-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Henke, George
tyvm, Seymour
What we have since discovered is that the ACF2/NETMENU Session process
has a side batch file non-SAF
process that contains the applications specific to each user and the
NETMENU session
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
:Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 5:48 PM
:To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:Subject: Re: ACF2/RACF User Appliation Logical Access
:
:In
:04b3da7b71b3ab408ca62ba6046bcf8f23d673a...@gvw0676exc.americas.hpqcorp.net,
:on 01/06/2012
: at 07:34 PM, Henke, George george.he...@hp.com
In
04b3da7b71b3ab408ca62ba6046bcf8f23d722c...@gvw0676exc.americas.hpqcorp.net,
on 01/12/2012
at 03:02 AM, Henke, George george.he...@hp.com said:
What we have since discovered is that the ACF2/NETMENU Session
process has a side batch file non-SAF process that contains the
applications specific
/RACF User Appliation Logical Access
In
04b3da7b71b3ab408ca62ba6046bcf8f23d722c...@gvw0676exc.americas.hpqcorp.net,
on 01/12/2012
at 03:02 AM, Henke, George george.he...@hp.com said:
What we have since discovered is that the ACF2/NETMENU Session
process has a side batch file non-SAF process
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:32:52 +, Henke, George george.he...@hp.com wrote:
It looks at it in addition, either before or after (still getting the facts)
going through the normal ACF2 validation process.
Evidently to avoid the huge SAF call overhead of 1000's of SAF calls when
1000's of users
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 5:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ACF2/RACF User Appliation Logical Access
In
04b3da7b71b3ab408ca62ba6046bcf8f23d673a...@gvw0676exc.americas.hpqcorp.net,
on 01/06/2012
and good luck.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Henke, George
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 5:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ACF2/RACF User Appliation Logical Access
Does anyone know how ACF2 validates a users
In
of1e657c39.6b09d6a3-on8625797d.005ea97d-8625797d.005f1...@us.ibm.com,
on 01/06/2012
at 11:18 AM, Wayne Driscoll wdri...@us.ibm.com said:
Based on my past experiences with ACF2, I believe that ACF2 acts as
if each rule line contains, in RACF terms, as asterisk after the
last character.
In
04b3da7b71b3ab408ca62ba6046bcf8f23d673a...@gvw0676exc.americas.hpqcorp.net,
on 01/06/2012
at 07:34 PM, Henke, George george.he...@hp.com said:
I suspect this may be generating a separate SAF call for each
application for each user and there are 1000's of users, whereas ACF2
may be
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Henke, George
Does anyone know how ACF2 validates a users access to specific
applications?
Recently we tried to migrate from ACF2 to RACF and were forced to
fallback because ACF2 was somehow
*wildcarding* a user's
In
04b3da7b71b3ab408ca62ba6046bcf8f23d673a...@gvw0676exc.americas.hpqcorp.net,
on 01/05/2012
at 11:49 PM, Henke, George george.he...@hp.com said:
Does anyone know how ACF2 validates a users access to specific
applications?
Not without knowing how the installation has defined each.
Recently
.
===
Wayne Driscoll
OMEGAMON DB2 L3 Support/Development
wdrisco(AT)us.ibm.com
===
From:
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
01/06/2012 10:07 AM
Subject:
Re: ACF2/RACF User Appliation Logical
On 1/6/2012 at 12:18 PM, Wayne Driscoll wdri...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Based on my past experiences with ACF2, I believe that ACF2 acts as if
each rule line contains, in RACF terms, as asterisk after the last
character. For example, if there are the following resources protected:
APPL
APPL1
PRIMARY LANGUAGE DEFAULT : ENU
SECONDARY LANGUAGE DEFAULT : ENU
READY
END
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chase, John
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 7:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ACF2/RACF User Appliation
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:34:33 +, Henke, George george.he...@hp.com wrote:
Below is a list of all profiles under MENUAPPL class and our SETR list. As you
will see there is a discrete profile for each application and 2 generic
profiles one being **. The ** profile has a UACC(NONE) and no users
Does anyone know how ACF2 validates a users access to specific applications?
Recently we tried to migrate from ACF2 to RACF and were forced to fallback
because ACF2 was somehow *wildcarding* a user's access to applications whereas
RACF was iterating through a list of applications.
The
16 matches
Mail list logo
