Imagine if Amadeus had gone down on the 1st rather than Sunday ;-)
Wouldn't *that* have drawn some heat.
Shane ...
> The BoQ one was the first I saw. That quacks like a Y2K-type problem
> despite a claim to t
John McKown wrote on 12/01/2010 07:45:46 AM:
> Perhaps this will be in Perl 6.
"Waiting for Godot" comes to mind.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists..
This would be primarily for the gratification of gil:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-11-03/time-for-change-gmt-could-be-history/3617226
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
"To stay young requires unceasing cultivation of the ability to unlearn old
falsehoods"
(Robert A Heinlein)
Some-how seemed appropriate. Must be time I went back and re-read some of his
work.
Shane ...
--
Fo
the last time we had a Linux on z space issue, we bit the bullet
>and just added a new physical volume to the LVM group (after first updating the
>IODF/IOCDS). :-(
pvresize not available ?.
pvscan ?.
Gotta ask as I don't have a system to check.
Shane ...
mes; executable code above 2GB line; many other
>goodies.
>
>Thanks to all IBM z/OS developers and their management.
Lol - wowser (sp) has an entirely different connotation in this neck of the
woods ...
But yes, looks good. Have to wonder why the VVDS needed enlarging; one volume,
one
file into IDCAMS.
Worked fine last time I had to do it - a while ago admittedly.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
M hasn't gotten sufficiently organized to
embrace it for z/OS
Damn, I guess that places me alongside gil/John. Thus a (nominal) triumvirate -
perchance to progress to a fully populated cabal someday ?
Shane ...
--
For IBM-M
Whoa there fella ... !!!
One could impute JGs influence here. I don't know how you'd live with yourself.
Shane ...
On Fri, Apr 1st, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
...
> It's dismaying how many followups presumed a z/OS client, or
> imputed facilities present o
Much as I think Java is the spawn of the devil, I fully to intend to look at
Dons little baby now that I too have some free time.
As for tracking the drivel on the so called "social" networks - not bloody
likely.
Shane ...
On Mon, Apr 4th, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Don Higgins wrote:
>
And how is any of this news ?.
(comment aimed at the wider community, not Lynn specifically)
Make it happen folks.
Shane ...
On Fri, Apr 8th, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
> New job for mainframes: Cloud platform
>
http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic
Check the A-P announcement link on the left.
Personally I'm more interested in the Linux support.
Shane ...
On Tue, Apr 12th, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Anthony Thompson
wrote:
> Not for Asia-Pacific???
--
For IBM-MAIN s
Really ?.
The IBM zEnterprise System includes the zEnterprise 196 (z196), the
zEnterprise BladeCenter Extension (zBX) with its integrated optimizers and/or
select IBM blades, and the Unified Resource Manager (zManager).
.
Shane ...
On Tue, Apr 12th, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Matthew Stitt wrote
fer to
lower the cap to eliminate it, and lower their (potential) software charge
exposure.
Where do you lot get 80% CPU ? ... ;-)
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
eled away years
ago. Came from OS/2 methinks. I never saw any usage of it (on MVS, OS/390,
z/OS), but then I avoid Comms Server whenever I can, and it seems to be the
only product team that ever embraced it.
Shane ...
--
For IBM
an be quietly killed - much like Apple and the lobotomy
performed on dtrace.
Shane ...
On Wed, Apr 20th, 2011 at 5:18 PM, David Crayford wrote:
...
> Some of the free tools for windows are superb. The free sysinternals
> suite is an example of a top developer
> who knows the internals of wi
Morality ... computing ...
I thought we'd beaten the (recent) oxymoron thread to death.
Or maybe I've just spent too much time dealing with the marketing side of the
industry ...
Shane ...
On Fri, Apr 22nd, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
> >I've removed the post
ROTFL ...
Interesting concept Peter.
Shane ...
On Mon, Apr 25th, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Peter Relson wrote:
...
> Curious: Does anyone use SVC screening for its documented intended
> purpose:
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / s
Why ?.
>From you, I was surprised at your other (preferred ?) suggestions.
I would have thought perl a natural fit.
Shane ...
On Mon, Apr 25th, 2011 at 10:41 PM, "McKown, John"
wrote:
> I will refrain from suggesting
).
Last I looked SLES was still available for download, and the RHEL6 Beta(s)
installed fine. Plus Fedora now of course.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua
t an emulator will presumably be slower, the benefit of access to
zSeries specific resources should always be a benefit to those seeking
satiation of "techie needs".
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch
A least the change in subject got me to read it Kirk ;-)
It's a pity the list doesn't support (per subscriber) blacklisting
threads/contributors *at the server*.
Would save an awful lot of bandwidth.
ISTR an OT group was set up a while back. Doesn't seem to have
check out the flash requirements and can't get the
site to respond ...
And yes, I use privoxy there too.
Shane ...
On Fri, 13 May 2011 11:06:35 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>If you are planning to migrate from z/OS R10 or R11 to R12, you might
>find this free webcast useful: "Acceler
D'oh ... Friday
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
check(s). It even "ticked" Linux 64-bit as a
supported O/S.
Shane ...
> On Fri, 13 May 2011 11:06:35 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>
>...
>Preregistration is required. Register at:
>http://events.unisfair.com/rt/ibm~zosr12mig
>l
>There are workstation system requiremen
LOL - I don't think so.
Would take a lot more than that is offering to convince me to fork out my
hard earned to go to Melbourne at this time of year.
Shane ...
On Tue, May 17th, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
> I think there was a discussion about running z/OS on your laptop
they can move stuff over.
Your gun, your foot ...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at h
This being the site that a couple of years ago was 20 years into its 5 year
plan to get off the mainframe ?.
Pity to see another one (finally) bite the dust.
With all this (encrypted) data, how are you going to read (most of) it after
the box goes away ?.
Shane ...
On Thu, May 19th, 2011 at 4
acts when they bring
up the sandpit. Seems likely they will run predominantly as 2 (active) system
even with the new LPAR.
Performance impacts can be mitigated. If they can be made acceptable, ring
(or base sysplex) can be a good cheap answer. Maybe not the best, but
possibly accep
ustomers are prepared to pay for the
privilege.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
miss something?
Toss a few shekels Al Sherkows way and find out for sure.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
On Thu, May 19th, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Peter Relson wrote:
> >Might that be *HOME*?
>
> Yes.
>
> Home = Primary = Secondary when a sysabend/sysudump/sysmdump is taken.
:-)
Of all the people to argue with, this fella just has to be one of those you
should choose to s
Have a hangover from the end of the world party
They Lied...
Shane
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Scott Ford
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 12:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: It got very quiet
No sympathy from me.
Rapidly approaching 01:00 ...
If I can figure it out from here, you lot in North America should be able to.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
lol
We've all probably had times when we've wondered that when we've had
maintenance arrive Jim ...
Shane ...
On Sun, May 29th, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Jim Mulder wrote:
> As to the "performance reasons (in allocation)"
> for which IEFBR14 was removed from SY
I coulda sworn you'd said that before ... ;-)
Shane ...
On Tue, May 31st, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> I hate JCL!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
> Can any third party Vendor still selling this STP and Maintaining it.
It's not STP that has gone unsupported, but the z9. That includes features
and upgrades - see the ibm site and search for "z9 withdrawal".
Shane ...
--
ot; should be listed under /usr/share/zoneinfo/
Shane ...
On Wed, Jun 15th, 2011 at 4:47 AM, "Schwarz, Barry A" wrote:
> It would seem you need more than just the date. The rules vary
> considerably by location. In Japan, local is always UTC+9. Europe and
> the US do not swit
e the presumption of time base is (always) wrong.
Bin there, dun that ...
Shane ...
On Thu, Jun 16th, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Dale Miller wrote:
> I forgot to respond to an assertion made on this thread to the effect
> that operating systems other than Z/OS gets this right. My daughter
> audits
fun ensued
for the techos who stayed the distance.
Wouldn't be at all surprised if a certain (current) HDS employee who recently
un-subscribed from this list was also present.
Seeds planted ...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN s
No, it looks broken Cheryl. A search on ibm.com retrieves the same address.
Same result too ...
Shane ...
On Mon, Jun 27th, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Cheryl Watson wrote:
> I haven't been able to access WSC techdocs for over 24 hours. Is anyone
> able to
> get to it? The link I usual
Unselectable Storage Segment ... ???
Seems a reasonable acronym - shouldn't cause any controversy.
Shane ...
On Tue, Jul 5th, 2011 at 9:43 PM, David Cole wrote:
> So what is the name for the 2G to 4G range of storage? Ok, you guys
> can go ahead and fight it out. Me? I'm just
H - well, I did finally see some hardware fail.
C'mon software vendors, your turn to step up to the plate ...
Shane ...
(I deleted all addresses as otherwise some may see it as disingenuous - gawd
knows how)
> >There's that old saw about not fixing something that ain'
I must admit I've been ignoring/deleting this drivel till now, but anybody
pissing on Sam and/or Frank (and their ilk) need to pull their bloody head(s)
in.
But as Sam just said, enough.
Shane ...
On Fri, Jul 8th, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Sam Golob wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> In response to
On Tue, Jul 12th, 2011 at 9:18 PM, John McKown wrote:
> One problem is that the z's "packed decimal" simply doesn't have any
> equivalent on a Widows (ASCII) based machine.
Not to mention the small matter of big-endian ve
Thank you Mark, I missed that. The following looks interesting ...
Oracle does not plan to support the use of Ksplice technology with Red Hat
Enterprise Linux or SUSE Enterprise Linux.
Maybe we should take this off to a
And for those others of you that object to the marketing gumph IBM presents
you with, the paper is available for direct download from Clabby Analytics.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
; control but could be considered overkill if you have proper recovery.
Maybe depends on ones definition of intercepting.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.u
mebody decided some renaming of (lots of) pages was in order to
themselves busy. Forgot to fix the links maybe. Pages failing all over the
place - including the "Search IBM" link offered. Well d'oh.
Maybe wait for a while, and it'l
ome not online. I
go get all the pdfs and set up an index html page. Several releases fit
easily on a 4G key.
You lose the cross referencing, but I can live with that.
As usual, many ways to skin this cat.
Shane ...
--
starting here;
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/support/
Not all nicely together, but the any restructure was no doubt done "for your
convenience".
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access ins
Softcopy reader in the past - java;
should have been easy right ?.
Was an unmitigated shemozzle. So much for "write once, run anywhere".
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send e
I must admit most of this thread has made its way into the bin without more
than a perfunctory glance.
Toms latest contribution does however display admirable patience in the face
of intransigence. Kudos to Tom.
Shane ...
--
For
> Looks like someone has hacked into John's email system.
Did anyone else get this as a privately addressed mail, or merely via the
list server ? Trying to work out if they got his contact list.
Header IP looks like China
My ISP just harvested some junk (supposedly) from John G - a vacation reply.
Never had similar (from John).
Let's hope he hasn't been using Internet Cafe(s) in Běijīng.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
Sorry - that would be Beijing in plain text.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archi
t;flat out" over outback Australia. No doubt those more hardy
souls that could survive such rigours were also impervious to the Concordes
adverse impacts.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access inst
atus over there due to incidents about a week ago (if you
aren't aware).
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Sear
> Sysplex.
Absolutely agree. Works a treat - and makes the definition debacle a whole
lot easier to manage.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the mess
Steve you are such a kill-joy - must be time we had another endless thread
about this ... ;-)
Nice post though.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
our
> ISPF apps instead of the LOGON proc.
Sue the bastards Tom - prior usage should be worth a few million to top up
your superannuation ;-)
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instru
guest, but now you've got me thinking otherwise. Maybe I could
just have a "dinosaur" machine - Herc with MVS 3.8 and OS/2.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lis
Now we're getting somewhere.
Shane ...
On Mon, Aug 29th, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Greg Dorner wrote:
> Ugly Semantics Silliness
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bam
ck.
Mighty impressive piece of work, but it still broke.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
least. Haven't checked that though ...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
"Female" and "X" (I kid you not). I wonder if your new "Hybrid" friends will
now feel receptary Jim ?.
Maybe just the Aussie ones ;-)
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archiv
I haven't played with this
Have a look at the Problem Management manual , Part 2. Has some
info on where you would be expected to install it (by default), and how
to mount a [zh]fs for it.
There is is even a script shipped to clear out things for you.
There is, however, the small matter of requirements:
- page fixed
- Supervisor state (or PKM 0-7)
Obviously another of Craddocks cronies ...
Shane ...
On Tue, Apr 13th, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Rob Scott wrote:
> If numerous volumes are to be varied online/offline, then I believe
> that usi
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:31:12 -0300, Clark Morris wrote:
>While I am still going through the joys of replacing an XP computer
>with a powerful documentation-free ACER computer (quad core with
>hyperthreading, terabyte hard drive, Blue Ray reader and 4 USB ports
>on the top with 1 or 2 E-sata ports
Erk - did I really say that, or just think it ?.
Apologies all round, my mind must have been elsewhere.
Shane ...
On Tue, Apr 13th, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Rob Scott wrote:
> ... and the only real difference being you must be
> non-swap (I see nothing in the doc for page-
On Thu, Apr 15th, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> To those using the archives searching for information on SYSTCPD
Pull up a comfy chair ...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructi
I suspect at one time we (nearly) all did this - I've seen plenty of code that
still does it.
These days you should check out CHECKREGIONLOSS in the DIAG member - see the
Init and Tuning
reference.
Shane ...
On Thu, Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Casey Rhodes wrote:
> Does anyone reser
h to create new ones and import
your (saved) policy.
The complex will start up o.k. without your input, but you'll need your
policy pretty soon there-after.
After the last few days, I wouldn't even attempt to broach LOGR.
Others will no doubt be able to deal
On Fri, Apr 16th, 2010 at 9:04 PM, "Hunkeler Peter" wrote:
> Is step 8 doing something different from all
> the other steps? Something that might need APF auth.?
SMP maybe ?.
Just joking.
.
.
I hope.
Shane ...
---
rules.
But SLAs always dictate the final outcome.
Shane ...
On Sat, Apr 17th, 2010 at 9:52 AM, gsg wrote:
> We have two production LPARs and two test LPARs. We have different
> service classes for Production batch and Test batch. My question is
> should both production LPARs use
>From the same people that foisted PDSE on an unsuspecting world no doubt.
I use zFS (now), but you can't blame the customers for slow take-up IMHO.
Shane ...
On Fri, Apr 30th, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Brian Peterson wrote:
> I agree 100 % with Mark. I've been using zFS for my root
lse seen this - or got an explanation ?. gil maybe ... ?
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http:/
G'day Marco, I'm not so concerned with getting the data across to OMVS, but
more with why the
change in RECFM had such a major impact once the data was there.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch
em I want to be aware of it (in advance).
Shane ..
On Sat, May 1st, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
> Shane,
>
> Its always best not to copy the files at all if you don't need to.
> Using our free BPXBATCH replacement, it is trivial to
cp //"'..'" /tmp/file.txt
and/or cat //"'..'" > /tmp/file.txt
Worked fine for VB input, not VBA. Hence my confusion.
Shane ...
On Sat, May 1st, 2010 at 12:46 AM, "Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4)" wrote:
> > [snip]A GENER of the files to VB
How's your short term memory - can you remember if you're in Sydney for the z
Symposium next
week ?.
Shane ...
On Sat, May 1st, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Greg Price wrote:
> At least, that's the way I remember it...
-
Thanks Bill - I'm off next week (as my post to Greg that went public
indicates), so I'll check this after I
get back in the office.
Cheers ... Shane
On Sat, May 1st, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Bill Godfrey wrote:
> I think the explanation can be found in the "C/C++ Programming
there - happened often when
I had to dabble
in ACF2 exits (some time ago).
Shane ...
On Sat, May 1st, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
> Coming from a Banking background, I believe a user should not have
> the ability to check beforehand.
> That's a security exposure, becaus
ut lack of (customer) control over the
migration.
Shane ...
On Thu, May 6th, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
> With OA29619, which became available a couple of weeks ago, you
> can control this function on an individual file system basis.
Only time I had an issue where I needed VLFNOTE (some years ago) I just gave
up, and forced the
VLFNOTE into every other system in the 'plex.
Slightly different situation to what you are seeing - every so often an update
didn't show up on some
other syst
I'm surprised it took Brian so long to respond; he's constantly berating us
that such "non (IBM)
sanctioned" upgrades are fine if handled sensibly.
Just don't screw it up - guess whose private parts will be on the chopping
block.
Can't really blame customers for b
Yeahhh that must be the reason.
Now why didn't I think of that ?.
Shane ...
On Sun, May 9th, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Brian Westerman wrote:
> I guess I'm just getting mellow. ;)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sign
Spot on - thanks again.
I wonder what bright spark came up with that idea. All the tools I tried (cp,
cat, awk) showed the
same symptoms.
Of course if IDCAMS had produced the VB output I asked for, I'd have never
known ...
Shane ...
On Sat, May 1st, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Bill Godfrey wrote:
guest that then
provides x86
emulation to the (nominally) Windoze code.
You'd need bloody fast fast processors to support that lot.
Shane ...
On Wed, May 12th, 2010 at 8:06 PM, "R.S." wrote:
> IMHO it would be much more exciting
> to have Windows in LPAR or under VM - li
s has been re-iterated here incessantly.
Shane ...
On Wed, May 12th, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
> Do you have any "tso app" running under master? (perhaps an
> automation product or TSSO)?
--
F
ly routinely
Yeah, I know.
Go back and read just about every thread you've contributed to in the last
12-18 months.
Scary, ain't it.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruction
lert (email/SMS). Suspicious repetition (same or
several ids) causes
automation shutdown. They determine what is suspicious.
Seemed reasonable to me, given the limited requirement for SPECIAL in a
production environment.
Shane ...
-
How so ?
In our space there have been rumours along these lines since Hitachi floated
"Hercules" to try and
steal the thunder from the "Freeway" announcement.
Others have "been there, done that".
Nothin' new these days.
Shane ...
On Wed, May 19th, 2010
nt powerPC architecture you'd have to think IBM have the smarts
to do massively
parallel these days.
Shane ...
On Wed, May 19th, 2010 at 11:06 PM, David Andrews wrote:
> "Mainframe operating systems don't scale well past 64 cores in a
> single
> system image"
>
x27;d lean toward it
attempting recovery.
Shane ...
On Sat, May 22nd, 2010 at 9:43 PM, "R.S."
wrote:
> However, possibly after some "unclean" system close (this is sandbox
>
> system) I had serious problems with IPL. OMVS could not initialize
> for approx. 50 m
customers.
Fail the mount unilaterally - what sort of a default is that ?. Especially for
things like the root ...
Shane ...
On Sun, May 23rd, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Mark Zelden wrote:
> But also make sure you have this in your zFS parms:
>
> romount_recovery=on/* see APA
Probably qualifies as descriptive though.
And more socially acceptable than a few others I've heard.
Shane ...
On Mon, May 24th, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Peter Relson wrote:
> ... "choked to death" is not a very tec
trivial - especially if you use a shared BPXPRMxx; just
roll it out with the
resvol. And using the ServerPac to introduce zFS is the simplest - no
conversions, no
(unexpected) down time.
Do it Art, nothing to lose IMHO.
Shane ...
Mark wrote:
As a matter of fact, since those are your most crit
beneficial. Anyone with a real
CF will laugh at the
numbers you get, but in our case they were significantly better than the ring.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send emai
Fancy that - Barbara being cranky with the support centre who'da thunked
;-)
Everyone in this discussion (except me) is probably a reasonable sized shop
with a reasonable
sized 'plex.
I still say go zFS - HFS has had its day.
Shane ...
On Tue, May 25th, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Ba
901 - 1000 of 1253 matches
Mail list logo
