My shop using the RMF overview report to calculate the workload
utilization APPLER% (defined in report class)
2012/5/11, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com:
On Tue, 8 May 2012 08:33:18 -0500, K Zafirop kzafiropou...@eurobank.gr
wrote:
We would like to convert CPU seconds copnsumed by an
For B20 if cache full, we will encounter a throttling write/read, is it
still happen in 7720 model, or have enhancement on throttling read/write ?
2012/3/29 Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com
Scott Chapman sachap...@aep.com wrote in message
Hi ALL,
Our shop currently using VTS B20, and planning to either migrate the 7740
(no migration need) or migrate to tapeless 7720 or Sun storageTek VSM
tapeless solution. Any shop using 7740 or 7720 or storageTek tapeless
solution. In market, I think all customer will use tapeless soultion
What I concerns are:
1. Tape still have life time, if 1TB tape damage then we need more time to
re-built or re-create it, except you implement dual copy or PPRC VTS and it
cost you more.
2. Tape migration is my concern, I think disk to disk migration is more
faster solution. I can't find any
Our shop use B20 almost 5 years and sometime the IBM CE will notify me the
tape cannot be recovered or the Gripper cannot move , some time need to
reboot the library console and re-inventory again. Any problems when use
VTS 7720? anyone can share?
access for that period.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Tapeless solution (IBM or Sun) Enterprise class
Our shop use
TT
On 2012-1-31 下午8:07, Meral Temel mer...@garanti.com.tr wrote:
To colleagues and students who are interested in,
IBM Research published z196 papers in their current issue which is
entitled `IBM zEnterprise Systems And Technology'.
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/
Best Regards,
Hi all,
I just find the RMF overview report which can show the APPLER for each
service class. Can we use APPLER to figure out the CPU allocation for each
CICS or DB2 subsystem? If yes how to calculate the CPU%?
Many thanks
--
] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2011 5:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Tapeless Solutions
W dniu 2011-12-24 10:50, Tommy Tsui pisze:
It seems the only choice for enterprise tapeless solution is only vsm
or 7720, anyone will consider bustech or ca-tape software
tsuiyuk...@bochk.com
On 2012-1-3 上午8:19, Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
tsuiyuk...@bochk.com
On 2011-12-29 上午9:04, Russell Witt res09...@verizon.net wrote:
Radoslaw,
Sorry, the only link is to the SHARE web-site to lookup presentations.
http://proceedings.share.org/proceedings
Actually we only have home written tape management system therefor it is
not easy for us migrate from current vts to other tapeless solution. Anyone
heard about innovation tapecopy I think it can help
On 2011-12-29 上午9:17, Russell Witt res09...@verizon.net wrote:
Ron,
I talked to the
It seems the only choice for enterprise tapeless solution is only vsm or
7720, anyone will consider bustech or ca-tape software solution what is
pros and cons
On 2011-12-24 上午8:52, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
W dniu 2011-12-23 20:44, Cosby, Bob - OCFO pisze:
At the time of this
Our shop currently use vts b20 and there is no way migrate to Vts 7720 .
Any shop replace b20 vts with other tapeless solutions such emc bustech or
sun storgtek vsm solution or 7720.
On 2011-12-23 下午7:27, Ron Hawkins ronjhawk...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Russell,
Do you think that CA-Vtape would
Hi all,
Is there anyone know how to use AXR to collect CICS information? How to
define *AXT04D1 console to CICS?
11270 15:40:03.10 *AXT04D1 0290 F ZPRD111Z,'CEDA I G(ABCD)'
11270 15:40:03.10 JOB03255 0090 +DFHAC2015 ZSMFCICS Console *AXT04D1
has not been defined to CICS. Input is
be defined in RACF
and the user id using it must be given authorization.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 7:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: How to use AXR to collect CICS
We don't know why the console hang suddenly and all mvs command aren't input
any shop hit this problem before we think something enqueue the console
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Hi all,
Since our shop development environment all datasets are SMS-managed and our
production environment is non-SMS managed. We known that there is no error
in SMS-managed environment if one of dataset catalog two time within same
step. While the JCL rollout to production (Non-SMS managed) and
most jobs abended with 822 in our production lpar below 16m private
region but works fine in our uat/dev lpar we dont know why.? we havent
any user exit to block the region, swa set to above, memlimit set to
nolimit, both production dev lpar got 10mb private region below 16m
. we now set all to
after i try memlimit equal 0m the step passed.it failed when memlimit
equal nolimit.any idea?
2010/9/12, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com:
It would help to have the complete message posted and any details on what is
being sorted?
Also, you will probably need to open an ETR with IBM on
HI ALL,
After migrated to z/os 1.11 we found lot of jobs using DFSORT
icetools abended with ICE185A S0C1 ABEND WAS ISSED BY DFSORT
anyone hit the same problem before?
many thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
i think its related to sum fields operation any limitation on sum fields
2010/9/12, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com:
It would help to have the complete message posted and any details on what is
being sorted?
Also, you will probably need to open an ETR with IBM on the S0C1.
Lizette
Hi all,
Our shop needs to compare the EMC IBM DASD performance. Is there any
free tools to test the DASD performance? such as online CICS/Batch
performance?
Many thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
hi all
our shop plan to buy a new mainframe disk with pprc, anyone have
suggestion on emc vmax or ds8700. which one is better. can we share?
such as easytier flashdrive, maintenance,io/cache perforamce etc
many thanks
--
從我的行動裝置傳送
-- Forwarded message --
From: tsuiyuk...@bochk.com
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:36:52 +0800
Subject: APPC/AFTP code page or CCSID
To: tommyt...@gmail.com
Hi all,
Is there anyone know the Code page or CCSID for ASCII using in
APPC application suite/AFTP, we found that lot of
Hi all,
I got the following messages in our production LPAR, D GRS,C, I can't
find who enqueue the *MASTER*, how can I find it???
Please help!!
S=SYSTEM SYSZIGGI
SYSNAMEJOBNAME ASID TCBADDR EXC/SHRSTATUS
PRODSYSD *MASTER* 0001 009E27E0 EXCLUSIVEOWN
thanks all information.
I got the following message after type D GRS,AN,BLOCKER
D GRS,AN,BLOCKER
ISG349I 21.02.34 GRS ANALYSIS 099
LONG BLOCKER ANALYSIS: ENTIRE SYSPLEX
BLOCKTIME SYSTEM JOBNAME E/S SCOPE QNAMERNAME
57:59:28 PRODSYSD *MASTER**E* SYS SYSZIGGI
OTHER
Also, I always got following messages, our system upgraded to z/os
1.11 last week and we can't find any errors on z/os 1.9
ISG376I GLOBAL RESOURCE SERIALIZATION FREEING STORAGE BUFFERS DUE TO
BUFFER THRESHOLD EXCEEDED DIAG=0004
ISG376I GLOBAL RESOURCE SERIALIZATION FREEING STORAGE BUFFERS DUE
We can't send to notify message to TSO user at the console. I checked
the IKJTSOXX sys1.broadcast console setting . Everything fine and
we didn't changed any setting after upgraded. After I enter the
following command
at master console
SE 'testing',LOGON,USER=(TESTUSR) - The user TESTUSR can't
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: 12 May 2010 15:04
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: One more problem we hit after upgraded to zos 1.11
We can't send to notify message
Here are the output after input
D GRS,C,RES=(SYSZIGGI,*),hex
ISG343I 21.09.59 GRS STATUS 753
S=SYSTEM SYSZIGGI
0A
28299779 1C
SYSNAMEJOBNAME ASID TCBADDR EXC/SHRSTATUS
PRODSYSD *MASTER* 0001 009E27E0 EXCLUSIVEOWN
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: 12 May 2010 15:19
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Help! Help! I got following GRS message, how to solve it
Here
I got it from the HEX value ..thanks I will check it
2010/5/12 Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com:
Can I know why ASID 01AC ?
2010/5/12 Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com:
You need to examine ASID x'01AC'
If TSO user - trying getting user to press enter or cancel the user
Rob Scott
Lead
I checked. All asid does not exist already...what can I do???
2010/5/12 Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com:
I got it from the HEX value ..thanks I will check it
2010/5/12 Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com:
Can I know why ASID 01AC ?
2010/5/12 Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com:
You need
I type D A,ALL D A,A ..but.cannot find any A=01AC
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Is it works if I purged all initiators and start again?
2010/5/12 Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com:
I type D A,ALL D A,A ..but.cannot find any A=01AC
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: 12 May 2010 16:02
To: IBM
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: 12 May 2010 16:20
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Help! Help! I got following GRS message, how to solve it
is it work if I restart the TSO ?
2010/5/12 Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com
Hi all
Is there anyone use IBM optim solution to clone rename production
datasets for UAT/DEV testing environment? includes VSAM QSAM?
Thanks for sharing
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Hi all,
I try to hard code the SMS vts tape address but it shows the following
error message, it works if I change the tape address to TAPEV.
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=ZSMD.ZSMD137.XXX,DISP=(,PASS),
// UNIT=(8649,1,,SMSHONOR),LABEL=(1,SL)
IEFA100I ZSMD137$ BACKUP1 SYSUT2 ALLOCATION FAILED - SMSHONOR
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 9:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: why SMSHONOR doesn't work
Hi all,
I try to hard code the SMS vts tape address but it shows the following
error
here is the error message with /8649
IEFA100I ZSMD137$ BACKUP1 SYSUT2 ALLOCATION FAILED - SMSHONOR
SPECIFIED ON A NON-LIBRARY REQUEST
It works only if I given the TAPEV ..
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Under the IODF I defined a ESOTERIC name TAPEV with 8610-864F
address, It works if I change the /8649 to TAPEV. I don't know why?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
is there any IBM product to manage WLC (workload license charge). I
only knew z/cost management?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
Hi all,
I have following question on CPU hard capping
LPAR1 initial capping=No CPU weight 80 = 800mips
LPAR2 initial capping=Yes CPU weight 20 = 200mips
assume CPU has 1000mips
my question is, for LPAR2 the maximum CPU utilization is 200 mips with
hard capping but how about LPAR1? the
be considered to manage your machine.
HTH and good luck.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: cpu capping question
Hi all,
I have
Hi all,
anyone try IBM AFTP suite that still can work under z/os 1.11?
thanks and regards
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Hi all,
One of IBM expert tell our shop to setup the CSA limit =0 in VTAM, but we
found IST561I STORAGE UNAVAILABLE: CRA4 BUFFER POOL problem when one of mq
server abnormal connect/reconnect to our host system. As we set the CSA
limit to 0 therefore VTAM use up all MVS ECSA. All commands
VSM 5 does support synchronous replication but why none publicly announced?
Anyone use VSM synchronous replication mode.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
Hi all,
Any shop using this two types of tape system. Any comment one them. I have
a question on whether the SUN VSM 5 can support synchronous replication?
IBM VTS 7740 support immediately mode.
thanks and regards
--
For
is it ture?
The new system uses IBM's specialty Linux processor and runs either Novell
SUSE or Red Hat systems. It does not use the mainframe operating system
z/OS but includes mainframe management software as well as IBM's z/Virtual
Machine system. Together, they constitute the company's
so next generation z10 no z/os operating system only VM?
在 2009/12/11下午2:37，Stephen Mednick ibmm...@css.au.com寫道：
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf
Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: Friday, 11 December 2009 4:58 PM
Hi all,
I try to delete the expired dataset HSM provides a patch byte that enable
users to override the requirement that an sms-managed dataset have a backup
copy before it is expired. anyone knows how to set the patch byte for HSM
thanks and regards
Hi all,
How come I invoke a OMVS session it will automatic submitting a batch job
each time I type a unix command like ls ???
thanks and regards
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
在 2009/10/22下午3:00，Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4)
peter.hunke...@credit-suisse.com寫道：
is it related to SMF EXIT IEFUJI, our shop using IEFUJI to verify user?
Well, JES2 will not submit a job, anyway, how do you recognize a job is
submitted?
-
Is it only with the ls command?
-
Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 1:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Invoke OMVS TSO session
Hi all,
How come I invoke a OMVS session it will automatic submitting
a batch job
each time I type a unix command like ls
Hi all,
I try to add OMVS subsystem with SETSSI command it looks successfully
SETSSI ADD,SUB=OMVS
IEFJ022I SETSSI ADD COMMAND FOR SUBSYSTEM OMVS COMPLETED 501
SUCCESSFULLY
after I add the subsystem to SMFPRMXX
with the following command SUBSYS(OMVS,NOTYPE(30,32)) it given the
following error
, not
joining the fray.
Hope that helps.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
After I defined the ARM policy and activiate it but nothing inside ? I
already defined the restart element in ARM policy. anything I missing?
SETXCF COUPLE,PCOUPLE=(SYS1
Hi all,
After I defined the ARM policy and activiate it but nothing inside ? I
already defined the restart element in ARM policy. anything I missing?
SETXCF COUPLE,PCOUPLE=(SYS1.ARMCDS01),TYPE=ARM
IXC309I SETXCF COUPLE,PCOUPLE REQUEST FOR ARM WAS ACCEPTED
IEF196I IEF237I 982E ALLOCATED TO
Hi all,
Any shop use this BMC product before? Is it really help improve I/O? any
overhead to CPU utilization?
thanks and regards
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
I try to test on one of testing LPAR and found that a slightly changed on
ESQA, ECSA from showmvs report. Thanks all information
在 2009/9/17上午8:38，Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com寫道：
The Page Frame Table moved out of ESQA/ECSA in OS/390 2.10, so that
shouldn't be an issue. I don't think
Hi all,
Is there any big concern when added real memory from 5 to 7G, if all CSA,
SQA, ECSA and ESQA remain unchanged?
thanks and regards
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Toggleplex, is it a IBM official technique? any shop applied this? We got 8
individual LPARs without sysplex and you knew how pains each time we IPL.
在 2009/9/7上午10:00，Timothy Sipples timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com寫道：
Cheryl Watson writes:
And I strongly believe that a parallel sysplex
Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
Tommy Tsui
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 5:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] 回覆：Re: 回覆：Re: paging in rates and real memory
Hi all,
We got 5GB in our production LPAR and some of CICS
Hi all,
Some of our CICS transaction time out becuase of page in. How can I solved
this problem? add region size or add more real memory? how to control the
cics use the real or AUX storage?
12:10 pagin 0
Service -- Frame Occup.-- - Active Frames - AUX PGIN MemObj
Jobname C Class Cr TOTAL
Hi all,
We got 5GB in our production LPAR and some of CICS transactions always time
out because of paging. Is there any other way to improve the paging rate
instead of add more real memory?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Hi all,
Is there any concern if we didn't IPL a LPAR over three months. Is there
any good practise to follow from IBM. They always replied LPAR never needs
IPL because of 24 x 7.
Any comment will be appreciated
--
For
Hi all,
I found that one of report class for CICS paging in rate reached 256,
normally it should be 0. In fact, our real storage is still sufficient
(from paging activity report) . how comes it needs paging in?
thanks and regards
Hi,
Is there any tools can caps software (such as CA product) CPU
utilization. So that we can control the software cost .
many thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
is it really can cap the usage for CA product... since our software
charge always over paid each time when we adjust our HMC CPU hard cap
ratio...
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Joel Wolpertj...@perfconsultant.com wrote:
You set the service units for the soft cap thru the hmc. That is what
.
Also do you have a TOR and AORs structure. If not I suggest you go that way.
Terry Draper
zSeries Performance Consultant
w...@btopenworld.com
mobile: +966 556730876
--- On Wed, 12/8/09, Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com
Subject: Can CICS region
Hi ,
We hit a problem that our cics cannot utilized more than one CPU
processor and IBM recommend our shop upgrade to CICSplex .Except this,
is there any other way to solve this problem?
any comment will be appreciated
best regards
thanks I will check CICS-L for more information
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Ted MacNEILeamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
We hit a problem that our cics cannot utilized more than one CPU processor
and IBM recommend our shop upgrade to CICSplex.
Except this, is there any other way to solve this
Hi all,
I try to defined a FCTC but it always shows no logical path, I double
check the following setting but still don't know why?
1. The channel path is defined as long wave - correct
2. IODF setting is copied from first FCTC which is running currently. correct
3. The current ficon director is
Hi all,,
How comes I activated the data class with expiration date = 20, but
the expiration date desn't work when I allocated a new dataset? The
new dataset is assigned to a correct
data class with expiration date = 20, but the expiration field still
shows NONE???
thousand thanks
yes, when I set the MVSLU01 to UACC(READ), it works ...
so what can I do? If I set the MVSLU01 to UACC(READ) it's too risky for our shop
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Walt Farrellwfarr...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:36:30 +0800, Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Walt
Here
so why we needs the data class for expiration date and what is it used
for ? I have some confused about the data class and management class
expiration date
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Vernooij, CP -
SPLXMkees.vern...@klm.com wrote:
Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote in message
news
09:11:50 +0800, Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since we defined following statement to protect our LU on mainframe,
APPC cannot access the PRDLU01 becuase without owner information, is
there anyone have same problem?
RDEFINE VTAMAPPL PRDLU01 UACC(NONE) OWNER(SYS1)
PERMIT PRDLU01
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Walt Farrellwfarr...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 22:58:10 +0800, Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
but one of audit report shows that an invalid user try to access the
APPC with ?? jobid and userid...I don't know how to answer our
auditor ?
What
...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 3:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Tape management system discussion
Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:152969820906162004u165cc271yaff8886248931...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi all
discussion
Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:152969820906162004u165cc271yaff8886248931...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi all,
Is there any one use the IBM RMM and BMC tape management system? Which
one is better ?
Any comment on this two products?
Any comment will be appreciated
Hi all,
Is there any one use the IBM RMM and BMC tape management system? Which
one is better ?
Any comment on this two products?
Any comment will be appreciated
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
hi all
I got the following message on last lpar
IOS500I ACTIVATE RESULTS 394
ACTIVATE FAILED - ERROR MESSAGE(S) ISSUED
DEVICE IS NOT DEFINED AS DYNAMIC
how can I activiate the last one LPAR with activiate = IODFXX ?
many thanks
even activiate=IODFXX,FORCE issued, activiate still failure
REASON=0161,CAN NOT DELETE DEVICE 05CF
DESCTEXT=DEVICE IS NOT DEFINED AS DYNAMIC
COMPID=SC1C3
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Tommy Tsuitommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all
I got the following message on last lpar
IOS500I ACTIVATE
Is it possible to use RECOVER with TARGET option?
to activate the IODF even dynamic =NO is given on HSA
4.9.2.2 Continuing LPAR mode I/O configuration changes without system
reset
If your processor was running in LPAR mode, the failure does not
require a
system reset, and you want to
any book recommend PR/SM?
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:13 AM, carlos roberto
viscondecvisco...@ig.com.br wrote:
Look at HMC Customize/Delete Profile.
2009/6/6 Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com
hi all
I got the following message on last lpar
IOS500I ACTIVATE RESULTS 394
ACTIVATE FAILED - ERROR
...@ig.com.br wrote:
Look at HMC Customize/Delete Profile.
2009/6/6 Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com
hi all
I got the following message on last lpar
IOS500I ACTIVATE RESULTS 394
ACTIVATE FAILED - ERROR MESSAGE(S) ISSUED
DEVICE IS NOT DEFINED AS DYNAMIC
how can I activiate the last one LPAR
but one of audit report shows that an invalid user try to access the
APPC with ?? jobid and userid...I don't know how to answer our
auditor ?
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Chase, Johnjch...@ussco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tommy
.* general
resource rule, and did you define a group as well, the user must be a member
of the group if you did.
Cheers, Paul Gillis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: Saturday, 6 June 2009 12:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN
0161 is a return code from HCD...yes some of device type = 3286 does
not support the dymanic delete
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Field, Alan
C.alan.c.fi...@supervalu.com wrote:
But some devices, such as BSC do not support dynamic in which case you need
to IPL with the IODF that excludes
Hi all,
I try to started a system task APPC with SUB=MSTR but can't find the
owner/user or jobid information even we defined a started task to
APPC.* . How can we assign a owner to this system task?
Any help will be appreciated
Hi all,
Is there any other way that can force delete any device even it is not
defined as dynamic ?
REASON=0161,CAN NOT DELETE DEVICE 0910
DESCTEXT=DEVICE IS NOT DEFINED AS DYNAMIC
COMPID=SC1C3
any help will be appreciated
REASON=0161,CAN NOT DELETE DEVICE
REASON=0161,CAN NOT DELETE DEVICE s
DESCTEXT=DEVICE IS NOT DEFINED AS DYNAMIC
You requested activation of an IODF that would cause a
device defined as static to be deleted from the system.
Verify that you attempted to ACTIVATE the correct IODF.
Hi all
Is there any RACF audit report which can list all datasets activites?
just like DAF utility ? Anything can share?
Any comment will be appreciated
Thanks and regards
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hi all,
Why I can't migrate all datasets not reference 360 days from primary
volume to ML1 volume with the following command?
HSEND MIGRATE VOLUME(DSMD02 MIGRATE(360))
why only migrate(0) is works?
is there any other way to migrate to ML1 ?
many thanks
thanks for your information.a great help
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:15 PM, John McKown joa...@swbell.net wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:30:49 +0800, Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I checked with GRSMON, there is nothing resource enqueue and can't
delete the file with rc
Hi all,
I tried both ALTER shareoptions( 2 3) and F
catalog,close(CAT.TEST), it doesn't works properly. Furthermore, there
is nothing display when issue D
GRS,RES=(SYSVAAM,TEST.CL)anything I can do now?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for your
,SYS1,,, 844
IEC161I ZTEST.REC.SIE.REXC1L,ZTEST.REC.SIE.REXC1L.DATA,
IEC161I CAT.TEST
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I tried both ALTER shareoptions( 2 3) and F
catalog,close(CAT.TEST), it doesn't works properly. Furthermore, there
is nothing
Hi all,
I checked with GRSMON, there is nothing resource enqueue and can't
delete the file with rc IEC1611 rc=52 SFI=009 . Is there any way to
delete the VSAM file?
009SUBTSKMS - First open of a data set, not connecting,
OUTPUT or DISP=OLD, SHR=1,x. Cannot get exclusive
control of the
the vSAM file??
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I checked with GRSMON, there is nothing resource enqueue and can't
delete the file with rc IEC1611 rc=52 SFI=009 . Is there any way to
delete the VSAM file?
009 SUBTSKMS - First open
Hi all,
After I installed exit ICHPWX11 and copy the REXX IRRPHREX into
SYS1.SAXREXEC but I didn't works. I try to turn on the debug='ON
..but nothing showsanything I miss?
ICH525I INSTALLATION ROUTER TABLE PROCESSED
ICH508I ACTIVE RACF EXITS: ICHRCX01 ICHPWX11
ICH524I INSTALLATION CLASS
1 - 100 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
