He was talking about TCA.
[Ron Hawkins]
He was talking about True Copy Asynch? I don't get the connection.
Total cost of acquisition.
Just because I'm using a non-company e-mail, maybe because they do not
want
Ms people to appear to be their spokespeople, does not invalidate my
response.
Hi,
For the SOCKET function in the EZASOKET call, I always get zero as the
socket descriptor. This happens even when I am doing INITAPI before SOCKET.
Although, the manual describes that SOCKET will implicitly make a INITAPI
call. Where am I going wrong ?
I am doing this in COBOL in batch
I don't believe so. All the execution node does is look at the NOTIFY statement
on the jobcard (if it is there) and sends a message back to the the origin node
via JES2 services/RTAM, and the origin JES2 sends a notify to the userid via
MVS SEND.
The execution node tries to use the same job
Does Jes2 save this Job number( from the receiving lpar) somewhere at the
sending lpar?
Once a job is sent to another node, the transmitting JES2 cuts a SMF26 record,
and 'forgets' everything about the transmitted job.
There is nothing left.
-
I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor
Hi Anthony,
I agree with you, but one more thing that made me feel that some where the
new Job number might be saved some where as when the execution is complete
and the output is received back at the node which sent the job, should be
able to match the two jobs.
If I see in sdsf, the job numbe
If I see in sdsf, the job numbe on ST panel is different and the job number in
the jesmsglg is diff, so Jes should be able to match these two or may be it
does something else to ensure this.
JES2 doesn't match anything.
The job comes back from the node it was transmitted to, but the number will
As Ted said. The NJE job headers only bother to record the job number assigned
on the originating node as the job travels through the various nodes.
Ant.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
vatsal raicha
Sent: Thursday, 14
For running Address SDSF under NetView I had to code the following:
isfjesname = 'JES2'
before the ISFCALLS(ON) mainly because NetView is started with SUB=MSTR and
so doesn't run under JES2. Maybe the same for OPS/MVS?
Sebastian
Control-D bundling function uses indexing method to create report bundles
which does not really creates new files. The products I looked into, uses a
different technology that creates a phisical report file for each user.
I wonder if there are other products that uses mainframe created files to
Anthony,
Back at a site where this was important we used to manage the job number
problem by assigning ranges to each JES2. Jobs submitted in Melbourne got
0-1000 and 3000 to 3999, and jobs submitted in Sydney got 2000 to 2999. This
meant that when a job was submitted in Melbourne and run in
All,
I know what it is, but I never really knew what it stood for.
One reference I found, the only one, says it means The SHARE Committee for
Imbibers, Drinkers and Sots.
Is this correct?
Ron
--
For IBM-MAIN
Yes. Like one of the previous posters to this thread the company I work for
used to offer a service of testing the site's defenses that we called a
System Access Security Audit (SASA).
This audit was completely unlike our normal System Audit which we still
perform. The current System Audit
Done that many times during security assessments at customers sites. for
example, Look at your SYS1.UADS dataset and compare it to RACF. You probably
will find users that are defined in your UADS dataset, but not in RACF. More
then that, IBM's ships UADS dataset with few users that probably not
I'd always heard Social Conversation in a Drunken Stupor.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Mary Anne Matyaz
maryanne4...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd always heard Social Conversation in a Drunken Stupor.
And I'd heard SHARE Collection of Inebriates, Drunkards, and Sots. But
I was also told that the true origin was losts in the mists of time.
--
zMan -- I've
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:26:30 -0700, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com wrote:
Yes. CPACF is millicode, and is logically on the die with our old friends
LA and MVC and ST (I'm actually guessing that it really IS mostly on the
die, and the millicode just enables it, but I don't really know that).
Jim Elliott wrote:
The Central Processor Assist for Cryptographic Function (CPACF) is a
coprocessor that uses the DES, TDES, AES-128, AES-256, SHA-1, and SHA-256
ciphers to perform symmetric key encryption and calculate message digests in
hardware. DES, TDES, AES-128, and AES-256 are used for
And I'd heard SHARE Collection of Inebriates, Drunkards, and Sots
That's the definition I'd heard, but I don't think anyone really knows what
SCIDS stands for.
Q: What does SHARE stand for?
A: SHARE is not an acronym. It stood for sharing information.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
There should *never* be two versions of any PTF released outside IBM.
If you really got two copies of a PTF that are not exactly the same,
this is a problem you should report to the support center.
Note that ++ASSIGN statements are not a part of PTFs, even though they
are in the same file as
Share Conference Informal Discussion Groups is the original name.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Bob Shannon
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: The meaning of SCIDS.
And
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:12:12 -0400
zMan wrote:
And I'd heard SHARE Collection of Inebriates, Drunkards, and Sots.
Well in that case, I certainly did my bit.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Dave Kopischke
[ snip ]
As for the original question, I'll quote the OP: His question was
why can't
mvs use scsi or san dasd, VSE and VM can. That does not look like a
price
gouging claim to me. I believe he's
That sounds quite reasonable.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
Tom Harper
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 4:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] FW: The meaning of SCIDS.
Share Conference Informal
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Using ADDRESS SDSF in OPS/MVS
home=''
home=environment('HOME')
Not as a criticism;
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:11:33 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Dave Kopischke
Google a price for this:
SEAGATE ST3500320NS465.76 GiB
CDW's website says: This product was discontinued as of Wednesday,
July 21,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mary Anne Matyaz
I'd always heard Social Conversation in a Drunken Stupor.
SHARE Conference Independent Communication Session. :-)
-jc-
--
For
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of ?? ???
(Nagesh S)
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 1:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: EZASOKET returns zero for socket descriptor in SOCKET call.
Hi,
For the
I didn't see anyone explicitly mention social engineering. IMO this may be
an easier way to get a not-very-technical user's id, but then you are back to
how to hack with a normal user TSO account. But if a system guy gave out a
password for an reason then, well, you know.
What about digging
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:17:04 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
And, then what did your comment mean, about my e-mail address?
He didn't say anything about your email address. What he wrote, and
what you quoted was, Based on your email do you think The
question was in regards to the email
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 7:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: When will MVS be able to use cheap dasd
snip
That's correct. It is not. For you to claim
SHARE Conference Independent Communication Session. :-)
That would be SCICS! :-(
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:42:20 -0500
From: jch...@ussco.com
Subject: Re: FW: The meaning of SCIDS.
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
I think that sig is meant in jest.
Of course it is!
If people are taking it seriously ...
-
I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation!
Kimota!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:13 AM, J R jayare...@hotmail.com wrote:
SHARE Conference Independent Communication Session. :-)
That would be SCICS! :-(
Yeah, but back then, there was hard liquor at SCIDS, so they spelled it wrong...
--
zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it
On 10/14/2010 3:17 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I think that sig is meant in jest.
Of course it is!
If people are taking it seriously ...
-
I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation!
Kimota!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 18:38 -0400, Rick Fochtman wrote:
I ALWAYS left the IBMUSER active on the system but the first thing I
also did was to change to password to some very obscure value.
A *very* long time ago, before a few ibm-mainers were born, there was an
early public-access packet
All,
(message cross-posted to other assembler-related lists)
I have all but completed the updates of the opcode tables on hlasm.com
There's a peculiarity I'd like to discuss here. Various instructions have
been introduced over the last couple of years that are a kind of umbrella
operation. They
I have seen the same problem. I ported some Windows socket code to z/OS.
The Windows code treated a return of = 0 as an error. However, the
documentation states that a return of less than zero indicates an error.
Changing it to check for 0 was an easy fix, and the code remained portable
back to
For the non-imbibers, I heard Share Conference Informal Discussion
Sessions
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: The meaning of
I am wondering if the old one he has was a pre-release test version?
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:50 AM, John Eells ee...@us.ibm.com wrote:
There should *never* be two versions of any PTF released outside IBM. If you
really got two copies of a PTF that are not exactly the same, this is a
problem
I always thought it was Society for the Consumption of Intoxicating Distilled
Solutions
Regards
Otto Schumacher
HP Enterprise Services
Infrastructure Specialist
Ahold Account
CICS Capacity Technical Support
P.O. Box 6462
2000 Wade Hampton Blvd.
LC1-302
Greenville, South Carolina, 29606
Social Contact and Informal Discussion Sessions
From:
J R jayare...@hotmail.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
10/14/2010 08:14 AM
Subject:
Re: The meaning of SCIDS.
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
SHARE Conference Independent Communication Session. :-)
That
Good morning listers,
We are researching a rather unusual approach to redirect our high-volume
VSAM I/O to a Grid server that would act as a real-time cached image of the
data.
From the little I know, the server will be connected through TCP/IP and once a
connection is established all the
At 10/13/2010 10:26 AM, Greg Shirey wrote:
I liked this article, and it's fairly recent. (Jan 2010)
http://www.mainframezone.com/it-management/mainframe-hacking-fact-or-fiction/P1
Greg
I read that article, and it is a good one. Interestingly (to me at
least), on the article's third web
A gotcha is the actual network data throughput*. Very likely that it will be
unacceptably slow.
I would imagine you would have a lot of application programming to do as well
as some expensive infrastructure to put in place. At the end of the day, a nice
DS8xxx DASD unit would likely cost a
maryanne4...@gmail.com (Mary Anne Matyaz) writes:
I'd always heard Social Conversation in a Drunken Stupor.
the definition I was told in the 60s was the
Society for Continuous Inebreation During Share
back in the days of open bar ... and one of the activities was seeing
how many bottles could
Performance? I have no idea. Hope you have a 10GBe network infrastructure.
A port can be in use for many concurrent sessions. Remember that only one
session can be sending data at a time, per OSA. How many concurrent sessions?
I'm fairly sure that the theoritical limit is 64K sockets. For z/OS
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:11 AM, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 7:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: When will
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 9:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: When will MVS be able to use cheap dasd
snip
Notice: This email has been sent to a publicly
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:46 AM, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
deleted
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
I do have permission from my manager to post via my work account. But you
have a very good point. I just got a
Is this hypothetical forest ranger rappelling up the skyscraper or being
repelled up the skyscraper by the pressure of the human throngs down on the
street?
Probably both.
Oh, well. It's almost Friday again. :-)
Bill Fairchild
Rocket Software
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
None such should ever escape IBM. Externally, it is allowed to have
multiple ++APAR fixes, but one and only one ++PTF with a given PTF number.
Although I can't assert it has never happened, I have personally never
heard of two versions of a PTF ever being shipped to a customer.
Mike Schwab
At 10/8/2010 03:35 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
-unsnip-
My 2 cents worth: the cheap DASD doesn't live up to the
reliability standards that IBM demands for z/OS. Stop and think,
really hard, about the demands on z/OS DASD storage,
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:50:58 -0400, John Eells ee...@us.ibm.com wrote:
There should *never* be two versions of any PTF released outside IBM.
Yannig Guiomard wrote:
I have some questions about the manner that PTFs are distributed, which I
hope someone can clear up for me!
Take PTF UA54182,
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010n.html#62 When will MVS be able to use cheap
dasd
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010n.html#65 When will MVS be able to use cheap
dasd
post from similar thread in this n.g. from 2007
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007h.html#13 Question on DASD Hardware
with
What would constitute a root kit for MVS? Perhaps an SVC with some hidden
functionality?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
David Cole
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Mainframe
I don't know why the home='' code. I didn't code that part.
I also tried the
Isfjesname = 'JES2' with the same RC=-3 results.
This is all the code that I need to reproduce the error
Calling it this way works tso exec (sdsf1) exec
Executing OPS/REXX with !OI , gives RC(-3)
-Some code that is executing in an authorized state
- Supervisor state
- PSW key 0-7
- Ability to issue MODESET SVC (APF authorized)
-This code would have one of the following flaws:
- Store into requester provided storage address while in an
authorized
d...@lists.duda.com (David Andrews) writes:
You could stay up all night typing in random subscriber IDs to see what
you would get. It didn't take long to discover that the first three
digits of a subscriber ID was the telephone area code of the subscriber.
That cut down on the search space
I would think it means code that front-ends one of the First Level Interrupt
Handlers, rather like the one that CA was using in 1996 (are they still using
it?) to front-end program interrupts so that various CA products could easily
become authorized by merely executing a particular invalid
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of J R
SHARE Conference Independent Communication Session. :-)
That would be SCICS! :-(
Oops! Showing my subsystem bias. :-)
C /Communication/Discussion/
-jc-
We have several tapes that are not initialized and when the job executes it
abends trying to use these tapes. I thought CA-1 was suppose to automatically
init the tapes but that is not happening. I am trying to init the tapes using
IEHINIT, the problem is these tapes are in a different library
Richard,
Have you opened a case with CA OPS/MVS? I find they are very helpful with
these kinds of questions.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Burge, Richard richard.bu...@aig.com
Sent: Oct 14, 2010 11:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Using ADDRESS SDSF in OPS/MVS
I don't know
Some of this sounds like the magic svcs that I've seen people use for
testing.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ray Overby
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 6:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Mainframe hacking?
The returning in an authorized state ones are exactly that. The
others are typically the result of poor coding and/or design.
On 10/14/2010 11:43 AM, Lindy Mayfield wrote:
Some of this sounds like the magic svcs that I've seen people use for
testing.
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Yes Ed, these sites all had RACF installed and yes, it still required the
VTOC data set is RACF protected bit to be flipped for the data set
protection call to even be made. The needed resource manager calls became
more apparent as the resources which were being protected grew. The ACF2
... oh, and the software company (front for criminal organization)
apparently was selected on the basis of being the low bidder.
--
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970
--
For IBM-MAIN
At 10/14/2010 12:24 PM, Chris Craddock wrote:
(as Bob knows) it is impossible to create/install a malicious FLIH
or SVC or PC without already having the keys to the kingdom anyway.
That is the foundation of integrity and the reason why the
installation has to appropriately protect system
The whole point, I think, is to get it by the system's guys. Not sure how to
do that. So much easier on Windows. Still there are coming more and more
freeware MVS utilities, like showmvs. (It can run authorized I think, yes?)
I don't think that it is that carefully audited, somebody could
p...@voltage.com (Phil Smith) writes:
Long ago and far away, a friend was looking at the VSE microfiche and
found an undocumented SVC that stored the top half of a register value
in the address contained in the bottom half of the register. He
promptly wrote a program that used that SVC to gain
Thanks for the information - I forgot about the OLDTAPE option. I updated the
unit to point to the other library and that job worked.
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Campbell Jay [mailto:james.l.campb...@irs.gov]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 11:16 AM
To: Mark Steely
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Bob Shannon
bshan...@rocketsoftware.comwrote:
I would think it means code that front-ends one of the First Level
Interrupt Handlers
That's how Amdahl implemented SE and SP assist years ago. I think IBM did
it to implement the IEEE floating point
Lindy Mayfield wrote:
What would constitute a root kit for MVS? Perhaps an SVC with some hidden
functionality?
Long ago and far away, a friend was looking at the VSE microfiche and found an
undocumented SVC that stored the top half of a register value in the address
contained in the bottom
I would think it means code that front-ends one of the First Level Interrupt
Handlers
That's how Amdahl implemented SE and SP assist years ago. I think IBM did it to
implement the IEEE floating point instructions so that they would work on
processors that lacked the hardware. Of course these
hi,
if you are interested in details on this concern refer to
http://www.fedtke.com/download.htm
- select english
- select the IT SECURITY FORUM
best
stephen
---
Dr. Stephen Fedtke
Enterprise-IT-Security.com
Seestrasse 3a
CH-6300 Zug
Switzerland
Tel. ++41-(0)41-710-4005
-The sad news is that integrity exposures exist today in every
z/OS system. There is no need to install anything other than what you
already have installed.
-These integrity exposures have already gotten past the system's guys.
- Current systems programmers (in general) do not have
On 14 Oct 2010 05:56:48 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
I didn't see anyone explicitly mention social engineering. IMO this may be
an easier way to get a not-very-technical user's id, but then you are back to
how to hack with a normal user TSO account. But if a system guy gave out
Ricc,
Yes, APF authorization still allows the keys to the kingdom. That is why
installations are expected to severely limit update access to APF
authorized load libraries, the SETPROG MVS command, all datasets in the
PARMLIB concatenation and all libraries defined as system level PROCLIBS.
If
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 12:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Mainframe hacking?
The whole point, I think, is to get it by the system's guys.
Not
On 14 Oct 2010 07:24:01 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
At 10/13/2010 10:26 AM, Greg Shirey wrote:
I liked this article, and it's fairly recent. (Jan 2010)
http://www.mainframezone.com/it-management/mainframe-hacking-fact-or-fiction/P1
Greg
I read that article, and it is a good
Hello:
Suppose you code something like this:
STIMER(M) SET BINTVL=1 second, EXIT=exitaddress,WAIT=NO
So the application program continues to run, and then 1 second later the
timer interrupt happens. The ASM MACROS documentation says the exitaddress
routine will get control at some point after
Paul,
Here is the answer:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2A8B0/22.1.5?SHELF=iea2bkb0DT=20100629141054
Basically, it states that if the TCB is waiting, it is given control
immediately. Otherwise, any interrupt, such as a page fault, may allow it to
begin
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:21:16 -0700, Ron Hawkins wrote:
I really struggle with the fact that you think that the cost of goods for a
disk drive assembly includes the disk drive and nothing else. Would you
argue with David Bowie or Amazon about the price you pay for a CD that you
can buy at Fry's
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:11:33 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
SEAGATE ST3500320NS465.76 GiB
CDW's website says: This product was discontinued as of Wednesday,
July 21, 2010. Call for availability.
Their price: $95.99.
Now what are we going to do ?!?!?!?!?!
;)
This has been a curiosity of mine of late. Why are on some systems, for
example DELETE and LISTCAT authorized in IKJTSOxx? And some systems they
aren't?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Clark Morris
Sent: Thursday,
We are planning to install new z10s into two data centers that do
not currently have mainframes. I'm not sure if we are planning to
have standalone tape drives (we will have vtls).
What is the process to install z/os 1.12 in this scenario? I was
hoping we could load some kind of starter system
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:43:31 +0200, Lindy Mayfield
lindy.mayfi...@ssf.sas.com wrote:
This has been a curiosity of mine of late. Why are on some systems, for
example DELETE and LISTCAT authorized in IKJTSOxx? And some systems they
aren't?
I don't know the answer to LISTCAT. For DELETE, some
I thought that IEBCOPY being authorized was due to a (possible archaic)
facility to invoke certain I/O appendage routines.
IDCAMS and its subcommands must be able to invoke auth services to satisfy
certain invocations - no surprise to find it in AUTHPGM.
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket
Your business partner and/or IBM would be my first choice for a start up plan.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Greg Smith
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 1:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: New Z10 install
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
The whole point, I think, is to get it by the system's guys. Not sure
how to do that. So much easier
on Windows. Still there are coming more and more freeware MVS
utilities, like showmvs. (It can
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:58:08 +, Bob Shannon wrote:
And I'd heard SHARE Collection of Inebriates, Drunkards, and Sots
That's the definition I'd heard, but I don't think anyone really knows what
SCIDS stands for.
Q: What does SHARE stand for?
A: SHARE is not an acronym. It stood for sharing
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:04:53 -0500 Paul Schuster pgs4ibmm...@pacbell.net
wrote:
:Suppose you code something like this:
:STIMER(M) SET BINTVL=1 second, EXIT=exitaddress,WAIT=NO
:So the application program continues to run, and then 1 second later the
:timer interrupt happens. The ASM MACROS
Bus-Tech has a zDASD product as you have described. I am not aware that
StorageTek has such a product. Based on my web searches and searching
the Oracle (STK) website, I found no listing for zDASD by StorageTek.
Pratt Parrish | WW Manager of Channel Development and Marketing |
Bus-Tech, Inc.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Pommier, Rex R.
rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com wrote:
XIV supporting z/OS roadmap? Can you point me at something official that
says this? I would like to look at the XIV but I was told by our VAR that
XIV supporting FICON and (emulated) CKD isn't in the works.
We have, as I alluded to yesterday, a workaround until the Customized
Offerings Driver is orderable on DVD next year. You can have your IBM
representative or business partner send me a note and I can get them in
touch with the right people.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
I seem to recall, but old age is having its way with me today.
Isn't there a way to dynamically determine if a page is fixed??
Any jarring of the memory is greatly appreciated.
Larry Crilley
Dino-Software Corporation
800.480.DINO
412.366.3566
On 10/14/2010 12:57 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
We are planning to install new z10s into two data centers that do
not currently have mainframes. I'm not sure if we are planning to
have standalone tape drives (we will have vtls).
What is the process to install z/os 1.12 in this scenario? I was
hoping
Hi listners.
I was checking erep output to try to discover more about MCIC (Machine
Check Interruption Code) and found following register,
but I checked 02 Erep manuals, (User´s Guide Manual and Reference
Manual), but can´t found any description how to readout these
little dump.
We are
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:37:37 -0400 Larry Crilley
larry.cril...@dino-software.com wrote:
:I seem to recall, but old age is having its way with me today.
:Isn't there a way to dynamically determine if a page is fixed??
It is a wrong question, because if your process did not FIX it the process
Sure. I just want to determine if a page is fixed. I'm not saying I want
to free/unfix it. I just want to know...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 4:56 PM
To:
Try a PGSER OUT against the page.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Larry Crilley
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 2:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: PAGE FIX
Sure. I just want to determine if a page is fixed.
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
