I'm not feeling the hate, except for the one item just mentioned.
The second sign on amounts to 9 keystrokes, one click and one enter -
first character of userid, accept Chrome's prompt, enter password and hit
enter. Once a day? No big deal. Leave the browser window open.
Being able to
Do it. If you do any policy based networking you'll be happy you did.
Incident packaging is nice, we don't use it a ton because we haven't
seemed to have had too many incidents for a while but it does make it
simpler to get all the diagnostics wrapped up with a bow. It looks like
there's a
Did I miss this in the discussion? I got this from srdonotreply this
morning:
'We would like to inform you of an important change in opening and
managing service requests with IBM for Passport Advantage and Passport
Advantage Express products. Details of the change can be found at ...
HTTP
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Thomas,
This is very helpful.
When you say You can couple up to eight nodes, do you mean 8 CECs to a
zBx, that 8 CECs can share a zBx?
If so, does zManager serialize the I/O?
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Tom Ambros
thomas_amb...@keybank.comwrote:
To be pedantic
You
To be pedantic
You have a zEnterprise node, which is a z196/z114 with zero or one
attached zBX. A zBX may have one to four frames. You can couple up to
eight nodes. This comprises the domain of a single zManager.
I suppose you could get clever and set up some sort of recovery and
I noticed that the ipsec -F add commands were appearing to work correctly,
retcode 0 and the files in /var/dm/filters updated appropriately, but
oddly no packet filtering took place. An ipsec -F display command showed
no filters in the stack and defensive mode inactive. Specifying the
stack
Compuware Xpediter, according to my pals at Google.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 02/23/2012 15:37
Subject:What are these facility classes
Sent by:
Make sure you understand the SERVAUTH EZB.INITSTACK.** requirements for
things like OMPROUTE and use DELAYSTART if you're autologging things.
We're considering whether it is worth changing up parent-child
relationships in SA because it can be disconcerting to see lots of
ICH408I messages
Forgive me for posting this here, it belongs on the RACF list I am sure
but I do not have that address handy to register.
It may be a simple enough question that it can be answered here.
I am attempting to use the passticket authentication method for the IKE
client to NSS. If I define a
the
password
itself is being used for successful authentication, not the PassTicket.
Well, you say that's not so. I don't know.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf
Of Tom Ambros
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 1:50 PM
There's no compelling reason, as far as I know, to run more than one stack
with the progress that has been made. IBM recommends that you do not.
There's a set of four very good redbooks on TCP/IIP Implementation,
SG24-7798-00 through SG24-7801-00. I have leaned on them heavily
recently,
Do you have MXG? If you do I may have something already coded.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Andy White awh...@metlife.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 11/10/2011 08:21
Subject:SMF 119 report
Sent by:IBM Mainframe
- I have the zSeries API documentation and the BCPii specific zOS docs but
I am not able to find items related to returned values, for example
HWIQUERY of HWI_OPERSTAT. I can probe and knowing the state of what I'm
seeing can infer what I am getting but I'd like to find wherever these
flags
@bama.ua.edu
08/16/2011 10:07
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: Naive BCPii questions
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:50:38 -0400, Tom Ambros thomas_amb...@keybank.com
wrote:
- I have the zSeries API documentation and the BCPii
We're being told that we are not going to see consistency groups formed on
the GM side while we run MM until we suspend MM at which point we get one
consistency group formed and can flash to our recovery volumes at the
remote site. This is inconsistent with the DS8000 Copy Services
For various reasons I'm going back through and reading some stuf I haven't
looked at in a long time... like before zOS 1.8, in this case.
I see the CFRM couple dataset format parm MSGBASED. Is this a no-brainer
or are there considerations sites have experienced that are not
necessarily
As zOSMF includes more functions, it is more likely that an installation
will want to add user roles beyond the few available today. For instance,
I'd like to set it up so my Capacity Planning group can see Links and WLM
admin, but not Comm Server Configuration. Certainly I can protect all
Would it be practical to implement encryption at the Media Manager layer,
key label and access rule definitions maintained in the SMS dataclass,
similar to the way it's done in the distributed environment by the IBM
Encryption Expert product. Basically, that product installs a shim in the
at
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/abstracts/sg247851.html?Open
http://www.ibm.com/vrm/newsletter_10300_8855_192978_email_DYN_1IN/GDiPillo126694429
Regards,
Gary DiPillo
Axios Products
On 04/25/2011 8:52 AM, Tom Ambros wrote:
As zOSMF includes more functions, it is more likely
How do we clean up unreasonably large numbers of duplicate Incident Log
entries? Is there a good programmatic way to do it?
Aside from assigning the virtual equivalent of making somebody write on
the chalkboard I will not leave MATCHLIM undefined 65535 times, telling
them to clean up each
20 matches
Mail list logo
