:
>Personally, I would say that it depends. My last gig on a small 2-way I was
>standing on my head with the Policy to make it work due to capacity
>limitations. I had all kinds of stuff in IMP 1.
That would be more of a problem on a small
Thanks very much and it worked.
Regards,
Chokalingam Thangavelu
TWUL Mainframe Support
Thames Water IS
In Partnership with Wipro Technologies
Mobile: +91(0)-96864 33224
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tue
Bill is correct in that DB2 will minimize the extent sizes for write
operations, therefore increasing the likelihood of multiple, parallel
operations to the same device. But also remember that DB2 will try to maximize
the effectiveness of write I/O's, endeavoring to externalize as many pages as
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:54:29 -0600, Mark Zelden
wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:15:24 -0800, Edward Jaffe
> wrote:
>
>>Mark Zelden wrote:
>>> A well known performance expert used to recommend that. But it wasn't
>>> "NO" importance=1, it was that imp=1 should only be used or emergency
>>> work an
Personally, I would say that it depends. My last gig on a small 2-way I was
standing on my head with the Policy to make it work due to capacity
limitations. I had all kinds of stuff in IMP 1. Now I'm currently supporting a
very large plex with many disparate sizes, shapes, workloads. Some LPARs
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:15:24 -0800, Edward Jaffe
wrote:
>Mark Zelden wrote:
>> A well known performance expert used to recommend that. But it wasn't
>> "NO" importance=1, it was that imp=1 should only be used or emergency
>> work and your "bread and butter" application(s).
>>
>> So I understand
I get them automatically from so I don't bookmark it
"IBM Announcement Letters"
"Jim Elliott,
IBM"
John Kelly wrote:
When defining DSECT entries, I always find it better to let the assembler
figure out lengths,ie use the length of the generated WTO to define the
length DSECT entry
sDetailmsg wto text=,routcde=(11),mf=l
endmsg ds 0H
then
Detailmsg ds cl(endmsg-sDetailmsg)
When defining DSECT entries, I always find it better to let the assembler
figure out lengths,ie use the length of the generated WTO to define the
length DSECT entry
sDetailmsg wto text=,routcde=(11),mf=l
endmsg ds 0H
then
Detailmsg ds cl(endmsg-sDetailmsg)
then you don't ne
Mark Zelden wrote:
A well known performance expert used to recommend that. But it wasn't
"NO" importance=1, it was that imp=1 should only be used or emergency
work and your "bread and butter" application(s).
So I understand where the recommendation comes from. 10-15 years ago
I had a lot
R Hey wrote:
It's been recommended NOT to use Imp 1 in WLM.
By whom?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
Mark Zelden wrote:
I try go by "trust, but verify"
Tru dat! I do the same with customers and developers alike! Sometimes
they take offense. That is, until my detail-oriented approach uncovers
their dumb mistake...
And, ...yes,... I occasionally fall into the trap myself. (Usually, not
b
I've had children, and they've had children since I worked with Librarian :-)
But as best I can remember, a 'dead block' is literally file corruption. I'd be
-very- worried.
Even more worried when I see that a large percentage (16%) of your critical
database is 'dead'.
-Original Messa
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:26:59 -0700, Steve Comstock
wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:54:59 -0500, Rob Scott
wrote:
It worked by pure chance - the OP was "lucky" that the workarea storage was
zeroes.
Once the un-initialized storage was dirty - then there
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:36:57 -0600, Mark Zelden
wrote:
>And people wonder why some sysprogs are skeptical when
>application programmers and system users come to them with a problem
>and say "nothing changed". (I try go by "trust, but verify")
Can I hear an "Amen"?
--
When I read the OP, I assumed that no changes had been made to the code that
had worked for ages. Sometimes the phrase "has worked for ages" really means
"has worked for ages, and any changes which I may have recently made were
trivial. But I really don't remember making any changes recently.
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:26:59 -0700, Steve Comstock
wrote:
>Mark Zelden wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:54:59 -0500, Rob Scott
wrote:
>>
>>> It worked by pure chance - the OP was "lucky" that the workarea storage was
>> zeroes.
>>> Once the un-initialized storage was dirty - then there was a cha
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:54:59 -0500, Rob Scott wrote:
It worked by pure chance - the OP was "lucky" that the workarea storage was
zeroes.
Once the un-initialized storage was dirty - then there was a chance that
WTO would complain about invalid bit settings.
So it's relate
1. DB2 tries very hard to minimize the size of the extent defined in the
Define Extent CCW for each I/O that it does to a Shark-type DASD that supports
Multiple Allegiance (MA). E.g., if an I/O references only one track, then that
channel program will have only that one track within the define
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:54:59 -0500, Rob Scott wrote:
>It worked by pure chance - the OP was "lucky" that the workarea storage was
zeroes.
>
>Once the un-initialized storage was dirty - then there was a chance that
WTO would complain about invalid bit settings.
>
So it's related to the GETMAIN ch
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:10:34 +, Martin Packer
wrote:
>Further, most shops I know run with a fair amount of Importance 1.
>There're no indications they're wrong.
>
>So I'd like to understand where the "No WLM Importance 1" advice came
>from.
>
A well known performance expert used to recommend
It worked by pure chance - the OP was "lucky" that the workarea storage was
zeroes.
Once the un-initialized storage was dirty - then there was a chance that WTO
would complain about invalid bit settings.
Rob Scott
Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:29:09 -0700, Steve Comstock
wrote:
>Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
>> Thanks Lizette, I just thought that it would be nice to see some
information about how the issue was resolved.
>>
>It was included in the post:
>
I missed the explanation of why something that worked "for ages"
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chokalingam Thangavelu
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 3:35 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: HFSCOPY ERROR
>
> Hi,
>
> I am getting below error while I do a SMPE APPLY job.
Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
Thanks Lizette, I just thought that it would be nice to see some information about how the issue was resolved.
It was included in the post:
Ah! That's got it! Thanks, Keven, and Robert. Once I added in a
length modifier, it works!
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@
Thanks Lizette, I just thought that it would be nice to see some information
about how the issue was resolved.
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sen
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Donald Russell
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 5:10 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: FTP PUT RECFM=FBM files
>
> Well, that's an interesting idea...
>
> How's this for co
Jon,
A Length was added to the MVC command. Otherwise the default length was
used.
mvc Detailmsg,sDetailmsg
Steve provided a sample program
Here's an even more stripped down version, complete code:
*PROCESS COMPAT(NOCASE,MACROCASE),RENT
sysstate archlvl=2
B34TEST RSECT
B34TEST AM
Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
That doesn't help us here.
Well, I was just trying to pass the word on, so
no one spent any time on the problem once it was
solved.
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ib
I forgot the last part
In ISPF mode, it can be annoying.
It looks like a WAD and something IBM is not looking at correcting.
Apparently they like annoying.
Lizette
>
> Check out Apar PK55485
>
> ZAP PRINT DSN issues IEC161I 008-0571 messages whenever the
> dataset is VSAM and is not RLS.
That doesn't help us here.
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Edward Jaffe
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 5:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What's up
Check out Apar PK55485
ZAP PRINT DSN issues IEC161I 008-0571 messages whenever the
dataset is VSAM and is not RLS. The message itself does not
mean that any problem exists. In batch mode, the message
can be ignored. In ISPF mode, it can be
Lizette
>
> Hi List,
>
> Has anyone seen t
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:51:54 +, Jan Vanbrabant
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Has the URL for announcement letters and/or sales manual changed?
>I get a 404 on
>http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/OIX.wss
>(or http://www-1.ibm.com/common/ssi/OIX.wss
>or http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/OIX.wss)
>
>jan
Always saf
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>>Can you think of any potential problems/issues?
>Yes!
>You are chopping out one level of importance for NO good reason. You are
going to have to redistribute all your service classes (excluding SYSTEM,
SYSSTC & Discretionary) over four importance levels rather than five.
Th
>It's been recommended NOT to use Imp 1 in WLM.
By whom?
>My client has been using Imp1 for online CICS.
As your client should be.
>I’m planning to change it to use Imp2 buy changing all Imp to Imp+1.
Why?
>Can you think of any potential problems/issues?
Yes!
You are chopping out one level
Yes, I did. And concur with the usefulness of it.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Rick Fochtman
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 4:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: JES2 Dynamic Proclibs - Advantages?
---
We are very happy with DB2 at Importance 1 and CICS at Importance 2.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Martin Packer wrote:
> Further, most shops I know run with a fair amount of Importance 1.
> There're no indications they're wrong.
>
> So I'd like to understand where the "No WLM Importance 1"
Hi,
I am getting below error while I do a SMPE APPLY job.
BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 26.
BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SMP5 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO TEXT
HFS FILE /Service/usr/lib/IBM/IWMA3HEW.
BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0090, REASON CODE 0549010C. A LINK FAILED FOR
LINK
Further, most shops I know run with a fair amount of Importance 1.
There're no indications they're wrong.
So I'd like to understand where the "No WLM Importance 1" advice came
from.
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer
Performance Consultant
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
+44-20-8832-5167
+44-7802-245-584
em
"R Hey" wrote in message
news:...
> Hi,
>
> It's been recommended NOT to use Imp 1 in WLM.
>
> My client has been using Imp1 for online CICS.
>
> I'm planning to change it to use Imp2 buy changing all Imp to Imp+1.
>
> Can you think of any potential problems/issues?
>
> TIA,
> Rez
Why/whe
I have a situation where we are writing to a Shark DASD from DB2.
I know DB2 will start multiple write engines to write the data from the buffer
pool. However all the writes will go to the same volume.
My questions are about PAV.
1. The DASD controller will serialise writes to the same ext
McKown, John pisze:
It appears to not be allowed. I found the following statement on the Web on
IBM's site:
Program Name: IBM 31-bit SDK for z/OS, Java Technology Edition, Version 6
Program Number: 5655-R31
Authorization for Use on Home/Portable Computer: You may not copy and use this
Program
Hi,
It's been recommended NOT to use Imp 1 in WLM.
My client has been using Imp1 for online CICS.
I’m planning to change it to use Imp2 buy changing all Imp to Imp+1.
Can you think of any potential problems/issues?
TIA,
Rez
The A/M attibute is a dataset attribute that is mostly of
importance to programs preparing the data to be printed, i.e.
JES2/3 or PSF/Infoprint. JES2/3 needs this information to build
the channel programm to drive the printer. PSF/Infoprint needs
this information to format the data according to th
85 matches
Mail list logo
