From: saurabh khandelwal sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com
But I am not able to change catalog name for $SYS alias. it
always takes master catalog name.
Sourabh,
from the Modify System Layout you can override the master catalog
attribute for the $SYS datasets using the command CH MCAT N.
Hi,
I realize you said that you contacted the Automation Software companies, but
you didn't contact us. We have hundreds of sites running our automation
software, and while we were aware of how to process and not process the verbose
messages, we were never contacted from you (or anyone) to
interesting topic..
I also wonder on if those service classes that are not active (no rules,no
workload assigned) will cause WLM overhead?
If no, then the suggested total number of sc/periods are for active ones
only.. any document supporting this?
--
Cobe Xu
Best Regards
Hi
Any simple tool, to monitor the storage usage of an address space ?
I'm using now the MXI from Rob Scott, and it is very good, but I would
need something like a function call to get this
in a program or in REXX
--
For
G'Day,
I am following up on a problem regarding the corruption of a dsn. I have the
SMF records for the day, however since the daily tapes are merged into a weekly
tape I am having a problem (space issues) trying to extract only the type 14
15 records for that particular date. I looked at
The MXI 4.3 freeware product comes with a REXX interface - it returns the
information that would have been presented on the screen as a set of REXX stem
variables for each logical line.
The commercial version of MXI has an enhanced REXX API where you can directly
access each column variable
Hi
Thank you, I will try out with REXX and stem.
I would need something , shows the running address space memory usage in
some time intervals.
On 04.05.2012 13:13, Rob Scott wrote:
The MXI 4.3 freeware product comes with a REXX interface - it returns the
information that would have
Try this in your SYSIN
//SYSIN DD *
INDD(INDD1,OPTIONS(DUMP))
OUTDD(OUTDD1,TYPE(14:15))
DATE(2012125,2012125)
/*
In my example, the job would select only records from today. Change the
125 to the day you need to select.
Have a nice day,
Dave Betten
DFSORT Development, Performance
John, try something like:
INDD(IN,OPTIONS(DUMP))
DATE(2012108,2012108)
OUTDD(OUT,TYPE(70:78))
The date parm is what you need.
Mary Anne
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Maybe you could write a function that reads the control blocks of the
z/OS storage management queues and computes the overall size of the
used storage blocks, per subpool?
If you call this function somewhere in a loop in your main program,
you could discover if one of your subroutines allocates
David,
I am trying out the suggestions made by you and Mary Anne . Thanks.
From: David Betten bet...@us.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Friday, 4 May 2012 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: SELECTING SMF RECORDS FOR 1 DAY
Try this in your SYSIN
//SYSIN DD *
A correction, courtesy of Jim:
STCBSST is on only when subspace information is being propagated from a
mother task to a daughter task.
Thus the mother task can be actively using a subspace and not have STCBSST
on.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
In 5625217423916820.wa.wkkelleyoptonline@bama.ua.edu, on
05/03/2012
at 08:46 PM, W. Kevin Kelley wkkel...@optonline.net said:
Any comments/criticisms/suggestions?
Suggestion: allow .MSGOPTION to enable writing the verbose message
lines to SYSLOG/OPERLOG.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
The VSMLIST service presents this information in a slightly more digestible
form and it will also get the appropriate locks for the caller if you use
LINKAGE=SYSTEM
It is what MXI uses under the covers for reporting on private or common subpool
usage.
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
I like the program DAF on CBTTAPE.ORG. It can select records by data set name
and date.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
John Dawes
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 6:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: SELECTING SMF
On Thu, 3 May 2012 22:03:03 -0500, W. Kevin Kelley wkkel...@optonline.net
wrote:
If the new MPFLSTxx option has it disabled by default or enables the verbose
messages, what
purpose does the OCE_ABEND_DESCRIP=YES serve in DEVSUPxx?
The DEVSUPxx external has been deprecated and replaced by the
Thanks for the help. That was exactly what I needed.
Brad Wissink
Information Technology Services
Iowa State University
515-294-3088
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Bonaduce, Frank
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 3:53 PM
To:
Control statements look good to me.
Change the BLKSIZE on OUTDD1 to 27998
i.e. ...DCB=(recfm=vbs,lrecl=32760,blksize=27998)
Increase the space allocation. There are an awful lot of type14/15 records cut.
Michael Cleary's DAF (CBT FILE 094) will be helpful here to decode the records.
Don't
On Fri, 4 May 2012 03:57:24 -0500, Brian Westerman
brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com wrote:
I realize that CPUs are a lot faster than they have ever been, but using the
resources on frivolous things like keeping people from having to look up a
message by always printing the verbose text is silly.
We are turning on 1 engine this weekend to one of our processors; we are
going from a 2097-604 to a 2097-605. Our IBM CE says that it will not
need a Power-on-Reset (POR). We are not changing the weights for the
lpars within the HMC; we are leaving them as is. How can we verify that
the actual
On 5/3/2012 9:48 PM, W. Kevin Kelley wrote:
In z/OS R13, DFSMS changed approximately 400 of their rather cryptic IEC error
messages to include additional lines of explanation. Feedback from R13 ESP
customers indicated that the additional lines of explanation were appreciated
for end-users but
Chip,
Thanks for mentioning IPLINFO, I didn't know about it. I learn so much by
reading this list!
-Roland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
You will have to issue very online command for the added CPU.
Issue D M=CPU to verify.
You will have to apply auth codes incase you have vendor products which
have auth codes depending on machine model.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu]
On Fri, 4 May 2012 14:39:29 +, Lopez, Sharon wrote:
We are turning on 1 engine this weekend to one of our processors; we are
going from a 2097-604 to a 2097-605. ... How can we verify that
the actual physical engine has been turned on? Is there a MVS display
that will show this or somewhere
I am wy into territory I know nothing about here but doesn't D M=CPU
show this?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Lopez, Sharon
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 7:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Engine increase
If I'm not mistaken, the HCD profile for the image will need to have
spare CPUs defined for the add to work.
Chip Grantham | Ameritas | Sr. IT Consultant | cgrant...@ameritas.com
5900 O Street, Lincoln NE 68510 | p: 402-467-7382 | c: 402-429-3579 | f:
402-325-4030
From:
I wrote a REXX program to take SYSOUT with ANSI control characters and
generates an XML file. It comes out looking very nice in MS-Word. From there
I print it to PDF using PDF Creator. I'm attaching the source for the REXX, as
well as the XML Style Sheet that it references. To run the REXX
Wouldn't it depend on how the LPAR is defined? If you've have 4 CP defined in
the partition definition, and no reserve(?) CPs defined, can you dynamically
CF a 5th CP online?
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N.
On 5/3/2012 7:15 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
If the new MPFLSTxx option has it disabled by default or enables the verbose
messages, what
purpose does the OCE_ABEND_DESCRIP=YES serve in DEVSUPxx? What if you want the
original behavior? I ask, because I like it.
I also like the current behavior.
On the z10 (2097) and up, you can dynamically make a new CP available to
an LPAR via the HMC. Once that is done, the z/OZ CONFIG command can be
issued. Be careful to follow through completely with all steps. We added
an engine a while back, but it went offline at the next regular IPL, and
we
Roland,
Are you aware of TXT2PDF? That's a free REXX tool to convert mainframe reports
into well - formatted PDF reports/files, optionally with greenbar background.
It was originally part of Lyonel Dyck's XMITIP Email package.
See http://homerow.net/rexx/txt2pdf/
Regards,
Ulrich Krueger
I am pretty sure the answer is: NO.
However you don't need a POR, changing the LPAR's definitions and a
deactivate/activate of the LPAR will do.
Kees.
McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote in message
news:a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea00e924b4...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom.
..
Wouldn't
I was in the ESP and joined the follow-on conversations about the
increased message traffic. The concern was not about a weightier
syslog/operlog, but about the even denser weed patch that one has to wade
through in syslog/operlog in order to troubleshoot some other totally
unrelated problem.
That's why I was ignorant. I'm stuck forever on an old z9BC. I lust after a
z114 or z196.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com *
I would love some software, preferable hosted on z/OS, which could do a
context sensitive search of the syslog/operlog. Along with a __good__
repository. There may be such a thing already. I would know because we are a
dying shop.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative
On Fri, 4 May 2012 08:56:38 -0700, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
wrote:
I like the solution. The installation can turn verbose on or off globally.
The new 'filter' allows us to direct long explanations to just the
programmer--my preference--or to syslog/operlog. Why complain about 'too
On Fri, 4 May 2012 08:42:37 -0700, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
On 5/3/2012 7:15 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
If the new MPFLSTxx option has it disabled by default or enables the verbose
messages, what
purpose does the OCE_ABEND_DESCRIP=YES serve in DEVSUPxx? What if you want
On 5/4/2012 8:56 AM, Skip Robinson wrote:
I like the solution. The installation can turn verbose on or off globally.
The new 'filter' allows us to direct long explanations to just the
programmer--my preference--or to syslog/operlog. Why complain about 'too
much control'?
You misunderstood.
On 5/4/2012 7:52 AM, Thomas Conley wrote:
I think the MPFLST option should be something like JOBLOG, SYSLOG, or BOTH.
That should satisfy the needs of all parties. My choice would be BOTH.
Thanks again for this enhancement.
I like this idea. However, I would caution against the use of
Touche. Since I don't want verbosity in my syslog/operlog, I failed to
notice the consequence for those who might. The original intent of
explanatory messages was to assist the programmer or production control
person or whoever has responsibility for fixing the problem to better
understand the
and the dinosaurs are very hungry.
I need to migrate 50 Solaris servers to zLinux under z/VM on a z114 and
about the same number of Windows servers to zBx.
Does anyone have experience with this, some ideas?
Need a migration path.
Some questions:
Can z114 be upgraded to include zBx or must I
On 5/4/2012 11:01 AM, George Henke wrote:
I need to migrate 50 Solaris servers to zLinux under z/VM on a z114 and
about the same number of Windows servers to zBx.
Congratulations! You wanna come share your experience at SHARE in Anaheim in
August?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
ty. I would, but I doubt it will have been completed by then.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.comwrote:
On 5/4/2012 11:01 AM, George Henke wrote:
I need to migrate 50 Solaris servers to zLinux under z/VM on a z114 and
about the same number of Windows
On 5/4/2012 11:10 AM, George Henke wrote:
ty. I would, but I doubt it will have been completed by then.
OK. We'll 'pencil' you in for San Francisco in February... :-)
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
I will remind you
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.comwrote:
On 5/4/2012 11:10 AM, George Henke wrote:
ty. I would, but I doubt it will have been completed by then.
OK. We'll 'pencil' you in for San Francisco in February... :-)
--
Edward E Jaffe
I can answer one question. Yes you can connect a zBX to a z114, it does
not require a z196.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:15 PM, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com wrote:
I will remind you
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
On 5/4/2012 11:10 AM, George
Hello,
We are debugging a cics programin that there is assembler protected
module, while in xpedtor this calls fails where as i we use CEDX then it is
working fine.
In xpeditor is there a way where we can execute the module without doing a
trap. I tried by skipping the call to this
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of George Henke
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 1:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: It's feeding time in Jurassic Park . . .
and the dinosaurs are very hungry.
I need to migrate 50
tyvm, John, Mark, Edward.
Mark,
Do I need an Enterprise Class z114 box or will a Business Class one suffice?
John,
A compelling reason for server consolidation on zBx as IBM pointed out in
their z Summit is that zMIPS GCPs are totally dedicated to regular workload
processing, no I/O - that is
On 5/4/2012 at 02:01 PM, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to migrate 50 Solaris servers to zLinux under z/VM on a z114 and
about the same number of Windows servers to zBx.
Does anyone have experience with this, some ideas?
Some. If you've decided to use SLES on System z, then
On 5/4/2012 at 02:55 PM, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com wrote:
Do I need an Enterprise Class z114 box or will a Business Class one suffice?
There are no such things. IBM marketing confusing things again. A z114 could
be considered the equivalent of a BC model and the z196 and EC model.
No disrespect but this looks a little like what the Fox channel dishes up for
us on a daily basis:
a) You post a message on IBMMAIN stating that you are starting a project but
have no idea how to do it
b) You use a nameless email account with a cellphone number listed as
Poughkeepsie , NY
c)
I do not suppose there is any way of sharing a zBx between 2 CECs.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Mark Post mp...@suse.com wrote:
On 5/4/2012 at 02:55 PM, George Henke gahe...@gmail.com wrote:
Do I need an Enterprise Class z114 box or will a Business Class one
suffice?
There are no such
Hello -
Many years ago I used dynamic allocation' to allocate a dataset from an
assembler program. In order to issue the DYNALLOC macro (I believe that it
is still documented in z/OS JOB MGMT) you must setup values in 'RB' request
block, 'RBPTR' request block pointer, 'TU' text unit and ''TUPL'
I think the way it works is that you have a 'zEnterprise CEC' which is
composed of a z114/z196 and optionally a zBX .
The zBX is not standalone
--
This email message and any accompanying materials may contain proprietary,
To be pedantic
You have a zEnterprise node, which is a z196/z114 with zero or one
attached zBX. A zBX may have one to four frames. You can couple up to
eight nodes. This comprises the domain of a single zManager.
I suppose you could get clever and set up some sort of recovery and
George,
Done a lot of migrations never Solaris to Z/vm and z/Linux...amen..we Dino's
are now smiling, victory...one thought, anyone done disk or cycle benchmarks ?
Or is this a slam dunk, been there too, but one needs to plan..not sure what
the total picture of your situation is...
But
Yeah and?
A) - happens all the time. management buys into a sales pitch and next
thing you know your plowing new ground.
B) - Yeah, so?
C) - They are trying to find information just like everyone else.
D) - ??
I just don't the FOX channel reference.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Kerneels de
On Fri, 4 May 2012 10:12:30 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 5/4/2012 7:52 AM, Thomas Conley wrote:
I think the MPFLST option should be something like JOBLOG, SYSLOG, or BOTH.
That should satisfy the needs of all parties.
I like this idea. However, I would caution against the use of the word
We have some experience here regarding developing portable
C applications targetting z/OS mainframes (which should be little or
no difference to z/VM and z/Linux) and Solaris on Sparc.
Our experience is: the Sparc hardware is more critical than the z hardware,
for example, a pointer to int or
On 5/4/2012 1:22 PM, Mark Pace wrote:
I just don't the FOX channel reference.
I assumed this was a reference to Hell's Kitchen since they serve duck on that
show and it is on FOX. Otherwise, I'm stumped...
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El
On Fri, 4 May 2012 16:08:30 -0400, Kenneth Barkhau wrote:
Many years ago I used dynamic allocation' to allocate a dataset from an
assembler program. In order to issue the DYNALLOC macro (I believe that it
is still documented in z/OS JOB MGMT) you must setup values in 'RB' request
block, 'RBPTR'
On 5/4/2012 1:31 PM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
Another source of problems might be the different character set; the Sparc
machine uses ASCII.
Linux on z also uses ASCII.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
Aren't we here to help colleagues who need the help and assistance ?
I understand there's a fine line between eloping and be used bad abused ..been
there done that haver numerous tshirts
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On May 4, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Kerneels de Wet
On 5/4/2012 at 04:31 PM, Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de wrote:
Another source of problems might be the different character set; the Sparc
machine uses ASCII. But the endianness of the integers is the same (big
endian).
Linux on System z is also ASCII, so no character set / code
The wisdom of Anton (Kerneels here) is generally well mixed in with much that
is superfluous to the actual conversation.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
We have a dataset that is as follows:
Management class . . :,**None**, ,,Allocated cylinders :,114
Storage class . . . :,**None**, ,,Allocated extents . :,4
,Volume serial . . . :,SGP103, , ,,, ,
,Device type . . . . :,3390, ,, ,
Data class . . . . . :,**None**, ,, ,
Try FBA and BLKSIZE=0
--
This email message and any accompanying materials may contain proprietary,
privileged and confidential information of CIT Group Inc. or its subsidiaries
or affiliates (collectively, CIT), and are
Did you change the RECFM from FA to FBA? FA says unblocked and won't allow
BLKSIZE of anything other than 133. Optimal on 3390 should be 27930. But I just
use DCB=(RECFM=FBA,LRECL=133,BLKSIZE=0,DSORG=PS) and allow DFP to determine the
best BLKSIZE.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
If it is setup in your shop, set blksize to 0 and let the system determine
block size figure it out.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: John Norgauer john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
Sent: May 4, 2012 1:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Old timer question
We have a dataset that is
Do you need to specify FBA rather than FA?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
John Norgauer
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 3:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Old timer question
We have a dataset that is as follows:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:48:16 -0700, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
If it is setup in your shop, set blksize to 0 and let the system determine
block size figure it out.
Lizette
Is there a way to not have it set up? I do remember an MVS system long ago
in a galaxy far far away
Oops, it;'s Friday I forgot to change FA to FBA.
Thanks.
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING.. Guilty, until
Mark, it should be, but I have heard of shops that may not allow this to be in
place. So I erred on the side of caution. ;-D
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com
Sent: May 4, 2012 1:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Old timer question
On Fri, 4 May
I think SDB is automatic these days, and not just for SMS data sets. Any
data set will get SDB if BLKSIZE is zero or omitted.
One note, however. Just changing the DCB characteristics of the data set
will not fix the problem. Existing data already contained in the
allocation will still be FA
On 5/4/2012 1:55 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
Is there a way to not have it set up? I do remember an MVS system long ago
in a galaxy far far away where there was a JES2 exit that changed the
internal text from your JCL to have half track blocking for DASD. But
BLKSIZE=0 has worked since... well,
In article 4fa41a98.9020...@phoenixsoftware.com you write:
Congratulations! You wanna come share your experience at SHARE in
Anaheim in August?
Which August? 2013, 2014, 20.
--
Rich Greenberg Sarasota, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 941 378 2097
Eastern time. N6LRT I speak for
Yeah Dave,
I also think a lot of managers , who lack technical expertise get sold ideas,
like someone else said. Been there also...about 100 Advil headache ...I was
told by a very wise Irish woman, my mom, don't use your head for a hat rack...
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
On 5/4/2012 3:01 PM, Rich Greenberg wrote:
In article4fa41a98.9020...@phoenixsoftware.com you write:
Congratulations! You wanna come share your experience at SHARE in
Anaheim in August?
Which August? 2013, 2014, 20.
Lol! August 2012 is Anaheim. August 2013 is Boston. August 2014 and
I have firsthand, personal knowledge of just one successful
Scandinavian project in which even more ambitious
server-virtualization goals were set and met; but one successful
project---conducted by serious, highly competent people---does
establish the feasibility of such an undertaking.
It is
Unimportant question, probably, but I've long wondered... What exactly does
lpp stand for in this instance?
Frank
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
On 5/4/2012 4:02 PM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Unimportant question, probably, but I've long wondered... What exactly does
lpp stand for in this instance?
I have long assumed it stood for 'licensed program products'. But I know not for
sure...
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
Confirmed!
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Imperium Group
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
On 5/4/2012 4:02 PM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Unimportant question, probably, but I've long wondered... What exactly
does lpp stand for in this
With all due respect Kerneels, I may indeed smell like a duck, quack like a
duck, look like a duck, and walk like a duck, but I am not a duck.
I represent a real entity which does not wish to telegraph its moves to the
competition, so I use my personal email.
That entity currently owns a z196
Given this is IBM, that sounds like a very good assumption. They must have a
very interesting department of naming things.
Frank
From: Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Friday, May 4, 2012 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: /usr/lpp
John,
At IBM's z Summit Road Show they cite Bank of India and Bank of China and
numerous others with cost savings of 1/3 or more.
Server consolidation vis-a-vis virtualization is the rage these days.
And this one is real too.
I do live in the vicinity of IBM, and even worked there in the
I know little about nothing in this regard, but given a zBx with an Intel
processor (that, along with POWER7, is available right?), I can't see why you'd
have to recompile anything. And in fact, could you not run Windows, Linux for
Intel, and Solaris for Intel on zBx? Wouldn't you just be
Right :-)
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Rich Greenberg ric...@panix.com wrote:
In article 4fa41a98.9020...@phoenixsoftware.com you write:
Congratulations! You wanna come share your experience at SHARE in
Anaheim in August?
Which August? 2013, 2014, 20.
--
Rich Greenberg
Frank,
Solaris is not supported under zBX.
So the workaround is to move it to zLinux under z/VM which is even better
because it will be running on the MF not the zBX side.
There it will have much more efficient use of the GCP, no GCP cycles used
for I/O.
This is especially nice when you
Mark,
This one is real.
Management has no choice or they would not be doing it, the competition is
doing it.
It's an idea whose time has come.
Thank you very much also for your earlier technical advice.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Mark Pace pacemainl...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah and?
A)
Thomas,
This is very helpful.
When you say You can couple up to eight nodes, do you mean 8 CECs to a
zBx, that 8 CECs can share a zBx?
If so, does zManager serialize the I/O?
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Tom Ambros thomas_amb...@keybank.comwrote:
To be pedantic
You have a
Thank you very much, Mark, for the very helpful info.
Right now, we are running RHEL and it looks like the Solaris migration will
be to that. Does SLES have better support?
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Mark Post mp...@suse.com wrote:
On 5/4/2012 at 02:01 PM, George Henke
Licensed Program Products. i.e., IBM separate products: COBOL, C, etc.
Lloyd
- Original Message
From: Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Fri, May 4, 2012 7:02:44 PM
Subject: /usr/lpp
Unimportant question, probably, but I've long wondered...
A correction, courtesy of Jim:
STCBSST is on only when subspace information is being propagated from a
mother task to a daughter task.
Thus the mother task can be actively using a subspace and not have STCBSST
on.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
I'm sorry to be such a bother, but...
George,
Are you sure you are not working for the Fox channel because you just said:
a) you HAVE TO do this project because your opposition is doing it
b) but based on your questions, you are not sure how, what and when all this
has to work together
c) and now, you are trying to tell us, we
On 5/4/2012 6:11 PM, George Henke wrote:
When you say You can couple up to eight nodes, do you mean 8 CECs to a
zBx, that 8 CECs can share a zBx?
Each node has its own zBX.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
96 matches
Mail list logo
