I think there's a difference between a z10 and previous generations.
For a z10 the CBU record is de-activated after 10 days, but the machine is
no longer kneecapped. It is set back to its original capacity.
If you want more information on activating and de-activating CBU testing
take a look at
I highlighted this alternate site mainly due to Marna's excellent per release
presentations as a very good source for changes to be wary of. You would
need to review each presentation from the oldest to z/OS 1.11 to get the
required picture.
There are additional items there which may also
Itschak Mugzach writes:
And you have Camouflage (datamasking.com) , 1st on Gartner and forrester.
Maybe. Camouflage is very late to the z/OS party (but much better late than
never, of course):
http://www.datamasking.com/pressreleases.aspx?id=44
Gartner has a magic quadrant reporting
You can have a look at CBT file 513, but it isn't simple.
angel luis dominguez
sysprog - spain
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
See
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/15/neon_zprime_update/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Hi all,
thanks to all for your valuable hints. The redbook, which Marc mentioned, tells
that you can deactivate the CBU capacity with Remove processors. If we wait
on the automatic deactivation after 10 days there may be some ugly messages on
processors no longer available. I think that we
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:51:58 -0500, Thierry Deleris thierry.deleris_s...@i-
BP.BANQUEPOPULAIRE.FR wrote:
JES2 Queues before Processing (Conversion Execution) thanks to SMF30-5
records.
Please be aware that I am not at all familiar with SMF records.
11.08.15 JOB94550 TUESDAY, 01 JUN 2010
Hello,
Thanks for your reply !
As mentionned there is no time spent in Duplicate State (Computed in
SMF30HQT). There is no Dataset or other ressources waiting time too...
And finally, our Initiators are not WLM-Managed...
Have another idea of investigations ?
Best regards,
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:10:32 -0400, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com wrote:
2) Does anyone know of a software tool that will scramble production data
like SSNs while maintaining referential integrity ( DB2, IMS, etc) to
prevent developers from having access to sensitive production data?
My
Timothy, Don't take it personally. May be they are in top 5. I don't care.
This is a fact that I can't recall where I've seen. A Gartner/Forrester
customer can get an analyst to speak with and find out himself.
They might entered late on z/os, but they are pure Java: No CPU cost if you
have zAAP,
--
Date:Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:46:16 -0400
From:Donald Johnson dej@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Cobol routine to convert TEXT to displayable HEX
Well, here is what I decided to use. I broke my text field into 100-byte
segments (based on report requirements), and
Hello,
We have TS1120 (3592) drives and TKLM - are these the only pieces we need
to start encryption? Do we need an EKM STC ? If we do, where the heck
do you get it from? The IBM Encryption Key Manager component for Java
says EKM should no longer be downloaded fro new tape encryption
I'm not sure if I'm too late to the party, but our FE just upgraded our HMC
code, and the OS LEVEL for our z/OS 1.11 system magically showed up.
Neal
OCM-BOCES
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
We just moved from RDX to using IBM Optim and from what I hear from our
RDX now Optim administrators is that they find Optim to be a much better
product for our use.
Hutchison, Gregory A.
Oregon DOT DMVIS
phone:503-945-7081
fax:503-945-5220
To all following the parent thread which - one would hope - includes all who
use Enterprise Extender in z/OS VTAM:
Just to summarise why this matter continues to be under discussion:
On IBMTCP-L I have attracted the attention of VTAM development to this
matter and I hope that the remaining
Don't know if what is stated below is something that you are considering, so
let me give you my 2 cents.
1) NO
2) NO
But seriously here are some of the reasons that will cause you issues
Privacy. If you have a separate environment with production data, you MAYBE in
jeopardy of contravening
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100610161411160
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case forthwith, [U.S. Judge]
Stewart writes in the final judgment. I believe that means SCO v. IBM is
essentially over now, unless IBM wishes to pursue its counterclaims.
-- gil
Another product to check out is Testbase, from Softbase. We have had good
success with this product.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
Nick, what is your HMC level and z/OS 1.11 service level? There was some
discussion about a month ago on this subject...
I'm at HMC 2.10.1 with 1.11 put1004 and don't see OS level.
http://www.mail-archive.com/ibm-main@bama.ua.edu/msg115990.html
MA
On 06/16/10 10:46, Lucy Arnold wrote:
Hello,
We have TS1120 (3592) drives and TKLM - are these the only pieces we need
to start encryption? Do we need an EKM STC ? If we do, where the heck
do you get it from? The IBM Encryption Key Manager component for Java
says EKM should no longer be
Well, as far as I can tell, (and I am no HMC expert here) the EC number for
HMC Framework is N10976 with a activated level of 70 (what ever that
means). We were at level 65 prior to this. If you need any more info, point
me to the proper screens in the HMC and I can get it for you.
The HMC
Lucy,
If you go the way of ekm and run into questions, I think I have most of the
answers.
I implemented EKM at my shop and am well versed in its usage. It is basic but
it works well.
Lizette
On 06/16/10 10:46, Lucy Arnold wrote:
Hello,
We have TS1120 (3592) drives and TKLM - are
Hello,
If anyone would be kind enough to email me a .txt copy of your
GLOSSMFR macro, it would be great help.
*
glen.manages@gmail.com
*
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Just out of curiosity, are there any other solutions out there?
We are looking at EKM soultion but are not really happy with it or TKLM.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010
All,
We are using TKLM and so far it is a PITA to get working too. We are
having issues with the OMVS RACF definition at the moment.
Lucy Arnold
Storage Manager
U.C. Davis Medical Center
916-734-5498
--
For IBM-MAIN
CA has it's own tape encryption software. I believe it does other than CA
products.
Lucy Arnold
Storage Manager
U.C. Davis Medical Center
916-734-5498
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
We heard that TKLM uses DB2. Is that true?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lucy Arnold
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 3:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Is anybody using TKLM, TS-1120 drives for encryption?
On 6/16/2010 1:37 PM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
Even though IBM says that Tivoli Key Lifecycle Manager (TKLM) is IBM’s
strategic new platform for storage and delivery of encryption keys to
encrypting storage end-point devices. EKM is still available and will work.
Trust me though, its a PITA to get
CA has an EKM manager that sits on top of EKM but automates the changing
and propagation of the keys.
I don't have it but I know it exists.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 4:48
We are running IN-Band - No DB2 on the Zbox is being used.
Lucy Arnold
Storage Manager
U.C. Davis Medical Center
916-734-5498
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
TKLM is not free. The zbox folks were just told that is what we're using.
We didn't get a vote.
Lucy Arnold
Storage Manager
U.C. Davis Medical Center
916-734-5498
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On 6/16/2010 4:37 PM, Lucy Arnold wrote:
TKLM is not free. The zbox folks were just told that is what we're using.
We didn't get a vote.
Thanks, that confirms what I thought.
--
Richard
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
They might entered late on z/os, but they are pure Java: No CPU cost if you
have zAAP, so they are far away from older solutions running on z/os and
make use of a CP and influence TCO. I've seen few sites that stepped back
from datamasking projects when they discovered that
Hi,
Does someone having a copy of VBSFIX module..could you please share it with
me..i used to have one lost however somewhere..
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
True, and if you use encryption device, like an accelerator, the overhead is
minimal as well...
ITschak
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com wrote:
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
They might entered late on z/os, but they are pure Java: No CPU cost if
you
have zAAP, so they
35 matches
Mail list logo
