As the failing PSW is problem state, and the abend location is off of R15, I
would expect that the SCRATCHD routine (which is not included) is at fault for
the abend. Of course the scratch failed, but that is the cause your routine
was driven.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:50:32 -0700 Scott Ford
Is there a fundamental reason why are you using a hiperspace?
If you are trying to selectively copy SMF data from IEFU8x into somewhere that
can be accessed/post-processed by another task/ASID, then using a common
dataspace would be much easier and you could manage the serialization with CDS.
hi,
I want to report all datasets with DSNAME recalled in fromdate - todate
dates
I used the command HSEND REPORT DAILY FUNCTION(RECALL)
OUTDATASET(STR016.HSM.RECALL) to get the number of datasets recalled.
but it just shows the count not the actual name of dsns
Any help will be
It doesn't look like any of the commands will do what you want. You may have
to examine the HSM log datasets or the job log.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Shameem .K .Shoukath
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:36 AM
Or HSM FSR SMF records ..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Schwarz, Barry A
Sent: יום ה 11 אוגוסט 2011 14:01
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Anyone know how to HSM report of recalled datasets
It doesn't look like
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
I am trying to perform a Physical volume backup to disk. My problem is that
SMS is trapping my output dsn - which I am attempting to direct to volume
PROM04 - and is allocating it in a certain storage group. Here is what I get:
IEF344I DFDSS22 BACKUP TAPE1 -
Gerhard,
Absolutely right, found the S0C1 but had two other issues ..
1. Must issue a CAMLST uncatalog request for dataset name first
2. Camlst scratch needs the correct parameter list
After doing 1 and 2 it worked like a champ.
Thanks for the help and I have to think about SMS ...
And thx
http://www.idug.org/p/fo/et/topic=19
is probably a good place to start.
Cheers,
Jantje.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
I made an error. I am trying to write the output to volume VE6C01 which is a
spare NON SMS volume. I am trying to backup volume PROM04.
Please excuse my error. Thanks.
From: esmie moo esmie_...@yahoo.ca
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 7:33:50 AM
Subject: DFDSS
OK, I couldn't find it in the two obvious places I looked, but where is the
default print class set for the SYSLOG dataset. I expected JESPARM, but it is
not making itself obvious.
Thanks,
Neal
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
The control cards show INDDNAME(DISK1), but the JCL shows DD statement
DASD1. Might that be part of the problem?
- Don Imbriale
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:42 AM, esmie moo esmie_...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I made an error. I am trying to write the output to volume VE6C01 which is
a spare NON SMS
Check out LOGCLS in IEASYSxx.
- Don Imbriale
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Neal Eckhardt neckha...@cnyric.org wrote:
OK, I couldn't find it in the two obvious places I looked, but where is the
default print class set for the SYSLOG dataset. I expected JESPARM, but it
is not making itself
Neal,
what about using LOGCLS=x in your IEASYSxx (in your hlq.PARMLIB) ?
ciao Lutz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Don,
I made the change to DISK1 however the problem persists. I tried using both
HLQ ZWAXPG and SYS1 however for some reason SMS is trapping the TAPE1 DSN
ZWAXPG ATTEMPT:
IEF344I DFDSS22 BACKUP TAPE1 - ALLOCATION FAILED DUE TO DATA FACILITY SYSTEM ERR
IGD17273I ALLOCATION HAS FAILED FOR ALL
Thanks guys, Not the obvious place, but as soon as you said it.
Neal
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Wrt IEFUJV, the first word of the parameter list points to the Common
Exit parameter area. Offset +20 of that contains the user identification
with the description:
User identification. SMF places this data in all subsequent
records for this job. This field is initialized to EBCDIC
blanks
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea00afc0ed...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 08/10/2011
at 09:50 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
The OMVS environment DOES NOT RUN IN YOUR TSO ADDRESS SPACE!
It doesn't run in the same process, but depending on how you're
configured you can have
In 1228402832218791.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu, on
08/10/2011
at 10:45 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
What can be done in IKJEFF10 that couldn't equally well be done in
IEFUJV?
Issue a TPUT[1] to the user, or anything else that is dependent on a
TSO environment.
Can
In 1313020232.153.yahoomail...@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com, on
08/10/2011
at 04:50 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
My question is this...after a LOCATE finds the dataset ..Is it
correct that the dataset name has to be moved into the DSNSCR
variable name
Normal practice would be to
In 638895340519.wa.dlikensinfosecinc@bama.ua.edu, on
08/10/2011
at 08:46 AM, Donald Likens dlik...@infosecinc.com said:
You stated that I could not get the CML lock if the local lock is
help. Is there a problem getting the local lock if the CML lock is
held?
There is no the CML; a CML
In
cabefxsoet9vpbx6a6h6suiesmppts9o8+gp7otlk_c6dweq...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/10/2011
at 12:11 PM, Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com said:
During dataset creation, the only DCB information available is from
the allocation parameters (i.e. JCL or SVC 99),
It's also possible to create a dataset
It looks like IEF343I is your answer - some of which was truncated on your
email.
NOT ENOUGH NON-SYSTEM MANAGED VOLUMES ELIGIBLE.
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of esmie
moo
THERE ARE (5) CANDIDATE VOLUMES and
5 VOLUMES WERE REJECTED BECAUSE THEY DID NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT SPACE
It appears that your storage group, ISTINT1, does not have enough space to
accommodate your allocation. If someone called me
in regards to this issue, I'd ask why they weren't directing
So I think the original poster wanted to go to a non-SMS volume - which I
forgot when posting my
last response.
He's going to need to talk to someone who know the SMS routines in his
shop. In my shop, I have
a StorClas which can be used to push a normally SMS controlled DS outside
of SMS
Greg,
I am trying to bypass SMS. This is why I am using these control cards in the
job:
BYPASSACS(**) -
STORCLAS(NONSMS) -
From: Greg Shirey wgshi...@benekeith.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:46:38 AM
Subject: Re: DFDSS QUESTION - BYPASS SMS
I tried using both HLQ ZWAXPG and SYS1 however
for some reason SMS is trapping the TAPE1 DSN
if hlq ZWAXPG is 'trapped' by SMS, it means that your SMS ACS routines
are coded in order to assign a SC and a SG (ISTINT1) to datasets whose hlq is
ZWAXPG.
Which doesn't mean it is bad.
The
Esmee,
Are you positively, absolutely sure that volume VE6C01 is non-SMS managed? How
much space is on the volume?
Can you post an updated JCL stream with the SYS1. output dataset along with
the messages, being that there were a couple errors that you have fixed.
Rex
-Original
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 07:02:37 -0700, esmie moo wrote:
Greg,
I am trying to bypass SMS. This is why I am using these control cards in the
job:
BYPASSACS(**) -
STORCLAS(NONSMS) -
Replace STORCLAS(NONSMS) with NSC NMC
Norbert Friemel
I would be happy to be corrected, but I thought that, by definition, each
process was a separate address space.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea00afc0ed...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 08/10/2011
Esmie,
Those control cards are input to DSS, and have absolutely nothing to do with
the allocation of TAPE1, which is in JCL. By the time DSS reads the control
cards, the allocation of the datasets defined in JCL is already complete.
Those keywords in DSS control statements are used for dynamic
I think it will depend on how many books you have. HD will likely help your
largest LPAR because HD will give exclusive access to 8 physical CPs across 2
chips which will result in better cache utilization.
We have 2 LPARS across 8 Physicals with 45%/55% weight distribution and are
seeing
I am surprised dfdss is not objecting to the use of BYPASSACS and
STORCLAS in that context. My manuals (z/OS 1.10) don't show those as
valid parameters for a DUMP command. They normally apply to placement
of target datasets of a RESTORE or COPY, not to placement of a dfdss
dump dataset from
Norbert,
I received the same error messages. SMS is still trying to trap it.:
ICH70001I ZWAXPG LAST ACCESS AT 10:18:27 ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 11, 2011
IEF344I DFDSS22 BACKUP TAPE1 - ALLOCATION FAILED DUE TO DATA FACILITY SYSTEM ERR
IGD17273I ALLOCATION HAS FAILED FOR ALL VOLUMES
Hi Andy,
Looking at the JES2 manual, under the detail for $VS, is this this example -
$vs, 'v (234,235,236),offline','d a'
which shows that while you can issue multiple commands, you will need to
enclose each in a separate set of single quotes with a comma between each
command, not
Walter,
I need to write the output to a NON-SMS volume because it (volume) will be
accessed by a test system which has different SMS rules.
From: Walter Marguccio walter_marguc...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:08:20 AM
Subject: Re: DFDSS QUESTION - BYPASS
Scott,
Thanks for pointing that out. You could be right. I will look around for a
jcl to by STORCLAS.
From: Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:35:59 AM
Subject: Re: DFDSS QUESTION - BYPASS SMS - CORRECTION
Esmie,
Those control cards
Rex,
Yes, I ensured that it was non-SMS. Here is the VTOC:
Device Volume Nbr Free - Largest - Nbr Nbr
Nbr Type Status Serial Cyl Cyl Track Cyl Track Ext Users
On 8/11/2011 8:25 AM, Scott Rowe wrote:
I would be happy to be corrected, but I thought that, by definition, each
process was a separate address space.
Check out
z/OS UNIX System Services Command Reference
z/OS UNIX System Services User's Guide
z/OS UNIX System Services Programming: Assembler
Do you not have a storage admin of some kind? Someone responsible for
writing the rules? A 5 minute conversation with someone who knows the
routines should easily resolve your question.
SMS is intercepting your allocation based on it's rules re-assigning it.
Someone coded it this way.
On 08/11/2011 09:52 AM, esmie moo wrote:
Norbert,
...
Here is my job:
//BACKUP EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=4096K,PARM='TYPRUN=NORUN'
//*STEP01EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=4096K,TIME=1440,PARM='UTILMSG=YES'
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//DISK1DD UNIT=SYSDA,VOL=SER=SHRPP4,DISP=SHR
//TAPE1DD
Esmee,
Try coding STORCLAS=storage-class-name which in your case would be
storclas=nonsms
See JCL Reference Chap 12 DD Statement for more details
David O'Brien
NIH Contractor
-Original Message-
From: Darth Keller [mailto:darth.kel...@assurant.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011
I am trying to track him down. I looked at the SMS rules and there is a
non-SMS storage class called STORCLAS=NONSMS in the ACS.
From: Darth Keller darth.kel...@assurant.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 11:04:08 AM
Subject: Re: DFDSS QUESTION - BYPASS SMS -
David,
I gave that a try however I got the same problem :
IEF343I DFDSS22 BACKUP TAPE1 - REQUEST FAILED - NOT ENOUGH NON-SYSTEM MANAGED
VOLUMES ELIGIBLE
IEF272I DFDSS22 BACKUP - STEP WAS NOT EXECUTED.
Here is my JCL:
//BACKUP EXEC
look at _BPX_SHAREAS. There are some cases where multiple UNIX processes run in
a single z/OS address space. Personally, I don't much care for it. But it could
be a performance enhancement.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard
Sharing an address space also allows you to run shell scripts in batch and
allow commands to access DD cards in the original address space.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:54 AM, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
look at
At this point you really need to resolve this with your storage admin person.
There is no way for us to determine if the storclass ACS routine is properly
written.
If it's my shop, I would put in the following at or near the top of the
Storclass ACS routine:
WHEN (DSN EQ
I gave that a try however I got the same problem :
Esmie,
is the SYSDA esoteric name conflicting with SHRPP4 volume ?
Wht happens if you give SYSALLDA instead of SYDA on TAPE1 DD ?
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich - Germany
Walter,
You hit the nail on the head. SYSALLDA worked. I don't know why SYSDA doesn't
eventhough it is part of the esoteric.
Thanks so much for you invaluable help.
Thanks to all the posters who helped with this post. You all are a smashing
bunch !!
From: Walter Marguccio
Also look at you commands. ===W L
Is part of the midnight mover.
In a message dated 8/11/2011 8:37:31 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
neckha...@cnyric.org writes:
but as soon as you said it.
--
For IBM-MAIN
Shmuel,
Yep one of the output files was closed and I issued a write, i fixed that...
The actual problem was in the Scratch code, i also fixed that, you need to
supply volser, and devtype
before issuing. After I made the changes all was good in Toontown. Thank you
for your response,
it's much
Scott,
To handle SMS you need to SCRATCH first then UNCAT (can't have uncataloged
SMS data sets).
Or you can invoke IDCAMS to do the DELETE and do it all at once.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ford
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 7:41 AM Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
I don't know why SYSDA doesn't eventhough it is part of the esoteric
using HCD, try to list all devices defined under the SYSDA esoteric name
and see if SHRPP4 address is defined within this group. My guess is SHRPP4
is NOT defined to SYSDA.
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS
Thanks much appreciated because I dont know SMS that well
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: DanD mvs-j...@sympatico.ca
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: CAMLST LOCATE and SCRATCH
Scott,
To handle SMS you need to
snip--
It's also possible to create a dataset with SVC 32, although I don't
know what happens if you try it on an SMS volume.
-unsnip--
I respectfully
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:25:53 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/f1a1b990/5.44
Because compression is such a light-weight process - here a comparison with
the heavy-weight processes compaction or encryption is valid! - it has a very
small
On 8/11/2011 5:04 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
I respectfully submit that the use of SVC 32 is archaic and
cumbersome and should be discouraged in favor of DYNALLOC (SVC
99) whenever possible.
I have a 33.3 RPM turntable, cassette tape recorder, VHS
recorder, and I have been known to use a manual
Paul
I recently saw - again I have to confess - a program where a character intended
to be portrayed as habitually and incessantly argumentative was described in
terms of it being very likely that if left alone he would immediately find a
reason to argue with himself.
If I see it again - it's
Thanks for the valuable information. I plan to use the MODE C cmd in selected
(10 or 20) z/os, or ZOS, or Z/OS R 1.12. IBM Mainframe(z196) batch jobs.
These FTP's currently have an Elapse Time of 20 minutes to 3 hours using BLOCK
Mode. With MODE C they use 6 minutes to 90 minutes. I never
At 19:23 -0400 on 08/11/2011, Gerhard Postpischil wrote about Re:
file allocation dcb order:
Most of the dinosaurs, who had to run OS/360 despite IBM's help.
g Completing a DSCB is no more difficult than setting up a JFCB.
True. You expand the mapping macro, map it over an area of the
I am out of the office until 08/15/2011.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 10
Aug 2011 to 11 Aug 2011 (#2011-223) sent on 8/11/11 22:00:03.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is
60 matches
Mail list logo
